|
Condoleezza Nice! posted:Maybe I'm dumb, but how can it be considered close air support if we're flying at 30,000 feet above sea level? That don't seem close to me. Well, that, but also, a plane 6 miles up is closer and faster to respond than artillery 10 miles behind you.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 01:53 |
|
|
# ? May 16, 2024 14:44 |
|
With precision guided weapons you can be very close from 6 miles up.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 02:27 |
Popete posted:At the risk of this becoming the Bacarruda plays CMANO thread I'll vote for Double The Numbers. It's nothing against you Bacarruda, you make good plans but I feel like we gotta mix things up introduce some chaos. Popete has a pretty good point. To spread the love around we're going to have a new rule, no consecutive missions from the same Goon. This'll come into play after the next mission. Said goon can still advise, just no "proper" plan. I'm not sure this'll impact the end result too much, most of the plans are pretty similar.
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 02:31 |
|
quote:I never really knew what this would be like when I signed up. Sure, on some level I understood that war wasn't anywhere near as flashy as Hollywood had made it seem, but nothing prepares you for how... well, immediately, things happen in this modern era. A missile is fired, there's a long wait for it to travel to its target in this BVR-allowed theater, and then a few very tense seconds while you wait to hear whether it hit. And then it's all over. There's no long, drawn out dogfights. No one-upmanship of piloting. Hell, even this outfit's two recorded air-to-air guns kills had one of them be the jet equivalent of shooting a man in the back. Though they don't advertise that fact in the job posting. Apologies if I'm taking too many liberties with the other pilots! But I'm pretty sure this is pretty much a literal version of what happened, so I think I'm okay. If I got any part of the calls wrong, well, we're a bunch of badly-trained mercs. Also I made some final tweaks to Double The Numbers' orders and drew up a basic map.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 02:32 |
|
i at least hope that bac continues to make briefings and the thread continues to doubler them with ace combat music even if it isn't his op
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 02:39 |
UberJew posted:i at least hope that bac continues to make briefings and the thread continues to doubler them with ace combat music even if it isn't his op Agreed! It's those little things that help set the tone.
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 02:44 |
|
power crystals posted:Apologies if I'm taking too many liberties with the other pilots! But I'm pretty sure this is pretty much a literal version of what happened, so I think I'm okay. If I got any part of the calls wrong, well, we're a bunch of badly-trained mercs. This is a Good Post
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 02:47 |
|
Peanut's Mercenary Report posted:
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 03:03 |
|
Voting for Operation Grognard
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 03:13 |
|
Bacarruda posted:Let's give this thing a name. Since we're taking out an SA-10 Grumble...Operation Grognard Looks good! I'll chime in and vote for Operation Grognard. My only criticism is that after the troubles Yooper had with no-navigation zones, I think we should try using mostly prosecution areas in order to leash aircraft. Stick the no-navigation zone over just the Free State, instead... and maybe tiny little 10 mile bubbles around SA-2 and SA-3 sites that we don't want to go after just yet. Planes assigned to a air warfare patrol (CAP) or anti-surface patrol (CAS) will rarely go outside their patrol and prosecution areas, so that would be a pretty good substitute for what you've been calling no-fly zones in your missions and briefings. Edit: Partially overlapping prosecution areas also provide a good way for both a west and east cap. Psawhn fucked around with this message at 05:03 on Apr 28, 2017 |
# ? Apr 28, 2017 04:30 |
|
I put it in spoiler tags before but just to reiterate, if I can get added to the back of the pilot list I think Hammer would like to get revenge for his brother Nails (in an F-35 of course).
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 04:36 |
|
Psawhn posted:Looks good! I'll chime in and vote for Operation Grognard. Fair enough. I'll leave it up to Yooper for how he wants to stop our aircraft from going on cross-border adventures. A no-go zone in spirit, if not in code.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 05:19 |
|
Now that I'm finally getting a chance to see the video of the mission... we got a precise fix on that SA-10 a lot more easily than I was expecting. Trying to get that exact fix was what I was worrying about, and why I was planning to expend the Sperwers on that. If it turns out that existing assets are able to fix the SA-10's exact GPS coordinates without sending the Sperwers to their deaths, I hope Yooper doesn't suicide them off anyway . Bacarruda posted:A no-go zone in spirit, if not in code.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 05:29 |
|
power crystals posted:Updated just because. Main differences vs. Grognard: This all seems reasonable Double the Numbers
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 05:41 |
|
Psawhn posted:Now that I'm finally getting a chance to see the video of the mission... we got a precise fix on that SA-10 a lot more easily than I was expecting. It's your plan, so I'll leave the final Sperwer call up to you?. Do you want to delete the Sperwer or leave it in? The Gorgon Stare on the Reaper did great work last time and spotted the S-300 without difficulty. I figure we should leave the spotting duty up to it. e: there's also the option to re-task it somewhere else on the map. Bacarruda fucked around with this message at 06:03 on Apr 28, 2017 |
# ? Apr 28, 2017 05:42 |
|
Bacarruda posted:It's your plan, so I'll leave the final Sperwer call up to you?. Do you want to delete the Sperwer or leave it in? Leave it in and send it scouting the western side of the map, north from our airfield. Positive recon on that area can't hurt.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 05:50 |
|
mllaneza posted:Leave it in and send it scouting the western side of the map, north from our airfield. Positive recon on that area can't hurt. Yeah, I feel like we'd get some good mileage from additional recon assets, but let's fly the ones we have somewhere.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 06:00 |
|
Double the Numbers Means Double the Fun And Double the Pleasure Of Shooting Them Guns
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 06:40 |
|
Bacarruda posted:It's your plan, so I'll leave the final Sperwer call up to you?. Do you want to delete the Sperwer or leave it in? I figure leave it in. I'm just hoping that "Sperwers aren't allowed to RTB until the SA-10 site is fixed" translates to an interpretation that allows for "Sperwers RTB as soon as the SA-10 site is fixed, even if they weren't the ones who saw it." Outside of situations where we're okay with risking losing them, I find they're just too slow to be useful for scouting. If they survive this mission I'd really want to look into loaning them out to von Hoff's troops since they can do more good work for them than they can for us, and I don't think we'd miss them at all. Not only do we have the MQ-9, the S 100B gives some really good ELINT, and the Litening targeting pods on their own are pretty much equivalent to a Sperwer's optics. Edit: All this time I've been referring to the Sperwer in the plural. We don't have more than one anymore, do we? Psawhn fucked around with this message at 07:02 on Apr 28, 2017 |
# ? Apr 28, 2017 06:56 |
|
Can I just say wonderful LP Yooper and if you ever need an eastern european accent for some briefings than I'm more than happy to record some stuff
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 06:57 |
|
Cthulhu Dreams posted:Yeah, I feel like we'd get some good mileage from additional recon assets, but let's fly the ones we have somewhere. The important eyeballs will be on the Bulgarians. We'll need good spotting to get the armored and mechanized units.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 07:13 |
|
Psawhn posted:Edit: All this time I've been referring to the Sperwer in the plural. We don't have more than one anymore, do we? I'm pretty sure we lost one on the last operation, but Yooper hasn't posted the losses and weapons expenditure from that mission, yet.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 08:07 |
|
OK, I'm guessing from the latest update from Von Hoff that this means we can't really push up on the flanks, since they've been weakened to shore up the centre. Kind of a bummer. Fingers crossed that the Dictator doesn't capitalise on this and hit one of our flanks while they're vulnerable. I've put some thought into an overall strategy. As you can see here, I've added two lines. They should seem fairly self-explanatory. Ideally we want our ground forces to reach the green line, before pushing on to the purple. If we push up further to the purple in the east for instance that's OK, but they should hold position from that point, since we don't want to overextend. The Green Line is obviously our best short-term goals, since that gives 3 more mines and takes away pretty much all of their ground radar cover in the west, as well as shortening the length of the front (not be much, but every little bit helps). The purple line, is what I call the 'tipping point'. Why? Because we will at that point control the majority of Lithium mines in Angola, rob the dictator of all but two of his southerly airfields, and (unless the Dictator makes big advances in the north) most of the territory, too. We'll be in a good place to muster our strength for further northerly pushes. The dictator will probably still have a larger pocketbook than us (he still has all the wealth Angola had beforehand, natch), but I dare say there that advantage will be far reduced. Let me know what you think.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 08:33 |
|
Yvonmukluk posted:OK, I'm guessing from the latest update from Von Hoff that this means we can't really push up on the flanks, since they've been weakened to shore up the centre. Kind of a bummer. I'm in favor of an Eastern push. Most of the population lives in the West. It's the best place to recruit troops, building weapons, and levy taxes. If Von Hoff rules most of the people, it also gives his government more political legitimacy. We're within reach of the crossroads city of Benguela and the second-largest deepwater port: Lobita. Taking both of them will gently caress with the Dictator's logistics. If we push in the East, we also take down the two radar stations on the coast, blinding the Dictator's Western defenses. He'll have to weaken his mobile radar coverage elsewhere to compensate. We can also grab the coastal Lithium mines and make And we can take away Kuito and Benuela Airport, forcing the Angolan Air Force to rely on smaller or more remote strips for air operations. There's virtually no roads in the Eastern part of the country and the terrain NW on Menongue is riddled with rivers and swamps. You can move light infantry through pretty easily, but supplying them or giving them armor and artillery support would be a non-starter. The center of the country is flat farmland and the coat is desert -- much better terrain for offensive operations.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 11:20 |
|
Bacarruda posted:
Sounds good to me for the initial objective. I'd still like to see us push up on the other flanks to at least the Phase 1 line, though. I figure there's no real need to push up further in the East on we reach Phase 2, but I can agree that a westward/central push should otherwise be our focus. Taking Huambo, which is not only a fairly central point on the road network but the country's 2nd city, should be another objective to take.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 11:43 |
|
You know, if we're still in the market for a cheap maritime patrol bird, how about this? https://wiki.baloogancampaign.com/index.php/DataAircraft?ID=1781
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 12:29 |
Bacarruda posted:It's your plan, so I'll leave the final Sperwer call up to you?. Do you want to delete the Sperwer or leave it in? If I recall correctly the S100B picked up the SA-10 battery. The Reaper identified all of the ground forces. Psawhn posted:Looks good! I'll chime in and vote for Operation Grognard. I'll do some more testing and see how closely they adhere to Prosecution Zones. If that works well I'll just the NoNav zone further off and keep it beyond weapons range from the Prosecution Zone. FailAtMagic posted:Can I just say wonderful LP Yooper and if you ever need an eastern european accent for some briefings than I'm more than happy to record some stuff Oh yes. You might become one of the Ivanov Brothers... lemme know a good way to reach you. Bacarruda posted:I'm pretty sure we lost one on the last operation, but Yooper hasn't posted the losses and weapons expenditure from that mission, yet. Thanks for reminding me! Bacarruda posted:
I assume you mean Western Advance? You've got arrows in the western area heading towards Lobito. Unfortunately there's no CMANO for Ground Units so we're forced to do what seems sensible in regard to gains made (or losses). I'll total up votes a bit later, build the mission, and maybe run it tonight? No guarantees!
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 12:45 |
|
Yooper posted:Unfortunately there's no CMANO for Ground Units (WinSPMBT is terrible but only thing that comes close to CMANO for ground forces)
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 13:00 |
|
Ooooooh. I hadn't noticed that our S100B has a good ELINT capability. We should keep in mind that we can leave its radar off and pick up emitters with pretty good precision from extreme range when advantageous to not broadcast the AEW location.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 13:04 |
|
Yooper posted:I assume you mean Western Advance? You've got arrows in the western area heading towards Lobito. You are correct. I meant west. I'm directionally challenged. Good thing I'm not the navigator on one of our Phantoms or anything... Yooper posted:Popete has a pretty good point. To spread the love around we're going to have a new rule, no consecutive missions from the same Goon. This'll come into play after the next mission. Said goon can still advise, just no "proper" plan. I'm not sure this'll impact the end result too much, most of the plans are pretty similar. Works for me! I don't want to be stepping on anyone's toes. If you'd like, I can withdraw my plan for the running this go-around, too. UberJew posted:i at least hope that bac continues to make briefings and the thread continues to doubler them with ace combat music even if it isn't his op Briefings will be a thing as long as goons want them to be a thing! Bacarruda fucked around with this message at 13:26 on Apr 28, 2017 |
# ? Apr 28, 2017 13:04 |
|
Gervasius posted:
I guess TacOps might also work (assuming that you could mix-and-match units between the OOB for a mixed unit). Assuming you could find a dedicated enough grog to run it. Yvonmukluk fucked around with this message at 13:27 on Apr 28, 2017 |
# ? Apr 28, 2017 13:10 |
|
Crazycryodude posted:This is a Good Post You're just saying that because you're in it but thanks. I figure I'll keep up the adventures of MEAT as I get inspired or until people tell me to knock it off. It's probably a good thing for his sake that we're unlikely to ever want to mount Hellfires on that Reaper. People who actually know how CMANO works, I have a dumb question: how do I get to a file browser when loading a scenario? All I can find is the list of stuff it starts you with so I have no idea how to open the thing I saved.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 13:18 |
Gervasius posted:
7.62mm Missed! X 10,000. I'm a pretty groggy dude, but even I won't give money to Shrapnel. The Tiller engine would work, but seeing as it's not universal that's out. Yvonmukluk posted:I guess TacOps might also work (assuming that you could mix-and-match units between the OOB for a mixed unit). And you could find a dedicated enough grog. Interesting. I've never looked at the Battlefront back catalog. ...and after 5 minutes with the demo. No. It makes Gary Grigsby look like a talented UI designer. I think we'll stick to abstracting it all.
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 13:36 |
|
Question: could we do a strike to try and kill the dictator, then take advantage of the ensuing chaos to move up? I'm thinking we might (*shudder*) cooperate with the Free State on this one, maybe organize a coordinated attack or getting some intel from them. The downside* would be that we'd risk someone more competent replacing him. * besides risking our planes being shot down, of course
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 13:39 |
power crystals posted:People who actually know how CMANO works, I have a dumb question: how do I get to a file browser when loading a scenario? All I can find is the list of stuff it starts you with so I have no idea how to open the thing I saved. I've run into this... so when you save it opens up the Save Game window and lets you choose a file location. But here's the catch, it has to be within the Cmano/Scenarios folder in order for the Load Game to find it. So when you save (or are moving a saved game) put it in the c:/steam/Cmano/Scenario folder. Once inside the Scenario folder you can add subfolders and the Load Game function will find it.
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 13:44 |
|
Crazycryodude posted:This is a Good Post Agreed, excellent stuff.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 13:45 |
|
Mikl posted:Question: could we do a strike to try and kill the dictator, then take advantage of the ensuing chaos to move up? I'm thinking we might (*shudder*) cooperate with the Free State on this one, maybe organize a coordinated attack or getting some intel from them. We could, but it'd be difficult to pull off. It depends on where he is and how well-defended he is. We could be looking at an operation as simple as having the Tornadoes sneak in and fire cruise missiles through his bedroom window. Or we could be talking about something with lots of moving parts, like this:
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 13:51 |
Bacarruda posted:We could, but it'd be difficult to pull off.
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 13:53 |
|
Voting Double the Numbers. Also now that everyone is onboard with how powerful electronic attack aircraft are, I'm lookin forward to having some Prowler bros after the next acquisition or two.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 13:54 |
|
|
# ? May 16, 2024 14:44 |
Voting is Closed Operation Grognard is a go. Which is good as those dudes on the ground need some help. Our intel is showing a minimal air presence in the South. The Free State is pretty quiet right now. Jack also hasn't been in touch. So either he blacked out drunk, or he's working on something...
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2017 14:01 |