|
Russia isn't likely to invade the EU, but it is eager to re-subjugate former Russian imperial holdings/USSR vassal states, and giving Russia the green light for wars in eastern europe is in nobody's interests.
|
# ? May 31, 2017 00:59 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 16:09 |
|
Incoming republican freakout!
|
# ? May 31, 2017 00:59 |
|
cargo cult posted:What exactly is Greenwald's deal, besides hating establishment Dems and the security state? I've heard him characterized as a libertarian but him constantly going to bat for the trump administration on the Russia stuff is so irritating. e- tl;dr: Greenwald is loving wrong frequently, but comes by it honestly. You asked a question, so you deserve a more robust reply. Hopefully this is helpful for curious lurkers, at least. As one of our resident Greenwald haters, a lot of those responses are somewhere between oversimplified and completely wrong. Greenwald's core beliefs come down to a few factors
The quoted tweet is actually fairly sensible given his position. He's not a fanatical believer in radical transparency (he dripfed the Snowden leaks, and doesn't mind redacting where he feels it makes sense), so it's not hypocritical to oppose leaks. In this case, his problem is that the American Intelligence Community is breaking its own rules in order to damage a politician it dislikes. In a vacuum, that's incredibly troubling-it's the sort of behavior that precedes a coup in less mature democracies. In context, the IC has watched Trump dismantle the mechanisms meant to keep him in line and has seen their work lied about for political gain (Nunes), sat on for political benefit (pre-election McConnell) or wither and die on the vine (current investigations). As 1 and 3 interact, they prevent Greenwald from reading the leakers as whistleblowers in a sense-distributing information outside of normal process because normal process has become corrupt- and instead assumes that Russia isn't as active as the IC claims, that whatever ties they've uncovered are not relevant, and that this is their attack against an unfriendly president. These intersections are evident in a number of cases. The writing was on the wall with Assange after the Swedish incidents (or, if you're inclined to take the word of a lying sack of poo poo over two For The Intercept broadly, the Neomccarthyist example is instructive: In many of their stories, they know better but assume you don't. Greenwald (and his whole writing staff) is smart enough to know that McCarthy ran a regime of terror against the powerless based on rumor and innuendo in a desire to raise his own power and profile. The current situation features heavy, credible reporting alongside credible leaks from anonymous sources-aimed at holding the rich and powerful accountable and without a clear beneficiary for pushing it. Other examples are Booker et.al voting against the importation bill that Cruz/Paul/Lee voted for and almost anything relating to the DNC. If you walk into one of their articles assuming that the Democratic Establishment and American Intelligence/Military communities are wrong, you'll come out with a lot of reinforcement for your view... provided you don't think too hard about it or look at other sources. Paracaidas fucked around with this message at 01:03 on May 31, 2017 |
# ? May 31, 2017 01:00 |
|
Just started House of Cards fifth season and I hope Trump caught a Twitter ad for it thinking nobody knows what it is and he starts openly quoting Frank Underwood at some point soon.
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:00 |
|
evilweasel posted:Russia isn't likely to invade the EU, but it is eager to re-subjugate former Russian imperial holdings/USSR vassal states, and giving Russia the green light for wars in eastern europe is in nobody's interests. I genuinely wonder if Russia would be capable of even that if they had a guarantee of no European or American intervention
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:02 |
|
http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/30/politics/michael-flynn-documents-senate/index.html?adkey=bnquote:
Can I assume this means they've doctored them or that they don't have anything incriminating in them? Frankly, I assume that anyone involved in this will literally do anything at all to avoid providing incriminating evidence, so I'm staunchly pessimistic about it. However, it'd be great if there's actually The Good Stuff somewhere in these documents. Until I see otherwise, though, I'm gonna assume it's yet another stalling tactic.
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:04 |
|
Tim Whatley posted:Just started House of Cards fifth season and I hope Trump caught a Twitter ad for it thinking nobody knows what it is and he starts openly quoting Frank Underwood at some point soon. "Power is a lot like real estate. It’s all about location, location, location. The closer you are to the source, the higher your property value.”
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:06 |
|
A rearmed Germany could probably gently caress Russia up in a non nuclear confrontation assuming it was defensive in nature. Germany defending Ukraine from Russian aggression would certainly be an ironic twist of history.
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:07 |
|
evilweasel posted:Russia isn't likely to invade the EU, but it is eager to re-subjugate former Russian imperial holdings/USSR vassal states, and giving Russia the green light for wars in eastern europe is in nobody's interests. I have strong doubts about Russian's capability to militarily subjugate the Baltic nations which are now NATO members and have US and other European stationed within them.
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:08 |
|
https://twitter.com/davidsirota/status/869040415118417920OhFunny posted:I have strong doubts about Russian's capability to militarily subjugate the Baltic nations which are now NATO members and have US and other European stationed within them. Russia has been focused on economic and clandestine approaches to subjugation and has been doing a fairly decent job at it, given the surge in far-right candidates we've seen throughout Europe.
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:12 |
|
empty whippet box posted:http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/30/politics/michael-flynn-documents-senate/index.html?adkey=bn This is a subpoena focused on the business he owns which is not protected under the 5th Amendment. He is legally obligated to provide the documents requested and can't delay any longer unless he wants to face obstruction charges.
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:12 |
|
empty whippet box posted:http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/30/politics/michael-flynn-documents-senate/index.html?adkey=bn It was turn them over or go to jail for contempt of congress
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:13 |
|
A while back, an article about Ben Sasse's book was posted here. The Vanishing American Adult: Ben Sasse on Virtue in Politics I saw this response and thought it was a good summary of why many people resort to "Nothing Matters" nihilism. The rhetoric is a bit over the top, but substantively, it delivers. Someone on Reddit posted:IT'S TOTAL loving BULLSHIT. twice burned ice fucked around with this message at 01:50 on May 31, 2017 |
# ? May 31, 2017 01:15 |
|
Martytoof posted:Didn't realize it had derailed before. Sorry I remember that one time the Trump thread derailed and we nipped it the bud two posts later and we've been derail free ever since!
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:15 |
|
Flynn's memory will be shredded.
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:16 |
|
cargo cult posted:What exactly is Greenwald's deal, besides hating establishment Dems and the security state? I've heard him characterized as a libertarian but him constantly going to bat for the trump administration on the Russia stuff is so irritating. The other explanation given was probably a lot better than mine, but in short Glenn believes some people are his enemies and he will ally with or believe anyone who sufficiently agrees with him on that. Up to and including people you wouldn't trust for a second if you scrutinized their affiliations or past actions in the slightest. He isn't stupid, nor evil (really). Just incredibly bullheaded and unable to view the world outside of his own lens.
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:17 |
|
logger posted:This is a subpoena focused on the business he owns which is not protected under the 5th Amendment. He is legally obligated to provide the documents requested and can't delay any longer unless he wants to face obstruction charges. Obstruction is way better than treason.
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:18 |
The Glumslinger posted:It was turn them over or go to jail for contempt of congress Nah, if you read the article they're negotiating for a certain percentage of the documents to satisfy the subpoena.
|
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:18 |
|
empty whippet box posted:http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/30/politics/michael-flynn-documents-senate/index.html?adkey=bn My understanding is that he cannot plead the fifth on behalf of his business, so business stuff he has no choice. Perhaps his personal stuff was essentially the same or very close so he had no choice, hence the compliance with the first subpoena. Others have also said that when they subpoena him, they likely have a pretty good idea what they will find and if not he is in hot water for hiding something. For all these guys, the level of scrutiny they are and will be subject to is probably beyond any previous effort.
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:18 |
|
Ague Proof posted:Flynn's memory will be shredded. poo poo, keep him away from the chili guys...
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:19 |
|
Nobody here actually reads what Greenwald writes so you post the same idiotic poo poo over and over again despite the fact that his openly stated position is contrary to whatever you imagine so honestly you should just shut the gently caress up
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:21 |
|
https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/869707796002025473
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:24 |
|
Than the murders began
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:26 |
|
Hahahah Huma's brain must be broken or something. No wonder Hillary lost
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:26 |
|
Taerkar posted:The GOP's new motto is Snitches Get Stitches. Clearly pandering.
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:32 |
|
Christ.
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:33 |
|
Anthony Weiner needs to teach trump a thing or two about making great deals
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:35 |
|
Taerkar posted:The GOP's new motto is Snitches Can't Afford to Get Stitches.
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:37 |
|
Jesus loving Christ Huma
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:42 |
|
twice burned ice posted:A while back, an article by Ben Sasse was posted here. The Vanishing American Adult: Ben Sasse on Virtue in Politics That's a hell of a good rant. Where on Reddit did you find it?
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:44 |
Boys will be boys!
|
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:44 |
|
Huma I think you're great but what are you thinking
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:44 |
|
In case anyone forgot, Hillary would probably be president if Weiner could have just resisted the temptation to send dick pics to underage girls.
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:47 |
How is it possible that basically everyone in our government is a loving gibbbering incompetent? It seems like neither side of the aisle is immune. Is this just what happens when you force human beings to live under a magnifying glass 24/7? Are the Illuminati changing our votes to let the reptiles in? Am I losing my mind???
|
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:47 |
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:That's a hell of a good rant. Where on Reddit did you find it? Here
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:48 |
For real please post some Good Governance, I need a fix
|
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:48 |
|
Rigel posted:In case anyone forgot, Hillary would probably be president if she had had Weiner killed.
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:51 |
|
Huma's the dumbest person in the world if that story is true, but this guy might be a close second. https://twitter.com/MattGertz/status/869608909849464833
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:52 |
|
Rigel posted:In case anyone forgot, Hillary would probably be president if Weiner could have just resisted the temptation to send dick pics to underage girls. Honestly I figure Comey or someone else would have just made up some other bullshit October Surprise instead.
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:53 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 16:09 |
|
HIS NAME WAS CARLOS DANGER.
|
# ? May 31, 2017 01:53 |