|
RiggenBlaque posted:He's going to tell people if there are tapes "over a short period of time?" What type of phrasing is that apparently you'll be disappointed when you find out
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:17 |
|
|
# ? Jun 13, 2024 06:10 |
|
theflyingorc posted:He clearly doesn't understand the gravity of what this accusation means to James Comey. Comey: "Lordy, I hope there are tapes" e: and just gives the Romanian pres a normal handshake, ofc
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:17 |
|
God drat, he has no idea what corruption is, let alone how it effects Romania. "Despite the long history of friendship with America we still have a lot of corruption!" "Yes, but American businesses are going there so *shrugs* can't be so bad." *facepalm*
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:18 |
|
theflyingorc posted:He clearly doesn't understand the gravity of what this accusation means to James Comey. Pfft, that's just POTUS accusing the former FBI director of committing perjury. Wait, what the gently caress timeline is this considered anymore?
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:19 |
|
I hope this further emboldens the FBI against him.
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:20 |
|
Retro42 posted:
extreme dark comedy
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:20 |
|
Aaaaand VANISH Still, he said he'd love to testify under oath. The media needs to hammer him and Spicersanders every loving day asking when that will happen.
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:21 |
|
Retro42 posted:Pfft, that's just POTUS accusing the former FBI director of committing perjury. Superman killed a pregnant Lois
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:21 |
|
Trump Under Oath would commit the most perjuries per second of any man who has ever given sworn testimony.
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:22 |
|
LaserShark posted:Aaaaand VANISH Mueller won't want to do it immediately. You interview a suspect last, after you already know everything.
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:22 |
|
loving dickhead. I can't wait until he gets crushed like a bug in court.
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:22 |
|
LaserShark posted:Aaaaand VANISH MSNBC is all over it, their main takeaway seems to be his committing himself to testifying under oath.
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:22 |
|
OhDearGodNo posted:He still talks about the election last year. Holy poo poo. Well that's a given. Trump is one of those people that constantly bring up some time they succeeded no matter how dubious to brag like a sad, pathetic 40 something reflecting all the time on his high school football years when he scored four touchdowns in a single game.
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:23 |
|
in any other time a sitting president accusing the (recently) former head of the FBI of perjury would dominate the news cycle for MONTHS we're in such a loving wacko dimension that editors are going "'trump accuses comey of perjury' is the best we've got? slow news day." i honestly just cannot get used to this sort of poo poo also how on earth could a law firm still represent this man? him going under oath would be absolutely the worst possible thing right? what the gently caress is wrong with trump's brain that he thinks it would end well? what hand does he think he's holding?
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:23 |
|
Kekekela posted:MSNBC is all over it, their main takeaway seems to be his committing himself to testifying under oath. Which is going to be unfortunate when the Qatar crisis escalates.
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:23 |
|
LaserShark posted:Aaaaand VANISH I still really, really want a yes/no answer on whether Trump believes in global warming.
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:23 |
|
Pollyanna posted:loving dickhead. I can't wait until he gets crushed like a bug in court. "I won! I won!" i continue to insist as the guards lead me to my jail cell
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:24 |
|
Night10194 posted:Trump Under Oath would commit the most perjuries per second of any man who has ever given sworn testimony. Is it still perjury if you don't know the meaning of any of the words you use?
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:24 |
|
As bad as I'm sure he'd loving lie through his teeth while in a hearing, I don't think it could possibly make him look any worse than he already does. The best it does is increase Democrats' chances of taking the House and holding firm in the Senate.
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:25 |
|
NiceGuy posted:Holy poo poo he actually just trotted out the 'i didn't say that... but if i did, it's not illegal!' line, almost verbatim!
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:25 |
|
Mr Ice Cream Glove posted:Superman killed a pregnant Lois Somehow that entire arc seems more plausible than reality right now.
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:25 |
|
Trump directly saying Comey lied is actually a much bigger deal. Republicans can't get away with justifying his behavior now because one of the two of them is lying. Trump didn't just not know better: he did it and lied to the public about it, or he didn't do it. So either Comey, the guy who is honest to a fault to the point of admitting to the Senate that he leaked his memos, or Trump, the guy who ordered his press secretary to lie on his very first day about very obvious facts observable with the naked eye, is a liar and they're going to be asked which one. That's, uh, not a great spot for them to be in.
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:27 |
|
Kekekela posted:MSNBC is all over it, their main takeaway seems to be his committing himself to testifying under oath. https://twitter.com/JuddLegum/status/873256174539460608 https://twitter.com/JuddLegum/status/873256512990433281 (It's probably not gonna happen, at least not soon)
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:28 |
|
evilweasel posted:Trump directly saying Comey lied is actually a much bigger deal. Republicans can't get away with justifying his behavior now because one of the two of them is lying. Trump didn't just not know better: he did it and lied to the public about it, or he didn't do it. So either Comey, the guy who is honest to a fault to the point of admitting to the Senate that he leaked his memos, or Trump, the guy who ordered his press secretary to lie on his very first day about very obvious facts observable with the naked eye, is a liar and they're going to be asked which one. That's, uh, not a great spot for them to be in. You always knew he was going to accuse Comey of lying, though. We all knew it. And of course Comey's telling the truth of his account. Why else would he constantly respond to 'THERE MIGHT BE TAPES' with 'Ahaha, god please yes.'
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:29 |
|
Night10194 posted:You always knew he was going to accuse Comey of lying, though. We all knew it. And of course Comey's telling the truth of his account. Why else would he constantly respond to 'THERE MIGHT BE TAPES' with 'Ahaha, god please yes.' We did, but I'm sure his lawyer, Paul Ryan, and Mitch McConnell all desperately hoped he'd forget, and all know he's lying. But they don't want to admit it.
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:29 |
|
https://twitter.com/chucktodd/status/873259620663480320 i can't decide if there are tapes and his lawyers explained how bad that would be to admit, or if there are not tapes and he didn't even mean to imply there were but now that he did he can't admit defeat on even the tiniest point
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:30 |
|
Spaced God posted:https://twitter.com/JuddLegum/status/873256174539460608 thanks i wasn't aware
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:31 |
|
Night10194 posted:Trump Under Oath would commit the most perjuries per second of any man who has ever given sworn testimony. Trump under oath is a loving treasure. quote:Q: Have you ever not been truthful?
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:31 |
|
https://twitter.com/NoahCRothman/status/873257230921019392
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:31 |
|
I strongly suspect that's part of why Comey was so direct in calling him a liar. Trump can't let an actual challenge stand.
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:31 |
|
Kekekela posted:Something I missed on the first listen is that he wasn't even basing "it's not illegal" on what OLC told him, but on "everything he read today" hahahaha. there is a very good chance he googled "donald trump obstruction" and looked for articles saying he was in the clear
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:32 |
|
Night10194 posted:I strongly suspect that's part of why Comey was so direct in calling him a liar. Trump can't let an actual challenge stand. I think the better explanation is that the media won't ever use the word liar, unless reporting on someone who did. So by saying it himself, he gets his statement reported accurately.
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:33 |
|
theflyingorc posted:there is a very good chance he googled "donald trump obstruction" and looked for articles saying he was in the clear he doesn't use the google himself he has staffers use the google and print out the news stories for him to read seriously
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:33 |
|
evilweasel posted:he doesn't use the google himself lol you think he reads news stories, they give him a one-paragraph summary he gets most of his news from Fox & Friends and cable TV
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:34 |
|
Help me understand, if Mueller subpoenas trump, does the president have an option of whether or not he testifies under oath? Or is that another thing the president gets to skip out on if he chooses?
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:34 |
|
evilweasel posted:he doesn't use the google himself you're right, i don't know what I was thinking those same articles we were making fun of, his underlings printed those out and he read the headlines and part of the first paragraph
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:35 |
|
I kinda wish dueling was still a thing.
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:35 |
|
evilweasel posted:Trump directly saying Comey lied is actually a much bigger deal. Republicans can't get away with justifying his behavior now because one of the two of them is lying. Trump didn't just not know better: he did it and lied to the public about it, or he didn't do it. So either Comey, the guy who is honest to a fault to the point of admitting to the Senate that he leaked his memos, or Trump, the guy who ordered his press secretary to lie on his very first day about very obvious facts observable with the naked eye, is a liar and they're going to be asked which one. That's, uh, not a great spot for them to be in. I expect the Republican defense to go from "He didn't know any better" to *shrug*.
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:35 |
|
Do you think he ever reads Twitter outside of his mentions?
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:36 |
|
|
# ? Jun 13, 2024 06:10 |
evilweasel posted:
Option three is that they're actually stupid enough to try to release partial tapes or in some way destroy evidence. I don't think we can rule it out at this point considering how colossally bad their legal strategy has been.
|
|
# ? Jun 9, 2017 20:36 |