|
euphronius posted:Is there a gdt for tonight . https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3818639
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 00:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 18:33 |
|
|
Butch Jones showed up and now I really hope no Tennessee player gets drafted tonight
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 00:45
|
|
|
pubic works project posted:What's up my dude
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 00:46
|
|
|
Current crowd mood, drunk and optimistic
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 00:58
|
|
|
This guy has the best live coverage: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFGCLAk7dGs
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 00:58
|
|
|
Philly isn't gonna draft Foster or Mixon apparently
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 01:07
|
|
|
Raku posted:Butch Jones showed up and now I really hope no Tennessee player gets drafted tonight If Barnett makes it out of the first round I will be blown away
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 01:26
|
|
|
mastershakeman posted:this is the most excited I've been for a draft since booing the Benson pick After trading up for Trubisky, you can be this excited next year.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 02:04
|
|
|
89 posted:Philly isn't gonna draft Foster or Mixon apparently Howard is available still, holy hell! I would be absolutely ecstatic
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 02:28
|
|
|
Is QB "ball velocity" really a thing or nah?
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 03:08
|
|
|
Joey Freshwater posted:If Barnett makes it out of the first round I will be blown away Titans took him 2 picks ago
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 03:09
|
|
|
Lasagna Pilot posted:Is QB "ball velocity" really a thing or nah? It's a thing. Someone posted a comparison way earlier in the thread and based on past results it seems to mostly be something you need a certain level of to be a successful QB, which makes sense. So it isn't a big deal to have the most velocity in a given class (and most of the top guys have sucked if I remember right), but you do need to be able to put a certain amount of zip on the ball to succeed.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 03:14
|
|
|
Grittybeard posted:It's a thing. Someone posted a comparison way earlier in the thread and based on past results it seems to mostly be something you need a certain level of to be a successful QB, which makes sense. In that case I am surprised Watson didn't drop out of the 1st round.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 03:16
|
|
|
Lasagna Pilot posted:Is QB "ball velocity" really a thing or nah? For certain things, without a doubt. Check out cams goal line throw to dickson against atlanta for instance. Alex smith isnt making that throw.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 03:19
|
|
|
MY NIGGA D-LINK posted:Titans took him 2 picks ago No we didn't you filthy troll
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 04:14
|
|
|
Texans cowboys bitch
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 04:24
|
|
|
Where is Romo. Is he with Houston
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 04:25
|
|
|
anne frank fanfic posted:Where is Romo. Is he with Houston CBS
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 05:08
|
|
|
Lord Waffle Beard posted:In order of likelihood First 2 happened
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 05:11
|
|
|
Wait. WAIT. WAIT. I missed this...we picked a TE in Round 1?
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 05:31
|
|
|
We picked a linebacker
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 05:48
|
|
|
What's this I hear about Trubisky loving to kiss titties? I'm a fan of that, too. Mitch sounds like a cool dude.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 06:05
|
|
|
IMO the Texans just closed their window Time to rebuild. Trade JJ and Clowney and Nuk
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 06:10
|
|
|
Intruder posted:IMO the Texans just closed their window Yes, please tank next year.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 06:13
|
|
|
From now on I'm going to call him Oily Head Rick Remember when he said he felt no pressure to take a QB?
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 06:14
|
|
|
Intruder posted:From now on I'm going to call him Oily Head Rick What did they lose to trade up?
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 06:28
|
|
|
Sad King Billy posted:What did they lose to trade up? Next year's first which will probably be a top 10 pick
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 06:35
|
|
|
Intruder posted:Next year's first which will probably be a top 10 pick So they traded up to get a So-so quarterback who has no offensive line to defend him? All the good OTs or OGs will be gone by the time Texans get their next pick.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 06:46
|
|
|
With the way Chiefs fans are partying tonight you'd think we won a playoff game
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 06:49
|
|
|
kiimo posted:With the way Chiefs fans are partying tonight you'd think we won a playoff game Give it time
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 06:57
|
|
|
Every single draft pick is a lottery ticket. Nothing is guaranteed. It's all just voodoo and tea leaves. Good will be bad and bad will be good. By the end of the year, ten UDFAs will be playing better than ten first round picks.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 07:13
|
|
|
I've been screaming Mahomes for two months I'm ecstatic
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 07:12
|
|
|
kiimo posted:I've been screaming Mahomes for two months I'm ecstatic I said this in the other thread but I originally wanted Mahomes at 27 in what I would have thought of as a ridiculous overdraft at the time or in the second round. As it turns out he never would have lasted that long because the NFL is insane about QBs and he got tons of hype, so this is probably about what it would have taken to get him. But man even though I like him that's too much to give up unless he hits, and Jesus he's not the most likely guy to actually hit to put it kindly. I'm already dreading hearing dumb people yell for him to start this year when Alex has one of his typically underwhelming games, Mahomes needs lots of time to get rid of bad habits. Having said all that if everything works out and Andy is as amazing as he's shown himself to be in the past it could be awesome. Eventually. Just almost certainly not now.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 07:21
|
|
|
I figured the Niners would gently caress up draft day pretty bad but instead they did great. I'm confused.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 12:56
|
|
|
I guess I'm okay with the Bucs. Give them a B. Maybe a B-
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 12:59
|
|
|
^^^ What? Tampa did exactly what you're supposed to do, let talent fall to you while everyone else goes crazy. All that CTE has given Lynch otherworldly insight into the very fabric of the NFL. As far as explanations go that's the best I got. I mean how does a deal like that Chicago trade even end up on the table? If San Fran proposed that poo poo to me I'd just flatly hang up.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 13:01
|
|
|
Grittybeard posted:I said this in the other thread but I originally wanted Mahomes at 27 in what I would have thought of as a ridiculous overdraft at the time or in the second round. As it turns out he never would have lasted that long because the NFL is insane about QBs and he got tons of hype, so this is probably about what it would have taken to get him. Here's my thing. Some people today are saying the Chiefs paid too much and should have taken defense and stayed at 27. We've done that. The Chiefs have drafted conservative for 34 years and what has it gotten us? Zero Super Bowl appearances. At some point you have to pull the trigger. Good on them for not doing it for a QB they didn't believe in. They were unilaterally 100% all for Mahomes, Reid said so in his press conference. So they had to move up 17 places and what we paid to do that is not much at all. Next year's top pick will also likely be late 20s. Who cares. The Chiefs drafted Derrick Johnson, an incredible linebacker over Aaron Rodgers. Results speak for themselves. So here's what I say to the detractors. You can argue that you know more than Reid, Dorsey and their draft war room and think Mahomes actually isn't that good. But you can't argue with the strategy. If you like a QB you go get him. This is an incredibly awesome move and I won't blame them one bit even if he busts. You have to swing at some point. But all along I've stated that I believe in Mahomes and his negatives don't bother me at all.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 17:37
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/rapsheet/status/857974622486188032
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 17:50
|
|
|
Can the Browns trade 2 firsts in 2018, 1 in 2019, and offer to burn Brock Osweiler at the stake and we get Aaron Rodgers?
Gatts fucked around with this message at 17:54 on Apr 28, 2017 |
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 17:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 18:33 |
|
|
The Puppy Bowl posted:I mean how does a deal like that Chicago trade even end up on the table? If San Fran proposed that poo poo to me I'd just flatly hang up. "Hi the bears this is SF. We have an offer on the table from <another team> to trade up to #2 and they are obviously going to draft your guy. Would you like to beat their offer?" SF was never going to draft Trubisky, but that doesn't mean that Trubisky was going to be available at #3.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2017 17:53
|
|