|
sry i meant gay ash edit: snipe lol
|
#
?
May 19, 2017 18:09
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 08:45 |
|
|
Radiofrequency radiation injures trees around mobile phone base stations. This makes the rounds on facebook. I am a ghoul soaking in the rads so i dont care.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2017 19:52
|
|
|
That's extra fun when you know just how much radiation it takes to really harm a tree. Even around Chernobyl only the areas that got hit the hardest with fallout had massive plant death - anything less than appreciable amounts of a reactor core raining down doesn't seem to bother trees much. (Nvm the entire "non-ionizing" part...) Oh well, radiation is scary when you known nothing about it and don't want to learn.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2017 22:05
|
|
|
So here's the popsci article that I saw http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2010-11/wi-fi-radiation-killing-trees This article is talking about WiFi signals as opposed to cell phone towers, but the effects seem largely minimal. And I especially don't think that a comparison to Chernobyl makes any sense
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2017 22:51
|
|
|
I mean, if you put a plant next to a radio tower I guess it might conceivably get a degree of radiation burn but it's not going to be radioactive and that's why you don't live underneath high power radio transmitters.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2017 22:56
|
|
|
But how will I become a superhero?!
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2017 23:18
|
|
WrenP-Complete posted:But how will I become a superhero?! 100 push ups, 100 sit ups, 100 squats and 10 km of running. Every single day.
|
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2017 23:20
|
|
|
Don't skip meals, but in the mornings just a banana is fine. Go without AC in summer and heating in the winter to strengthen your soul.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2017 23:39
|
|
|
I had to do some searching but I found a writeup regarding the wifi/tree study posted 4 years later. you'll see why this wasn't shared on various news sites compared to the original fearmongering one: from http://www.pepijnvanerp.nl/2014/10/no-clues-for-negative-effects-of-wi-fi-on-trees-according-to-wageningen-university/ I'm not going to copy the whole thing but I suggest you read it if you're interested. Basically they did a legit study exposing wifi radiation to trees in controlled climate chambers and found negligible differences between the experimental and control group. And this wasn't a study backed by multiple universities, it was done by one university and commissioned by the guy who manages the city's urban "green spaces". quote:To cut things short: the scientific experiments by Wageningen University don’t show any clue that Wi-Fi (or other sources of EM-fields, like UMTS and DVB-T) might have a negative health effect on trees. It therefore is very unlikely that EM-fields play any role in the occurence of the tree disease and the cause of that should be sought in another direction.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 02:36
|
|
|
Seems rather unsurprising, correlation is not causation and all of that.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 02:40
|
|
|
Honest question I always wondered about. Why didnt they try to capture bin laden instead of shoot on site?
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 05:15
|
|
|
cr0y posted:Honest question I always wondered about. Why didnt they try to capture bin laden instead of shoot on site? They did try to capture him alive, it didn't work out. He wasn't shoot on sight. If they just wanted him dead, they'd have simply dropped a few bombs on the place. But what they wanted was to capture as many people and as much info on site as possible.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 05:22
|
|
|
cr0y posted:Honest question I always wondered about. Why didnt they try to capture bin laden instead of shoot on site? It was one of those snap choice decisions and if it came down to risking one of the Seals getting shot vs. Taking in Bin Laden dead they went with the latter.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 05:38
|
|
|
Plus I don't think it counts as a crazy conspiracy theory to suggest that taking him alive wasn't even much of an actual mission priority. Obama's got wayyyy fewer headaches if he comes back in a bag, not because it wasn't him or something, but because he doesn't have half the country screaming about why we gotta do all this "trial" nonsense. And everybody involved in the mission knows this.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 12:45
|
|
|
I'm 100% sure that bringing him back to the US alive was never part of the mission. There are two things they can do with him in that situation. Put him on trial (which would have been a clusterfuck) or throw him in Guantanamo forever. Both of those outcomes have much the same set of downsides and create a continuing problem for as long as OBL is still alive. Even if he was captured alive, I'd be willing to bet that the mission parameters were 'shoot him as soon as expedient'.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 12:56
|
|
|
So Kim Dotcom, a man who hates attention, is busting Richgate wide open, right? He says he knew Rich and that he definitely was in contact with wikileaks and he was the leaker, totally.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 13:10
|
|
|
Helen Highwater posted:I'm 100% sure that bringing him back to the US alive was never part of the mission. There are two things they can do with him in that situation. Put him on trial (which would have been a clusterfuck) or throw him in Guantanamo forever. Both of those outcomes have much the same set of downsides and create a continuing problem for as long as OBL is still alive. Even if he was captured alive, I'd be willing to bet that the mission parameters were 'shoot him as soon as expedient'. They probably would have given him a show trial like saddam.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 15:19
|
|
|
RagnarokAngel posted:They probably would have given him a show trial like saddam. Saddam was tried by the Iraqi government not by the US. The two situations are not remotely comparable.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 15:41
|
|
|
Helen Highwater posted:Saddam was tried by the Iraqi government not by the US. The two situations are not remotely comparable. Oh I'm well aware but lol if you think the us government didn't hand him over knowing they'd get what they wanted. It was a show trial. Not that he didn't deserve it, I feel he did, but if there was any doubt the Iraqi government would pardon him they absolutely wouldn't have handed him over in the first place.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 15:54
|
|
|
I feel like "show trial" is a little unfair given that he didn't exactly hide his dictating. Like a show trial is usually used to suggest you've rigged the result, if the defendant does that themselves that's not quite the same.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 16:17
|
|
|
The idea that Bin Ladin had anything to do with those towers was disproven. Bin Ladin wasn't the man "killed" by the military without a trial that was all made up. If he was ever killed at all it happened at Tora Bora. It is a myth like Mohamed Atta. I think I need a photo op.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 18:44
|
|
|
FecLives posted:The idea that Bin Ladin had anything to do with those towers was disproven. Bin Ladin wasn't the man "killed" by the military without a trial that was all made up. If he was ever killed at all it happened at Tora Bora. It is a myth like Mohamed Atta. I think I need a photo op. Sir, I asked if you wanted fries with that.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 19:54
|
|
|
FecLives posted:The idea that Bin Ladin had anything to do with those towers was disproven. Bin Ladin wasn't the man "killed" by the military without a trial that was all made up. If he was ever killed at all it happened at Tora Bora. It is a myth like Mohamed Atta. I think I need a photo op. Well you see so-called "Bin Laden" was only his LEGAL name so the LEGAL FICTION of "Bin Laden" as killed but the PERSON WHO IS BIN LADEN is actually immortal.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 20:07
|
|
|
You can't prove Pakistan even EXISTS.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 20:44
|
|
|
Why can't we get the cool conspiracy guys like why isn't Immortal Technique posting?
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 20:51
|
|
|
Skinty McEdger posted:100 push ups, 100 sit ups, 100 squats and 10 km of running. Every single day. Constrict anus 100 times and dent navel 100 times, and you can good-bye depression, too!
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 21:00
|
|
|
Make that a plain burger, no kechup, no mayo, nothing, just the buns and the hamburger patty. I'm sorry you removed your post about the fries. I was responding to you. Thanks for reposting El Puerco fucked around with this message at 21:51 on May 22, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 22, 2017 21:46
|
|
|
FecLives posted:The idea that Bin Ladin had anything to do with those towers was disproven. Bin Ladin wasn't the man "killed" by the military without a trial that was all made up. If he was ever killed at all it happened at Tora Bora. It is a myth like Mohamed Atta. I think I need a photo op. Sir this is really outside the scope of my training as a furniture salesman
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 00:15
|
|
|
Well then, I would like a Steelcase Desk circa 1980, AKA the " Tank Desk" and a Steelcase chair to go with.
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 00:32
|
|
|
I knew Nanking denial existed in Japan and certain circles but this is the first time I've seen anyone cite ghosts as evidence. http://eng.the-liberty.com/2014/5260/ quote:Master Ryuho Okawa of Happy Science Group called forth the spirit of Iris Chang to find out the truth. Since we don't have a 'PYF Conspiracy Theory' thread I'm posting this here. I"m torn between sobbing and laughing at that, it's all just so disgusting, even by the extremely low standards of atrocity deniers.
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 04:54
|
|
|
Yeah, that's new to me as well.
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 11:29
|
|
|
Nckdictator posted:I knew Nanking denial existed in Japan and certain circles but this is the first time I've seen anyone cite ghosts as evidence. On the plus side, it will inspire new generations of leftist necromancers to study the dark arts.  We need a new generation to be trained before the older generation ascends to lichdom and loses interest in mortal affairs.Edit: ..."Happy Science Group"? Someone assure me this is a mistranslation.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 01:50
|
|
|
GreyjoyBastard posted:On the plus side, it will inspire new generations of leftist necromancers to study the dark arts. Unfortunately...  That's just the political arm of the cult, fortunately they aren't very successful.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 02:56
|
|
|
I've been watching ufo videos on youtube, some of them would be kind of plausable if it weren't for the fact that the people who post them are always crazies who think science is a scam and the world is going to end this year. That and the horrible clickbait titles/thumbnails.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2017 06:50
|
|
|
So there's a huge fire in a 24 story residential building in London at the moment. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/live/2017/jun/14/grenfell-tower-major-fire-london-apartment-block-white-city-latimer-road I wonder how many conspiracy theorists are masturbating right now, saying "It's not collapsing!"
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2017 09:53
|
|
|
Yup, you called it:
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2017 14:09
|
|
|
That's just barely enough to make sense if you don't think about it at all and hit yourself in the head with a rock a few times so yeah it's going to spread like wildfire.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2017 14:22
|
|
|
Ugh.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2017 14:25
|
|
|
So this shooting in Virginia this morning... It was against Republicans, so that would make this not a false flag, in Infowars-land, right?
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2017 14:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 08:45 |
|
|
brylcreem posted:So there's a huge fire in a 24 story residential building in London at the moment. The reddit thread about it started getting swarmed with "Huh, strange how it didn't fall into its own footprint like a certain other building" conspiracy retards not long after it hit the front page. E: Also "Which muslims did this" people from the Trump subreddit. Fishstick fucked around with this message at 15:00 on Jun 14, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2017 14:58
|
|
