|
Groovelord Neato posted:lol like 99 percent of hacking is social engineering duder. I don't believe your statistic
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 18:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 06:39 |
|
|
99 percent of hacking is cheating at video games.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 18:05
|
|
|
There's more. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 18:12
|
|
|
Chomp8645 posted:99 percent of hacking is cheating at video games. 99% of hacking is the downswing, I don't care how many retards try to say the upswing is equally as important. You don't even make any contact with the flesh on the upswing, you morons!
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 18:16
|
|
|
Zuck will hire the data wizards and win He won't let the data wizards down
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 18:18
|
|
|
lol
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 18:24
|
|
|
BrutalistMcDonalds posted:Zuck will hire the data wizards and win From what I've read, Zuck supports single-payer, so I bet he's going to run in the Bernie position of "anti-establishment guy millennials love" who ultimately loses the primary leading to Trump beating some shitheel Dem like Cory Booker
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 18:26
|
|
|
Zuckerberg is a huge piece of poo poo
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 18:28
|
|
|
I like how Hillary has to add continually to the list of reasons why she lost. So far we have - Free press - Free speech - Misogyny (see items 1&2) - Racism (see items 1&2) - Transphobia? (nevermind, just see items 1&2) - The Rust Belt - White people - Black people and Latinos who voted for Trump - Racism (see 'the Rust Belt') - Wikileaks (see items 1&2) - "Russian Wikileaks" (does not exist) - "Hackers" (like the movie) - Russia (the whole thing) And now THE MEDIA and THE DNC and HER SUPPORTERS. Yeah, Hillary. I bet the people who sank their stolen millions into your lovely campaign are mutually pleased with you. If you had told them you were going to run on IDPOL and let a computer decide where you would rally, they might have held on to their money instead of wasting it on a proven failure. I hope her friends on Wall Street and in the DNC remember her criticisms when she inevitably runs again and tell her to piss off. One thing we can be sure of: with all this wind-up to the next couple of years, Bill is probably the most relaxed he's been since 2004. No expectations from the party since they doffed him in favor of HAL 9k, and no harridan flitting around his house constantly pecking at him. He is dicking bimbos in whatever part of the country his wife ain't in. Ordinarily I would not believe Colin Powell about anything, but since his words were "hacked"  I figure there migght be something to it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 18:30
|
|
|
Blue Train posted:Zuckerberg is a huge piece of poo poo Zuckerberg is tremendously unlikeable and it is hilarious that he's obviously gearing up to run.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 18:30
|
|
|
Blue Train posted:Zuckerberg is a huge piece of poo poo Stumping for the welfare state could get some traction, though.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 18:30
|
|
|
Blue Train posted:Zuckerberg is a huge piece of poo poo ...who will gladly continue the Dem party split by sticking his dick into the primary to gain attention
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 18:30
|
|
|
phasmid posted:Ordinarily I would not believe Colin Powell about anything, but since his words were "hacked" Powell's best leak: "Everything HRC touches she kind of screws up with hubris."
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 18:33
|
|
|
Accretionist posted:Powell's best leak: "Everything HRC touches she kind of screws up with hubris." Hacking triumphs again!
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 18:35
|
|
|
phasmid posted:Yeah, Hillary. I bet the people who sank their stolen millions into your lovely campaign are mutually pleased with you. If you had told them you were going to run on IDPOL and let a computer decide where you would rally, they might have held on to their money instead of wasting it on a proven failure. i don't think she ran on idpol so much as used it as a shield to deflect criticism, ie: "would breaking up the banks end racism" an idpol candidate would have spoken positively about BLM, for one, or reforming the police. there was more than one confrontation between her and black activists where she came off super lovely. she was also anti-legalization, let alone ending the drug war, which disproportionately affects and targets minorities.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 18:37
|
|
|
Hey guys some talking head told me its illegal for us to look at those leaks so cut it out.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 18:38
|
|
|
Stexils posted:i don't think she ran on idpol so much as used it as a shield to deflect criticism, ie: "would breaking up the banks end racism" I liked the one where security dragged the poor girl out as the WASP audience hissed and Clinton said, "back to the issues that I think are important."
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 18:42
|
|
|
Stexils posted:i don't think she ran on idpol so much as used it as a shield to deflect criticism, ie: "would breaking up the banks end racism" IDPOL implies that they don't actually give a gently caress about those issues outside of paying lip service which is exactly why it applies to her campaign imo
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 18:47
|
|
|
Excuse me, Hillary, but Black Lives Matter. Hey! What the...? Get your hands off me! Where are you taking me!? *bonk* Ow! Stop hit-*BONK* 
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 18:50
|
|
|
MIdwest is chilly, poor, and full of farm animals. Why would anybody campaign there?
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 18:54
|
|
|
food court bailiff posted:Zuckerberg is tremendously unlikeable and it is hilarious that he's obviously gearing up to run. He could win by virtue of being a political outsider and by not being Hillary Rodham Clinton. You can not underestimate him. Didn't any of you see revenge of the nerds? Krustic fucked around with this message at 19:19 on Jun 1, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 19:14
|
|
|
Corporations: greedy, bad! Mark Zuckerberg, billionaire who built his fortune on a literally stolen platform: political outsider, techie, good!
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 19:17
|
|
|
BrutalistMcDonalds posted:Excuse me, Hillary, but Black Lives Matter. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 19:23
|
|
|
Nobody is voting for Zuck. He has the most beat upable face and body in existence. And could you imagine the minefield that facebook would be if he's running for president?
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 19:28
|
|
|
The Human Crouton posted:Nobody is voting for Zuck. He has the most beat upable face and body in existence. Actually how would that even work legally? Like if you owned either a social network or media outlet, how could you run without a poo poo ton of lawsuits about manipulating your coverage to be positive and your opponents to be negative like Facebook does regularly about their pet projects or pet peeves?
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 19:35
|
|
|
lovely Wizard posted:Actually how would that even work legally? 
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 19:37
|
|
|
Yeah but she didn't own the media outlets, her staff just made backroom deals with the various executives and employees of all the major media outlets to either give her positive coverage or focus solely on Trump which gave her/them the step of plausible deniability they needed. If you loving RUN the thing, your plausible denial goes out the window.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 19:40
|
|
|
lovely Wizard posted:Yeah but she didn't own the media outlets, her staff just made backroom deals with the various executives and employees of all the major media outlets to either give her positive coverage or focus solely on Trump which gave her/them the step of plausible deniability they needed. bonus points for when he runs and doesn't put Facebook in a blind trust because of Trump, and his supporters defend it without a hint of irony
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 19:42
|
|
|
Accretionist posted:Stumping for the welfare state could get some traction, though. Facebook has been shown to be an unbelievably powerful tool influencing the last US election and Brexit. It's not unreasonable to think with all the data analytics and mind control available to Faceboom that it could have a strong chance of getting someone to win any election, the candidate is one of the least important variables.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 19:46
|
|
|
lovely Wizard posted:Yeah but she didn't own the media outlets, her staff just made backroom deals with the various executives and employees of all the major media outlets to either give her positive coverage or focus solely on Trump which gave her/them the step of plausible deniability they needed. I feel that with things going the way they are, he could very well attempt (and succeed) in turning Facebook in to a giant propaganda arm. Why not? A whole kaboodle of people out there get their news from their Facebook wall. Lawyers could maybe put the hurt on him, but if he decided to run for prez, he could always step down as the chairman (or w/e) of the company.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 19:49
|
|
|
kickascii posted:Facebook has been shown to be an unbelievably powerful tool influencing the last US election and Brexit. It's not unreasonable to think with all the data analytics and mind control available to Faceboom that it could have a strong chance of getting someone to win any election, the candidate is one of the least important variables. Facebook obviously tanked Hillary Clinton's image so Zuckerberg's main rival for 2020 would be a loser instead of an incumbent/first woman president.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 19:49
|
|
|
phasmid posted:I feel that with things going the way they are, he could very well attempt (and succeed) in turning Facebook in to a giant propaganda arm. He already has, he just uses it for personal pr fluffing atm hth
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 19:51
|
|
|
Blue Train posted:He already has, he just uses it for personal pr fluffing atm hth
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 19:54
|
|
|
phasmid posted:At the moment, yes. I'm musing as to what his next phase is - keeping the thing and letting the dollars roll in, being a power behind the throne, or doing what lots of dudes seem to be unable to resist doing and throwing his hat in the ring. Among other things, Bowles worried that one of the concessions Zuckerberg wanted -- to allow the billionaire to serve two years in government without losing control of Facebook -- would look particularly irresponsible, according to court filings. Bowles did not respond to requests for comment. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...=BBD120916_TECH
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 19:56
|
|
|
Blue Train posted:Corporations: greedy, bad! who cares? people voted for trump who was also a political outsider who said he'd "drain the swamp" lol presidents will continue to all be bad and love money, hth
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 20:01
|
|
|
Yea they were dumb as gently caress as well and I dream that one day there will be a presidential candidate worth voting for, inshallah
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 20:02
|
|
|
Blue Train posted:Yea they were dumb as gently caress as well and I dream that one day there will be a presidential candidate worth voting for, inshallah that candidate will be Skynet
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 20:03
|
|
|
Any candidate that runs on the platform of annihilation of humanity will get my vote
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 20:04
|
|
|
finally.... war against the machines
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 20:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 06:39 |
|
|
Blue Train posted:Any candidate that runs on the platform of annihilation of humanity will get my vote https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCnEHXo1CZk
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 20:07
|
|