|
OXBALLS DOT COM posted:Ehat is rlm? Red lives matter? Red Letter Media, it's a youtube show
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 00:36 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 03:24 |
|
I prefer red lives matter
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 00:40 |
|
bonerjam posted:she was softballed into the abortive nbc newsmagazine rock center iirc, anchored by now-disgraced television personality brian williams Chelsea got paid around 600k a year despite having almost zero air time for her consultant job.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 00:45 |
|
got some chelsea hayterzzzz in this thread.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 01:23 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 01:27 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQ4PYVATBac https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqYJRc0TJkQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=26-VzfBZg1w spacetoaster posted:TBH this was written back when democrats were screeching about roving gay death squads.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 01:39 |
|
killed by a Jewish guy it even has his name in parentheses, what a loving anti-semite
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 01:40 |
|
single parenthesis means "I don't hate jews, hell I love Woody Allen", double parenthesis means "I don't hate jews, but you gotta admit Hamas makes a lot of sense", triple parenthesis is plain antisemetic. Personally I'm trying to reach four parenthesis by channeling the ghosts of Hitler and David Duke but for now I only managed to formulate "the holocaust didn't happen and is a jewish lie, but I wish it did happen, and next time it happens we will do it right, but it will also be a jewish lie" and let's be honest it still needs some work. edit : parentheses? poo poo if know lmao
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 01:50 |
|
It's funny because Jesus and Hillary are both fake people
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 01:52 |
|
Creamed Cormp posted:single parenthesis means "I don't hate jews, hell I love Woody Allen", double parenthesis means "I don't hate jews, but you gotta admit Hamas makes a lot of sense", triple parenthesis is plain antisemetic. wait isn't that a real thing? i seem to recall being that an actual thing like putting (bernie sanders) in parentheses is supposed to mean something antisemitic. idfk i don't understand why antisemitism is a thing in the first place.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 02:04 |
|
bonerjam posted:wait isn't that a real thing? i seem to recall being that an actual thing like putting (bernie sanders) in parentheses is supposed to mean something antisemitic. idfk i don't understand why antisemitism is a thing in the first place. just in case you're not joking, some far-right podcast has an echo special effect every time a jewish sounding name, and its fans represent that by putting jewish sounding names in parenthesis, like that : (((Schlomo Creamed Cormp))). and antisemitism is a thing because they killed jesus and control the world in the shadows.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 02:22 |
|
Creamed Cormp posted:just in case you're not joking, some far-right podcast has an echo special effect every time a jewish sounding name, and its fans represent that by putting jewish sounding names in parenthesis, like that : (((Schlomo Creamed Cormp))). i wasnt joking because i dont really keep up to date on the latest trends in antisemitism so I thank you.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 02:26 |
|
nigga crab pollock posted:it was entirely people who wanted a female president. there was literally no other angle provided by the campaign or really covered in any publicity or advertising. plus people really susceptible to mass media propaganda just lapped up the pro hillary angle without even really thinking about it and you can tell by catching a lot of nonsensical rhetoric from them or assertions that things are entirely separate from how they are in reality i refuse to believe anyone thinks trevor noah is funny
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 03:34 |
|
Rutibex posted:i refuse to believe anyone thinks trevor noah is funny youre right noahbody does. see, trevor noah would never come up with a joke that funny
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 03:38 |
|
Chomp8645 posted:I just read a book about the Emperor Augustus (of Rome, obv). He did the same poo poo, he ruthlessly promoted his own chosen heirs while quashing the careers of individuals who were promising for the state, but not of the chosen clan. rome had just gone though about 100 years of cival wars. massive slave rebellions, political tomfollery, a social war with Italian allies, Sulla, and finally the civil wars between Caesar/Pompii/Antony/Crassus. the people were really loving sick of ambitious romans screwing with their entire civilization for personal gain. Augustus was very wise to value loyalty over ambition after what he went though skasion posted:As long as we're making ridiculous comparisons to Rome, Trump is clearly Pompey. we are not that far along, Trump is Tiberius Gracchus Rutibex fucked around with this message at 03:59 on Apr 27, 2017 |
# ? Apr 27, 2017 03:51 |
|
Rutibex posted:we are not that far along, Trump is Tiberius Gracchus This is probably still too generous to Trump
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 05:09 |
|
theperminator posted:It's funny because Jesus and Hillary are both fake people Jesus is reasonably well attested to for a wandering prophet no one would have cared about 2000 years ago. If you mean disingenuous, I don't see how you can possibly conclude one way or the other.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 05:22 |
|
skasion posted:This is probably still too generous to Trump we will see when Trump is beaten to death by an angry mob of senators, his body thrown into the Potomac so his followers will have nowhere to greave
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 05:27 |
|
porfiria posted:Jesus is reasonably well attested to for a wandering prophet no one would have cared about 2000 years ago. They cared enough to kill him for opening his mouth. But if by "well attested" you mean he deffo existed I expect you consider Josephus a good source, because there weren't many others.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 05:28 |
|
phasmid posted:They cared enough to kill him for opening his mouth. Josephus was writing a century later, he just heard the story from a christian
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 05:31 |
|
Rutibex posted:we will see when Trump is beaten to death by an angry mob of senators, his body thrown into the Potomac so his followers will have nowhere to greave Oh like that poo poo we did to Bin Laden
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 06:10 |
|
e. Dumb derail.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 06:12 |
|
Rutibex posted:we will see when Trump is beaten to death by an angry mob of senators, his body thrown into the Potomac so his followers will have nowhere to greave Why not just get an innertube?
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 06:31 |
|
Mr-Spain posted:Oh like that poo poo we did to Bin Laden im pretty sure they completely fabricated that entire story because they hosed up and crashed their top secret skunkworks stealth blackhawk that technically doesn't exist
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 17:08 |
|
nigga crab pollock posted:im pretty sure they completely fabricated that entire story because they hosed up and crashed their top secret skunkworks stealth blackhawk that technically doesn't exist No poo poo. When the news broke, the official story changed like 4 times in 24 hours. Like, holy poo poo, you guys launched an illegal sneak attack FOR PUBLICITY and you didn't have your story ready? What good is having a whole bunch of news orgs eating from your hand if you're going to gently caress up your own story? "And now, in accordance with his religious beliefs, we will jettison him into the Indian ocean to be eaten by salt-water crocodiles, which he loved. No cameras."
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 17:16 |
|
so the president ordered a secret raid on the compound of quite possibly the most wanted man in the entire world and the elite crack team of navy seals flying an experimental prototype crash lands in the desert within earshot of the fortified complex that may or may not even contain the guy, and a dozen navy seals despite crashing a helicopter still managed to raid the compound, find the guy, and kill him before he escaped. theres more believable poo poo in Call Of Duty our boy obama just needed something tangible to say he accomplished during his presidency lmao. bin laden probably died months or years before that
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 17:20 |
|
nigga crab pollock posted:im pretty sure they completely fabricated that entire story because they hosed up and crashed their top secret skunkworks stealth blackhawk that technically doesn't exist Nah it's all above board just don't ask for evidence supporting our account of what happened.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 17:19 |
|
phasmid posted:No poo poo. When the news broke, the official story changed like 4 times in 24 hours. Like, holy poo poo, you guys launched an illegal sneak attack FOR PUBLICITY and you didn't have your story ready? What good is having a whole bunch of news orgs eating from your hand if you're going to gently caress up your own story? its because we hosed up and crashed a top secret military prototype and pakistan gave it to china and told us to gently caress off. they had to obfuscate that with something people would care about, such as america murdering terrorist #1
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 17:21 |
|
Mr-Spain posted:Oh like that poo poo we did to Bin Laden Yeah. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jr9Kaa1sycs
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 17:24 |
|
nigga crab pollock posted:its because we hosed up and crashed a top secret military prototype and pakistan gave it to china and told us to gently caress off. they had to obfuscate that with something people would care about, such as america murdering terrorist #1 I didn't dig very far when the news came. I thought it was a Chinook or something that crashed and lost several men and I remember thinking "yeah, that sounds like something we might do after a lengthy and expensive set of sims and dry runs". Zero dark thirty my rear end. So is the prevailing notion that bin Laden is dead? Killed by people near him or maybe a lucky shot from our missiles? I heard several people say he was dead starting in the mid 2000s, including Benazir Bhutto. But then al-Zawahiri called on jihadists to take revenge on 9/11 (which syncs up w/Benghazi, I believe).
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 17:35 |
|
im not gonna pretend i know why they did the raid but i find it hard to believe that bin laden was a strategically important target and anything more than publicity. there was probably another reason why they were raiding that compound. but the official release by the US just screams damage control. yeah they were really sloppy and changed the story but they pretty much had to break the story immediately because if they didn't do it first and establish an official story then it was going to come out sooner or later that some other government has the wreckage of a top secret aircraft recovered from a failed raid on a terrorist compound and nobody is going to believe the official US line if china or pakistan broke that story first
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 17:46 |
|
Bin Laden is obviously dead and the White House knew he was dead at the time Obama announced his death. The whole point of the announcement was to give Obama a political boost, is anyone really stupid enough to think they would run the risk of claiming he was dead if there was the slightest chance he could turn up alive? Hersh's book is interesting in that it pokes a couple holes in the propagandized official story (the thesis is basically that the Pakistani govt had had Bin Laden on lockdown for years and a former Pakistani intelligence officer essentially sold him out to the US over the govt's head to claim the reward) but doesn't convince me in the slightest that American troops didn't verifiably kill Bin Laden around the time and place they said they did.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 17:46 |
|
I remember when the story first came out the troops had shot Bin Laden who was using one of his wives as a human shield and firing back with an AK-47. Over the span of like, 12 hours, he wasn't firing at them, but he had a gun, well, he was going for a gun, well, he was going for a nightstand that had a gun in it, until finally it was just his wife was in the room and a gun was later found in the room.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 17:51 |
|
What is it with underachieving men and conspiracy theories
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 17:53 |
|
whoflungpoop posted:What is it with underachieving men and conspiracy theories I'll be the judge of my achievements, tyvm.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 17:54 |
|
more conspiracy theories are true than theories that are untrue. not counting the stuff like the moon landing or JFK or anything that was a CIA psyop to try and discredit government skepticism of course
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 17:59 |
|
whoflungpoop posted:What is it with underachieving men and conspiracy theories What is it with underachieving men and [every single activity starting with the word "Internet" or "political"]
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 18:00 |
|
nigga crab pollock posted:more conspiracy theories are true than theories that are untrue. not counting the stuff like the moon landing or JFK or anything that was a CIA psyop to try and discredit government skepticism of course More theories are true than untrue if you exclude untrue theories That's true.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 18:01 |
|
Conspiracy theories and their popularity are a good indicator of how much people trust what they are being told. I'll take a stab in the dark before I trust pretty much anything the CIA says.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 18:03 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 03:24 |
|
the government's default setting is "lie rear end off" which has been proven over and over to the point that you should question literally everything they say even if it's just the capitol cafeterias lunch menu
|
# ? Apr 27, 2017 18:05 |