|
Blue Train posted:Yea they just molest the vulnerable young men Let's be honest, if there's something both faiths agree on it's organized pedophilia
|
# ? May 25, 2017 01:22 |
|
|
# ? May 12, 2024 20:07 |
|
Nerses IV posted:Let's be honest, if there's something both faiths agree on it's organized pedophilia Fair
|
# ? May 25, 2017 01:22 |
|
Super good ideas Catholicism and Islam had: Make a bunch of men self enforce celibacy on pain of Hell. Have people trust them implicitly as authority figures. Then surround them alone with children. One of them is still doin it tho XxXCaptainNoxXxX fucked around with this message at 01:26 on May 25, 2017 |
# ? May 25, 2017 01:23 |
|
Agag posted:The savage musselman will never possess the creative, individualist mind of a Roof or a Breivik. Who knows how you got this from my post, but if you wanna defend old men abusing the mentally ill to destroy innocent civilians, go right ahead. I'm sure your tolerance will be looked upon kindly when you look over flourishing glades and fountains of your afterlife, and into the sea of burning copper where all those kids are rightfully receiving the unbeliever's just rewards.
|
# ? May 25, 2017 01:25 |
|
FisheyStix posted:Who knows how you got this from my post, but if you wanna defend old men abusing the mentally ill to destroy innocent civilians, go right ahead. I'm sure your tolerance will be looked upon kindly when you look over flourishing glades and fountains of your afterlife, and into the sea of burning copper where all those kids are rightfully receiving the unbeliever's just rewards. FisheyStix posted:Yeah, but islam is the only one that I know of that actively recruits unstable young men to kill themselves and murder as many women and children as possible. At least when a christian goes nuts and shoots up the place, he has the balls to do it of his own crazy accord instead of being lured and baited into it by old men. Brown guys do mass shootings like this. But white guys do mass shootings like this.
|
# ? May 25, 2017 01:41 |
|
So are people realizing with the UK terrorist leaks that the enemies (US leakers) of their enemy (Trump) aren't actually their friend and have a specific agenda they want to accomplish?
|
# ? May 25, 2017 01:43 |
|
savages IDIOTS SAVAGES SAVAGE IDIOTS .... IDIOTS! -dennis reynolds
|
# ? May 25, 2017 01:44 |
|
lol sounds like someone's a little bit raaaaaacist
|
# ? May 25, 2017 01:45 |
|
i love the attempt at diverting attention away from the train wreck that is islam onto christianity lol
|
# ? May 25, 2017 01:49 |
|
SilkyP posted:i love the attempt at diverting attention away from the train wreck that is islam onto christianity lol Good thing I can hate on both at once. Multi-track drifting!!
|
# ? May 25, 2017 01:50 |
|
islam is tied with the mormons for worst origin story
|
# ? May 25, 2017 01:53 |
|
XxXCaptainNoxXxX posted:Super good ideas Catholicism and Islam had: Make a bunch of men self enforce celibacy on pain of Hell. Have people trust them implicitly as authority figures. Then surround them alone with children. What part of islam has celibacy
|
# ? May 25, 2017 02:01 |
|
XxXCaptainNoxXxX posted:Super good ideas Catholicism and Islam had: Make a bunch of men self enforce celibacy on pain of Hell. Have people trust them implicitly as authority figures. Then surround them alone with children. Celibacy just means that you can't get married. You're thinking of chastity. And since they're forbidden from marriage, that means there's no possibility that the sex they have is premarital. Therefore, Catholic priests can screw all they want and it's not a sin. Bing bang boom! Get rekt God!!!
|
# ? May 25, 2017 02:02 |
|
Sometimes I wonder if these threads, even though they have a lot of vitriol involved, aren't a way for us to try to collectively recover from how lovely this kind of thing is. re-reading the first few pages is scary and awful. anything that follows those kinds of tweets and poo poo is an improvement over the first few pages.
|
# ? May 25, 2017 02:07 |
|
Ork of Fiction posted:Bing bang boom! Get rekt God!!!
|
# ? May 25, 2017 02:08 |
|
lovely Wizard posted:So are people realizing with the UK terrorist leaks that the enemies (US leakers) of their enemy (Trump) aren't actually their friend and have a specific agenda they want to accomplish? Essplain.
|
# ? May 25, 2017 02:10 |
|
Much like the bombers themselves, we rage because we are otherwise impotent against the faceless gods that guide drone after drone the oil lands to empty them. But only a little. Only enough to rekindle grief sufficient to power the war machine that generates their marvelous profits. *farts*
|
# ? May 25, 2017 02:11 |
|
FisheyStix posted:Much like the bombers themselves, we rage because we are otherwise impotent against the faceless gods that guide drone after drone the oil lands to empty them. But only a little. Only enough to rekindle grief sufficient to power the war machine that generates their marvelous profits. i like this, is that from something? my favorite part was the fart at the end
|
# ? May 25, 2017 02:12 |
|
It came from the same place all my other farts came from!
|
# ? May 25, 2017 02:13 |
|
FisheyStix posted:It came from the same place all my other farts came from!
|
# ? May 25, 2017 02:15 |
|
Agag posted:True but atheist too though. What to do? You better capitalize that a when you say Atheist, heathen.
|
# ? May 25, 2017 02:47 |
|
ariana grande is good idiot shut the gently caress up
|
# ? May 25, 2017 02:50 |
|
all religions are the same because they are all called "religions" much like "sports" are all called "sports" so i mean yeah tennis and bowling are pretty much the same you know and yeah ariana grande is pretty good
|
# ? May 25, 2017 03:02 |
|
so, the decision to invade iraq and remove saddam hussein was morally correct who agrees?!
|
# ? May 25, 2017 03:08 |
|
Secular Humanist posted:so, the decision to invade iraq and remove saddam hussein was morally correct who agrees?! Interested to see where you are going with this
|
# ? May 25, 2017 03:09 |
|
staberind posted:you forgot "Cucked"? This is really sad. Going back 20 pages to get more Ariana muslimish stuff
|
# ? May 25, 2017 03:12 |
|
Burt Sexual posted:This is really sad. nope, mr sexual, i just picked up where i left off. i slept, time past, after morning prayers, ( I live in the imaginary caliphate some of you think exists). I stopped off at burqua burger to eat and see if anyone in my family was taken by the boogymen last night, I could go on but some of you have probably already cum.
|
# ? May 25, 2017 03:29 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVZkNI1d_FI&t=107s
|
# ? May 25, 2017 03:29 |
|
Blue Train posted:Interested to see where you are going with this i was just bored cause this fine thread is slowing down, BUT i legit think it was the right thing to do. the democratic congress essentially voted almost unanimously in 1998 to do so with the iraq liberation act, and virtually nobody even knows what that is. leaving saddam in power after the first gulf war was the original mistake, and letting the iraqi people rot under his regime for over a decade was unconscionable. bailing prematurely was the next mistake, not going there in the first place. bush's dumb explanation for it is what hosed up the PR. he tried to shoehorn in 9\11 as a justification when he should have just been like "uhh yeah we pretty much already decided to do this and under a democratic congress no less, a-hyuck". people get lazy and think being "anti-war" is just virtuous by default or something and it super isn't. now quick, somebody point out how we accidentally bombed an innocent person or whatever and disregard everything i wrote, because kill is bad
|
# ? May 25, 2017 03:30 |
|
Democrats hunger for slaughter and their wanton appetites are only briefly sated by the corpses of foreign children
|
# ? May 25, 2017 03:32 |
|
Secular Humanist posted:i was just bored cause this fine thread is slowing down, BUT i legit think it was the right thing to do. the democratic congress essentially voted almost unanimously in 1998 to do so with the iraq liberation act, and virtually nobody even knows what that is. leaving saddam in power after the first gulf war was the original mistake, and letting the iraqi people rot under his regime for over a decade was unconscionable. bailing prematurely was the next mistake, not going there in the first place. bush's dumb explanation for it is what hosed up the PR. he tried to shoehorn in 9\11 as a justification when he should have just been like "uhh yeah we pretty much already decided to do this and under a democratic congress no less, a-hyuck". people get lazy and think being "anti-war" is just virtuous by default or something and it super isn't. America shouldn't be the world police and there will always be a Saddam or gaddafi or bin laden or Kim. There's always going to be hosed up poo poo happening and you know we carry out a lot on our own
|
# ? May 25, 2017 03:33 |
|
Psycho Society posted:Democrats hunger for slaughter and their wanton appetites are only briefly sated by the corpses of foreign children It's true, I can't get enough
|
# ? May 25, 2017 03:33 |
|
Secular Humanist posted:i was just bored cause this fine thread is slowing down, BUT i legit think it was the right thing to do. the democratic congress essentially voted almost unanimously in 1998 to do so with the iraq liberation act, and virtually nobody even knows what that is. leaving saddam in power after the first gulf war was the original mistake, and letting the iraqi people rot under his regime for over a decade was unconscionable. bailing prematurely was the next mistake, not going there in the first place. bush's dumb explanation for it is what hosed up the PR. he tried to shoehorn in 9\11 as a justification when he should have just been like "uhh yeah we pretty much already decided to do this and under a democratic congress no less, a-hyuck". people get lazy and think being "anti-war" is just virtuous by default or something and it super isn't. If you go to war, you must wage total war or none at all. Anything else is just cruelty.
|
# ? May 25, 2017 03:35 |
|
Secular Humanist posted:i was just bored cause this fine thread is slowing down, BUT i legit think it was the right thing to do. the democratic congress essentially voted almost unanimously in 1998 to do so with the iraq liberation act, and virtually nobody even knows what that is. leaving saddam in power after the first gulf war was the original mistake, and letting the iraqi people rot under his regime for over a decade was unconscionable. bailing prematurely was the next mistake, not going there in the first place. bush's dumb explanation for it is what hosed up the PR. he tried to shoehorn in 9\11 as a justification when he should have just been like "uhh yeah we pretty much already decided to do this and under a democratic congress no less, a-hyuck". people get lazy and think being "anti-war" is just virtuous by default or something and it super isn't. yeah, thats what happened at those times according to some people. who helped saddam and daffy into those positions though? how about trying to fix the poo poo that started all this?
|
# ? May 25, 2017 03:37 |
|
Secular Humanist posted:i was just bored cause this fine thread is slowing down, BUT i legit think it was the right thing to do. the democratic congress essentially voted almost unanimously in 1998 to do so with the iraq liberation act, and virtually nobody even knows what that is. leaving saddam in power after the first gulf war was the original mistake, and letting the iraqi people rot under his regime for over a decade was unconscionable. bailing prematurely was the next mistake, not going there in the first place. bush's dumb explanation for it is what hosed up the PR. he tried to shoehorn in 9\11 as a justification when he should have just been like "uhh yeah we pretty much already decided to do this and under a democratic congress no less, a-hyuck". people get lazy and think being "anti-war" is just virtuous by default or something and it super isn't. Hmm yes the 70% of people who were killed in iraq were civilians, and this is a bad thing. what an astoundingly hot take you have expertly pre-empted. What was notable about saddams' regime that the iraqis needed the US world police to save them from again?
|
# ? May 25, 2017 03:37 |
|
The US attacked Saddam because he was trying to upset the petrodollar. So the neocons picked him for their brilliant plan to democratize the middle east which failed harder than possibly anything has ever failed in history
|
# ? May 25, 2017 03:37 |
|
A suicide bomber killed three officers in hometown Jakarta. But it's Islamist on Islam violence, so no one in the non-Muslim world will understand or care.
|
# ? May 25, 2017 03:39 |
|
"We killed all those people because they were living under a repressive government" How to refute a point this well made, hmm
|
# ? May 25, 2017 03:41 |
|
Psycho Society posted:"We killed all those people because they were living under a repressive government" I like almost all your posts please never stop
|
# ? May 25, 2017 03:41 |
|
|
# ? May 12, 2024 20:07 |
|
democrats want eugenics more than republicans do, and republicans are terrible lol
|
# ? May 25, 2017 03:41 |