|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EKN4qilUOfs Why do you idiots believe these professors and not the hundreds telling you about climate change?
|
![]() |
|
![]()
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 16:09 |
|
Right off the bat he says "No, the official explanation makes no sense"
|
![]() |
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:Right off the bat he says "No, the official explanation makes no sense" Sorry, can't trust him. He's part of the "establishment"
|
![]() |
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:And yet people keep saying it. Where? What I read is that Russia used twitterbots and hacked voting systems, which is proven
|
![]() |
|
frakeaing HAMSTER DANCE posted:Why do you idiots believe these professors and not the hundreds telling you about climate change? There's a lot of money at stake for climate change which skews results. It's politicized
|
![]() |
|
SpaceGoatFarts posted:Where? What I read is that Russia used twitterbots and hacked voting systems, which is proven Yeah but Alex Jones didn't say that Spunky Psycho Ho posted:There's a lot of money at stake for climate change which skews results. It's politicized Yes, whereas conspiracy theory has no money in it. http://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-celebrities/alex-jones-net-worth/
|
![]() |
|
The Emir struck your decadent towers of excess, waste, and capitalism and you still argue to this day whether it was the Jews, the U.S government, or lizard people. TRuly he, and bernie, would ahve won
|
![]() |
|
SpaceGoatFarts posted:Where? What I read is that Russia used twitterbots and hacked voting systems, which is proven Who said Russia hacked voting systems?
|
![]() |
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:There's a lot of money at stake for climate change which skews results. It's politicized Nothing political about 9/11 no sir
|
![]() |
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:Right off the bat he says "No, the official explanation makes no sense" So, like the Russia thing, let's wait until the whole investigation is done and then look at his findings, instead of saying "see? he's investigating it therefor this is what REALLY happened!"
|
![]() |
|
VikingSkull posted:So, like the Russia thing, let's wait until the whole investigation is done and then look at his findings, instead of saying "see? he's investigating it therefor this is what REALLY happened!" I don't think logical consistency is Spunky's thing
|
![]() |
|
Toadvine posted:Who said Russia hacked voting systems? https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-06-13/russian-breach-of-39-states-threatens-future-u-s-elections
|
![]() |
|
Toadvine posted:Who said Russia hacked voting systems? bloomberg article this morning https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-06-13/russian-breach-of-39-states-threatens-future-u-s-elections efb apropos of nothing but still true: VikingSkull posted:Bernie would have won
|
![]() |
|
VikingSkull posted:So, like the Russia thing, let's wait until the whole investigation is done and then look at his findings, instead of saying "see? he's investigating it therefor this is what REALLY happened!" This is an independent investigation to correct the official investigation which was already done
|
![]() |
|
SpaceGoatFarts posted:https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-06-13/russian-breach-of-39-states-threatens-future-u-s-elections It's cool that Spunky somehow manages to not be the most credulous person in this thread
|
![]() |
|
SpaceGoatFarts posted:Where? What I read is that Russia used twitterbots and hacked voting systems, which is proven This only matters if they changed votes, which they did not.
|
![]() |
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:This is an independent investigation to correct the official investigation which was already done and that invalidates my point how exactly the results of the independent investigation aren't released yet, so drawing any conclusion from any of it is irrelevant perhaps the dude will have some mind blowing revelation, but we don't know that yet
|
![]() |
|
Tinfoil Papercut posted:This only matters if they changed votes, which they did not. Nah, it clearly shows intent to meddle which is important context to the rest of the investigation
|
![]() |
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:This is an independent investigation to correct the official investigation which was already done Wrong
|
![]() |
|
SickZip posted:It's cool that Spunky somehow manages to not be the most credulous person in this thread I fail to see how believing cyberwar is real is being credulous. You won't see me (nor the article linked) claiming they changed vote results though. I can totally believe Americans voted for Trump.
|
![]() |
|
Tinfoil Papercut posted:This only matters if they changed votes, which they did not. Which is why I asked Spunky to show me examples of people claiming Russians rigged the election results. That's not what I read.
|
![]() |
|
Remember when they released a list of IPs they associated with Russian Intelligence and 40% were TOR nodes? lol
|
![]() |
|
frakeaing HAMSTER DANCE posted:Nah, it clearly shows intent to meddle which is important context to the rest of the investigation No doubt, hence the investigations, and rightly so. But what does that have to do with Trump? The left is using this as the basis to imply that the election results were literally changed by Russia, and that Trump helped them do it. This is the part nobody believes, because there's no evidence.
|
![]() |
|
SpaceGoatFarts posted:Which is why I asked Spunky to show me examples of people claiming Russians rigged the election results. That's not what I read. Then what did Russia do and how is Trump connected to it
|
![]() |
|
SpaceGoatFarts posted:https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-06-13/russian-breach-of-39-states-threatens-future-u-s-elections Is this still the NSA leak being used as a source? quote:The new details, buttressed by a classified National Security Agency document recently disclosed by the Intercept
|
![]() |
|
Tinfoil Papercut posted:No doubt, hence the investigations, and rightly so. No they're not. They're being used as a basis to investigate the connections between the Trump campaign and Russia, which were already sketchy even before Election Day.
|
![]() |
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:Then what did Russia do and how is Trump connected to it You tell me. I never claimed Russia rigged the elections. Nor did I read something like that. All I've seen is the story about the piss tape, Trump and his family getting loans from Russians, and Trump and people from his cabinet having business ties with Russians. Not that I care (besides the piss tape. I care about that story because it's funny)
|
![]() |
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:Then what did Russia do and how is Trump connected to it Too direct a question for the nebulous talking points which simultaneously have to deny the Wikileaks happened (or imply they are fake news) and link Russia to Trump with a fake piss video.
|
![]() |
|
frakeaing HAMSTER DANCE posted:No they're not. They're being used as a basis to investigate the connections between the Trump campaign and Russia, which were already sketchy even before Election Day. What did Russia do and how was Trump connected to it
|
![]() |
|
frakeaing HAMSTER DANCE posted:No they're not. They're being used as a basis to investigate the connections between the Trump campaign and Russia, which were already sketchy even before Election Day. Is it suppose to be strange that a Presidential candidate for the United States of America begin communicating with major world superpowers? It would not surprise me if Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton, and Ted Cruz all had "connections" to Russia. I can "link" Trump to any major world power, it's neither proof of a collusion campaign, nor cause to investigate.
|
![]() |
|
SpaceGoatFarts posted:I fail to see how believing cyberwar is real is being credulous. You're literally believing Intelligence Agency press releases. The evidence linking Russia to any specific acts is paper thin, any time they get the slightest bit specific it's always an embarrassment
|
![]() |
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:What did Russia do and how was Trump connected to it Somehow it would be less funny if it was the Russians getting Trump elected. Sorry Spunky, it's really Americans who voted for Donald Jabulon Trump
|
![]() |
|
What is Hillary's status? Fine?
|
![]() |
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:What did Russia do and how was Trump connected to it Sorry I don't talk to literal retards, I'm not equipped to deal with them Tinfoil Papercut posted:Is it suppose to be strange that a Presidential candidate for the United States of America begin communicating with major world superpowers? It's mildly unusual, but there are protocols for such incidents such as filing paperwork revealing said contacts. Too bad that wasn't done. Not suspicious at all!
|
![]() |
|
frakeaing HAMSTER DANCE posted:Sorry I don't talk to literal retards, I'm not equipped to deal with them You have no idea that's why
|
![]() |
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:You have no idea that's why Ask your caretaker to help you Google Michael Flynn for a start
|
![]() |
|
SickZip posted:You're literally believing Intelligence Agency press releases. The evidence linking Russia to any specific acts is paper thin, any time they get the slightest bit specific it's always an embarrassment Why do you want to protect Putin's image so bad?
|
![]() |
|
frakeaing HAMSTER DANCE posted:Ask your caretaker to help you Google Michael Flynn for a start Lay out the theory of Russia and Trump as you understand it
|
![]() |
|
Spunky Psycho Ho posted:Lay out the theory of Russia and Trump as you understand it Nah I'm good.
|
![]() |
|
![]()
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 16:09 |
|
frakeaing HAMSTER DANCE posted:Sorry I don't talk to literal retards, I'm not equipped to deal with them I'd classify it as "highly usual" to have such contacts, and "completely expected" if Trump blew off protocol and paperwork. In fact, that's why people like him.
|
![]() |