|
Internet Explorer posted:I want to know how you actually get a virus on a server these days. I'm not even mad, that's impressive. Sefal posted:boss: Nah. it works fine now. Logged in as local admin or that. Vargatron posted:Not content to just say "I disagree", goons must attack your intelligence as well. you have a small penis
|
# ? Apr 24, 2017 20:12 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 16:38 |
|
CrazyLittle posted:you have a small penis Sir, I have a medical condition.
|
# ? Apr 24, 2017 20:16 |
|
Vargatron posted:Sir, I have a medical condition. Is it adipositas?
|
# ? Apr 24, 2017 20:20 |
|
SEKCobra posted:Is it adipositas? Micropenis.
|
# ? Apr 24, 2017 20:21 |
|
Explains why you're comfortable playing goalie.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2017 10:42 |
|
dogstile posted:Explains why you're comfortable playing goalie. No, that's genuine mental illness.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2017 13:22 |
|
People that don't use Outlook rules are weird. Thoughts?
|
# ? Apr 25, 2017 16:10 |
|
Tab8715 posted:People that don't use Outlook rules are weird. Company I'm consulting for hired a new Systems Engineer, and the guy didn't know how to setup rules, then proceeded to complain about the amount of email he got. I showed him how to sort and use rules, he still doesn't use them.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2017 16:13 |
|
Tab8715 posted:People that don't use Outlook rules are weird. So, what, is your inability to filter by rules suddenly my problem?
|
# ? Apr 25, 2017 16:15 |
|
The first Outlook rule I make is one that suppresses the new mail notification for stuff that I'm just CCd on.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2017 16:17 |
|
MC Fruit Stripe posted:Every time I add someone to a particular distro, which I manage membership for but not content of, I get complaints that the distro is too busy. Not even necessarily the ability to filter, but the professional skill to ignore email while they get important work done uninterrupted. "I filter it to this folder here but there's always unread emails so I have to click on that folder every ten seconds!"
|
# ? Apr 25, 2017 16:18 |
|
Thanks Ants posted:The first Outlook rule I make is one that suppresses the new mail notification for stuff that I'm just CCd on. My own email approach is pretty simple. If a human being wrote it, it goes to my inbox, and if it's automated, it goes to a folder for later (unless it's a proper alert, of course). Judge Schnoopy posted:Not even necessarily the ability to filter, but the professional skill to ignore email while they get important work done uninterrupted. MC Fruit Stripe fucked around with this message at 16:32 on Apr 25, 2017 |
# ? Apr 25, 2017 16:29 |
|
Thanks Ants posted:The first Outlook rule I make is one that suppresses the new mail notification for stuff that I'm just CCd on. That only works if idiots use CC correctly
|
# ? Apr 25, 2017 16:33 |
|
Tab8715 posted:People that don't use Outlook rules are weird. I get over a million emails yearly I have to use 35 rules, one being a popup box whenever anyone uses my name in the body, to not get buried every day
|
# ? Apr 25, 2017 16:43 |
|
Tab8715 posted:People that don't use Outlook rules are weird. Wrong, people who have massive inbox folder trees but do not use Outlook rules are weird.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2017 16:45 |
|
I have two folders, Inbox and 'poo poo I don't care about'
Sepist fucked around with this message at 16:48 on Apr 25, 2017 |
# ? Apr 25, 2017 16:46 |
|
I have a monitoring folder I make sure to not look into too often. Our monitoring is flaky as poo poo and our software team decided that they don't need to actively fix some of their systems going down for 1,5 minutes every once in a while because they could just have those notifications disabled for themselves. Of course I still get them.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2017 17:08 |
|
Tab8715 posted:People that don't use Outlook rules are weird. Every once in a while I notice someone's unread email badge on their mail app is like 25,000 and just go At that point you're obviously getting a shitload of automated junk and making zero effort to filter any of it. How do you possibly even notice when a non-poo poo message comes in?
|
# ? Apr 25, 2017 17:31 |
|
Docjowles posted:
You don't, you just scream at people for not notifying you of ANYTHING, EVER!!!! Obviously.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2017 17:34 |
|
If someone sends you an email, but you couldn't find it because of all the other noise you get in your inbox, did they tell you? (The answer is yes. Manage your inbox.) I'd liken it to like, laundry. I shouldn't have to tell you to stay on top of email anymore than I have to tell you that shirt could use a wash. To go even farther, I'm not sure if I can trust someone who can't manage their inbox, because how on earth are they going to handle actual responsibilities.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2017 17:58 |
|
SeaborneClink posted:You don't, you just scream at people for not notifying you of ANYTHING, EVER!!!! Obviously. my brain screams at me when I read the yospos secfuck thread and sees the future crumbling down. now my brain is screaming at me for this thread
|
# ? Apr 25, 2017 18:02 |
|
We use Google Apps and I have practically no filtering and just search for what I need.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2017 18:03 |
|
The most important Outlook rule is the one that marks all received emails sent with high importance as normal importance.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2017 18:19 |
|
Japanese Dating Sim posted:The most important Outlook rule is the one that marks all received emails sent with high importance as normal importance. Absolutely. I wish we could administratively disable high importance for our O365 environment.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2017 18:24 |
|
Vargatron posted:Absolutely. I wish we could administratively disable high importance for our O365 environment.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2017 18:41 |
|
Inspector_666 posted:We use Google Apps and I have practically no filtering and just search for what I need. This is how I operate. People who get pissy because an inbox isn't "clean" make me laugh.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2017 18:45 |
|
Vargatron posted:Absolutely. I wish we could administratively disable high importance for our O365 environment. Also disable read receipt requests.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2017 18:46 |
|
22 Eargesplitten posted:Also disable read receipt requests. What's the point of this poo poo if you can just hit No?
|
# ? Apr 25, 2017 18:52 |
|
Docjowles posted:
I've seen a few people like this (particularly bad managers) and rather than thinking they're just messy and not taking care of a little admin work, I just think to myself they are too reliant on E-mail in the first place and has lost its effectiveness.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2017 18:56 |
|
Tab8715 posted:People that Inspector_666 posted:We use Google Apps and I have practically no filtering and just search for what I need. I have a few GMail labels that I use for mailing lists that I don't read regularly and would like to be able to conveniently review recent threads when I have spare time, but normal email is just a stream of whatever's current with search for whatever's not. I have a few users that have literally hundreds of tiered folders in their inboxes and I just don't get it. wolrah fucked around with this message at 20:16 on Apr 25, 2017 |
# ? Apr 25, 2017 20:13 |
|
Vargatron posted:Absolutely. I wish we could administratively disable high importance for our O365 environment. Sign your mail with a personal certificate to get peoples attention instead.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2017 20:43 |
|
GnarlyCharlie4u posted:I was recommended papercut previously. I checked it out and it looks alright. It claims to do what I need but who knows how it is to implement and get working properly. PaperCut works well and isn't a giant pit of despair like Equitrac. Stay the gently caress away from that one and if somebody suggests it start beating them and never stop. PaperCut also has a free print logging utility that you can throw on a print server for tracking and auditing purposes if you don't want to spend actual money on a real control mechanism. It also has the typical bells and whistles for MFDs (MEAP apps for Canons, etc.)
|
# ? Apr 25, 2017 21:12 |
|
Inbox chat: I get hundreds of emails every day. Any automated alert except for branch WAN link down gets filtered into one of two alert folders. Any ticket that is in my notify rules gets sent to a specific folder. everything else goes to my inbox, and I read every one. I then mark it as unread if I need to take action on it and only mark it read after I have actually done so. It's effective enough.
|
# ? Apr 26, 2017 03:50 |
|
Inspector_666 posted:We use Google Apps and I still have a billion ridiculous filters because of all the alert lists I'm on that I'll never read fixed for me
|
# ? Apr 26, 2017 04:08 |
|
wolrah posted:I have a few users that have literally hundreds of tiered folders in their inboxes and I just don't get it. Well yeah this is retarded too. Classifying every email into its own hand-crafted artisanal kale-scented folder isn't productive, either. Do you guys in the "no filters, no masters, just search" crew just not get that many emails? If I didn't filter on a few key categories of automated messages I'd be right there with Mr. 25k unread mails and never know when something I actually needed to read arrived. And that's been consistent across every sysadmin job I've ever had. I had the exact same issue at past jobs that used Google Apps, btw. It's not an Outlook issue. If everything dumps into my Gmail inbox and I have to search for "NOT dumbalerts AND NOT poop AND NOT butts" to get a usable view, guess what, that's still filtering.
|
# ? Apr 26, 2017 04:24 |
|
Docjowles posted:Well yeah this is retarded too. Classifying every email into its own hand-crafted artisanal kale-scented folder isn't productive, either. I worked with a guy before he became a PM that had a ton of folders, some of those would only have one or two emails in it. I questioned him on it a few times and he'd always just say that's how he liked it. Didn't seem to hurt him too much, but he would have to scroll up and down the list a few times looking for the right folder.
|
# ? Apr 26, 2017 04:57 |
|
I have a few folders. One for payroll/HR type stuff. A folder with a bunch of subfolders, one for each distinct project I work on. A big folder for stuff that doesn't have my name in the to or cc fields. A folder for emails from addresses that don't match in the address book.
|
# ? Apr 26, 2017 05:33 |
|
I really don't like sharepoint.
|
# ? Apr 26, 2017 12:28 |
|
wolrah posted:I have a few users that have literally hundreds of tiered folders in their inboxes and I just don't get it. Kind of like SA, the more sub-forums you have the less attention each one gets.
|
# ? Apr 26, 2017 12:40 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 16:38 |
|
GOOCHY posted:Kind of like SA, the more sub-forums you have the less attention each one gets. Same with children.
|
# ? Apr 26, 2017 13:33 |