|
I could talk about my hopes and dreams all day.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 19:02 |
|
|
# ? May 14, 2024 21:37 |
|
resting duckface is pretty funny, not expected from r/ds
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 19:04 |
|
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 19:05 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:I've given this three times now. I want to see SQ42 drop in its entirety next year (2017) and real progress made with the (star)systems. That is to say, everything that alpha 4.0 was touted to be - should be in 2017. ManofManyAliases posted:-We're going to see 3.0 release much earlier than "mid-year." ManofManyAliases posted:Go re-read my posts, slowly this time. I've claimed that SQ42 would be released in 2017 for some time now. Now that we can say with certainty that CiG have no plans of coming even close to having everything slated for 4.0 in the PU by the end of the year (judging by their own plan it appears getting everything promised in 3.0 is going to be tough), and that everything regarding Squadron 42 has become mum (Star Marine déjà vu all over again?): Have you given any more thought to getting a refund? Why/not? Have you revised your estimation of what it would take for you to consider the possibility of a refund? Thank you in advance for your answers, Mr. Aliases, sir.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 19:06 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:old man. OLD L D e: old man tax
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 19:07 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Big difference between ignoring and doing work while casually observing. I get it, "old man" is a sick burn because it's such a lovely nickname. I'm sure you're safe from any unexpected irony here.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 19:16 |
|
https://twitter.com/TarkaRoshe/status/756236684811984896
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 19:20 |
|
I feel grief.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 19:20 |
|
Sorry mods, but I gotta dox MOMA. He's clearly Chris Roberts. Proof: Bad at estimating release dates. Thinks UI is a priority at this point. Talks about game, does not play it. Obsessed with Derek Smart. Does not understand game development.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 19:20 |
|
When this all falls apart, Tarka is one of those guys I'm curious to see how he reacts.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 19:21 |
|
Propagandist posted:Derek you're so old. Jadzia was best Dax.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 19:26 |
|
Paid demonstrators. Fake News. It's an organized attempt by some really competent and yet incompetent forum users that have no lives and are all Derek. A conspiracy intended to make CiG fail through words and cat pictures. 4chan for old people, that's what it is. Edit: You can't see it, but in some of the gels of the Enterprise there's a couple of fairly large rubber ducks on one of the elevations. They're reprinted in the technical manual, but it's kinda fun how there were actually fairly obvious injokes on the set, just outside of the resolution of the cameras of the time. It's how I'm feeling looking at this "gannt" chart they produced. 'Star Marine' or FPS is all over it, but there's weirdness in arranging it the way that they have, and I have a nasty feeling that the 100 systems is going to become a hundred bodies in x systems. Even better, when you break out the backend/network stuff, they're spending around a hundred days serializing for data. A month to rework a rifle? A month for an FOV slider? Hav fucked around with this message at 19:35 on Apr 17, 2017 |
# ? Apr 17, 2017 19:26 |
|
Exinos posted:Sorry mods, but I gotta dox MOMA. Mods?
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 19:27 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:
quote:“..so, it’s our big end of the year release. er so er yeah, so we’re gonna get it out the end of the year; hopefully not on December 19th but, er, like last year….but it is a big one, so, not making er, I got shot for making promises, but er, that’s our goal.” So between Aug, 2016 and the 3.0 schedule (amid much fanfare), the 3.0 is now stated to be coming June 29th, 2017. That's 10 months since Gamescom; and 6 months since Dec 2016. Yet, shortly after raising over $22 million* between Aug-Dec based on those LIES; right after, in Jan, they started talking about "doing a 3.0 schedule". And then in April 2017, they released it. With a video explaining - gasp - how difficult it is to make a schedule. * code:
Dec 2016 - Mar, 2017. nothing. 2.6.x Apr, 2017. We're working on the 3.0 schedule (for a build we were going to release FOUR months ago) as our mid-year release As I said on Twitter a few mins ago: "In Q4/16, Chris Roberts raised $22m from gamers based on LIES. If they were investors, the SEC would be involved." So this wasn't a lie then? As wrote here on Jan 14, 2017 quote:You can see all the slides showing the roadmap for 3.x up to 4.0 which he then went on to share during CitizenCon 2016 in Nov. Subsequently, ahead of the show, back on Nov 2, 2016, I had written a missive that sources told that the 3.0 patch didn’t even exist at the time that he made those statements; and that he was blatantly lying. In fact, sources told me that the first time they even heard anything about such a patch, was when the slide went up. So apparently this was something the Chris and his top cohorts (Erin Roberts, Sean Tracey, Tony Zurovek, Brian Chambers) cooked up in the continued bid to lie to and mislead backers. D_Smart fucked around with this message at 19:32 on Apr 17, 2017 |
# ? Apr 17, 2017 19:29 |
|
momas guesses are reasonable if you expect CIG to actually be honest about the state of the game and not horribly deceptive doing everything they can to meet 1/5th of the promises they've made while being .5-1.5 years late. We still haven't seen anything about 3.0 running on live servers and they have two months for it to apparently hit the avocados and a month after that to hit live. Look at the progress in 2.6, 4 months of making the live version even less stable. Now they need to push out the entire package in 3 months, which would be incredibly difficult for a very competent 400+ man team, which is hilarious when earlier in the year it was obvious that Chris was focusing on SQ42. The deathmarch that usually starts in July/August for CIG started on April. Its going to be a rough spring/summer/fall/winter for the people at CIG. Cao Ni Ma fucked around with this message at 19:51 on Apr 17, 2017 |
# ? Apr 17, 2017 19:48 |
|
Exinos posted:Sorry mods, but I gotta dox MOMA. I have been saying that for a very long time! Oh and TheAgent is Erin Roberts. Makes perfect sense.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 19:51 |
|
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 19:52 |
|
Cao Ni Ma posted:momas guesses are reasonable if you expect CIG to actually be honest about the state of the game and not horribly deceptive doing everything they can to meet 1/5th of the promises they've made while being .5-1.5 years late. Stop spreading FUD. They've got this. That's why the 3.0 schedule starts in April, you see. They've mastered quantum computing and time dilation, whereby they're going to cram what - to any competent project manager - looks like a years worth of work, into a 2.5 month period. It's loving hilarious. And I love it.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 19:53 |
|
D_Smart posted:Stop spreading FUD. They've got this. That's why the 3.0 schedule starts in April, you see. They've mastered quantum computing and time dilation, whereby they're going to cram what - to any competent project manager - looks like a years worth of work, into a 2.5 month period. Core. loving. Tech.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 19:55 |
|
HycoCam posted:I have been saying that for a very long time! Oh and TheAgent is Erin Roberts. Makes perfect sense.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 19:58 |
|
MoMa, have you heard anything? https://twitter.com/dsmart/status/854046494516817921
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 19:59 |
|
Hav posted:
a little over one month to program a slider which controls a single variable less than two months to code an entire planetary system with seemless transitions, huge surface area, spherical gravity, celestial mechanics, multiple biomes and deformable terrain, and squeeze it in to the already broken and buggy PU
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 20:01 |
|
The completionist package purchases are 100% money launders. If i had to guess and guess right, my bet is ships sold on the grey market over dozens of accounts. Due to paypal and such it takes time to confirm the money as fully delivered, so whenever the grey market accounts accumulate 15000 in verifyable off transaction cash, they purchase a completionist package to move the money "legally" into their own accounts This is highly illegal and hard to trace from the outside. Go anc record all paypal accounts selling ships and put the pieces together. Just bid, get a payal email and record where the money gets sent Havent read the thread in many pagea, so no clue if yall already figured this all out
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 20:03 |
|
Or just argue with moma and post pics of reddit fights you win
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 20:04 |
|
Nicholas posted:a little over one month to program a slider which controls a single variable The problem is what exactly?
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 20:06 |
|
D_Smart posted:MoMa, have you heard anything?
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 20:07 |
|
Madcosby posted:Or just argue with moma and post pics of reddit fights you win Option B, please.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 20:09 |
|
Madcosby posted:The completionist package purchases are 100% money launders. If i had to guess and guess right, my bet is ships sold on the grey market over dozens of accounts. Due to paypal and such it takes time to confirm the money as fully delivered, so whenever the grey market accounts accumulate 15000 in verifyable off transaction cash, they purchase a completionist package to move the money "legally" into their own accounts
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 20:10 |
ManofManyAliases posted:Mods? I swear to God if you kids don't quit it I'll turn this thread right around around and then NOBODY will get to go to Citizencon
|
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 20:11 |
|
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 20:13 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:I didn't have to pay $30 over the course of 1 year to resub on a gay comedy forum. You're not my real MoMA. I love me some smug MoMA, but I don't like this defensive MoMA that turns up when CIG somehow manages to gently caress up yet again, so please CIG do something MoMA can claim to be proud of
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 20:14 |
|
Hav posted:
How does it take one month create a standard drop-in UI element that changes a number in a file? Alternatively, how does it take one month to make the game read a rendering setting that it should be reading automatically? Alternatively alternatively, how does it take one month to make a game use a setting in its renderer that the renderer should already be using? Even if they have to do all three, HOW THE gently caress DOES IT TAKE O N E M O N T H to make a FoV slider in a Cryengine game?! I'm all calm now.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 20:14 |
|
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 20:15 |
|
Tippis posted:How does it take one month create a standard drop-in UI element that changes a number in a file? It might have something to do with the fact that the camera sits inside your player model's face so an FOV slider is currently impossible due to fundamental design failings, since you start looking at the inside of your helmet almost immediately when you increase FOV. Funny how their incompetence doesn't just mean that people spend time adding stupid and poorly thought out features - it also sows the seeds for months of wasted time as people try to unwind the terrible code to implement basic features that should be there by default. Chalks fucked around with this message at 20:21 on Apr 17, 2017 |
# ? Apr 17, 2017 20:19 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:All of your faux concern for me is not endearing in the least. I don't need to frequent a gay comedy forum on my weekend off, especially one that is a holiday weekend. Quick somebody quote the post where moma said it will be out "way before middle of the year, closer to february" or whatever he said.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 20:20 |
|
D_Smart posted:MoMa, have you heard anything? Give it a rest.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 20:20 |
|
Madcosby posted:The completionist package purchases are 100% money launders. If i had to guess and guess right, my bet is ships sold on the grey market over dozens of accounts. Due to paypal and such it takes time to confirm the money as fully delivered, so whenever the grey market accounts accumulate 15000 in verifyable off transaction cash, they purchase a completionist package to move the money "legally" into their own accounts Derek: Read this response. I've been playing along too much. If you can't understand that they're goading you and then making fun of you, then there is no hope.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 20:22 |
|
Chalks posted:It might have something to do with the fact that the camera sits inside your player model's face so an FOV slider is currently impossible due to fundamental design failings, since you start looking at the inside of your helmet almost immediately when you increase FOV. Oh right. It's simplicity being stumped by absolute idiocy. I forgot what company we were talking about.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 20:22 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Give it a rest. Put you down for a 'no comment'. ManofManyAliases posted:Read this response. I've been playing along too much. If you can't understand that they're goading you and then making fun of you, then there is no hope. Who is 'they', honky? Hav fucked around with this message at 20:28 on Apr 17, 2017 |
# ? Apr 17, 2017 20:26 |
|
|
# ? May 14, 2024 21:37 |
|
Well the whole "rolling layoffs" thing is something that would actually have public visibility, so either something is finally happening or Derek is just crying wolf again. If we don't hear about rolling CIG layoffs in Two Weeks I think we all know what should happen.
|
# ? Apr 17, 2017 20:28 |