|
Jomo posted:With the solo umbrella girl photo, the angled look works really well in making the eye follow a diagonal focus from bottom-left to top-right of the image, which makes me feel like the umbrella itself is nearly popping out of the photo. While with the schoolboy one it helps to emphasize his movement in the picture. Thank you!  Untitled by Jason Martin, on Flickr
|
#
?
May 29, 2017 19:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 23:43 |
|
|
Summer of 2016 in Porto, Portugal. _DSF1272 by Dan Hozias, on Flickr _DSF1267 by Dan Hozias, on Flickr _DSF1161 by Dan Hozias, on Flickr _DSF1207 by Dan Hozias, on Flickr _DSF1251 by Dan Hozias, on Flickr
Jomo fucked around with this message at 00:06 on Jun 1, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 11:21
|
|
|
Jomo posted:
Those birds look like g-g-g-g-g-ghosts
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2017 16:26
|
|
|
JHVH-1 posted:Those birds look like g-g-g-g-g-ghosts The HDR mode managed to catch the same bird in different positions between each internal frame. As Bob Ross would say, "happy little accident".
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 00:05
|
|
|
Jomo posted:The HDR mode managed to catch the same bird in different positions between each internal frame. As Bob Ross would say, "happy little accident". I wouldn't call it "happy", since HDR was involved.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 03:25
|
|
|
 This must be the place. by Jason Martin, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 05:41
|
|
|
 I see you. by Jason Martin, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 16:49
|
|
|
 Untitled by Jason Martin, on Flickr  Untitled by Jason Martin, on Flickr  Untitled by Jason Martin, on Flickr  Untitled by Jason Martin, on Flickr  Do not delay. by Jason Martin, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 19:25
|
|
|
Yep, street thread is still street thread.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 22:11
|
|
|
elgarbo posted:Yep, street thread is still street thread. Feels like Battlefield Earth in here.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 23:33
|
|
|
elgarbo posted:Yep, street thread is still street thread. Pham Nuwen posted:Feels like Battlefield Earth in here. I don't know what any of this means.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 23:43
|
|
|
thetzar posted:I don't know what any of this means. they're saying your photos are bad. maybe sit on your pics a bit more and work on self curating.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 00:14
|
|
|
thetzar posted:I don't know what any of this means. Battlefield Earth wiki posted:Almost every shot in the film is at a Dutch angle, because, according to Roger Christian, he wanted the film to look like a comic book.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 00:19
|
|
|
ansel autisms posted:they're saying your photos are bad. maybe sit on your pics a bit more and work on self curating. Okey.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 02:57
|
|
|
The second to last one is actually pretty good. The strong diagonals actually work for you in that case. The rest are pretty boring tho.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 04:59
|
|
|
thetzar posted:I don't know what any of this means. So my comment doesn't come off sounding like a thoughtless jab, here's some constructive critique -- those photos all just depict uninteresting subjects, but you've tried to add *drama* by shooting at weird angles. Street photography is really ultimately going to be about shooting countless thousands of photos and curating them down to only the very few good ones. Example: what's the deal with the photo of the guy pointing randomly at something out of frame, with the sunset behind him? I look at this photo and see a photo of a guy looking at something. Where's the tension? The interest? Nothing about this shot says anything interesting at all. It's just a guy who's probably just reading a sign and there's a bit of aesthetic lighting behind him. Probably should have been culled on a first pass through Lightroom. You post a lot of stuff in a lot of threads in great big photodumps, which is cool and fine if that's your thing, but I guess what I'm trying to say is maybe cast a critical eye over your stuff and do some curating of your own work.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 11:17
|
|
|
elgarbo posted:So my comment doesn't come off sounding like a thoughtless jab, here's some constructive critique -- those photos all just depict uninteresting subjects, but you've tried to add *drama* by shooting at weird angles. Street photography is really ultimately going to be about shooting countless thousands of photos and curating them down to only the very few good ones. Example: what's the deal with the photo of the guy pointing randomly at something out of frame, with the sunset behind him? I look at this photo and see a photo of a guy looking at something. Where's the tension? The interest? Nothing about this shot says anything interesting at all. It's just a guy who's probably just reading a sign and there's a bit of aesthetic lighting behind him. Probably should have been culled on a first pass through Lightroom. Thank you! This is the sort of useful feedback that I like to get.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 17:47
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2017 07:12
|
|
|
thetzar posted:
Have to say I really like this one. Though I'm not sure my eye would have been drawn to the sign if it weren't for the title of the photo. This feels like something that can rise above the others as it offers something poignant to say. It made me think about the relationship between those two people who are sitting next to each other. They seem awkward in juxtaposition to the (what you might call) faux-authentic marketing on the sign which I assume is for a bar or a cafe.
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2017 11:20
|
|
|
Nigel Tufnel posted:Have to say I really like this one. Though I'm not sure my eye would have been drawn to the sign if it weren't for the title of the photo. That's funny, because my eye jumped straight to the sign but I didn't read the title until you pointed it out (and now that song is in my head all day).
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2017 14:55
|
|
|
Nigel Tufnel posted:Have to say I really like this one. Though I'm not sure my eye would have been drawn to the sign if it weren't for the title of the photo. I like the parts of that one but the actual composition sort of ruins it for me. Maybe a bit wider and centered on the couple would be better.
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2017 06:13
|
|
|
 Views by Cacator, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2017 01:24
|
|
|
the CN tower in the background of pics looks just enough like the Space Needle that I always start looking to see where the picture was taken only to realise "in another country".
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2017 06:18
|
|
|
Looks like it was shot in the west end, but higher up than Bloor, I'd say around Dupont. What are you doing in tdot cacator
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2017 15:30
|
|
|
bobmarleysghost posted:Looks like it was shot in the west end, but higher up than Bloor, I'd say around Dupont. bobmarleysghost posted:What are you doing in tdot cacator
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2017 18:59
|
|
|
Just one, carefully selected, straight. Untitled by Jason Martin, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2017 19:46
|
|
|
Some photos from the market in Colombo, Sri Lanka.    Not the best framing or focus I could have hoped for but I was shooting quickly and from the hip on occasion.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2017 13:43
|
|
|
Cacator posted:The stairs next to Casa Loma! good stuff enjoy it
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2017 14:31
|
|
|
thetzar posted:
I like these a lot, your composition is great. Some street-ish stuff I guess (what is a railway line, if not a street for trains?):   
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2017 17:41
|
|
|
Nigel Tufnel posted:Some photos from the market in Colombo, Sri Lanka. oh ffs
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2017 02:30
|
|
|
Nigel Tufnel posted:Some photos from the market in Colombo, Sri Lanka. Why did you keep these? I'm curious to understand what you see in them given the major technical issues and the terrible framing.
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2017 12:35
|
|
|
Helen Highwater posted:Why did you keep these? I'm curious to understand what you see in them given the major technical issues and the terrible framing. because their of homeless-looking people, and theyre are the pinnacle of fine art
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2017 12:59
|
|
|
this is perfect, actually. you can just feel the photographer's gaze walking through an unfamiliar environment, clutching their camera bag close, turning a corner and SHOCK - it's a poor!!! dip your head back around the wall margaret, this place is not for us
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2017 15:17
|
|
|
thetzar posted:
I really like this one. The harsh doomsday text juxtaposed with her almost serene (but judgmental) facial expression is funny but also weirdly insightful. The weird diagonals and angles create an almost dizzying effect which is actually pretty on-point with the overall message. The contrast seems a little bit off, though. Edit: on the other hand it looks like your sense of timing gives your subjects a very lifeless vibe. Like they're secondary to your picture quality. Ernie. fucked around with this message at 16:03 on Jun 12, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2017 15:48
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2017 18:45
|
|
|
ansel autisms posted:this is perfect, actually. you can just feel the photographer's gaze walking through an unfamiliar environment, clutching their camera bag close, turning a corner and SHOCK - it's a poor!!! dip your head back around the wall margaret, this place is not for us
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 00:25
|
|
|
ansel autisms posted:this is perfect, actually. you can just feel the photographer's gaze walking through an unfamiliar environment, clutching their camera bag close, turning a corner and SHOCK - it's a poor!!! dip your head back around the wall margaret, this place is not for us I think it's more about the noble savage, laid low by western vices
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 01:31
|
|
|
Shellman posted:I think it's more about the noble savage, laid low by western vices you can really see the humanity in his eyes though, they are so poor but so content. rly makes u think
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 02:44
|
|
|
Yikes. Message received guys. Back to the drawing board.
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 04:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 23:43 |
|
|
good attitude
|
|
#
?
Jun 13, 2017 15:51
|
|