|
New Larry Cohen doc looks pretty great. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SPblr7nKaYw
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 17:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 21:56 |
|
|
ruddiger posted:New Larry Cohen doc looks pretty great. Goddamn, Fred Williamson is looking good for a guy pushing 80.
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 19:13
|
|
|
New Spider-Man trailer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0D3AOldjMU
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 12:12
|
|
|
The MSJ posted:New Spider-Man trailer Man that looks super fun and cool.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 13:20
|
|
|
Movie fight potential is not lookin' good.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 14:54
|
|
|
Yeah, that...doesn't look good. I do like how "warm" it looks, though, it reminds me of Kick-rear end.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 15:06
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bcIlQFPbPnM
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 15:45
|
|
|
Gangsta's Paradise is certainly a novel song to put over that trailer. Will watch, but it opens against Dunkirk iirc, so it's probably boned.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 15:51
|
|
|
The MSJ posted:New Spider-Man trailer Looks genuinely amazing, love how coming-of-age it is. This is the Spidey I've wanted for years. Looks like a visual feast but it's probably going to be a narrative mess with two horribly miscast leads.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 16:10
|
|
|
Valerian looks way better than Spider-man.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 16:14
|
|
|
MacheteZombie posted:Valerian looks way better than Spider-man. or Dunkirk, for that matter.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 16:34
|
|
|
Uncle Boogeyman posted:or Dunkirk, for that matter. I haven't watched the trailer but figured that was a joke since I haven't heard anyone talk about Dunkirk.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 16:35
|
|
|
MacheteZombie posted:I haven't watched the trailer but figured that was a joke since I haven't heard anyone talk about Dunkirk. It's neat in theory that Nolan is doing a war movie but apart from the first teaser the trailers really haven't been that impressive.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 16:39
|
|
|
Some film nerd really needs to do an analysis of the ratio of trailer quality to film quality because there's definitely some correlation to be sussed out
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 17:17
|
|
|
The MSJ posted:New Spider-Man trailer new international trailer too that's completely different https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xY4qZwfSI-o
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 17:25
|
|
|
That long 3rd person shot tracking through different environments was super videogamey....but super cool Not sure if I'll roll with it but i think besson earned my ticket with the dozens of times I've watched the 5th Element Dunkirk looks like an awful experience and a bore
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 17:28
|
|
|
Looks great. But one goon mentioned that while Valerian will probably be a good movie, it's likely going to flop at the box office. I'm inclined to agree.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 17:31
|
|
|
That international trailer for Spidey makes me want a whole FF Spider-man flick.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 17:42
|
|
|
Deakul posted:Looks like a visual feast but it's probably going to be a narrative mess with two horribly miscast leads. That's weird, I feel EXACTLY the opposite of this.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 17:58
|
|
|
MacheteZombie posted:That international trailer for Spidey makes me want a whole FF Spider-man flick. Well, you're in luck!
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 18:00
|
|
|
Valerian looks visually really nice, but the fact they haven't really given us any idea what it's going to be about and have avoided showing too much of the leads (who I agree are miscast, in the eyes of the common folk) makes me think they know their problems and hope people line up for the visuals and Besson alone. It's gonna tank. Spiderman looks visually like total poo poo, like bad even for a Marvel film. But I guess they are going for the teenage melodrama angle so it's fitting it looks like Dawson's Creek or some poo poo you would have stumbled on when channel surfing 15 years ago.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 18:11
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zxrpNbjwBc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=giYeaKsXnsI edit: I guess this isn't a movie.. but here it is anyway
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 18:15
|
|
|
Trailer shows too much no need to see movie Trailer shows too little movie must be bad
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 18:18
|
|
|
Are you guys fans of the graphic novel, or what are you basing the miscast thing on
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 18:24
|
|
|
morestuff posted:Are you guys fans of the graphic novel, or what are you basing the miscast thing on "its the girl from Suicide Squad and the bad guy in Chronicle, totally miscast"
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 18:26
|
|
|
morestuff posted:Are you guys fans of the graphic novel, or what are you basing the miscast thing on I think people just think they look weird, which they do, but that's a plus for me.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 18:28
|
|
|
MacheteZombie posted:Trailer shows too much no need to see movie I would usually agree that not showing much of the plot would be a good thing, but in this case it just feels that there is nothing to show, or it is so generic they don't bother. I remember people saying the same for Suicide Squad's trailers, like how awesome it is that the studio won't "reveal too much of the plot", as if there were any. But I might be wrong, and I hope I am, but having studied and worked in the industry for a decade, I'm too loving cynical and pessimistic to put my trust into studios' efforts. I guess the potential trainwreck-aspect is the only thing I will get any enjoyment out of. And regarding the miscasting; yeah I think they look weird. I have to think about what the public would want, and Dane Dehaan's school shooter vibe mixed with Delevingne's indifference for everything -attitude aren't really welcoming. But what do I know. They may have millions of instagram followers or whatever. Oh, and they aren't that good at acting to hide those aforementioned problems. not trolled not crying fucked around with this message at 18:37 on May 24, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 18:28
|
|
|
morestuff posted:Are you guys fans of the graphic novel, or what are you basing the miscast thing on I don't like the actors, pretty much. They're both terrible in everything I've ever seen them in.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 18:28
|
|
|
Valerian looks cool. These other movies look like poo poo.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 18:43
|
|
|
Deakul posted:I don't like the actors, pretty much. I can see Cara, she hasn't really been in anything noteworthy except Suicide Squad and she was arguably the best part of that movie. So you hated (based off IMDB) her mermaid appearance in Pan? Dane Dehaan is IMO amazing in everything - he brings a great, intense presence and I think he's gonna be our next breakout star. He pretty much owned the part in Chronicle and carried the entire movie.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 18:46
|
|
|
teagone posted:Looks great. But one goon mentioned that while Valerian will probably be a good movie, it's likely going to flop at the box office. Well yes, it is this generation's The Fifth Element after all. 
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 18:54
|
|
|
morestuff posted:Are you guys fans of the graphic novel, or what are you basing the miscast thing on Dane Dehaan has huge bags under his eyes that give him a less than heroic appearance, but works really well for something like Chronicle where he's meant to be this sort of outcast loser. He's a fine actor, though, just has the sort of appearance that would work more for a character actor than an action lead. That being said, I have no idea what actor/actress in their 20s-30s with the charisma to lead an action movie nowadays, although someone will likely share a choice that is blindingly obvious.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 18:54
|
|
|
not trolled not crying posted:Valerian looks visually really nice, but the fact they haven't really given us any idea what it's going to be about and have avoided showing too much of the leads (who I agree are miscast, in the eyes of the common folk) makes me think they know their problems and hope people line up for the visuals and Besson alone. The trailer says that they're under attack from "an unknown force" and Valerian and Laureline's mission is to discover who they are within the next 10 hours so it looks like they're keeping the villains under their hat so as to avoid spoilers. That really hamstrings them in terms of showing conflict or revealing aspects of the plot in the trailer when they can't even show the bad guys, which is really unfortunate.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 19:04
|
|
|
Uncle Boogeyman posted:I think people just think they look weird, which they do, but that's a plus for me. They look like a weird brother and sister, which is fantastic.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 19:08
|
|
|
Game of Thrones: 
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 19:14
|
|
|
HUNDU THE BEAST GOD posted:They look like a weird brother and sister, which is fantastic.  Their weird face bones feel like a good match for the movie's overall vibe
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 19:16
|
|
|
The original Valerian is a tall square-jawed man of action who can punch his way out of any situation Dane Dehaan is pretty much the opposite of that. But I'll go and see the film anyway, I'm sure he'll be fine.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 19:27
|
|
|
He started out that way, but in later stories is written as much more of a dope.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 19:31
|
|
|
Snowglobe of Doom posted:The original Valerian is a tall square-jawed man of action who can punch his way out of any situation And then spends most of the stories not doing that. MacheteZombie posted:He started out that way, but in later stories is written as much more of a dope.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 19:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 21:56 |
|
|
Snowglobe of Doom posted:Well yes, it is this generation's The Fifth Element after all. The Fifth Element did ok at the box office though, no? It was in the top 10 for world wide box office results in 1997 — $260 million world wide on a ~$90 million dollar budget.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 20:33
|
|