|
hoiyes posted:The easiest fix is change wording on Advanced SLAM to include "action bar". That would neuter K Wings entirely as bombers, which would be no bad thing, but I think a fairer nerf would be to make ASLAM give a stress instead. Then they can't 3-bank-3-bank-bomb forever and they get predictable the round after they ASLAM which might make them think twice about whether to bomb NOW. Sabine needs to be range limited, ideally to only work on bombs dropped by the ship she's equipped to.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 20:49 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 01:32 |
|
thespaceinvader posted:Sabine needs to be range limited, ideally to only work on bombs dropped by the ship she's equipped to. That sounds terrible, because there's no token to mark either player ownership of bombs, or ship with Sabine token.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 21:01 |
|
canyoneer posted:Are you in the US? An X Wing playing family member just moved to Madrid and I guess they have a bunch of K Wings available, but oddly enough have very little product from waves 1-4. Are the included cards in Espanol also? New question: Adaptive Ailerons and Twin Ion Engine Mk. II - Since AA lists doing bank maneuvers, and TIE mk. II counts banks as green, does that mean a Striker can do its AA maneuver which clears a stress out for doing an action?
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 21:09 |
|
IronSaber posted:Are the included cards in Espanol also? Yeah, they would be in Espanol Striker cannot do an AA maneuver while stressed, so it wouldn't come up
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 21:12 |
|
Dumb question, I just want to double check something. If you attempt a barrel roll, but aren't able to fit in the desired spot, you are then obligated to check to see if you can complete the barrel roll anywhere else on that same side, correct?
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 21:25 |
|
canyoneer posted:That sounds terrible, because there's no token to mark either player ownership of bombs, or ship with Sabine token. Which is funny, because Sabine does specify "friendly bomb token," which means you do need a way to track who's dropped what bombs.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 21:31 |
|
canyoneer posted:Yeah, they would be in Espanol Whoops, forgot about the not stressed part. I'm gonna have to pass on the Espanol K-wings. I like having my collection in English. Thank you for the offer though!
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 21:32 |
|
Ballpoint Penguin posted:Dumb question, I just want to double check something. If you attempt a barrel roll, but aren't able to fit in the desired spot, you are then obligated to check to see if you can complete the barrel roll anywhere else on that same side, correct? Correct.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 21:33 |
|
Baron Fuzzlewhack posted:Which is funny, because Sabine does specify "friendly bomb token," which means you do need a way to track who's dropped what bombs. I seriously want to see this come up on the finals of a stream just to see how many people start defending the clueless judges who happened to be there but absolutely doing nothing. I also enjoy the people who say there's no need for stricter rules to prevent against cheating because
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 21:34 |
|
It's not that difficult to keep track of what bomb/mine/net tokens belong to who.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 21:41 |
|
Ballpoint Penguin posted:Dumb question, I just want to double check something. If you attempt a barrel roll, but aren't able to fit in the desired spot, you are then obligated to check to see if you can complete the barrel roll anywhere else on that same side, correct? The procedure is: Declare a barrel roll, including a direction. Attempt to barrel roll in that direction. If you cannot complete the barrel roll that you want, but can complete a barrel roll in that direction in general, i.e. you wanted to barrel roll such that the edge of the movement template is aligned with the front of the ship base, but the ship base has to be moved forward to clear an obstacle, you do that. If you cannot barrel roll in that direction at all, you are not obligated to barrel roll in a different direction. Note that if you pushed the limit to perform this barrel roll, you even have the option of rescinding use of the PTL card entirely. In other words, if you say 'I want to barrel roll left,' attempt it, and discover that you just barely land on an obstacle, no matter where you position the ship along the template, you cannot barrel roll left, and you are not required to barrel roll right. You can choose a different action. Boost works the same. TheCenturion fucked around with this message at 21:47 on Jun 6, 2017 |
# ? Jun 6, 2017 21:44 |
|
The most depressing thing about Contracted Scouts is comparing their stats and dial to a generic T65
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 21:51 |
|
General Battuta posted:The most depressing thing about Contracted Scouts is comparing their stats and dial to a generic T65 obligatory "But the pilots are so good" apologia.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 21:52 |
|
Managed to rock an enemy Fenn using Ketsu and then my Fenn destroyed him in one salvo, feels good
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 21:55 |
|
Pac-Manioc Root posted:obligatory "But the pilots are so good" apologia. Before I stopped playing I'd often look at the Jumpmasters across the table and try to assess exactly what 4 points were worth (Rookie Pilot vs. Contracted Scout) —lose one red (worth 12 pts I guess?) —lose a green 1-bank right + gain lots of green if you go left + gain 1-turns and sloops + lol a white sloop + PWT + 1 hull (not 2 cause integrated astro) + 2 shields + large base to go fast + barrel roll + extra torpedo slot + crew slot + illicit slot + EPT, lol 4 points
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 22:29 |
|
canyoneer posted:That sounds terrible, because there's no token to mark either player ownership of bombs, or ship with Sabine token. The same argument could easily apply to Sabine as she is now (she only works on friendly tokens, how do you distinguish those your opponent dropped) and she works fine (from a practical perspective) now. In practice, you'd almost always know which bomb came from which ship. The number of bombs dropped in a game rarely exceeds single figures.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 22:46 |
|
I use challenge coins as my side bombs for clusters because they are amost exactly the right size and because im a deuche* *only in friendly games not tournaments
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 00:12 |
|
Chill la Chill posted:Correct. Thanks. So, that being the case, what do people think the deal will be with the new Starviper title? You declare your barrel roll to one side or the other, are you then also committed to trying the 1 bank template in both of its orientations? Or is it like a boost where you can try it one way and if it doesn't work you can opt out?
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 00:17 |
If you use Echo as a precedent you have to declare both a side and an orientation
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 00:37 |
|
Ballpoint Penguin posted:Thanks. I expect it will work same as Echo does. On the Starviper, you have 4 options to declare. Left banked forward, left banked backward, and their 2 right side equivalents. You declare before putting the template down. If you declare left and banked forward but cannot because you're blocked, you can instead declare a barrel roll in another direction or do any other legal action. You're not stuck doing the roll left and banked backwards if you tried for left forward and didn't fit.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 00:37 |
|
thespaceinvader posted:That would neuter K Wings entirely as bombers, which would be no bad thing, but I think a fairer nerf would be to make ASLAM give a stress instead. Then they can't 3-bank-3-bank-bomb forever and they get predictable the round after they ASLAM which might make them think twice about whether to bomb NOW. Actually, thinking further on this I think the best fix, considering the intent of Mines as area denial not free damage, and considering that higher PS should mean a) a pilot better at bombing, and b) better at avoiding bombing, would be: Mines only become active in the following activation phase. This means Miranda is still a beast at bombing low ps ships, but will struggle to hit PS9 (and PS8 aces that cede initiative). And it will end the counter-intuitive fact that Wardens will no longer be amazing bombers. It brings more skill to bombing as you have to plan how to funnel ships onto your bombs and predict where ships are going.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 01:56 |
|
Anyone else picking up a C-ROC tomorrow?
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 05:17 |
|
I've got one coming in on Thursday. Trying to figure out a 100 point list with Jabba but he seems more geared toward epic play.
DogCop fucked around with this message at 06:23 on Jun 7, 2017 |
# ? Jun 7, 2017 05:30 |
|
Zigmoose posted:I've got one coming in on Thursday. Trying to figure out a 100 point list with Jabba but he seems more geared toward epic play. Yeah he just does not seem to be worth it in regular x-wing.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 07:18 |
|
No sign of an FAQ for Cikatro Vizago yet though so swapping out your cloaking device for permanent cloak should still work. Unkar Plutt (17) Cikatro Vizago (0) Cloaking Device (2) Spacetug Tractor Array (2) Total: 21 Exchange cloaking device for BMST and you've got a 4 agility bumping tugboat.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 08:47 |
|
Zigmoose posted:No sign of an FAQ for Cikatro Vizago yet though so swapping out your cloaking device for permanent cloak should still work. Shiiiit. Try this for fun times after you swap out the cloak Asajj Ventress (37) Push the Limit (3) Cikatro Vizago (0) EMP Device (2) Black Market Slicer Tools (1) Anti-Pursuit Lasers (2) Total: 45 Edit: drat just realized cloak is small ship only Raged fucked around with this message at 09:42 on Jun 7, 2017 |
# ? Jun 7, 2017 09:38 |
|
Look, if you want to get silly with it: G-1A Starfighter: •4-LOM (39) •Experimental Interface (3) •Mist Hunter (0) •Squad Leader (2) •Cikatro Vizago (0) Sensor Jammer (4) •Cloaking Device (2) Tractor Beam (1) Total: 39/100 Enhanced Scopes probably better than Jammer for blocking and slicing.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 10:43 |
|
Is the C-ROC finally out now?
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 15:27 |
|
Officially tomorrow, my local store has theirs in stock and ready to sell.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 15:33 |
I really like the X-wing Squadron Builder app but it hasn't updated since Rogue One. I've tried other apps and I hate the UI and how you choose ships and upgrades.
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 15:34 |
|
Admiral Joeslop posted:I really like the X-wing Squadron Builder app but it hasn't updated since Rogue One. I've tried other apps and I hate the UI and how you choose ships and upgrades. If you are on Android, Startactics is amazing. Updates are great, he updated the app the day Guns for Hire was announced.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 15:54 |
|
Wow yeah, Startactics is really good.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 16:13 |
|
So we're between league cycles at my local store. We were thinking of trying some furball or some such. Anyone have any preferred rule sets for furball, such as point limit and the likes?
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 17:26 |
|
My favorite squad builder is still X-Wing Squads Designer, which you have to sideload because Disney is capricious. https://plus.google.com/117131374075828331639/posts/Vf8UER8Y1ro
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 19:43 |
|
FFG updated the FAQ. https://images-cdn.fantasyflightgames.com/filer_public/6e/96/6e96c3c3-85e1-4138-97f6-5b31cef1bee7/x-wing_faq_v433_low.pdf CROC base isn't a misprint. IG2000 title is Scum only. Ships can't perform actions during setup. What's up with the last one. Some weird rule for Jake and Hyperwave Comm Scanner?
|
# ? Jun 8, 2017 00:59 |
|
canyonero posted:IG2000 title is Scum only. I mean, it makes sense. But still, boooo
|
# ? Jun 8, 2017 01:01 |
|
I'm amazed we actually got a faq before the product released!!
|
# ? Jun 8, 2017 01:02 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2017 01:09 |
|
canyonero posted:CROC base isn't a misprint. Oh, it's a misprint. This is an easy way of fixing it.
|
# ? Jun 8, 2017 01:12 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 01:32 |
|
So is there any chance of heavy FAQ's rolling through any time soon, or has Store Champ season put that kind of stuff on hold?
|
# ? Jun 8, 2017 01:24 |