|
osx siera's build in f.lux just kicked in yo
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2017 01:21
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 20:56 |
|
|
pagancow posted:Dolby Vision includes color and brightness management, and has cool technologies to shove 12-bpc over a 10-bpc RGB pipe. Lol dump Dolby vision into the betamax and laserdisc pile
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2017 01:30
|
|
|
Malcolm XML posted:Lol dump Dolby vision into the betamax and laserdisc pile wasn't laserdisc kinda successful tho?
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2017 01:32
|
|
|
pagancow posted:Dolby Vision includes color and brightness management, and has cool technologies to shove 12-bpc over a 10-bpc RGB pipe.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2017 01:43
|
|
|
akadajet posted:wasn't laserdisc kinda successful tho? It.clung onto the margins kept alive by nerds and the Japanese So perfect for for Dolby vision, except lg instead
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2017 01:44
|
|
|
pagancow posted:get hosed UHD havers  
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 07:20
|
|
|
gaming guy talking hdr was p. interesting http://c0de517e.blogspot.co.za/2017/02/tonemapping-on-hdr-displays-aces-to.html
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 10:05
|
|
|
Malcolm XML posted:What like rec 2100? you take that back, rec 2020 is going to be the greatest color space of all time!!!!
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 18:44
|
|
|
gonna make the bold prediction that HDR will mostly be a cluster gently caress that goes nowhere Which is unfortunate because in theory it sounds pretty nice
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 19:46
|
|
|
hdr sounds interesting for video games and terrible for any other media which means its going nowhere. physx card for the monitor
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 19:47
|
|
|
hifi posted:hdr sounds interesting for video games and terrible for any other media which means its going nowhere. physx card for the monitor in theory it sounds really nice for movies and series like planet Earth In practice a group of A/V professionals can stand around a top of the line Sony TV arguing whether or not HDR is "on" because it's not clear to them if it is.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 20:06
|
|
|
p. sure if you can't tell that it is hdr then your dr is not h enough. the best way to judge the quality of the hdr is what spf you need to watch a movie on it
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 20:33
|
|
|
hdr sounds like 96khz audio . poo poo for spergs to argue over that is not relevant to normal people
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 20:47
|
|
|
just wait until you see a calibrated rec.709 next to a 4,000 nit display in a best buy. It will move TVs
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 21:03
|
|
|
if I don't see faded plastic on all nearby TVs, it's not worth buying
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 21:19
|
|
|
pagancow posted:just wait until you see a calibrated rec.709 next to a 4,000 nit display in a best buy. It will move TVs so....never?
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 21:33
|
|
|
like five-ten years from now? tv manufacturers got all up in the standards process and diluted everything until you barely need to do anything more than decode the PQ curve to slap HDR!!!! on the box
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 21:35
|
|
|
in 2020 all of the hd sunglasses are going to rebrand as hdr sunglasses
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 21:41
|
|
|
don't even know why people bother with color for consumer entertainment when 99% of people watch on a terribly calibrated bargain monitor/tv
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 22:15
|
|
|
i need very accurate reds for when i turn on flux
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 22:27
|
|
|
MeruFM posted:don't even know why people bother with color for consumer entertainment when 99% of people watch on a terribly calibrated bargain monitor/tv dolby vision solves this problem by putting input tranforms into the metadata stream so something VLC will never understand so get ready to watch linux isos EXTRA hosed up
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2017 23:50
|
|
|
pagancow posted:putting input tranforms into the metadata stream now you have two problems
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2017 00:56
|
|
|
Max Facetime posted:now you have two problems
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2017 19:10
|
|
|
pagancow posted:nobody in the game industry is making their own tone mapping, they programmers just search "filmic tone mapping" and then use that math source btich
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2017 04:29
|
|
|
pagancow posted:just wait until you see a calibrated rec.709 next to a 4,000 nit display in a best buy. It will move TVs people overwhelmingly bought TVs at Best Buy that had motion interpolation demoed so guess what is enabled by default now
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2017 08:16
|
|
|
its real bad that tvs still come set up with overscan by default, it looks like real garbo
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2017 23:49
|
|
|
fishmech posted:its real bad that tvs still come set up with overscan by default, it looks like real garbo i don't think i've seen this
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 03:24
|
|
|
fishmech posted:its real bad that tvs still come set up with overscan by default, it looks like real garbo nah, it just separates the kids from the adults in the video production world
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 03:46
|
|
|
between bumping into walls onto the way to my bathroom or lawn (e.g. same) I stare at the sun all day through binoculars because i demand the best brightness and the blindest whites
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 05:42
|
|
|
pagancow posted:nah, it just separates the kids from the adults in the video production world yeah the idiots leave the overscan setting on on the display so everything is slightly stretched and terrible looking
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 15:57
|
|
|
fishmech posted:its real bad that tvs still come set up with overscan by default, it looks like real garbo I haven't seen an overscanning lcd tv in ages my parents own a "polaroid" "1080p" tv that was some black friday special. It's in permanent overscan mode that you can't disable, i'm fairly certain so they could build them with panels that had yield fuckups in the hidden areas that was like 2006 though
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 17:07
|
|
|
COACHS SPORT BAR posted:my parents own a "polaroid" "1080p" tv that was some black friday special. It's in permanent overscan mode that you can't disable, i'm fairly certain so they could build them with panels that had yield fuckups in the hidden areas
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 17:40
|
|
|
COACHS SPORT BAR posted:I haven't seen an overscanning lcd tv in ages the tvs in question don't actually require overscan, like they do have full 1920x1080 panels. but the default modes have hdmi/dvi input set up so that they get blown up like 10% with horrible non-integer scaling all over the screen and the edges cut off. the hotel i stayed at over thanksgiving had their tvs set to do this on the digital inputs every time you turned them on. the cheap lcd tv i just got also had it turned on by default but it was an easy change to keep it off. i have no idea why this feature a) exists b) is the default on any tv that has a full resolution panel.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 17:43
|
|
|
wasnt there cheap af "720p" tvs that actually used 1366x768 panels?
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 17:53
|
|
|
fishmech posted:its real bad that tvs still come set up with overscan by default, it looks like real garbo my tv has uncorrectable overscan, no menu options at all i did figure out it will display correctly if it has an hdmi signal without sound so laptop >hdmi cable> TV = overscan with sound but laptop > displayport to dvi > dvi2hdmi > hdmi cable > TV = no overscan and no sound
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 17:55
|
|
|
fishmech posted:the tvs in question don't actually require overscan, like they do have full 1920x1080 panels. but the default modes have hdmi/dvi input set up so that they get blown up like 10% with horrible non-integer scaling all over the screen and the edges cut off. broadcasters hide stuff in these areas that are not meant to be visible.  Basically since Overscan exists on a lot of TVs 20 years ago, it's part of the standard, and people create their graphics for it. TV manufacturers know that only 90% of the image gets used, therefore they scale so things look appropriate. Also rebroadcasts assume that the overscan area wasn't visible so things like boom mics sometimes appear in older TV shows there.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 00:28
|
|
|
pagancow posted:broadcasters hide stuff in these areas that are not meant to be visible. so in other words it's dumb. got it.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 00:33
|
|
|
pagancow posted:broadcasters hide stuff in these areas that are not meant to be visible. it doesn't make things look appropriate though, it makes them look really bad because it's applying a lovely scaling to the input image. as opposed to other tvs where they simply use a panel that doesn't have a full resolution, so while you do get the edges chopped off, the central pixels aren't being stretched weirdly. usually this results in colors looking very bad. (modern 720p/1080i/1080p content also really shouldn't be produced expecting overscan to hide things like mics or poo poo like that, since the majority of TVs capable of displaying it will not perform overscan for over-the-air broadcasts or modern digital video inputs. so anyone expecting overscan to save their rear end is doing clownshoes video) fishmech fucked around with this message at 00:46 on May 2, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 00:42
|
|
|
Can we agree that broadcasting in 720p instead of 1080p these days is unacceptable?
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 00:53
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 20:56 |
|
|
lol atsc amirite
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 00:55
|
|