|
the fact that youtube of all things blows broadcast tv out of the water now is crazy
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 00:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 20:52 |
|
|
Olivil posted:wasnt there cheap af "720p" tvs that actually used 1366x768 panels? i think what you're thinking of is those lovely 42" plasma TVs where the resolution was actually some dogshit like 1024x768
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 02:29
|
|
|
is there a modern freeware Windows (or, hell, cross platform) program for very basic video editing (cutting, cropping, etc). Virtualdub was always my go to but it seems to crash constantly on Windows 10
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 02:35
|
|
|
Farmer Crack-rear end posted:i think what you're thinking of is those lovely 42" plasma TVs where the resolution was actually some dogshit like 1024x768 nah tons of 720p tvs used 1366x768 panels, because they were available cheap and also let you advertise it as suitable for computer monitor use, while also being large enough to display 1280x720 video and of course some tvs actually did have 1280x720 panels, but would report themselves as 1366x768 when connected up by vga or hdmi, and you'd just lose the outer edges of the signal from computers and some other digital video devices if you couldn't switch them to put out plain 1280x720
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 02:48
|
|
|
Linguica posted:is there a modern freeware Windows (or, hell, cross platform) program for very basic video editing (cutting, cropping, etc). Virtualdub was always my go to but it seems to crash constantly on Windows 10 vlc has you covered http://www.videolan.org/vlmc/ edit lol: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UY_UMZJLoOA
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 02:51
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 02:54
|
|
|
Fraunhofer has terminated their MP3 patent licensing program, so I guess MP3 is now "officially" patent-free.Linguica posted:is there a modern freeware Windows (or, hell, cross platform) program for very basic video editing (cutting, cropping, etc). Virtualdub was always my go to but it seems to crash constantly on Windows 10 will avidemux suit your needs? Mr.Radar fucked around with this message at 03:11 on May 2, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 03:07
|
|
|
virtualdub mod?
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 03:32
|
|
|
Perplx posted:my tv has uncorrectable overscan, no menu options at all because dvi doesn't carry audio
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 04:11
|
|
|
Linguica posted:is there a modern freeware Windows (or, hell, cross platform) program for very basic video editing (cutting, cropping, etc). Virtualdub was always my go to but it seems to crash constantly on Windows 10 ffmpeg to crop use the crop filter. this is an actual simple cross platform answer OldAlias fucked around with this message at 06:11 on May 2, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 06:07
|
|
|
Openshot and KDENLive are both cross platform ffmpeg frontends.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 08:22
|
|
|
They are also both extremely bad, with KDENLive being a lot less bad. You'd be a lot happier with a creative clod sub or Vegas like a frag video memelord
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 08:25
|
|
|
pagancow posted:and SLAP ANY MOTHERFUCKER who calls anything under four thousand pixels across "4k" this but anyone who says 2k
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 15:09
|
|
|
fishmech posted:the tvs in question don't actually require overscan, like they do have full 1920x1080 panels. but the default modes have hdmi/dvi input set up so that they get blown up like 10% with horrible non-integer scaling all over the screen and the edges cut off. i have tried to disable this on my tv but there is no setting for it that i can find, i am not a video pro though
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 15:17
|
|
|
Munkeymon posted:because dvi doesn't carry audio it can. hdmi is basically dvi-d and audio is sent during the vblank period. pretty much every video card can send audio via the dvi port if the device at the other end supports it.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 15:23
|
|
|
Share Bear posted:i have tried to disable this on my tv but there is no setting for it that i can find, i am not a video pro though Just try changing every setting there is. On my TV it ended up being a change of a setting from "video" to "graphic"
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 15:25
|
|
|
Share Bear posted:i have tried to disable this on my tv but there is no setting for it that i can find, i am not a video pro though It only tends to be a setting on the TV itself on "higher end" sets, generally you adjust the overscan on the device generating the output
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 15:28
|
|
|
akadajet posted:Can we agree that broadcasting in 720p instead of 1080p these days is unacceptable? People on twitch still do 720P!
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 21:44
|
|
|
Linguica posted:is there a modern freeware Windows (or, hell, cross platform) program for very basic video editing (cutting, cropping, etc). Virtualdub was always my go to but it seems to crash constantly on Windows 10 Just suck it up and get davinici resolve. You wont get any color management until you buy some hardware. use ffmpeg CLI to convert any dogshit formats you have to real ones that Resolve supports.
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 21:48
|
|
|
how critical is frame synchronization on the camera side when shooting 2-camera stereoscopic 3D
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2017 22:23
|
|
|
pretty critical, i'd imagine. otherwise, when played back one "eye" will be ahead of the other.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2017 00:15
|
|
|
The_Franz posted:it can. hdmi is basically dvi-d and audio is sent during the vblank period. pretty much every video card can send audio via the dvi port if the device at the other end supports it. huh still I'm not surprised you'd lose that through a converter since they're probably bargain basement poo poo inside
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2017 02:31
|
|
|
Munkeymon posted:huh hdmi<->dvi convertors don't have any active circuits inside. they're just pin adapters.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2017 02:57
|
|
|
atomicthumbs posted:how critical is frame synchronization on the camera side when shooting 2-camera stereoscopic 3D you can pull off some clever effects with judicious use of desync, but mostly you'll just headaches. The effects are less severe the farther away your subject is from the camera rig though
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2017 03:06
|
|
|
*turns 360 degrees and walks far away from fishmech*
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2017 04:25
|
|
|
pagancow posted:Just suck it up and get davinici resolve. You wont get any color management until you buy some hardware. The free version of DaVinci Resolve is a disgustingly good deal - the real things you get if you pay $300 (used to be $1000, used to be $30,000) are multi-GPU support, >UHD export, noise reduction, and the ability to have multiple people working on the same project simultaneously. Woo.
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2017 05:03
|
|
|
it made some sql or other nerdy thing pop up after boot on my mac forever until I found some terminal commands online to kill that process but otherwise its good for free
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2017 05:36
|
|
|
oh yeah it was postgres, maybe???
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2017 05:36
|
|
|
wait was the davinci resolve thing a real suggestion. i thought it was pagancow pagancowing
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2017 06:08
|
|
|
Linguica posted:wait was the davinci resolve thing a real suggestion. i thought it was pagancow pagancowing Yeah he is - they've taken what was previously just a color correction app (albeit very good) and tacked on editing. Originally it was about as good as you'd expect it to be, but now it's getting to be surprisingly decent. If you're actually editing for anything real you'll still want to do Avid/Premiere. I wouldn't say that this is a 'broken clock twice day' situation but pagancow is pretty much this: technically right on average but the getting there is insane. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WBzHm2fqHE Blackmagic's business strategy is apparently 'wait for some pro A/V company to nearly go bankrupt, bail them out, actually finance their product development' and surprisingly this actually works well, because you can still charge comical amounts of money for hardware as opposed to even 'pro' software. lol if you think someone's gonna color correct a TV series with a MacBook Pro and an iPad as a control surface when the budgets currently exist to support post houses that cost 4 and 5 figgies per hour. Jimmy Carter fucked around with this message at 06:53 on May 11, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 11, 2017 06:48
|
|
|
Jimmy Carter posted:The free version of DaVinci Resolve is a disgustingly good deal - the real things you get if you pay $300 (used to be $1000, used to be $30,000) are multi-GPU support, >UHD export, noise reduction, and the ability to have multiple people working on the same project simultaneously. Woo. it worth noting that their fusion product has a free version with similar restrictions. a free node-based vfx compositor that's comparable to nuke (which costs thousands) is pretty cool, plus it integrates with resolve it's pretty sweet that today you can basically get a cross-platform, pro-tier editing suite for free
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2017 18:08
|
|
|
The_Franz posted:hdmi<->dvi convertors don't have any active circuits inside. they're just pin adapters. you're stacking a couple of adapters to get there so I just assume weird poo poo will happen for some reason and my best guess was lovely adapters - maybe the manufacturer skipped a resistor somewhere because it Seems to Work granted this is a holdover assumption from when everything was analog so maybe I should expect better nowadays?
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2017 18:26
|
|
|
if you can skip a resistor somewhere you can save a cent and that poo poo adds up!!!
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2017 18:32
|
|
|
Bulgakov posted:oh yeah it was postgres, maybe??? it's not used anymore. they have been migrating away from a mega database for a few years now
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 02:52
|
|
|
fishmech posted:you can pull off some clever effects with judicious use of desync, but mostly you'll just headaches. i'm thinking of putting a pair of cameras at equal altitude on the sides of mountains in the desert to make the desert small
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 10:25
|
|
|
atomicthumbs posted:i'm thinking of putting a pair of cameras at equal altitude on the sides of mountains in the desert to make the desert small 
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 10:33
|
|
|
atomicthumbs posted:i'm thinking of putting a pair of cameras at equal altitude on the sides of mountains in the desert to make the desert small NASA shot 3D footage of the shuttle like this.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 10:34
|
|
|
gota light the scene to keep your iso at native.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 14:17
|
|
|
atomicthumbs posted:i'm thinking of putting a pair of cameras at equal altitude on the sides of mountains in the desert to make the desert small shouldn't be too bad then obviously better if you can rig up a remote activation system, or just a partner who you can radio over to switch them on at the same time.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 16:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 20:52 |
|
|
god tier dadding
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 17:32
|
|
