|
HoAssHo posted:sorry, that was mean Its okay I've done some bad stuff in my life I deserved it.
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 07:30
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2024 07:00 |
|
|
its amazing to me that Rich and Jack are the only guys on the team with wives Mike and Jay gotta be doing it right
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 07:37
|
|
|
bloom posted:Joke's on you, I put a ton of effort into my appearance and still haven't got past second base. XXXL Hawaiian shirts and fedoras are the pinnacle of effort. I know because I am also a goon.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 08:07
|
|
|
Jonas Albrecht posted:I want an Alien prequel that explains where the logo came from. I want a Star Wars pre-prequel that explains who built the first lightsaber and how and using what components Every single loving detail
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 09:59
|
|
|
wookiepedia: the movie
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 10:01
|
|
|
Double Bill posted:I want a Star Wars pre-prequel that explains who built the first lightsaber and how and using what components Like the Aviator but with a lightsaber.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 10:02
|
|
Jonas Albrecht posted:I don't like or approve of this take. I wanted to make a "take the red pill" kinda joke here but I'm too lazy.
|
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 10:18
|
|
|
Back to that helicopter stunt in T2, there's another I'm thinking of from a Jackie Chan movie, maybe Rumble in the Bronx, where a chopper hovers down to ground level in an alley, leans forward and tries to use its propellers to kill Jackie Chan. Was that a real stunt or was it on a crane? I think I remember a wide shot.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 10:40
|
|
|
Al Borland Corp. posted:Back to that helicopter stunt in T2, there's another I'm thinking of from a Jackie Chan movie, maybe Rumble in the Bronx, where a chopper hovers down to ground level in an alley, leans forward and tries to use its propellers to kill Jackie Chan. Was that a real stunt or was it on a crane? I think I remember a wide shot. That was the second or third Brosnan James Bond movie and it's physically impossible for a helicopter to do that.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 11:07
|
|
|
Don't listen to that guy! Not only did it happen, but I was the pilot.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 13:07
|
|
|
The_Franz posted:That was the second or third Brosnan James Bond movie and it's physically impossible for a helicopter to do that. If that was in the Brosnan film I'm fairly sure they ripped it off from a Jackie Chan movie.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 13:09
|
|
|
Fartbox posted:its amazing to me that Rich and Jack are the only guys on the team with wives Think about how many Star Trek references Mike makes Does that seem like a guy who has 'done', 'does', or 'will do' 'it'
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 13:10
|
|
|
Stabbatical posted:Think about how many Star Trek references Mike makes Mike fucks, of this I have no doubt
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 14:37
|
|
|
The_Franz posted:That was the second or third Brosnan James Bond movie and it's physically impossible for a helicopter to do that. But I did it all the time in Grand Theft Auto!
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 14:40
|
|
|
You've seen Mike put his arm around Jessie. They bonged.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 14:40
|
|
|
Al Borland Corp. posted:If that was in the Brosnan film I'm fairly sure they ripped it off from a Jackie Chan movie. It was Tomorrow Never Dies, when Brosnan and Michelle Yeoh are being chased through Beijing. And yeah, 100% fake. A helicopter can't hover with its nose down and rotors at 45 degrees. If it were elevated it would be diving quickly while moving forward. An inch off the ground it would wreck in one nanosecond. Also, helicopter blades will shatter under the stress of their own force if they hit solid objects. They can't be used like a buzzsaw like in that scene.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 15:53
|
|
|
Al Borland Corp. posted:You've seen Mike put his arm around Jessie. They bonged. gross
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 16:09
|
|
|
They also do the helicopter thing in the first Mission Impossible, around 4 min into this clip; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjxUCEWPr-k
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 16:13
|
|
|
Also they did that in 28 Weeks Later, choppin zombie heads.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 17:01
|
|
|
A helicopter basically self destructs in an instant if one of its blades touches an object. here's a video of that happening: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5aMT9MBfZI&t=29s (no one killed in that crash)
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 17:41
|
|
|
Helicopters are bad designs. Where are our cool hovering vehicles and stuff?
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 17:43
|
|
|
I forget the physics equation, but picture how slow an object would move sitting close to the center of 45 rpm record, versus how fast it moves out at the edge. Now scale it up to the record is moving at 500 rpm and the record is 32 feet wide. The tip of a rotor is moving at something insane like 440 mph. Just glancing a solid object at that speed will tear apart anything. And helicopter rotors are designed to bend because of the forces they generate. If they were made of extremely sturdy steel, allowing it to cut through objects, the engine would tear itself apart. So helicopters are quite literally designed to be perfect at flying and to shatter into little bits if they touch something because you can only choose one of these two options: Stabile flight or being a big dumb buzzsaw that can't fly.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 17:53
|
|
|
rewatching that T2 helicopter scene now, this poo poo is insane
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 17:56
|
|
|
A GLISTENING HODOR posted:I forget the physics equation, but picture how slow an object would move sitting close to the center of 45 rpm record, versus how fast it moves out at the edge. 
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 18:08
|
|
|
That's a lot of words that don't matter because the blade is going at the same RPM as the rotor. The tip doesn't "go faster" it just covers more ground than the center in the same amount of time, it's only technically "faster" but that's not really relevant. I learned this from a Google search, just now. You could just say "a helicopter is a giant fan but the fan blades are flimsy and will fly apart if anything touches them".
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 18:17
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 18:19
|
|
|
King Vidiot posted:The tip doesn't "go faster" it just covers more ground than the center in the same amount of time, it's only technically "faster" but that's not really relevant. You should probably have a better grasp on what words mean if you are going to comment on something.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 18:26
|
|
|
King Vidiot posted:That's a lot of words that don't matter because the blade is going at the same RPM as the rotor. The tip doesn't "go faster" it just covers more ground than the center in the same amount of time, it's only technically "faster" but that's not really relevant. I learned this from a Google search, just now. 
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 18:29
|
|
|
LMAO Savaged by Calvin's dad. The loving physics formula for speed is literally distance over time. The tip of the rotor is going farther in the same amount of time. That's literally the definition of faster, dude. lol. The Anime Liker fucked around with this message at 18:42 on May 28, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 18:39
|
|
|
Interesting aerodynamic theories gentlemen, but could an aeroplane take off from a treadmill if it were big enough?
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 18:51
|
|
|
A GLISTENING HODOR posted:I forget the physics equation, but picture how slow an object would move sitting close to the center of 45 rpm record, versus how fast it moves out at the edge. Stiffer bladed helicopters are becoming a thing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HncZgouxt9k I don't know how the S-97 compares to longer flappy bladed ones in efficiency, but it definitely can fly.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 18:52
|
|
|
A GLISTENING HODOR posted:The loving physics formula for speed is literally distance over time. The tip of the rotor is going farther in the same amount of time. That's literally the definition of faster, dude. lol. That is not at all how evolution works.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 19:02
|
|
|
a bone to pick posted:Interesting aerodynamic theories gentlemen, but could an aeroplane take off from a treadmill if it were big enough? what would happen if u tryed to fly a drone in the subway??? probly it would fly back super fast and hit the rear door
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 19:05
|
|
|
I wish Jack was here so he could beat you all to death with his huge monster dong
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 19:05
|
|
|
Rotacixe posted:Stiffer bladed helicopters are becoming a thing. Well yes, you can have sturdIER props, but solid ones that hold together against impact are theoretically impossible unless we discover unobtainium. And 99% of non-military helicopters would never have a use for the enormous cost of those when it's easier and vastly cheaper to just not fly into poo poo. Fun fact: interstates and baseball/soccer fields and public parks are often designed with a restriction on overhead wiring so that military and hospital/ems helicopters can land in the clearing unobstructed at night, and firefighters and some police carry mobile landing zones for this.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 19:07
|
|
|
My ego immediately shatters upon the slightest contact with another person
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 19:08
|
|
|
I do Science is cool and much better than another St** **rs derail.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 19:10
|
|
|
Rumble in the Bronx had a couple insane stunts involving that hovercraft. There was also the Jackie Chan movie where some dude just plows through a bus windshield that was completely unplanned.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 19:12
|
|
|
I love all derails equally *earlier that day* I don't care for Star Wars.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 19:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2024 07:00 |
|
|
Hemingway To Go! posted:I do Light takes 8 minutes to reach the Earth from the Sun. As soon as the star is destroyed I'm pretty sure everything on the planet would instantly freeze cause it gets pretty cold in my shed.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 19:16
|
|
