|
Baronjutter posted:Why does pride even need to be a huge big expensive event? Why can't it just be what ever size it can naturally be while self-funding and focusing on the event being both a celebration of and agitation for gay rights? This is pretty much my opinion on the matter, but I'm not a member of the LGBTQ community, and I don't know how much Pride Toronto can accomplish through self-funding. It's very expensive to hold any kind of event in Toronto, and while it's much easier to raise funds through online donation systems these days, I imagine there are additional logistical challenges involved when you don't have a stable funding source to plan around.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2017 22:53 |
|
|
# ? May 14, 2024 02:29 |
|
Baronjutter posted:Why does pride even need to be a huge big expensive event? Why can't it just be what ever size it can naturally be while self-funding and focusing on the event being both a celebration of and agitation for gay rights? Pride Toronto is one of the biggest LGBT events in the world and is a tourist draw so stripping its public funding and hoping that it will remain as popular and successful as it is would be an interesting gamble. Obviously there are a bunch of squares on Council who would be totally fine with Pride disappearing completely so stripping its funding is no problem for them.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 01:06 |
|
So Canada has merit based immigration, we want the best and brightest, people with funds to start businesses, and people with language skills. Two of three major urban centres have 15% taxes for non-residents. So yes we welcome immigrants with open arms, but want them to rent or lease in these urban areas until they can be deemed residents
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 14:53 |
|
It's 15% you loving retard. If you can't afford that then don't buy a loving house
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 15:00 |
|
The alternative is having a bunch of yuan percenters turn housing developments into whatever the hell Vancouver is now that's made it so nobody who works there can afford to live there. I'm okay with this change. e: yeah I also agree with CI yet again, if they're doing it to dump ridiculous amounts of cash 15% is probably not high enough.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 15:03 |
|
namaste faggots posted:It's 15% you loving retard. If you can't afford that then don't buy a loving house People with illicit money don't care about a 15% tax when our market appreciates 20% a year. Converting black money to legit at a 15% tax is a crazy good deal. 15% is absurdly low given they are trying to stop speculation.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 15:08 |
|
Risky Bisquick posted:So Canada has merit based immigration, we want the best and brightest, people with funds to start businesses, and people with language skills. Two of three major urban centres have 15% taxes for non-residents. So yes we welcome immigrants with open arms, but want them to rent or lease in these urban areas until they can be deemed residents Oh no, you will need to rent for a year until your PR paperwork arrives. It's basically a new Warsaw ghetto.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 15:10 |
|
Man I hope Winnipeg becomes the next hot market so I can dump my house in a few years, pocket half a mil and use it to supplement my income while I go work a much lower paying but much more interesting job.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 15:11 |
|
Risky Bisquick posted:So Canada has merit based immigration, we want the best and brightest, people with funds to start businesses, and people with language skills. Two of three major urban centres have 15% taxes for non-residents. So yes we welcome immigrants with open arms, but want them to rent or lease in these urban areas until they can be deemed residents Any immigrant couldn't afford a house in Vancouver or Toronto anyways so what's the difference? Also you can get citizenship 4 years after immigration. Also it's stupid to buy a house in a country you aren't a citizen of.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 15:11 |
|
Risky Bisquick posted:So Canada has merit based immigration, we want the best and brightest, people with funds to start businesses, and people with language skills. Two of three major urban centres have 15% taxes for non-residents. So yes we welcome immigrants with open arms, but want them to rent or lease in these urban areas until they can be deemed residents Or maybe they could move somewhere that's not Vancouver, Toronto, or Montreal
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 15:14 |
|
They are. The amount of immigrants settling in Winnipeg is astounding, especially folks from the Philippines. I can't wait for summer when they start applying for permits to shut down entire side streets for block parties because they always have kick rear end music and really good food at a decent price.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 15:15 |
|
TheKingofSprings posted:Or maybe they could move somewhere that's not Vancouver, Toronto, or Montreal
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 15:17 |
|
Yes you too can live the dream of participating in the economic engine of the country by cramming your entire family into a basement suite and paying 60% of your after tax income in rent while working double shifts as a cleaner making minimum wage for Busy Bee cleaning the office buildings filled with piece of poo poo white 1%ers. Being an immigrant in Toronto is loving AMAZING! I mean some people do the same poo poo here but at least their rent and commute isn't quite so loving stupid.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 15:27 |
|
Risky Bisquick posted:People with illicit money don't care about a 15% tax when our market appreciates 20% a year. Converting black money to legit at a 15% tax is a crazy good deal. When there are Chinese operations using Bitcoin to get their money out of China, you know they can afford a slight tax like 15%.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 15:35 |
|
You talk about Filipinos being awesome at parties and no mention of pig roasts smh
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 15:36 |
|
Risky Bisquick posted:So Canada has merit based immigration, we want the best and brightest, people with funds to start businesses, and people with language skills. Two of three major urban centres have 15% taxes for non-residents. So yes we welcome immigrants with open arms, but want them to rent or lease in these urban areas until they can be deemed residents It's absurdly easy to be considered a resident assuming you actually live here. Like, we're not even talking *Permanent* Resident, you just have to be considered a resident of Canada. I'm pretty sure if you filed Canadian taxes and were in Canada for like six months in that year, you're considered a resident, if not sooner that that.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 16:15 |
|
DariusLikewise posted:Any immigrant couldn't afford a house in Vancouver or Toronto anyways so what's the difference? Not all immigrants are fleeing poverty. Some are quite well-established in their careers, and are coming from other expensive areas.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 16:20 |
|
Subjunctive posted:Not all immigrants are fleeing poverty. Some are quite well-established in their careers, and are coming from other expensive areas. Hopefully no one is asking me for sympathy for the immigrant moving to Vancouver having to pay 15% more for their 3 million dollar hovel.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 17:02 |
|
quote:http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/canada/edmonton/alberta-bans-hiring-foreign-workers-for-29-high-skilled-jobs-1.4075684
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 17:05 |
|
Subjunctive posted:Not all immigrants are fleeing poverty. Some are quite well-established in their careers, and are coming from other expensive areas. I would wager that most banks wouldn't approve a mortgage for a new landed immigrant until they have 6 months at least in the country. Again the 15% foreign tax is a complete non-issue for immigrants.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 17:07 |
|
Skilled labour. Yes. That's the problem with the TFW program, is that it's taking up entirely too many jobs that don't involve coffee or soy-chicken sandwiches.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 17:07 |
|
DariusLikewise posted:I would wager that most banks wouldn't approve a mortgage for a new landed immigrant until they have 6 months at least in the country. Again the 15% foreign tax is a complete non-issue for immigrants. I think this scenario is the bread and butter for mortgage investment corporations (MIC). A wealthy immigrant that shows up wanting to buy may have nowhere near enough documentation to make one of the big banks comfortable enough to lend, but they can get a very short term, high interest mortgage from a MIC, then later on once they're more established get a regular mortgage with a sensible normal interest rate.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 17:20 |
|
If someone has the capital for that type of mortgage they are not worried a 15% foreign buyer tax
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 17:25 |
|
Couldn't new immigrants just rent for a year until they get their PR to avoid the tax? You know, the way that literally millions of residents and citizens of this country rent, for many, many years?
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 17:35 |
|
DariusLikewise posted:If someone has the capital for that type of mortgage they are not worried a 15% foreign buyer tax Agreedo!
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 17:42 |
|
peter banana posted:Couldn't new immigrants just rent for a year until they get their PR to avoid the tax? You know, the way that literally millions of residents and citizens of this country rent, for many, many years? It's resident, not permanent resident. It's even less time than a year. Like you pretty much just have to prove you live in Canada and aren't just visiting.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 17:49 |
|
Risky Bisquick posted:TFW stuff On the one hand, good, because too many businesses are abusing the TFW program. On the other, I can't help but feel that this will somehow be used in a spectacularly racist way, it being Alberta and all.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 18:11 |
|
This may amaze you, but a lot of the people in Alberta looking for jobs are, in fact, already not white.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 18:50 |
|
DariusLikewise posted:I would wager that most banks wouldn't approve a mortgage for a new landed immigrant until they have 6 months at least in the country. Would citizenship matter? Does a citizen returning from abroad have to wait until they're a resident for tax purposes? (Which could be right away if they buy a house, I think.)
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 18:53 |
|
Quotes from news articles, so it doesn't apply to refugees or immigrants and exempts foreign students and skilled workers. I'm assuming since it's targeting foreign buyers that people with existing citizenship living abroad would be exempt as well.quote:The 15 per cent foreign buyers’ tax won’t apply to refugees and immigrant nominees, and a rebate could be available for those who get citizenship later
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 19:04 |
|
Well seeing as we already have 'students' buying million dollar homes this 15% tax is basically going to do nothing.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 19:09 |
|
I don't really want to pay $1.2m for a floor of a triplex.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 19:20 |
|
I know you folks hate weed chat, so I'll be brief: So if drug tests that can differentiate between a join smoked an hour ago and one smoked a week ago aren't available, won't the proposed legislation to clamp down on intoxicated driving make it illegal for anyone who drives for a living-or drives at all for that matter-to smoke within a month of taking the wheel? And if the tests are unreliable or overly subjective wouldn't it be pretty easy to challenge almost any charges?
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 19:29 |
|
cowofwar posted:I don't really want to pay $1.2m for a floor of a triplex. Oh living in the armit of the golden horseshoe has spoiled you bad.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 19:31 |
|
JoelJoel posted:I know you folks hate weed chat, so I'll be brief: So if drug tests that can differentiate between a join smoked an hour ago and one smoked a week ago aren't available, won't the proposed legislation to clamp down on intoxicated driving make it illegal for anyone who drives for a living-or drives at all for that matter-to smoke within a month of taking the wheel? They would rely on roadside sobriety tests and the testing officers expert opinion. Remember that breathalyzer tests can and are be beaten in courts.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 19:31 |
|
Risky Bisquick posted:They would rely on roadside sobriety tests and the testing officers expert opinion In other words, yes.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 19:32 |
|
So if an officer doesn't like you all they have to do is say "well, your honour, he looked tired and wasn't responding quickly, so he was high now throw him in jail"? That seems bad. (on top of the implications of "enjoy the weed as long as you never drive")
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 19:42 |
|
You mean like what they do to Aboriginal people and minorities who "smell like pot" today? Yes I believe that's literally what Blair was going for.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 19:46 |
|
JoelJoel posted:So if an officer doesn't like you all they have to do is say "well, your honour, he looked tired and wasn't responding quickly, so he was high now throw him in jail"? The accused is charged with listening to Mastodon in a residential 50 kmh zone.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 19:48 |
|
|
# ? May 14, 2024 02:29 |
|
So I guess Trump wants a full-on trade war with Canada now? Woo? http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-bloomberg-dairy-trump-1.4077625 quote:"Canada ... what they've done to our dairy farm workers is a disgrace. It's a disgrace," he said. "Rules, regulations, different things have changed, and our farmers in Wisconsin and New York state are being put out of business."
|
# ? Apr 20, 2017 19:51 |