|
It's her return
|
# ? May 8, 2017 14:26 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 03:56 |
|
kikkelivelho posted:I don't think she should run for president again, but I also don't think she should disappear into a black hole like some people here feel. She's an experienced, competent politician, and the democrats need those now more than ever. I constantly have to remind people that Hillary did actually win the popular vote. People did like her, even if some sections of the left are now trying to portray her as a catastrophically bad candidate. Ya know, the popular vote thing is funny, since that's not how Presidents are elected. But since you go around reminding people of nonsense, check this out! If California sank into the sea, Trump would have won the popular vote too, and polling indicates that if they held the election now, Trump would still win!
|
# ? May 8, 2017 14:26 |
|
Toadvine posted:Have the fools learned nothing? They are just gonna let the public see her and hear her speak?? lol Blue Train posted:It's her return
|
# ? May 8, 2017 14:26 |
|
Blue Train posted:It's her return
|
# ? May 8, 2017 14:31 |
|
The only time you should be bringing up the popular vote is if you're trying to explain what a disappointment Hillary is, like "Hillary campaigned for the popular vote and, in so doing, doomed the country to being ruled by a retard piss baby"
|
# ? May 8, 2017 14:35 |
|
lol hillary clinton had more than twice as many faithless electors than donald trump
|
# ? May 8, 2017 14:39 |
|
nah the electoral college has always been loving retarded and was put in place so the slavers would have disproportionate political power.
|
# ? May 8, 2017 14:39 |
|
Regardless of your opinion on the electoral college it was the system she was running under, and she probably should've tried not to lose so many electoral votes while running up the score in New York and California
|
# ? May 8, 2017 14:41 |
|
Rutibex posted:Hillary Clinton should fall on her sword. if a roman politician had hosed up this badly he would not be able to live with the shame Also modern Japan and Korea. Which I respect
|
# ? May 8, 2017 14:41 |
|
Groovelord Neato posted:nah the electoral college has always been loving retarded and was put in place so the slavers would have disproportionate political power. it's weird that all those Democrats who won under that system never changed it to a popular vote only the losers cry about it afterwards
|
# ? May 8, 2017 14:41 |
|
VikingSkull posted:it's weird that all those Democrats who won under that system never changed it to a popular vote
|
# ? May 8, 2017 14:45 |
|
VikingSkull posted:it's weird that all those Democrats who won under that system never changed it to a popular vote I remember all the pre-election talk about the inherent advantage democrats had (~the blue wall~) on the electoral map
|
# ? May 8, 2017 14:49 |
Hahaha this is loving iberals.jpg right here. Post that in D&D uspol and i bet nobody would see the problem
|
|
# ? May 8, 2017 14:57 |
|
basic hitler posted:Hahaha this is loving iberals.jpg right here. Post that in D&D uspol and i bet nobody would see the problem We had a thread making fun of stuff like this in c-spam, but even they were too liberal to allow an actual thread about making fun of liberals.
|
# ? May 8, 2017 14:59 |
|
basic hitler posted:poor hillary, oppressed by the media A number of news networks definitely tried to make the race look as close a possible despite Hillary's constant lead. The media also spent a ton of time entertaining and normalizing Trump's retarded bullshit antics. I don't agree with her being "oppressed" by the media but none of the major networks we're ever truly on her side, which makes their post election tears even more pathetic. You have no right to cry about Trump being the wrong choice when you've enabled him fomr the loving start.
|
# ? May 8, 2017 15:02 |
|
VikingSkull posted:it's weird that all those Democrats who won under that system never changed it to a popular vote how did you make this post without realizing how dumb it is. how many times have the dems won the electoral vote and not the popular.
|
# ? May 8, 2017 15:01 |
|
kikkelivelho posted:A number of news networks definitely tried to make the race look as close a possible despite Hillary's constant lead. The media also spent a ton of time entertaining and normalizing Trump's retarded bullshit antics. I don't agree with her being "oppressed" by the media but none of the major networks we're ever truly on her side, which makes their post election tears even more pathetic. You have no right to cry about Trump being the wrong choice when you've enabled him fomr the loving start. Looooooooool
|
# ? May 8, 2017 15:05 |
|
kikkelivelho posted:A number of news networks definitely tried to make the race look as close a possible despite Hillary's constant lead. The media also spent a ton of time entertaining and normalizing Trump's retarded bullshit antics. I don't agree with her being "oppressed" by the media but none of the major networks we're ever truly on her side, which makes their post election tears even more pathetic. You have no right to cry about Trump being the wrong choice when you've enabled him fomr the loving start. Trump was the only potential candidate Hillary stood a chance against, that's why she instructed her media connections to elevate him early on.
|
# ? May 8, 2017 15:06 |
|
Assuming you aren't trolling According to an email from Marissa Astor, Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook’s assistant, to Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, the campaign knew Trump was going to run, and pushed his legitimacy as a candidate. WikiLeaks’ release shows that it was seen as in Clinton’s best interest to run against Trump in the general election. The memo, sent to the Democratic National Committee (DNC) also reveals the DNC and Clinton campaign were strategizing on behalf of their candidate at the very beginning of the primaries. “We think our goals mirror those of the DNC,” stated the memo, attached to the email under the title “muddying the waters.” The memo named Trump, Sen. Ted Cruz, and Ben Carson as wanted candidates. “We need to be elevating the Pied Piper candidates so that they are leaders of the pack and tell the press to them seriously,” the memo noted
|
# ? May 8, 2017 15:06 |
|
Groovelord Neato posted:how did you make this post without realizing how dumb it is. how many times have the dems won the electoral vote and not the popular. What's this have to do with anything? All the more reason for them to have used that victory to do away with it.
|
# ? May 8, 2017 15:09 |
|
kikkelivelho posted:A number of news networks definitely tried to make the race look as close a possible despite Hillary's constant lead. The media also spent a ton of time entertaining and normalizing Trump's retarded bullshit antics. I don't agree with her being "oppressed" by the media but none of the major networks we're ever truly on her side, which makes their post election tears even more pathetic. You have no right to cry about Trump being the wrong choice when you've enabled him fomr the loving start. On a scale of one to ten, how bad did you want to kill yourself as election night drew to a close?
|
# ? May 8, 2017 15:12 |
|
VikingSkull posted:What's this have to do with anything? All the more reason for them to have used that victory to do away with it. you would need a constitutional amendment to abolish the electoral college, and lol at that ever happening
|
# ? May 8, 2017 15:16 |
|
Blue Train posted:Assuming you aren't trolling Ha and yet when I first said this they howled and called me a conspiracy theorist and handed out probs to anyone who agreed Thanks wikileaks
|
# ? May 8, 2017 15:21 |
|
mannerup posted:you would need a constitutional amendment to abolish the electoral college, and lol at that ever happening This is what happens when you retreat to urban areas as a party and completely poo poo on rural areas. Perhaps if they gave a poo poo about the rural areas, Republicans wouldn't have had the power to gerrymander those areas in their favor.
|
# ? May 8, 2017 15:22 |
|
before 2000 the electoral college had only hosed up once. now the republicans have only won the popular vote once since 1988 but got three terms out of it. and even in 2000 the electoral college didn't really gently caress up it was stolen.
|
# ? May 8, 2017 15:27 |
|
Groovelord Neato posted:before 2000 the electoral college had only hosed up once. now the republicans have only won the popular vote once since 1988 but got three terms out of it. and even in 2000 the electoral college didn't really gently caress up it was stolen. so before 2000, way back when pro-slavery candidates won, that wasn't a gently caress up? it was created to allow such a terrible outcome, was it not?
|
# ? May 8, 2017 15:29 |
|
"Electoral college BAD, super delegates GOOD." If the electoral college was a major issue loving Obama had 8 loving years to get rid of it. It's almost as if the democrats didn't care about it till they lost. Dean of Swing fucked around with this message at 15:33 on May 8, 2017 |
# ? May 8, 2017 15:29 |
|
Dammit double post
|
# ? May 8, 2017 15:31 |
|
Hillary lost to Donald Trump. Donald Trump. That guy. She also may have killed the entire Democratic party. In ancient Rome and medieval Japan, if you hosed that bad, you'd typically go for an honorable suicide over living in disgrace. However, she is a dishonorable p'takh not worthy to enter into sto'vo'kor
|
# ? May 8, 2017 15:35 |
|
she is WITHOUT HONOR
|
# ? May 8, 2017 15:37 |
|
IF YOU WERE ANY OTHER MAN I WOULD KILL YOU WHERE YOU STAND!! *stabs bat'leh into table*
|
# ? May 8, 2017 15:42 |
|
*is extremely nice to Clinton supporters, implying they're soft*
|
# ? May 8, 2017 15:45 |
|
Blue Train posted:Assuming you aren't trolling It seemed like an excellent plan at the time. Trump was a racist, sexist moron who had no actual policies. In most elections he wouldn't have had a chance. I'd argue the plan would have worked perfectly in most other western countries (see what happened with Makron and Le Pen in France). In retrospect it's easy to say that supporting Trump in the primaries was a flawed plan, but at the time there was no way to tell just how much support and attention Trump would get from voters and the media.
|
# ? May 8, 2017 15:51 |
|
rezatahs posted:she is WITHOUT HONOR
|
# ? May 8, 2017 15:51 |
|
Blue Train posted:Assuming you aren't trolling
|
# ? May 8, 2017 15:50 |
|
I'd rather hit that than HRC any day of the week.
|
# ? May 8, 2017 15:54 |
|
kikkelivelho posted:there was no way to tell just how much support and attention Trump would get from voters and the media. the dnc colluded with the media to cover him hth
|
# ? May 8, 2017 15:52 |
|
Hillary takes full responsibility for her loss ... Hillary blames Comey and Wikileaks for her loss ... "Yes, this person is leadership material"
|
# ? May 8, 2017 15:52 |
|
Bernie would've won
|
# ? May 8, 2017 15:53 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 03:56 |
|
kikkelivelho posted:It seemed like an excellent plan at the time. Trump was a racist, sexist moron who had no actual policies. In most elections he wouldn't have had a chance. I'd argue the plan would have worked perfectly in most other western countries (see what happened with Makron and Le Pen in France). In retrospect it's easy to say that supporting Trump in the primaries was a flawed plan, but at the time there was no way to tell just how much support and attention Trump would get from voters and the media. You know, it's not a good idea to interfere in the democratic process in the attempt to elevate a candidate favorable to your goals. People get really mad when you do!
|
# ? May 8, 2017 15:56 |