|
Volkerball posted:Pretty soon instead of getting cremated these fat fucks will want to be turned into an oil lamp who's fire can never be extinguished 
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 02:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 18:38 |
|
|
LucyWanabe posted:Holy poo poo: Well I'm sure it made a ton of money at the box office which made all the pain and sacrifice worthwhile, I'll just check .... quote:Box Office WHOOPS NOPE
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 02:39
|
|
|
There's a charity dedicated specifically to taking care of the lions that survived Roar
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 02:42
|
|
|
sounds like there oughta be one for the people too
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 02:44
|
|
|
LucyWanabe posted:Holy poo poo: Edit, I'll link it in case anyone is incredibly squeamish. It's not a very graphic image though. http://i.imgur.com/GRRHfNC.jpg
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 02:54
|
|
|
Tears In A Vial posted:Edit, I'll link it in case anyone is incredibly squeamish. It's not a very graphic image though. When Drafthouse re-released the film in 2015 they had a whole set of posters featuring photos of the attacks and injuries which was obviously the selling point of the film for them. The tagline was "No animals were harmed in the making of this film. 70 cast and crew members were."
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 03:12
|
|
|
Snowglobe of Doom posted:"No animals were harmed in the making of this film" quote:In 1978, a flood from a dam break killed many lions in the film, washed away the set and destroyed nearly all of the movie, including sets, completed film footage and three key lions including Robbie, the movie's lion king. The picture was set back several years and the damaged done amounted to approximately US $4 million. Checks out.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 03:19
|
|
|
Memento posted:Checks out. Note that the lions didn't drown during the flood but quote:Deputy Sheriffs had to shoot three lions during the flooding of the Marshall ranch. One of these lions was Robbie, the lion king of the picture. Robbie was a unique black-maned Rhodesian lion. It didn't happen during filming so technically they're correct to say "No animals were harmed in the making of this film" but yeah, that's splitting hairs pretty finely
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 03:28
|
|
|
Just watched Roar. 
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 05:03
|
|
|
Snowglobe of Doom posted:It didn't happen during filming so technically they're correct to say "No animals were harmed in the making of this film" but yeah, that's splitting hairs pretty finely I love The Beastmaster and Phantasm but Don Coscarelli pulls that poo poo with The Beastmaster by saying no animals were harmed. The tiger that they for reasons unknown spraypainted black for the film died shortly after they were finished filming due to an allergic reaction to the paint. 
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 05:16
|
|
|
Neo Rasa posted:I love The Beastmaster and Phantasm but Don Coscarelli pulls that poo poo with The Beastmaster by saying no animals were harmed. The tiger that they for reasons unknown spraypainted black for the film died shortly after they were finished filming due to an allergic reaction to the paint. The "No Animals Were Harmed" line has been a standard disclaimer in movies since 1972. Prior to that, animals were routinely killed and otherwise abused to get shots of the animals dying for combat scenes and such. Westerns were particularly terrible about it. Horses were shot with a rider on it to get the fall accurately. A wagon going over a cliff actually went over a cliff with the horses. The American Humane Society raised a stink about it in the 40s and finally got the industry to develop trick animals that could mimic the actions needed or use camera tricks to get the shot without the necessity of harming the animals. What it means is no animals were deliberately harmed for the purposes of filming. Lots of animals still get hurt or killed in movies (so do humans), but due to accidents that aren't part of the direct filming process. They are a different category. i.e. The tiger with the allergic reaction wasn't painted so they could specifically film the allergic reaction. It was to make the tiger black, which is what was filmed. So the movie gets to put the "no animals were harmed" tag on the movie if it was made with the approval and treatment guidelines of the American Humane Society. It's a sort of legal obfuscation that sometimes doing everything by the book results in a dead animal anyway. The difference is that it wasn't planned to happen, it just did due to unforeseen circumstances. Kind of a loophole, but that's why it's there.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 05:42
|
|
|
People get really upset when animals are hurt on set. Look at Luck, it took down that whole series.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 05:48
|
|
|
Arms_Akimbo posted:People get really upset when animals are hurt on set. Look at Luck, it took down that whole series. Well of course. Causing suffering to animals for something that only exists for aesthetic reasons, especially out of negligence (presuming no one is outright doing it intentionally anymore) is hard to justify ethically. Same reason for the backlash against fur, for example.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 05:54
|
|
|
Deteriorata posted:The "No Animals Were Harmed" line has been a standard disclaimer in movies since 1972. Prior to that, animals were routinely killed and otherwise abused to get shots of the animals dying for combat scenes and such. Westerns were particularly terrible about it. Horses were shot with a rider on it to get the fall accurately. A wagon going over a cliff actually went over a cliff with the horses. Apparently the whole system has, unsurprisingly given that it is a private organisation doing a job that should be done by a government agency and it is funded by the companies it is meant to monitor, degenerated into a scam. They fudge the tag or outright lie so as to cover for the productions. It's hosed up.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 06:19
|
|
|
I’m pretty sure they still trip horses in India. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imM6omziU_I
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 06:29
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 08:50
|
|
|
AreWeDrunkYet posted:Well of course. Causing suffering to animals for something that only exists for aesthetic reasons, especially out of negligence (presuming no one is outright doing it intentionally anymore) is hard to justify ethically. Same reason for the backlash against fur, for example. Yeah but in the case of Luck, they were already really old horses on the short list for the glue factory. One of them literally fell over and conked it's head and needed to be put down. It was a case where they were trying to do the best they could and people still got pissed off because they don't understand how old animals work.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 08:57
|
|
|
Poor Freckles, thought of Hollywood fame and died.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 10:14
|
|
|
Thought of a second take and died.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 10:12
|
|
|
Volkerball posted:Pretty soon instead of getting cremated these fat fucks will want to be turned into an oil lamp who's fire can never be extinguished I heard Morrissey became pretty insufferable when he went vegan but dont do this to The Smiths man.... 
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 12:24
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:I’m pretty sure they still trip horses in India. I thought you were making a joke about the sliding horse and now I remember everything that wasn't the sliding horse. 
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 16:47
|
|
|
Lazyhound posted:This guy's channel is a treasure trove. 
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 23:45
|
|
|
Lazyhound posted:This guy's channel is a treasure trove. In this episode, Grant learns about headspacing.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 00:04
|
|
|
That guy should not be allowed to carry firearms or even be around firearms, jesus christ. *edit* Holy loving poo poo, I watch most of that video and it just got worse and worse v--- my father was a commercial airline pilot and was not retarded with guns (he grew up on a farm) and is the reason I am not retarded with guns. MF_James fucked around with this message at 00:24 on May 2, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 00:08
|
|
|
MF_James posted:That guy should not be allowed to carry firearms or even be around firearms, jesus christ. Outside YouTube, Grant is an airline pilot and has built a real estate business.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 00:12
|
|
|
We got a call from a customer today asking if someone's card could be revoked. The story he told was a little terrifying. Someone we had certified was operating a crane on a job site, and he hit a guy with the hook & ball and left him hanging by one arm from a ladder. Doesn't sound so bad...except the ball smashed into the guy so hard that the impact broke his back. He was a 16 foot fall away from death if he wasn't able to hold on. How did our illustrious crane operator respond? By jumping out of the crane and running away. They tried to get a hold of him for a drug test, but he didn't answer any calls and the guy sent to his house found him nowhere to be seen. Not only did he not even try to help the guy he nearly killed, he is now in hiding to try and avoid any consequences.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 00:33
|
|
|
chitoryu12 posted:How did our illustrious crane operator respond? By jumping out of the crane and running away. They tried to get a hold of him for a drug test, but he didn't answer any calls and the guy sent to his house found him nowhere to be seen. Not only did he not even try to help the guy he nearly killed, he is now in hiding to try and avoid any consequences. "Ha! Hah! Can't blood/piss test me if you can't find me!"
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 00:35
|
|
|
Coxswain Balls posted:I thought this was gonna be a repost of one of the earlier ones in the news, but nope. The fact that this is a thing that keeps happening in increasing frequency is hilarious. All the firefighters' gear got covered in human grease 
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 00:39
|
|
|
He was just trying to play the real life version of this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6rtZGtCj3BY
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 00:43
|
|
|
MausoleumExtremist posted:All the firefighters' gear got covered in human grease This needs to be part of a public health campaign. MF_James posted:v--- my father was a commercial airline pilot and was not retarded with guns (he grew up on a farm) and is the reason I am not retarded with guns. My point was more "imagine entrusting the lives of hundreds of people to this man on a regular basis". Lazyhound fucked around with this message at 00:52 on May 2, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 00:50
|
|
|
Lazyhound posted:My point was more "imagine entrusting the lives of hundreds of people to this man on a regular basis". oh well apparently I'm the dumb rear end now
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 01:00
|
|
|
RatHat posted:He was just trying to play the real life version of this I'm fairly sure this kills the turtle.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 01:09
|
|
|
I just don't even understand how he couldn't cast the bullets correctly and instead of doing something logical such as just recasting instead of putting it in a casing and jamming it in a glock.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 01:45
|
|
|
Asproigerosis posted:I just don't even understand how he couldn't cast the bullets correctly and instead of doing something logical such as just recasting instead of putting it in a casing and jamming it in a glock. It is because he thinks muffin trays are adequate to store molten metal. He uses ultra cheap poo poo to make his moulds.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 01:47
|
|
|
Osha https://vimeo.com/215528297
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 01:55
|
|
|
Asproigerosis posted:I just don't even understand how he couldn't cast the bullets correctly and instead of doing something logical such as just recasting instead of putting it in a casing and jamming it in a glock. Even if he's a lovely caster, he can just cast them small. Lead will expand under pressure to grip the rifling, and even if it's too small to do that it at least won't risk overpressure like something too large to swage itself down would.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 02:00
|
|
|
chitoryu12 posted:Even if he's a lovely caster, he can just cast them small. Lead will expand under pressure to grip the rifling, and even if it's too small to do that it at least won't risk overpressure like something too large to swage itself down would. Guy's not the shiniest penny, just an incredibly lucky moron. Too much time with his head in the clouds, if you ask me.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 02:07
|
|
|
I like how he's like "The gun didn't move!" when it clearly pulled up the stakes a bit and also rotated up in the vice. That's the good stuff. Not long until he's a part of the opioid epidemic.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 02:17
|
|
|
How much does a steel beam weigh?
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 02:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 18:38 |
|
|
Asproigerosis posted:I just don't even understand how he couldn't cast the bullets correctly and instead of doing something logical such as just recasting instead of putting it in a casing and jamming it in a glock. His entire schtick is characterized by not bothering to actually understand what he's doing or why certain things happen. He just does a thing to see the superficial result and then calls it an experiment.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 02:22
|
|