|
Listen in my household, if I spend money I don't have...
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 21:09
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 09:53 |
|
|
FizFashizzle posted:Listen in my household, if I spend money I don't have... Then you can tax your dog or take your loaf of bread's pension
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 21:10
|
|
|
also i have a printer in my garage that makes money the rest of my neighborhood buys from me at extremely advantageous rates therefore
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 21:11
|
|
|
Audit the garage
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 21:20
|
|
|
Let's re-import the stuff we moved up to the attic.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 21:26
|
|
|
Nobody can actually gauge the effects of QE and QE2 because there's no control group to look at and see what would have happened without them.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 21:26
|
|
|
I'm building a wall across my driveway and I'm gonna make the post office pay for it
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 21:28
|
|
|
FizFashizzle posted:sorry plane earth Cephalopod supremacy
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 21:33
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:I'm building a wall across my driveway and I'm gonna make the post office pay for it I'll tax their stamps to pay for it
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 21:33
|
|
|
Three reasons why Trump pulling out of the Paris Climate Agreement probably won't doom the planet: 1) If the US pulls out the three non-signatory nations will generate 15% of global CO2 emissions, and the US will be roughly 14.5% of that. That's not great. But China by itself releases as much CO2 as the US, India, and the entirety of Europe combined, so their participation is by far more crucial. We're the second-largest producer of greenhouse gasses but it's still not a massive amount in the grand scheme of things. 2) The US pulling out of the deal won't cause a domino effect of other nations because, for one thing, everyone thinks we're crazy and doesn't want to be on our side. But more importantly energy has been the most important and lucrative commodity for most of human history and leaving the agreement sets you behind on the next wave of energy generation technology. You'd have to be an idiot to sit out the next industrial revolution. 3) We're probably doomed anyway. We won't see the point the chain reaction started until it's already mostly over, and odds are good that happened when permafrost started thawing and decomposing and belching out methane.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 21:35
|
|
|
a neat cape posted:Three reasons why Trump pulling out of the Paris Climate Agreement probably won't doom the planet: Anxiously awaiting Shangri's 18 reasons why Trump pulling out of the Paris Climate Agreement spells death to any and all of us while deflecting that this would never have happened under Hillary's watch!  Actually, no I'm not...
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 21:38
|
|
|
Weather.com has a bone to pick.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 21:50
|
|
|
I accomplished very little at work today. working for the man is getting me down
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 21:53
|
|
|
You should start your own business. Maybe selling shirts?
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 21:54
|
|
|
Jiminy Christmas! Shoes! posted:You should start your own business. Maybe selling shirts? PTS Inc.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 21:55
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:Nobody can actually gauge the effects of QE and QE2 because there's no control group to look at and see what would have happened without them. yeah but we know that it didn't cause any inflation, which was my point. nor did the european versions, when somehow a country the size of north carolina was poised to bring down the entire financial order
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 22:03
|
|
|
Ehud posted:PTS Inc. I'd buy one
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 22:08
|
|
|
Would you guys rather have the Cavs sweep the finals or Trump get successfully removed from office
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 22:16
|
|
|
Does Pence go with him?
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 22:16
|
|
|
gently caress the Cavs
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 22:19
|
|
|
You're going to need a King Ralph and a simultaneous strike on whomever's in the bunker to fix that government. Also, since I know we've talked about Blue Apron before: https://twitter.com/DKThomp/status/870386653294202880
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 22:19
|
|
|
SHOAH NUFF posted:Would you guys rather have the Cavs sweep the finals or Trump get successfully removed from office Cavs
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 22:20
|
|
|
Kalli posted:You're going to need a King Ralph and a simultaneous strike on whomever's in the bunker to fix that government. ahahahahahahahaha
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 22:23
|
|
|
Also the Cavs sweeping the finals would be pretty funny. If it happens, Ehud, your shirt business needs to crank out some fo' fo' fo' oh and fo' shirts immediately.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 22:23
|
|
|
I feel like there are about 10 people left in the entire world that actually want GS to win.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 22:25
|
|
|
Jiminy Christmas! Shoes! posted:I feel like there are about 10 people left in the entire world that actually want GS to win. weird Asian candy posted:gently caress the Cavs Myself, and the 9 other people in the entire world, care not what you feel.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 22:29
|
|
|
FizFashizzle posted:ahahahahahahahaha $144m in advertising means they must pay about 4 cents for each podcast they advertise on.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 22:29
|
|
|
If LeBron somehow leads the Cavs to beat Golden State for the championship, they should just demolish the Basketball Hall of Fame and replace it with a statue of LeBron bigger than the Colossus of Rhodes.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 22:36
|
|
|
Bulls fans probably want the Warriors to win because they know that LeBron is a better basketball player than Michael Jordan and want to cling to the dumb 6 rings argument
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 22:37
|
|
|
a neat cape posted:Bulls fans probably want the Warriors to win because they know that LeBron is a better basketball player than Michael Jordan and want to cling to the dumb 6 rings argument Just lol at that entire sentence
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 22:38
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 22:40
|
|
|
a neat cape posted:Bulls fans probably want the Warriors to win because they know that LeBron is a better basketball player than Michael Jordan and want to cling to the dumb 6 rings argument I, Mel Mudkiper, a mother fucker whose entire legacy is based on being wrong and dumb, am looking at this sentence and realizing I have been outmatched
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 22:52
|
|
|
He's right tho. That is the coldest take ever.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 22:55
|
|
|
"Better than" arguments are inherently meaningless because they always assume a vacuum that cannot be proven Who knows if LeBron is actually better than Michael? What is inarguable is that Michael Jordan is the greatest basketball player of all time and probably one of the most important figures in the history of sports in general.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 22:57
|
|
|
Mel continues to be wrong and dumb I see.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 22:58
|
|
|
CharlestheHammer posted:Mel continues to be wrong and dumb I see. Name a player more significant to the current cultural climate of professional sports than Michael Jordan. He defined the way we perceive the modern superstar athlete. Hell, consider the fact that we keep comparing EVERY great bball player to him. No one asks "Is Lebron better than Kobe" or "Is Lebron better than Chamberlain" Jordan is a benchmark as much for his talent as he is for his iconic grip over the popular consciousness of the sport itself
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 23:00
|
|
|
Lebron.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 23:02
|
|
|
CharlestheHammer posted:Mel continues to be wrong and dumb I see. He's right. It's what makes Ross' statement about the 6 rings argument and calling it dumb even funnier. The whole MJ/Lebron comparison at it's root is a loving stupid exercise in the first place. Comparing generational talents against each other is a pointless argument because no one knows how it would play out. The game is different. The players are different. How the games are officiated are different. It's not comparable. Not to mention that comparing the two in the first place is dumb because they didn't even do the same poo poo. Mike and Kobe were scorers, 2 guards, not facilitators like Lebron. The better Lebron comparison is Magic and even then it's dumb for the reasons listed above. I don't know why everyone has to anoint people better than others from past generations, it's one of the most stupid and pointless loving debates in all of sports.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 23:04
|
|
|
CharlestheHammer posted:Lebron. ...can thank Michael for the shoe deals and endorsement money.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 23:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 09:53 |
|
|
weird Asian candy posted:He's right. It's what makes Ross' statement about the 6 rings argument and calling it dumb even funnier. The whole MJ/Lebron comparison at it's root is a loving stupid exercise in the first place. Comparing generational talents against each other is a pointless argument because no one knows how it would play out. The game is different. The players are different. How the games are officiated are different. It's not comparable. Not to mention that comparing the two in the first place is dumb because they didn't even do the same poo poo. Mike and Kobe were scorers, 2 guards, not facilitators like Lebron. The better Lebron comparison is Magic and even then it's dumb for the reasons listed above. Why do boomers refer to themselves as the greatest generation instead of the luckiest? The answer might not surprise you!
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 23:07
|
|