|
VikingSkull posted:do you seriously believe that firing the FBI Director ends investigations the FBI has ongoing? you seriously believe that? Trump does apparently
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:09 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 19:52 |
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:You're basing your information off what, where did this report come from. Who said it. Where is proof Where's yours?
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:10 |
|
Snatch Duster posted:It was on cspan.... In other words, you misremembered, because as usual, you don't know what you're talking about. VikingSkull posted:precedent is a dangerous thing to set when you do so down party lines Well, yeah, but keep in mind, it was Trump who threatened Clinton directly in a debate by saying that he was going to get a special prosecutor to "look into her situation." "Her situation" being "EMAILS." I'm not saying we should lock Trump up based on the criteria he laid out in his case against Clinton, because that criteria was insane, but let's face the facts: the dude kind of escalated poo poo over the past couple years.
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:10 |
|
Bholder posted:Trump does apparently Which changes things...how?
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:10 |
|
Aesop Poprock posted:when did this happen. There are literally no breaking reports or tweets about this anywhere here you go
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:11 |
|
It's not even about the actual Russian conspiracy anymore but I totally believe that Trump is such a flailing idiot that he's miring himself so deep in this quagmire that he'll hang himself on Obstruction or some poo poo trying to force it to go away instead of just kicking back and letting it die quietly. I will applaud all of this for no higher reason than to watch all the "11d chess MAGA" idiots be proven they worship a dunce.
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:12 |
|
Her exact words were "attorney general or senior officials at the department of justice" Which of those is Trump?
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:12 |
|
Lemming posted:Her exact words were "attorney general or senior officials at the department of justice" lmao
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:13 |
|
A Typical Goon posted:lol like who gives a poo poo if the idiotic national embarrassment of a president committed a felony Hhahahahahah This is what liberals actually believe
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:13 |
|
Bholder posted:Where's yours? Actually you need to provide evidence to prove guilt. Not just "A RANDOM SOURCE SAID UGGGHGHH You're talking about accusing the president of treason lmao
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:13 |
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:You're basing your information off what, where did this report come from. Who said it. Where is proof Are you just one of those people who won't believe unsourced reporting, which is one of the most important aspects of journalism? Here's a good example of why it's almost certainly 100% true: The WH is not refuting it and is in fact just just escalating attacks on Comey quote:"The President has always emphasized the importance of making deals with Russia as it relates to Syria, Ukraine, defeating ISIS and other key issues for the benefit and safety of the American people," Spicer said in a statement to CNN. "By grandstanding and politicizing the investigation into Russia's actions, James Comey created unnecessary pressure on our ability to engage and negotiate with Russia."
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:13 |
|
VikingSkull posted:lmao Your entire argument is dependent on being technically incorrect when talking about someone who's been a lawyer for like 30 years
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:14 |
|
Snatch Duster posted:Is there a recording of Trump saying that in the closed door meeting with the Russian minister? I would very much like to hear it. Well there's a good thing it's been a slow couple Newsweek and nothing has changed in the two week since then...
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:14 |
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:Actually you need to provide evidence to prove guilt. There is more evidence that Keith Obermann committed treason than Trump lol.
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:15 |
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:Actually you need to provide evidence to prove guilt. They had proof. That's how journalism works. You don't have to reveal your sources at the scene, and in fact doing so could prove harmful to both the quality of reporting and to the person reported as the source. Are you entirely ignorant on this.
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:15 |
|
Lemming posted:Your entire argument is dependent on being technically incorrect when talking about someone who's been a lawyer for like 30 years I mean, I figure that would have been a good time for him to go public with what he had instead of waiting until after he got fired so he didn't look like a vindictive oval office making poo poo up He is a fine, upstanding person, and a great American, after all
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:15 |
|
T.S. Smelliot posted:Hhahahahahah You believe Trump is going to come out of this undamaged. This is what Trumpenproles actually believe.
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:15 |
|
Aesop Poprock posted:Are you just one of those people who won't believe unsourced reporting, which is one of the most important aspects of journalism? he won't accept Trump's own words because 'lol the dudes just a jokester.' there is no standard od proof strong enough if it paints Trump poorly, he's just sending you on goose chases.
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:17 |
|
VikingSkull posted:I mean, I figure that would have been a good time for him to go public with what he had instead of waiting until after he got fired so he didn't look like a vindictive oval office making poo poo up I think Comey sucks balls but that doesn't mean he didn't get all his ducks in a row to obliterate Trump if he got fired lol
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:17 |
|
I'm willing to bet one of those anonymous insiders is Spicer himself
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:17 |
|
Aesop Poprock posted:They had proof. That's how journalism works. You don't have to reveal your sources at the scene, and in fact doing so could prove harmful to both the quality of reporting and to the person reported as the source. Are you entirely ignorant on this. It's about ethics in yellow rag journalism Lol
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:17 |
|
VikingSkull posted:I mean, I figure that would have been a good time for him to go public with what he had instead of waiting until after he got fired so he didn't look like a vindictive oval office making poo poo up You are aware that the actual obstruction of justice was he firing of Comey which happened after the congressional testimony right? Are you being purposely disingenuous or are you just a retard
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:18 |
|
VikingSkull posted:I mean, I figure that would have been a good time for him to go public with what he had instead of waiting until after he got fired so he didn't look like a vindictive oval office making poo poo up Nobody thinks Comey is good as a human being but that doesn't mean he's not useful for bringing down Trump and Trump isn''t a total moron for thinking he could get away with firing him in the middle of an investigation unscathed
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:19 |
|
A Typical Goon posted:You are aware that the actual obstruction of justice was he firing of Comey which happened after the congressional testimony right? Hahahaha how is replacing the director of the fbi obstruction of justice. The investigation can still continue without Comey.
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:19 |
|
A Typical Goon posted:You are aware that the actual obstruction of justice was he firing of Comey which happened after the congressional testimony right? Trump supporters are about as mentally sophisticated as Trump
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:20 |
|
I swear these idiots lapping up this poo poo believe that the world is a film nior or something loving lmao.
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:21 |
|
Snatch Duster posted:It's about ethics in yellow rag journalism Jesus Christ dude research even the bare minimum of what checks and balances journalists and editors do before releasing reports like this. The dude 100% said what was reported.
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:21 |
|
Snatch Duster posted:Hahahaha how is replacing the director of the fbi obstruction of justice. The investigation can still continue without Comey. Because he just admitted his intent.
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:21 |
|
Lemming posted:I think Comey sucks balls but that doesn't mean he didn't get all his ducks in a row to obliterate Trump if he got fired lol A Typical Goon posted:You are aware that the actual obstruction of justice was he firing of Comey which happened after the congressional testimony right? Aesop Poprock posted:Nobody thinks Comey is good as a human being but that doesn't mean he's not useful for bringing down Trump and Trump isn''t a total moron for thinking he could get away with firing him in the middle of an investigation unscathed it is totally not a problem that the FBI Director withheld information from Congress that Trump asked for an investigation into one of his associates be ended in fact, it's good that he kept an ace in the hole in the event he was fired
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:21 |
|
Snatch Duster posted:Hahahaha how is replacing the director of the fbi obstruction of justice. The investigation can still continue without Comey. http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/332741-comey-sought-funding-increase-for-russia-probe-before-firing-report What a coincidence huh
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:22 |
|
Snatch Duster posted:Hahahaha how is replacing the director of the fbi obstruction of justice. When he's investigating the President, and it's the President who fires him, that's pretty much a textbook case of obstruction of justice.
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:22 |
|
VikingSkull posted:it is totally not a problem that the FBI Director withheld information from Congress that Trump asked for an investigation into one of his associates be ended Looks that way yeah. But don't you guys think this information is like false or something why do you even care. If Comey's lying or whatever you're trying to pretzel your mind around (I can't even tell what your arguments are at this point) then he's the one who will eat poo poo
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:23 |
|
Aesop Poprock posted:Jesus Christ dude research even the bare minimum of what checks and balances journalists and editors do before releasing reports like this. The dude 100% said what was reported. You consider media outlets that seriously report on how many scoops of ice cream the president had after a meal credible source of unbiased information? Get the gently caress out of here lol.
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:23 |
|
Snatch Duster posted:Hahahaha how is replacing the director of the fbi obstruction of justice. The investigation can still continue without Comey.
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:24 |
|
VikingSkull posted:it is totally not a problem that the FBI Director withheld information from Congress that Trump asked for an investigation into one of his associates be ended Comey sucking doesn't make Trump suck any less, no matter how hard you believe it does
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:24 |
|
Majorian posted:When he's investigating the President, and it's the President who fires him, that's pretty much a textbook case of obstruction of justice. Comey was the only man on the case. No one else. poo poo idiots believe.
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:24 |
|
Aesop Poprock posted:Looks that way yeah. But don't you guys think this information is like false or something why do you even care I've never said that Trump was clean in this what I've always maintained was that the media and numerous parts of the government are corrupt as gently caress and if any of them want me to believe anything they say, they better have goddamn proof that doesn't require me to take their word for it
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:24 |
|
Snatch Duster posted:You consider media outlets that seriously report on how many scoops of ice cream the president had after a meal credible source of unbiased information? You just tried to use a quote from Comey from half a month ago before Trump actually obviously obstructed justice to prove that he didn't. Why the gently caress should anyone take even a single word you say seriously They shouldn't already, because you're Snatch Duster and a proven liar and exaggerator but you're not doing yourself any favors on this very page
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:25 |
|
VikingSkull posted:I've never said that Trump was clean in this Every post you make is defending Trump
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:26 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 19:52 |
|
Trey Gowdy is skeptical of the whole Russia thing and obsfruction of justics. He is legit good dude and has head for these justice.
|
# ? May 19, 2017 22:26 |