|
Might do that; keeping dist off the repo seems more elegant, but perhaps Heroku's use of the repo to deploy might counter this. I'm going through my files cleaning up the TS errors (some legit errors in my code, some TS being dumb... I miss Python's static type checker...); will post results after. Related; more of a JS question. TS raises errors when setting globals from another module; apparently this is part of the ES6 import spec. Is the easiest workaround exporting setter funcs? (You can just set the vars and the code works; TS just doesn't like it / it's noncompliant with ES6) Dominoes fucked around with this message at 20:23 on Apr 11, 2017 |
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 19:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 01:50 |
|
|
Dominoes posted:will post results after.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2017 20:01
|
|
|
Dominoes posted:No luck; can get heroku to post valid console out from webpack that looks right, but the browser can't find the bundles; recommitted dist. Sounds like your static files setup is misconfigured.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2017 00:10
|
|
|
Thermopyle posted:Sounds like your static files setup is misconfigured.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2017 08:20
|
|
|
Django static files on heroku are very easy if you just do this: http://w4t.pw/1ycabe
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2017 15:32
|
|
|
Passing on a recommendation here: https://www.gitbook.com/book/frontendmasters/front-end-handbook-2017/details It's an e-book that is basically a huge list of links to other websites (videos, courses, and articles; both paid and free) sorted by topic for everything you'll ever need to learn about front-end stuff. It has like 10~20 links to resources for every topic.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2017 07:21
|
|
|
Love Stole the Day posted:Passing on a recommendation here: https://www.gitbook.com/book/frontendmasters/front-end-handbook-2017/details This looks like an interesting read, thanks!
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2017 14:31
|
|
|
Love Stole the Day posted:Passing on a recommendation here: https://www.gitbook.com/book/frontendmasters/front-end-handbook-2017/details bookmarked! e: or downloaded whatever
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2017 22:36
|
|
|
Is this the proper place to get a gut check on my scaling plans?
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 02:24
|
|
|
I have a problem where running a very long script prevents users from loading any other pages until it finishes. A PHP script calls on wkHTMLtoPDF to render a series of customisable web templates and download a single file when complete. It can take more than ten seconds to render each template. So for a forty page document, the script can run for about five minutes before the download is ready. This wouldn't be a big deal if people could still navigate and use the website while waiting. For instance, if you click download, then open a new tab, it'll stay blank with the loading spinner until the PDF finalises and then the new page will load instantly. The problem is I don't know why this happens. I've tried searching but am a bit in the dark to what keywords I should use, because none of the results match my problem, let alone hint at a solution. Happy to provide more details. What am I doing wrong?
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 07:49
|
|
|
Why not run the script in a separate worker?
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 08:48
|
|
|
I'm unaware about PHP workers. Regardless, I was lucky and found the solution shortly after posting. It was due to PHP session locking. Calling session_write_close() before the script does any heavy processing makes everything responsive as expected. Thanks though!
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2017 09:10
|
|
|
Question about SharePoint Online: There's a page I've been asked to fix that has a Web Part with several tabs. One tab's text populates to all the other tabs. Does anyone have an idea why that'd be happening? I spent a few hours trying many different edits and the problem wouldn't stop. Any insights?
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2017 22:42
|
|
|
ProperCoochie posted:Question about SharePoint Online: Totes not enough info sorry
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2017 01:27
|
|
|
Is there a standard for database setup in node environments? Most of my experience has been with mongo (which allows you to just throw crap at it and it'll work) and Rails which has a nice db:setup/migrate thing going on.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2017 13:17
|
|
|
gmq posted:Is there a standard for database setup in node environments? Nope. Node, afaik, doesn't have a database module in its standard library. There are modules for every kind of db you could think of though.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2017 15:06
|
|
|
gmq posted:Is there a standard for database setup in node environments? One of my contract jobs used http://knexjs.org to try and get away from having all data in nosql and has had decent results. Has migrations plus query building, so it's not an ORM, probs worth a shot.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2017 15:29
|
|
|
The Fool posted:Totes not enough info THANKS FOR NUTHIN. No but really, I wasn't sure what to share or not. I did resolve the issue so I'm happy. To contribute: I swear I tried this and variations of this previously but the main problem was the id="tabs-9" not correlating across all the code. I had to connect the code for the tabs navigation and the tab content.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2017 19:14
|
|
|
I'm about 6 hours deep into trying to fix this one bug and thought I'd better ask for help... I am trying to implement a mobile push menu based on this article. The problem I'm having is the further down you scroll on mobile (the phone only, not in the simulator) the slide out menu also gets displaced. So by the time you've scrolled all the way down to the bottom the slide out menu is off by a few hundred pixels or so. Page is here. The Codrops example doesn't have this problem so it must be some combination of styles and structure specific to my page... Any ideas would be very much appreciated. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2017 20:13
|
|
|
awesomeolion posted:I'm about 6 hours deep into trying to fix this one bug and thought I'd better ask for help... Is position fixed, not relative or absolute?
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2017 20:44
|
|
|
Lumpy posted:Is position fixed, not relative or absolute? The position of the slide out container is fixed (all styles on the slide out container below). code:
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2017 20:52
|
|
|
jesus that is some hellish css at least just do padding:0 you animal
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2017 21:35
|
|
|
NewForumSoftware posted:jesus that is some hellish css I was debating whether or not to explain my mess. I've been throwing all kinds of crap at this trying to get it to stop moving around. That's how I arrived at this hellish state please understand...
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2017 22:04
|
|
|
Is there a way to go from a side-by-side tabbed layout like this on desktop: to a stacked layout like this on mobile:  with just CSS? Sorry for my terrible mockup. I can't figure out if there's a way to go from: code:code:
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 10:31
|
|
|
Either display:grid, with a media query, or display:flex (with a media query that changes 'order') can do that. Which you use depends on your required browser support.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 11:19
|
|
|
Nice, thanks. So many of my CSS issues would be solved if I just loving updated my 15 year old knowledge and learnt poo poo like display: flex properly.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 11:40
|
|
|
You could also do it with floats and/or positioning and setting things to display none/block.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 14:45
|
|
|
kedo posted:You could also do it with floats and/or positioning and setting things to display none/block. Oh hey you're right. I think I figured something out by making the tab content position:absolute on desktop and position:relative on mobile. Thanks.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 16:12
|
|
|
You've found your solution, and it's probably a better one, but I did a similar thing with CSS3 columns. Might not work for you because I was going from 3 on desktop to 2 on mobile but thought I'd throw it out there.
|
|
#
?
Apr 26, 2017 18:36
|
|
|
fuf posted:Nice, thanks. Yeah flex layout is supported enough now to be well worth your time learning. But I know how you feel, I only took the time to do so recently myself.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2017 03:23
|
|
|
I would agree with that. Layout via float and absolute positioning is really nasty, bodgy and prone to breaking horribly, especially with resolution changes. Neither method was intended to be used to solve a problem like this. Flexbox and grid are *the* standards for layout.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2017 09:21
|
|
|
Yeah I went back to the flexbox solution in the end, it works really well. Thanks for all the input.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2017 10:38
|
|
|
I'm dealing with a situation where our input fields are stupid long and it turned out to be a duplicated/superseding class because of some dumb merge conflict and I want to die because I couldn't figure out the problem no matter what I did.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 16:16
|
|
|
I'm a Web Designer, and we're working on a pretty big project in Drupal. The company that's in charge of development has been lacking the bandwidth for the dozens of little design edits we keep requesting, so I offered to help them out a bit and got a git repo. The CSS is fine, but everything is in Twig. I don't know PHP but can kind of understand what I've been looking at so far, and Twig looks simple enough where I could easily rip it out and leave it as HTML, but it's a pretty large volume of files to do so manually. I'd rather just have a PHP file where I can change the Twig file that's printed and the placeholder variables I send it so I can display it on a browser and get poo poo done. Is there any easy way to set this up? I just want to fix all these spacing and sizing errors and would like to see what I'm doing 
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 17:18
|
|
|
Dumb question: A long time ago I learned about the Singleton design pattern in the context of "never do this!!!1" but recently as I learn more and see examples of React stuff and MERN projects and tutorials I notice that everything seems to be doing that same scary Singleton design pattern (i.e. everything or almost everything contained in a <App /> DOM element or whatever). Is there a reason for this? Is it really a best practice somehow? Because up to now I have always been told that the Singleton thing is never necessary, albeit in a different context.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 05:16
|
|
|
I wouldn't call it a best practice as much as a here's how we settled on doing it this way thing. React apps are a bit weird though because well designed it ends up being just a stack of functional components technically. Functional components dot really mean the same concept of a singleton, because they just get composed into something bigger, usually your <App> at the end, but there are a lot of implementation details that can get hidden on the way to such a set up. Personally with my most recent project I've been looking to keep React from being my top level component, so I've got more flexibility to plug in another view renderer in certain cases or just make it easier to offload common functionality to libraries rather than force myself into depending on the React ecosystem for every little thing. I think the thing to remember though is many of these libraries need to be demonstrated in simple ways, and that usually means singletons that illustrate the concept rather than complex software patterns. JavaScript is so permissive and flexible that you really can structure your program however you like, but that's both good and bad. If you write your code to work more like functional transforms than objects with state though, you can throw out a bunch OOP principles because of the guarantees and testability a functional style can give you.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 05:34
|
|
|
Speaking of great programming ideas I read a summary of what this guy is doing 2 days ago but didn't look in depth: https://github.com/Michaelkielstra/Object-oriented-HTML He says he's made an HTML pre-processor that adds OOP to HTML. Any of you guys heard of it?
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 18:18
|
|
|
Scaramouche posted:Speaking of great programming ideas I read a summary of what this guy is doing 2 days ago but didn't look in depth: Sounds like what Angular and React are doing, but on the server side and crappier.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 18:27
|
|
|
Anyone here use Velocity for Windows? Would you recommend paying for it vs something like Zeal or DevDocs? I know there's a WinRAR style trial for Velocity, but I'm curious if there's any appreciable differences between the programs.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 18:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 01:50 |
|
|
Warbird posted:Anyone here use Velocity for Windows? Would you recommend paying for it vs something like Zeal or DevDocs? I know there's a WinRAR style trial for Velocity, but I'm curious if there's any appreciable differences between the programs. Velocity & Zeal both use Dash's API docs, so what's the point in paying for Velocity when Zeal is free? I use Zeal all the time on my Windows/Linux boxes and it's great.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 22:53
|
|
