|
SousaphoneColossus posted:would love to know more about scenarios in which it is acceptable to use a gun against tyrannical government according to republicans funny enough we were JUST in that period but it magically ended 144 days ago. We may never know why.
|
# ? Jun 14, 2017 22:30 |
|
|
# ? Jun 13, 2024 06:24 |
|
This is probably the first time I'm glad I don't have access to the paid feed because I had the experience of reading some of the book and there's a segment where she honestly tries to pin criticism of Justin Tredeau's pipeline and blind eye towards First Nation folk abuse as "tumblry" and it was probably one of the dumbest things I've ever had the scorn of reading. Holy shiiiit gently caress that book so hard.
|
# ? Jun 14, 2017 23:01 |
|
Kunster posted:This is probably the first time I'm glad I don't have access to the paid feed because I had the experience of reading some of the book and there's a segment where she honestly tries to pin criticism of Justin Tredeau's pipeline and blind eye towards First Nation folk abuse as "tumblry" and it was probably one of the dumbest things I've ever had the scorn of reading. Holy shiiiit gently caress that book so hard. I literally just got to that section in my copy and I don't think you've read it?
|
# ? Jun 14, 2017 23:09 |
|
Maybe I imagined it but at some point Alex Nichols rted someone who posted a bunch from the book and there was something like that. Still from the tidbit they posted I wanted to stab my eardrums out.
|
# ? Jun 14, 2017 23:26 |
|
to make a not lovely comment her greatest sin she lays at the feet of the internet left is their focus on just expressing their outrage and then stopping as if that was all they needed to do. Her point with that stuff was that saying 'Tredeau is carrying on the proud Canadian tradition of loving the First Nations while then in a week reblogging a picture of handsome sex boy Tredeau showing Trump what a REAL leader is doesn't actually work to a goal'. She's a cultural marxist in the literal sense, and a lot of the writings from those guys kinda center around the idea that finding the root cause of the evil you're fighting is lovely but it's about as useful as pointing to a burning car and going "OH poo poo THE GAS IN THAT FUEL TANK IGNITED AND NOW FIRE IS CONSUMING THE CAR", cool work and that is probably helpful but it doesn't do anything about the flaming car. It's like how RL went on his thing about how him recognizing that he was being hosed over by a horribly racist boss is a direct result of white supremacy and the white privilege his co-workers had in never having to deal with that. It was cool that he knew that, and it certainly inspired him to keep fighting for the right thing, but also it didn't change the fact that he has no options but to take the racist bullshit until he ~just happened to not fit in~. She uses the criticism of guys like Hunky Canada Man on such basic issues as an example because many of the people doing it also had no issue with the Democratic establishment in America even though they also tacitly supported the pipeline and loving natives and all.
|
# ? Jun 14, 2017 23:31 |
|
https://twitter.com/MarkAmesExiled/status/875023362619310081 I mean, its definitely the end point of accusing the republicans of being secret Russian infiltrators and not racist profiteers
|
# ? Jun 14, 2017 23:35 |
|
sexpig by night posted:to make a not lovely comment her greatest sin she lays at the feet of the internet left is their focus on just expressing their outrage and then stopping as if that was all they needed to do. Her point with that stuff was that saying 'Tredeau is carrying on the proud Canadian tradition of loving the First Nations while then in a week reblogging a picture of handsome sex boy Tredeau showing Trump what a REAL leader is doesn't actually work to a goal'. Ok I definitely imagined a lot since I remembered something about crying wolf re: criticizing Tredeau when the real racists like Milo came in. I don't know how in the heck I read that. (I still hated the part I reread). I do fear that a bunch of folk have read RL's words in a way where they gloss over the part where bigotry is actually addressed on the organizing and are just using this as a way to gloss over said bigotry.
|
# ? Jun 14, 2017 23:41 |
|
GalacticAcid posted:lol is she the one that rode a lyft with adam freidland looooool
|
# ? Jun 14, 2017 23:49 |
|
Kunster posted:Ok I definitely imagined a lot since I remembered something about crying wolf re: criticizing Tredeau when the real racists like Milo came in. I don't know how in the heck I read that. (I still hated the part I reread). she for sure does have a 'you can only care about one thing at a time' issue and I do take issue with her claim that Milo is a product of the over identified left since guys like him ALWAYS have been popular for republicans and shitbags, this is just the first era where they have such a huge platform. Still, yea to me most of her issues boiled down to 'I agree this is bad, but you have to have a better plan than just talking about how much it hurts you, you have to stand up and march' and that I do 100% agree with. The biggest issue she has with that crowd, that I agree with as well, is that they're just goddamn useless. Like, they're where the joke of "Republicans: we're putting all muslims in death camps; Democrats: MAKE. THE. GUARDS. WOMEN." come from, they just are absolutely drains on the left. sexpig by night fucked around with this message at 23:55 on Jun 14, 2017 |
# ? Jun 14, 2017 23:52 |
|
Justin Trudeau is extremely loving bad
|
# ? Jun 14, 2017 23:54 |
|
https://twitter.com/JadziaDax2017/status/874758487372378112 Dax, no!
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 00:12 |
|
as an alien being that has transitioned from one gender to another Kamala would be very upset if Dax got HRT in one of her prisons. What I'm saying is way to support The Dominion neolibs
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 01:12 |
|
She's gonna run in 2020, being touted as Obama 2.0 only a woman with a hard on for strong law enforcement. Watch.
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 01:58 |
|
God I can't get over how bad this tweet is.
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 02:03 |
|
Forceholy posted:She's gonna run in 2020, being touted as Obama 2.0 only a woman with a hard on for strong law enforcement. Watch. Screencapped for posterity
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 02:11 |
|
Sarah go on Cum Town
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 02:28 |
|
Also Will is by leaps and bounds the best host on this show, the rest of you are out of your minds.
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 02:28 |
|
But his eyes don't point in the same direction. Btw, non-MGS semi-serious Felix is the best Felix. Still funny, not pedantic and boring. E: in fact, Saudi Arabia Felix was the best Felix in recent memory. I really like it when he goes off on stuff he knows and makes insightful comments.
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 02:57 |
|
Lord Frisk posted:But his eyes don't point in the same direction.
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 03:28 |
|
What's joke Felix? On point Felix? Cause I agree
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 04:00 |
|
The weird thing is on point Felix has the exact same tone and cadence as ironic about to make a joke Felix. He keeps talking and I think a hilarious punchline is coming but it just ends in a interesting point. It freaks me out
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 04:06 |
|
you all need to recognize that every chapo is vital to the trap house
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 04:19 |
|
Dog, dog, I just enjoy Felix more when he's on point.
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 04:21 |
|
I can't believe Felix is into anime now https://twitter.com/ByYourLogic/status/875198668340682752
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 04:53 |
|
Speaking of anime, did you hear they're making a live action Cowboy Bebop?
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 05:08 |
|
ElNarez posted:I can't believe Felix is into anime now I'm into her.
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 05:15 |
|
Sebadoh Gigante posted:Speaking of anime, did you hear they're making a live action Cowboy Bebop? lmao
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 05:23 |
|
Matt is Faye.
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 05:26 |
|
Sushi in Yiddish posted:https://twitter.com/MarkAmesExiled/status/875023362619310081 mark ames found a russian woman he did not want to force abortion on and is extremely woke about russophobia now
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 07:41 |
|
https://twitter.com/ByYourLogic/status/875242088190926848
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 07:46 |
|
Kunster posted:Maybe I imagined it but at some point Alex Nichols rted someone who posted a bunch from the book and there was something like that. Still from the tidbit they posted I wanted to stab my eardrums out. Twitter use garbagekate started an account where she posts excerpts and comments on books. It's pretty good. https://twitter.com/katereadsbks/status/872501966760431616 I disagree with a lot of the conclusions Nagle makes but the thing that made me decide not to buy her book is the part where she discusses no-platforming/protesting campus speakers. She posits that online communities like tumblr made virtue a thing of scarcity and that that is the reasoning behind things like callout culture and preventing assholes from speaking at colleges. If virtue is a scant, finite thing, then people who were previously bastions of virtue can have it all taken away with one bad tweet, comment etc. Then she uses Germaine Greer as the first example of a college speaker falling victim to this virtue scarcity. I get that some things fly in Ireland that don't elsewhere but if you're giving an example of someone who at one point had virtue, nearly anyone else who's ever lived is a better choice than a pedophile TERF. If there are professionals whose work/points of view/etc. should not be encouraged or even actively opposed (Nagle seems to take it as a given that there are not) then Greer is decidedly in that group and I'd say that even in a universe of limitless virtue one would be hard pressed to look at Greer and say that she has a net positive amount of virtue. It's really shoddy analysis, and not the only example I saw but just the most egregious.
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 09:07 |
|
Regulus74 posted:Twitter use garbagekate started an account where she posts excerpts and comments on books. It's pretty good. Germaine Greer, her impact on feminist theory and basically her entire career are complicated as gently caress and I think dismissing her as a 'pedophile TERF' is reductive to the point of glib and more than a little hosed up Also it seems kinda rear end-backwards that you decided not to buy her book because you disagree with the conclusions she reaches. In the book you haven't read and only have a second-hand account of. Posted on a medium custom designed to amputate context at the knee. I mean sure don't buy it if you're interested but don't then act like you're being academically rigorous some plague rats fucked around with this message at 10:05 on Jun 15, 2017 |
# ? Jun 15, 2017 10:03 |
|
Crane Fist posted:Germaine Greer, her impact on feminist theory and basically her entire career are complicated as gently caress and I think dismissing her as a 'pedophile TERF' is reductive to the point of glib and more than a little hosed up For some people, pedophilia and violent hatred of trans people is going to outweigh an impact on feminist theory. quote:Also it seems kinda rear end-backwards that you decided not to buy her book because you disagree with the conclusions she reaches. In the book you haven't read and only have a second-hand account of. Posted on a medium custom designed to amputate context at the knee. I mean sure don't buy it if you're interested but don't then act like you're being academically rigorous I'm not buying the book because what I saw of it made me disinterested in buying it so I'm not sure what you're trying to say here.
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 10:16 |
|
Regulus74 posted:For some people, pedophilia and violent hatred of trans people is going to outweigh an impact on feminist theory. Violent hatred is attacking trans people in the street, not wittering tediously in academic circles about what defines gender but you know what, I'm going to stop here because I don't even like Germaine Greer, I think she's a real poo poo and not really worth defending. Point I was trying to make was that kind of instant dismissal based on an extremely reductive assessment of someone (the pedophile thing is knee-jerky as gently caress, save it for your Daily Mail column) is exactly the poo poo Nagle was talking about? Regulus74 posted:I'm not buying the book because what I saw of it made me disinterested in buying it so I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. You made a big deal out of how you disagree with her conclusions and find her analysis shoddy even though you haven't actually read the book is what I'm saying. It's like how I'm assuming you're real dense based on two posts. I refuse to engage with the broader context of your posting but I'll make sweeping statements about it
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 10:28 |
|
guys, guys, come on, you're all idiots
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 10:42 |
|
Anti-trans feminism does lead to less and worse support and services for trans people, and considering how rough it is to be trans they have a right to get pissed about that. Terfs aren't stabbing trans women but if they block them from dv shelters, don't offer health services or simply just harass them there's going to be deaths.
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 10:52 |
|
cat doter posted:guys, guys, come on, you're all idiots That's actually a very good point rumble in the bunghole posted:Anti-trans feminism does lead to less and worse support and services for trans people, and considering how rough it is to be trans they have a right to get pissed about that. Terfs aren't stabbing trans women but if they block them from dv shelters, don't offer health services or simply just harass them there's going to be deaths. I thought about editing out that part because pointing out excessive language to segregate degrees of transphobia is a Real Bad Stance but if I'm being a dumbass I'd rather do it honestly some plague rats fucked around with this message at 10:55 on Jun 15, 2017 |
# ? Jun 15, 2017 10:52 |
|
Crane Fist posted:the pedophile thing is knee-jerky as gently caress Calling someone who made a book filled with sexualized pictures of adolescent and prepubescent boys and passages openly sexualizing them a pedophile = knee-jerky as gently caress quote:You made a big deal out of how you disagree with her conclusions and find her analysis shoddy even though you haven't actually read the book is what I'm saying. I described what in the passages I've read made me lose interest in reading the rest of the book and you've... restated this but with added hostility? I still don't see your point but my disinterest in reading it is never going to match your passion for defending it so I'll just leave this be. Breadallelogram posted:you all need to recognize that every chapo is vital to the trap house Truth Ninja edit: cat doter posted:guys, guys, come on, you're all idiots Not gonna deny this one.
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 10:54 |
|
Regulus74 posted:I described what in the passages I've read made me lose interest in reading the rest of the book and you've... restated this but with added hostility? I still don't see your point but my disinterest in reading it is never going to match your passion for defending it so I'll just leave this be. You didn't say you'd 'lost interest in reading it', you declared her analysis shoddy and her conclusions invalid, that's what I took issue with. I don't give a gently caress if you actually read it or not, I'm not getting paid here Regulus74 posted:Calling someone who made a book filled with sexualized pictures of adolescent and prepubescent boys and passages openly sexualizing them a pedophile = knee-jerky as gently caress Oh poo poo here's a theme: Did you actually read it Follow up question: Did you consider that an extremely radical feminist was maybe making some kind of point and not just being like 'hey, here's some child porn, this is what I get off to, just thought I'd share' e: oh my god I'm defending Germaine loving Greer again! I loving hate Germaine Greer! She's a horrible person! loving hell you're my own personal white whale
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 11:00 |
|
|
# ? Jun 13, 2024 06:24 |
|
cat doter posted:guys, guys, come on, you're all idiots
|
# ? Jun 15, 2017 11:04 |