|
Sanders even better than Spicey at doubling down on every last tweet
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:15 |
|
|
# ? May 10, 2024 13:13 |
|
Harik posted:How the gently caress was this supposed to work? Were we just counting on their citizens expecting "Papers, please!" around every street corner and not realizing you could freely travel inside the US? How does any visa restriction work in any country? Most visa rules in most countries are 80% honor based and 20% "if we catch you we will kick you out and never let you back in" instead of any real minute to minute enforcement.
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:15 |
|
https://twitter.com/EliStokols/status/871792065163800578
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:15 |
|
Majorian posted:This is the assumption that Dems made in 2016, and it absolutely didn't pan out: "Oh, look at Trump's negatives! We don't need to link Republicans to him; it will alienate those white affluent moderate suburbanites that we want to win, and people know not to vote for the party Trump's running with anyway." if you're going to say stupid things that don't make sense if you read the rest of my post i suppose it makes it less obvious if you delete the parts you didn't read, but it's still stupid you couldn't read a single sentence all the way to the end before mashing post
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:15 |
|
Sanders is getting bodied lol
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:16 |
|
Trump: "I want to literally fist fight the mayor of london! Sad!" WH: "I haven't had time to discuss with the president the issue of fist fighting the mayor of london. next?"
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:16 |
|
It's not a ban, it's a 219000 hour probation.
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:17 |
|
Krispy Kareem posted:You guys remember how even with polls picking Hillary, electoral history said the Republican should win the election? And that one researcher who has correctly predicted every election in the last couple of decades said his data pointed to Trump regardless of common sense? Even when 'nothing matters', stuff still matters. "Losing seats" will definitely happen. IDK about the House. It's a lot of seats.
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:17 |
|
"Is anyone vetting his tweets?" "Wellll, not really......" Oh gods we're so dead.
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:17 |
Kammat posted:"Is anyone vetting his tweets?" No you see, it's important that he have that contact with the 100 million totally not bots unfiltered by liberal media spin!
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:18 |
|
Javes posted:Sanders is getting bodied lol yeah but unlike Spicer she's pretty good at keeping her cool and not yelling at reporters she has made a couple whiny remarks about people not being polite which were pretty eyeroll worthy
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:18 |
|
evilweasel posted:I suspect that people are misunderstanding the proposal because trump didn't understand it either, of course.
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:18 |
|
Krispy Kareem posted:You guys remember how even with polls picking Hillary, electoral history said the Republican should win the election? And that one researcher who has correctly predicted every election in the last couple of decades said his data pointed to Trump regardless of common sense? that researcher is a lying weasel his "correct prediction in every election in the past couple of decades" relied on saying he got 2000 right when he picked gore because gore won the popular vote so when he says he predicted a trump win, he means he predicted a trump popular vote win and guess what didn't happen
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:18 |
|
evilweasel posted:i don't believe anyone who wasn't in a coma for 2016 will be complacent in any election in their lifetimes from here on out Oh how I wish you were right but voter turnout during midterms is almost always pathetic. I can't even begin to tell you how many don't even know about midterms and think the only elections that happen in this country are presidential elections.
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:19 |
|
Regarding Trump's base still loving him, our pal Nate Silver has thoughts on that: https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/871788305737756673
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:19 |
|
EXTREME VETTING! *power guitar chord*
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:20 |
|
Charliegrs posted:Oh how I wish you were right but voter turnout during midterms is almost always pathetic. I can't even begin to tell you how many don't even know about midterms and think the only elections that happen in this country are presidential elections. voter turnout was alright in 2006, the last time there was both a cripplingly incompetent and blindingly obvious republican administration and a republican congress discussing bills to gut entitlements that people hate with the white hot intensity of a thousand suns
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:20 |
|
"The tweets are important because it gets the president's message across unfiltered directly to the people" "But stop focusing on them so much, Media, gosh"
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:21 |
|
Kammat posted:EXTREME VETTING! *power guitar chord* ... it's extremely important!
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:21 |
I just want someone to call the WH reps out for repeatedly calling the media liars to their face. Get mad! They're directly insulting you, do something about it. I know this would be a bad move because it means playing their game but gently caress it makes me angry to see that go unchallenged constantly.
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:21 |
|
Not That I'm Aware Of
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:22 |
|
ask if Trump believes climate change is real please then keep doing it every briefing until you get a yes/no
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:22 |
|
Chard posted:I just want someone to call the WH reps out for repeatedly calling the media liars to their face. Get mad! They're directly insulting you, do something about it. the problem is if they do that, then they validate the "media vs. trump" narrative civil society relies on other republicans calling this poo poo out and whoops they're all soulless weasels
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:22 |
|
evilweasel posted:if you're going to say stupid things that don't make sense There's no need for that; I'm not trying to be disrespectful to you. quote:if you read the rest of my post i suppose it makes it less obvious if you delete the parts you didn't read, but it's still stupid you couldn't read a single sentence all the way to the end before mashing post The rest of your post didn't really answer my criticism, though: quote:and (c) everyone else is saying why trump sucks they'd rather say why they'd be good This doesn't address the need for Democrats to tie Republicans to Trump. Trump may be stylistically different from Ryan and McConnell, but they ultimately have the same aims: make most Americans poorer, dumber, and more paranoid. That's something that can't be emphasized enough. e: I'm glad that you recognize the need for the Dems to say why they'd be good, but they really do need to do both things at the same time. Majorian fucked around with this message at 19:24 on Jun 5, 2017 |
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:22 |
|
Krispy Kareem posted:You guys remember how even with polls picking Hillary, electoral history said the Republican should win the election? And that one researcher who has correctly predicted every election in the last couple of decades said his data pointed to Trump regardless of common sense? Even when 'nothing matters', stuff still matters. Every single election you hear a billion of these, half of them are wrong, then 4 years later they all come back and do the exact same tour, just adding another rule to their "prediction" to cover if they hosed up the last election.
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:22 |
|
evilweasel posted:This is the same misunderstanding of privatization. This is going to be a non-profit government-controlled corporation, not a privately owned for-profit corporation. My worry would be that it would then draw the same sort of contempt republicans seem to have for other entities in that mold and face the same sort of fuckery they try pulling with those (massive pre-funding requirements for benefits, etc. as in the case of USPS), all with the unstated goal of government divestment and sale of assets and operation to for-profit enterprises.
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:23 |
evilweasel posted:the problem is if they do that, then they validate the "media vs. trump" narrative I know, that's what I said? I just want the media to constantly put "they said X, fact is Y" on every screen all the time, doesn't have to be a direct response e: ahaha "Where's Sean?!"
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:24 |
|
lol "where's Sean" "he's here today."
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:24 |
|
Lol "Where is Sean? Is he OK? Is he alive?"
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:24 |
|
"YOU DIDN'T ASK ANY OTHER DEPUTY PRESS SECS ABOUT THI-" (everyone at once) "Yeah, we did"
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:25 |
|
theflyingorc posted:THEY ARE LITERALLY LETTING HIM PRETEND TO PRESIDENT
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:25 |
lol "you can stay longer" after she smokebombs outta there
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:25 |
|
hahaah "You can stay longer!"
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:25 |
|
"You could stay longer!"
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:25 |
|
hahahaha "You can stay longer"
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:25 |
That went swimmingly.
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:26 |
|
Aww they didn't ask if she'd followed up on whether Trump believes in climate change.
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:26 |
|
Majorian posted:There's no need for that; I'm not trying to be disrespectful to you. the hillary campaign was generally criticized for doing too much stuff about why Trump sucks and too little about "here is what i, hillary clinton, will do for you". people who are reachable re: trump sucks know he sucks. they know he's a republican. if you don't know he sucks, a democratic candidate for congress isn't going to be the one who convinces you. so the democratic candidates want to run on their positive vision for america, run against republicans generally - and that includes the specific terrible things candidate x voted for, like the ahca - but to not waste their time on how much of a garbage person trump is and what a burning trash fire his administration is because if you don't know that by now, how is anyone going to convince you, but you can perhaps be convinced that your representative voted to take away your health care and the democratic candidate is saying some sensible things that are good for you even though you still believe in your heart of hearts, because you lack a brain, trump still is fighting for you edit: to be clear that last sentence the "you" refers to our hypothetical idiot trump voter not you, the poster majorian evilweasel fucked around with this message at 19:28 on Jun 5, 2017 |
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:26 |
|
Chard posted:I know, that's what I said? I just want the media to constantly put "they said X, fact is Y" on every screen all the time, doesn't have to be a direct response Other Shaun but https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAhG9D9UO7c
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:26 |
|
|
# ? May 10, 2024 13:13 |
|
There really is not a good huckabee
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 19:26 |