|
Why? Why on earth would they include engine production separate from airframe production?
|
# ? May 18, 2017 17:21 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 04:23 |
Flavius Belisarius posted:Why? Why on earth would they include engine production separate from airframe production? Strategic bombing is a major factor - this way the Allies can get lucky and shut down several models of aircraft by damaging the engine production, and the Empire can reallocate production to compensate.
|
|
# ? May 18, 2017 17:26 |
|
G4M's should be using the Mitsubishi Ha-32 engines, of which you only have 13 in your pool; enough for 6 aircraft.
|
# ? May 18, 2017 17:49 |
|
Jobbo_Fett posted:G4M's should be using the Mitsubishi Ha-32 engines, of which you only have 13 in your pool; enough for 6 aircraft. The spare can be shared between them.
|
# ? May 18, 2017 17:51 |
|
Flavius Belisarius posted:Why? Why on earth would they include engine production separate from airframe production? Gnoman posted:Strategic bombing is a major factor - this way the Allies can get lucky and shut down several models of aircraft by damaging the engine production, and the Empire can reallocate production to compensate. Its much more about the fact that Japan had a hard time developing "proper" and good aero engines, due to a combined lack of special materials, capable workforce, inter-service cooperation, and overall industrial output. If you look at late-war examples, its clear that the Japanese could create engines with thousands of horsepower, but they also generally suffered from a lack of high-altitude capability. The lack of rarer and high quality metals meant that they couldn't build engines that had higher tolerances for heat such as those of the Americans. And its a grog game.
|
# ? May 18, 2017 17:54 |
|
Jobbo_Fett posted:And its a grog game. This is actually the only correct answer. This is a game that makes you manage airframes separately from engines... but abstracts all non-oil supplies into "supplies" and generates hundreds of thousands of troops from specific cities, even of those cities are literally surrounded and besieged. The logistics engine is hugely inconsistent in where it chooses to be detailed vs. abstracted, which is entirely typical of grog games.
|
# ? May 18, 2017 20:31 |
18 May 1943 German minesweeper M.345, sunk during the night by RAF Beaufighters off Gravelines.
|
|
# ? May 18, 2017 21:38 |
|
With combat that one-sided, they really ought to allow you to board and capture the ships.
|
# ? May 18, 2017 23:23 |
|
Grey Hunter posted:I have nearly twice the US score at the moment. Once the troops in China are freed up, I can try and take Namou, which will get us there with the total shift - Efate will add a few hundred more points when I go after that - the question then is if I go after Fiji or Australia. Came across this in the Matrix forum today and thought of you Grey. Maybe this is why you can't upgrade some of your squadrons? some grog posted:Air units which are not scheduled to withdraw can be manually upgraded if there is 1 airframe in the pools. Units which are scheduled to withdraw can only be manually upgraded if the full TOE complement in airframes are in the pool. For automatic upgrades the full complement is necessary to be in the pool for both PDU OFF and PDU ON. Regarding Fiji or Australia, it seems like you are vulnerable to the Allies bypassing your position in the South Pacific by supplying Australia through Cape Town and Aden, which just opened. If they can do that they can strike your resource centers in the DEI and wreck your economy. Do you already hold Darwin? If your goal is to prevent the Allies from using Australia as a base to invade your empire from the south you should take Darwin and maybe Perth. This would deny them to the Allies and add depth to your defense of the DEI. Fiji doesn't give you anything because they can route convoys around it or supply Australia from the west. If your goal is to score victory points then that might be backwards. I don't know how much the bases are worth. e: haha, I just searched the thread and found the failed Darwin invasion of November '42. Disregard my question about Darwin. Trogilus fucked around with this message at 04:11 on May 19, 2017 |
# ? May 19, 2017 04:05 |
|
He can totally take Darwin if he just lands one hex away from it though, landing directly in the city is pretty much the only thing that killed him last time.
|
# ? May 19, 2017 04:15 |
|
RZApublican posted:He can totally take Darwin if he just lands one hex away from it though, landing directly in the city is pretty much the only thing that killed him last time. "Grey attempts a naval gunfight with a continent." and "Grey destroys the entire USN CV fleet." are the extremes of bumbling and incredible brilliance I tune in for, though.
|
# ? May 19, 2017 04:19 |
|
RZApublican posted:He can totally take Darwin if he just lands one hex away from it though, landing directly in the city is pretty much the only thing that killed him last time. You're no fun.
|
# ? May 19, 2017 04:24 |
|
RZApublican posted:He can totally take Darwin if he just lands one hex away from it though, landing directly in the city is pretty much the only thing that killed him last time. Dieppe Raid with Battleships.
|
# ? May 19, 2017 04:44 |
|
Take Darwin. You don't need to land in a neighboring hex. Just do a proper invasion. Base bombers at Koepang. Fly recon out of Merauke or Timor and get your detection level up on Darwin. Base a DMS squadron somewhere nearby and sweep for mines at night. Move AKEs to support sustained bombardment. Bombard with BBs from 5k+ yards and if you don't take too much damage work them closer the next night. Strike Darwin with the KB and then land. It will be awesome. Trogilus fucked around with this message at 05:35 on May 19, 2017 |
# ? May 19, 2017 05:20 |
|
Actually ignore Darwin and hit Perth they won't be expecting it! Or even better Auckland, I am pretty sure the entire NZ army is dead at this point.
|
# ? May 19, 2017 05:54 |
|
Concentrate your fire! Oh for the love of.... This is a effective bombing run! Thank the Emperor for the boys in Burma. Now this is interesting, we took a base. I don't remember sending these guys marching north, but it would have been months ago during my (more) sleep addled phase. But they just took a base with level 3 forts!
|
# ? May 19, 2017 18:01 |
|
Onwards to Chengtu!
|
# ? May 19, 2017 18:10 |
|
This has me curious. How is the rest of China looking? Notably, the north - there are a few bases with oil/refinery production points up there (Lanchow in particular) that you'd do well to pick up if you haven't already. Also, do you have enough spare AV on hand to send to Chengtu to see how well defended it actually is? Removing its production would be a huge win. Finally, most of those remote bases up in the desert are also worth a fair number of victory points if you build them up. If you want to feel a bit better about those bombers, you might check the Aircraft Losses screen and sort by operational losses. I would expect at least some of those damaged planes get written off. The allies only get 33 replacement B-24D1s/month, so if they're losing more than 1/day, you're still outpacing production.
|
# ? May 20, 2017 07:14 |
|
Curse all Dutch subs. Just one? I'm disappointed. Grumble, grumble, broad side of a barn. Another day of losing fighters to bombers. Bloody Dutch subs.
|
# ? May 20, 2017 17:27 |
20 May 1943 British minesweeper Fantôme, stern blown off by mine off Cape Bon, written off as a total constructive loss.
|
|
# ? May 20, 2017 19:01 |
|
OpenlyEvilJello posted:20 May 1943 Great job there boys
|
# ? May 20, 2017 19:34 |
|
Slippery42 posted:If you want to feel a bit better about those bombers, you might check the Aircraft Losses screen and sort by operational losses. I would expect at least some of those damaged planes get written off. The allies only get 33 replacement B-24D1s/month, so if they're losing more than 1/day, you're still outpacing production. Remember though replacement numbers don't matter for the AI, they get more planes.
|
# ? May 20, 2017 20:20 |
|
bunnyofdoom posted:Great job there boys The good news: we found some mines. The bad news: the mines found us first.
|
# ? May 20, 2017 20:34 |
|
Every ship can be a minesweeper. ...Once.
|
# ? May 20, 2017 22:25 |
|
For a second I thought that ship reported sunk at the very end of Grey's last update was the famous Windrush that brought the first major wave of Jamaican immigrants to the UK just after ww2, appears to be a different ship though.
|
# ? May 21, 2017 06:19 |
|
Curse their sniper planes. The Liberators keep on coming. Get off my rail line! At least our plane losses have slowed. Unlucky buggers.
|
# ? May 21, 2017 21:01 |
|
Liberators be Liberatin'
|
# ? May 22, 2017 03:56 |
|
Is there an average chance that a damaged Liberator crashes on the way home?
|
# ? May 22, 2017 04:58 |
|
Flavius Belisarius posted:Is there an average chance that a damaged Liberator crashes on the way home? Yes, damaged planes have a higher chance of not returning or crashing on landing. They become "Operational Losses" in the Strategic Report/Intelligence screen. But we don't know if yesterdays 2 allied ops losses are 4e bombers or single engine fighters. But you'll always suffer some ops losses, even if all planes are undamaged. WWII planes be crashing all on their own quite a lot. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equipment_losses_in_World_War_II#Air posted:China: Total losses of the Nationalist Air Force were 2,468 (According to Chinese and Taiwanese Sources).
|
# ? May 22, 2017 22:19 |
|
Curses! A troop ship! Do you know how much those planes cost? Do you think they grow on trees. We finally get some revenge. Enemy bombers are getting more and more deadly. I think I'm going to hate to see their fighters. drat, that must have been an old wound.
|
# ? May 23, 2017 04:26 |
|
You know you're a day behind, right? Just asking, no pressure
|
# ? May 24, 2017 00:04 |
|
Leperflesh posted:You know you're a day behind, right? Just asking, no pressure Posts are coming out on date for me.
|
# ? May 24, 2017 00:41 |
|
Oh, I see: the date in the leading banner is wrong, but the end of the post intelligence report says may 23rd.
|
# ? May 24, 2017 00:53 |
|
I used to get confused about the schedule but then I switched to night shift and now all of Grey's updates are on time. You guys should try it!
|
# ? May 24, 2017 00:56 |
|
Leperflesh posted:Oh, I see: the date in the leading banner is wrong, but the end of the post intelligence report says may 23rd. The intelligence report is always a day ahead, because it reports on the previous day. It can't tell you how the day's turn played out, since it hasn't yet.
|
# ? May 24, 2017 01:08 |
|
Oh, right OK in that case yeah, today is May 23rd, except for places on Earth where it's already May 24th (which include the UK as of this post), but Grey just posted the update for May 22nd.
|
# ? May 24, 2017 01:12 |
|
Grey is posting on Hawaii time atm, it happens.
|
# ? May 24, 2017 01:16 |
|
Leperflesh posted:Oh, right OK in that case yeah, today is May 23rd, except for places on Earth where it's already May 24th (which include the UK as of this post), but Grey just posted the update for May 22nd. Grey posted the update for May 22nd on May 22nd, 23:26 EST, sometimes he posts late
|
# ? May 24, 2017 01:22 |
|
Here we go again! Erm... Here we go again! Dammit! I should not have mentioned enemy fighters yesterday! I swear the AI reads this thread sometimes. Okay, their planes can go home now. Jobbo_Fett posted:Grey posted the update for May 22nd on May 22nd, 23:26 EST, sometimes he posts late Its still the 23rd in hawaii!
|
# ? May 24, 2017 04:21 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 04:23 |
|
They got p40s in range?
|
# ? May 24, 2017 17:49 |