Best In The South This poll is closed. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Atlanta Falcons | 33 | 16.92% | |
Carolina Panthers | 42 | 21.54% | |
New Orleans Saints | 42 | 21.54% | |
Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 17 | 8.72% | |
You All Suck | 61 | 31.28% | |
Total: | 195 votes |
|
Chilichimp posted:This is one of the best loving things ever. The Falcons need to now make one with a Jalen hologram blowing up Jameis
|
# ? May 4, 2017 16:44 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 19:21 |
|
weird Asian candy posted:The Falcons need to now make one with a Jalen hologram blowing up Jameis https://youtu.be/Oo6nPyv5bNY
|
# ? May 4, 2017 18:39 |
|
Trigger Warning, bro.
|
# ? May 4, 2017 18:44 |
|
https://twitter.com/TooEasy59/status/794379545696575489
|
# ? May 4, 2017 18:49 |
|
Riley Cooper and Blake Sims at RB are getting tryouts for the Bucs. https://twitter.com/JennaLaineESPN/status/860536322628370432
|
# ? May 5, 2017 17:54 |
|
https://twitter.com/TBBuccaneers/status/860237338412232710 Praise Allah
|
# ? May 6, 2017 22:45 |
|
Pershing posted:We live in a world where the Browns exist is all im saying. I get what you're saying, but the Saints really were that bad for a long time.
|
# ? May 8, 2017 01:24 |
|
Get hyped! https://twitter.com/TBBuccaneers/status/861589141791879169
|
# ? May 8, 2017 18:12 |
|
I don't know if I'm ready for the Bucs to be relevant again...
|
# ? May 8, 2017 18:19 |
|
weird Asian candy posted:I don't know if I'm ready for the Bucs to be relevant again... Its been long enough.
|
# ? May 8, 2017 18:40 |
|
When the Bucs play in Buffalo I am gonna be in the stands with inflatable crab legs.
|
# ? May 8, 2017 20:56 |
|
Kinda miffed that this will be the second time the Bucs play the Bears since I moved to Chicago and both games have been in Tampa.
|
# ? May 8, 2017 22:39 |
|
NFCS Incest https://twitter.com/gregauman/status/861993088612544512
|
# ? May 9, 2017 18:29 |
|
Mike Smith sure loves his former players Bobby was really good for like a year. Him and DeCoud I thought were going to be so much more than they ended up being. I believe DeCoud went to Carolina before he found his way out of the league.
|
# ? May 9, 2017 18:31 |
|
McClain is serviceable.
|
# ? May 9, 2017 19:02 |
|
I doubt he winds up as more than a backup anyway.
|
# ? May 9, 2017 19:37 |
|
Probably a better starter than their midget first rounder.
|
# ? May 9, 2017 20:26 |
|
McClain is no doubt a decent reserve corner. There is no upside there, however, so it's best to just draft a young guy and coach him into something.
|
# ? May 9, 2017 20:48 |
|
Hopefully Grimes doesn't die this year or else the secondary will turn in to trash in a hurry.
|
# ? May 9, 2017 20:55 |
|
wandler20 posted:Hopefully Grimes doesn't die this year or else the secondary will turn in to trash in a hurry. He's due for a groin tear.
|
# ? May 9, 2017 20:59 |
|
Chilichimp posted:He's due for a groin tear. With Miko around its a wonder he still has one
|
# ? May 9, 2017 22:50 |
|
Raku posted:With Miko around its a wonder he still has one Those deep massages do wonders.
|
# ? May 9, 2017 23:00 |
|
http://ftw.usatoday.com/2017/05/dan-quinn-falcons-super-bowl-loss-patriotsquote:After a thorough review of the film, the third-year Falcons coach knows exactly why his team was unable to finish off New England: His defense was simply too tired. Also maybe not snapping the ball in the second half with a zillion seconds left or taking dumb sacks.
|
# ? May 16, 2017 15:54 |
|
Jiminy Christmas! Shoes! posted:http://ftw.usatoday.com/2017/05/dan-quinn-falcons-super-bowl-loss-patriots The sack wasn't on Ryan. Freeman completely whiffed on the block. No one in their right mind can blame that loss on Matt Ryan. He had a perfect passer rating late into the game and was the better QB... The offensive gameplan in the second half was god awful plain and simple. RUN. THE. BALL. To only run the ball five times in the second half with such a big lead is inexcusable. They run the ball at all in the second half they win the game. The thing that sucks the most is sooooooooooooo many things had to go right and wrong for that comeback. Dropping back to pass instead of running, penalties, snapping the ball with :20 on the clock, tipped balls that miraculously find their way into Patriot's receiver's hands, dropped interceptions, etc. etc. I mean, it sums it up perfectly to say the Falcons lost the Superbowl without ever being down until it was over. Such a Falcons way to lose. I do hold DQ accountable for not putting an end to Shanahan's aggressive play calling, but I can kind of understand riding the wave that got you there. If Freeman picks up the block, Ryan probably hits a wide open Gabriel for a huge gain. If they continue to run the ball, they take time off the clock and force NE to take time outs, kick the field goal and odds are Bryant hits it to go up 11 with little time. It was just a comedy of events. All that said, and I may be viewing through rose colored glasses, but I don't think this team is going anywhere and I like what they are building especially on the defensive side of the ball. I think they will be back soon, but ya never know.
|
# ? May 16, 2017 16:40 |
|
weird Asian candy posted:The thing that sucks the most is sooooooooooooo many things had to go right and wrong for that comeback. Dropping back to pass instead of running, penalties, snapping the ball with :20 on the clock, tipped balls that miraculously find their way into Patriot's receiver's hands, dropped interceptions, etc. etc. Proof that Satan is real and that Belichick knows the proper rituals. Which also means that Eli is Jesus reborn.
|
# ? May 16, 2017 16:43 |
|
WampaLord posted:Proof that Satan is real and that Belichick knows the proper rituals. Yep and proof that.....................the nfl is scripted
|
# ? May 16, 2017 16:44 |
|
Vince McMahon wishes he could write as well as the NFL does.
|
# ? May 16, 2017 16:45 |
|
It's worth mentioning the Falcons running game in the second half was not exactly productive: -3 yards 5 yards 0 yards 9 yards -3 yards -1 yards 8 yards 1 yard 2 yards -1 yard
|
# ? May 16, 2017 17:10 |
|
It's clearly because dan Quinn counted out tom "touchdown tom" Brady.
|
# ? May 16, 2017 17:21 |
|
Jiminy Christmas! Shoes! posted:It's worth mentioning the Falcons running game in the second half was not exactly productive: Who cares? At that point, especially in the 4th, is to milk to clock and force timeouts. Neither of which they did, especially in the 4th. Besides, with gains of 5, 9 and 8 it's not like they were destined for -3 yards everytime they ran the ball which is irrelevant because running the ball would have eliminated the stupid sacks and holding calls (probably) and would have burned off a lot of time. Also, even if they kneeled on the ball three times after the Julio catch...they would have ended up on the 25 and Bryant would have had a pretty easy kick to go up two scores with little time left and would have forced NE to burn their final timeouts.
|
# ? May 16, 2017 17:23 |
|
weird Asian candy posted:Who cares? At that point, especially in the 4th, is to milk to clock and force timeouts. Neither of which they did, especially in the 4th. Besides, with gains of 5, 9 and 8 it's not like they were destined for -3 yards everytime they ran the ball which is irrelevant because running the ball would have eliminated the stupid sacks and holding calls (probably) and would have burned off a lot of time. Also, even if they kneeled on the ball three times after the Julio catch...they would have ended up on the 25 and Bryant would have had a pretty easy kick to go up two scores with little time left and would have forced NE to burn their final timeouts. I realize that by the second half the Falcons had to value burning up clock more than any yardage gained. But the best way to burn the clock is for the offense to stay on the field, and to do that they had to throw. If the Falcons had just ran it into the pile every down in the second half they still would have lost. There had to be a better balance on offense, obviously. But I don't think it's fair to throw so many bones at the offensive playcalling when the defense gave up five scoring drives in a row, many of them long ones.
|
# ? May 16, 2017 17:30 |
|
Jiminy Christmas! Shoes! posted:I realize that by the second half the Falcons had to value burning up clock more than any yardage gained. But the best way to burn the clock is for the offense to stay on the field, and to do that they had to throw. If the Falcons had just ran it into the pile every down in the second half they still would have lost. There had to be a better balance on offense, obviously. But I don't think it's fair to throw so many bones at the offensive playcalling when the defense gave up five scoring drives in a row, many of them long ones. If the Falcons ran it into the pile every down in the second half, they probably would have won actually...going 3 and out over and over and over and stopping the clock due to incompletions ultimately killed them. Not to mention keeping the clock going on offense would have resulted in giving their defense SOME rest. As it was, incomplete passes and 3 and outs resulted in their defense routinely going back out onto the field and being gassed beyond recognition. They were on the field for over 90 snaps, that is ridiculous. That is a direct result of the Falcons 1) not running the ball and 2) not passing the ball effectively. Along the lines of blaming Matt Ryan, I don't know how anyone in their right mind can blame the defense who was on the field for over 90 snaps and had held one of the most explosive offenses and Tom Brady in check for basically 75% of the game for the loss. I mean it was a team effort, but I put the bulk of the blame on the offense for not doing a drat thing in the 2nd half. The final 2 series was 8 runs and 2 passes. The final 3 series was 9 runs and 4 passes. It's just dumb playcalling plain and simple. weird Asian candy fucked around with this message at 17:51 on May 16, 2017 |
# ? May 16, 2017 17:42 |
|
lol, the John Babineaux reaction.
|
# ? May 16, 2017 17:45 |
|
weird Asian candy posted:If the Falcons ran it into the pile every down in the second half, they probably would have won actually.. I highly doubt this considering that means New England would have had to score one less time. weird Asian candy posted:going 3 and out over and over and over and stopping the clock due to incompletions ultimately killed them. Not to mention keeping the clock going on offense would have resulted in giving their defense SOME rest. As it was, incomplete passes and 3 and outs resulted in their defense routinely going back out onto the field and being gassed beyond recognition. They were on the field for over 90 snaps, that is ridiculous. That is a direct result of the Falcons 1) not running the ball and 2) not passing the ball effectively. Prior to New England's tying possession, the Falcons went 3-and-out twice, and each series had a run for negative yardage. On both of those they burned around 2 minutes of clock - about what you would get from running it into a pile three times. What separates those two drives of course is a series with lots of passes resulting in a touchdown. On Atlanta's other drive that technically wasn't a 3-and-out (because it ended with a Ryan fumble) they ran it 2 out of 3 times. Impossibly Perfect Sphere fucked around with this message at 18:03 on May 16, 2017 |
# ? May 16, 2017 17:58 |
|
Jiminy Christmas! Shoes! posted:Prior to New England's tying possession, the Falcons went 3-and-out twice, and each series had a run for negative yardage. What separates those two drives of course is a series with lots of passes resulting in a touchdown. On Atlanta's other drive that technically wasn't a 3-and-out (because it ended with a Ryan fumble) they ran it 2 out of 3 times. You can nitpick all you want. Run the ball. Win the game. It's honestly as easy as that. I'm sure it's easy to sit there being on the side you are on with your team winning, but on this side of it, especially down the stretch in the 4th, run the loving ball, kick the loving field goal, win the loving superbowl. That's really all it boils down to.
|
# ? May 16, 2017 18:01 |
|
Please stop doing this. The game is over and I don't need anyone filling my view with dumbass revisionist or hindsight arguments about how or why it happened or could have been avoided.
|
# ? May 16, 2017 18:23 |
|
Chilichimp posted:Please stop doing this. The game is over and I don't need anyone filling my view with dumbass revisionist or hindsight arguments about how or why it happened or could have been avoided. Sorry, you got blown out in the most historic Superbowl loss ever, people will literally never stop talking about it until another team chokes harder or y'all win a new one.
|
# ? May 16, 2017 18:30 |
|
WampaLord posted:Sorry, you got blown out in the most historic Superbowl loss ever, people will literally never stop talking about it until another team chokes harder or y'all win a new one. This is the unfortunate truth. Although "blown out" isn't true...at all...the narrative will always be, and rightfully so, how the Atlanta Falcons collapsed in historic fashion and blew the largest lead in SB history. It will be with this team until they win one. If they ever win one.
|
# ? May 16, 2017 18:35 |
|
WampaLord posted:Sorry, you got blown out in the most historic Superbowl loss ever, people will literally never stop talking about it until another team chokes harder or y'all win a new one. Best avatar/post combo in history.
|
# ? May 16, 2017 18:38 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 19:21 |
|
Chilichimp posted:Best avatar/post combo in history. The saddest part is that I'm not wrong. Like, y'all have to live with this shame forever, just like the Bucs have to live with have the most consecutive losses. Eventually time heals all wounds, but this one's still fresh. weird Asian candy posted:This is the unfortunate truth. Although "blown out" isn't true...at all...the narrative will always be, and rightfully so, how the Atlanta Falcons collapsed in historic fashion and blew the largest lead in SB history. It will be with this team until they win one. If they ever win one. "choked" would be a better phrase, sure.
|
# ? May 16, 2017 18:46 |