Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Mister Fister
May 17, 2008

D&D: HASBARA SQUAD
KILL-GORE


I love the smell of dead Palestinians in the morning.
You know, one time we had Gaza bombed for 26 days
(and counting!)

SKULL.GIF posted:

capitalists correctly recognize they actually need a customer/servant base that isn't dying in poverty for them to continue to be rich

I just don't trust them to push that hard for those policies, OTOH, it might be the only way, like some sort of 'only nixon could go to china' moment.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Grondoth
Feb 18, 2011
Is Trucking Deregulation what allowed trucking companies to make all their workers independent contractors who have to pay for their trucks and get no benefits?

Cause if that's the case, that's... another thing that can be laid at our feet. Carter did that.

fits my needs
Jan 1, 2011

Grimey Drawer
https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/876142263058944001

docbeard
Jul 19, 2011

Man, just do not name ships "Fitzgerald"

Al!
Apr 2, 2010

:coolspot::coolspot::coolspot::coolspot::coolspot:

Mister Fister posted:

I just don't trust them to push that hard for those policies, OTOH, it might be the only way, like some sort of 'only nixon could go to china' moment.

stick anything they give you into your pocket and stick your hand right back out, if they swat it for your ingratitude slap them in the face

Lemming
Apr 21, 2008

Oh Snapple! posted:

why would you expend any effort beyond a lazy vote for a little piece of poo poo like ossoff

Democrats are spineless cowards and if we get a win in an unlikely district they're more likely to slink out of their holes

etalian
Mar 20, 2006

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPTUqy1utdM

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold

docbeard posted:

Man, just do not name ships "Fitzgerald"

where else are we supposed to get our marine based folk songs

Ace of Baes
Jul 7, 1977



The sexy blogger has logged on.

Venuz Patrol
Mar 27, 2011
https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/876125397133537284

quote:

One Democratic source cautioned that the caucus may not go that far given the bipartisan atmosphere following the shooting at a congressional baseball practice Wednesday.

But other Democrats said they wanted to escalate the fight to give more prominence to the GOP's closed-door process of drafting health care legislation, which Republican leaders want to pass by month's end.

it's that time again. time to pick which anonymous sources you attribute the attitude of the entire democratic party and all its voters to

PostNouveau
Sep 3, 2011

VY till I die
Grimey Drawer
Oh gee guys, I don't know if the GOP trying to throw tens of millions of people off their health insurance is worth breaking decorum. :ohdear:

got any sevens
Feb 9, 2013

by Cyrano4747

Ace of Baes posted:




The sexy blogger has logged on.

nice

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Subjunctivitis posted:

Has there been any good amount of high quality research/hypothesizing on this? I'd be genuinely interested in reading serious material what caused leftist apathy/political abandonment.

I expect it's complex and multi-faceted, involving a bunch of historical points like MLK's assassination, Vietnam, McGovern's defeat, Reagan/Second Cold War/Baby Boomer economy, Clinton/Tech Bubble/GenX economy, but is there a well-developed thesis about the interweaving of these (and/or probably other) things to drive leftist out leftist participation? Or do I just need to read Chomsky?

I imagine there's been tons written about it, but I don't know of any specifically high-quality stuff.

AstheWorldWorlds posted:

And yet union enrollment numbers and all around leftist organization enrollment are significantly lower and the power of capital is significantly more entrenched than previously, while operating basically virtually unopposed. The state and capitalist class use soft power now in part because they are restrained from the minor victories achieved but also because they don't have to use hard power most of the time as there is effectively zero meaningful resistance. Should they feel threatened I absolutely guarantee hard power will make a swift come back.

Your argument doesn't make a terrible amount of sense, to be honest. You are describing existing conditions, not the degree of organization and mobilization (strength). The left is indeed significantly weaker in real terms than in the past.

What is your explanation for why the left vanished?

There's a lot of things that hurt and weakened the left in the years leading up to the post-war decline, but if I had to pick the most important, it'd probably be:
  • Working conditions, wages, and general prosperity had improved tremendously compared to when the labor movement had started. Workers - especially the blue collar white workers that were traditionally allowed to be the backbone of the labor movement - were in a relatively good position in the 50s, so the grassroots weakened. There just wasn't as much anger and drive as there had been before. Sure, they were still bound to work for wages and exist at the pleasure of employers, but the anger that fueled the early labor movement was from so much more than just that.
  • The major union movements pushed toward centralization, particularly in the interwar period and onward - and as a result, they drifted away from the workers. With a small leadership cadre leeching away more and more power from the grassroots, they fell out of touch with the interests of their membership, causing them to become less adaptable and more risk-averse. As the years passed, this only became self-reinforcing, with each generation of union leaders being more out of touch than the last, leading to union leaders being career bureaucrats and lawyers who've never been blue-collar in their lives. The current president of the AFL-CIO, for example, calls himself a "former coal miner" - but to him, the mines were never anything more than a part-time job he'd go work in the summer during the break between college semesters. As a result of this, the big unions have gotten much more focused on electoral politics and compromises, and are less interested in direct action and real gains.
  • The decline of the immigrant role in labor, and in international socialism. At the turn of the 20th century, many radical leftist thought leaders were European immigrants who'd brought the latest socialist ideas with them from overseas, there were plenty of poor (white) immigrants involved on the ground in the labor movements, and the Russian Revolution seemed to be a beacon to the rest of the world saying that socialism was possible, that capitalism could be defeated. As Europe turned to social democracy to defang the socialists, that weakened the leftist solidarity coming from overseas, and the Soviet Union posed problems as well; the excesses of Stalinism disillusioned many American socialists, and the US Communist Party became dependent on Soviet funding and ideological guidance
  • The relationship between labor leftists and political leftists was troubled and tended to lack in solidarity. The unions' relationship with the Socialist and Communist parties had long been shaky, and the new wave of leftism that rose in the 60s and 70s largely spurned labor. Being a product of students with no memory of any time before the prosperity of the 50s, they tended to focus on the biggest problems facing middle-class white youth: the fear that the Cold War might end the world, the fear that their number might get pulled in the Vietnam draft, and the feeling that America (the Greatest Nation in the World for as long as they could remember) should be above the unattractive and often brutal civil rights battles happening on their TVs. In other words, they largely abandoned economic issues and class inequality in order to focus on social issues instead. The Port Huron Statement sums it up pretty well - the one paragraph that talks about labor or the economy in any detail sounds like something out of a "here's what these wacky lazy millenials think about work" article, and it asserts that the core of the leftist movement should be the universities rather than the workers. Most of the rest is just complaining about society's lack of values,
  • The fact that these aging leftist bureaucracies and new leftist movements, both of which emphasized nonviolent electoral action, chose to willingly be absorbed into the Democratic Party, giving up their independent identity and seeking to become part of an established party and push it to the left.

punk rebel ecks
Dec 11, 2010

A shitty post? This calls for a dance of deduction.

Subjunctivitis posted:

Has there been any good amount of high quality research/hypothesizing on this? I'd be genuinely interested in reading serious material what caused leftist apathy/political abandonment.

I expect it's complex and multi-faceted, involving a bunch of historical points like MLK's assassination, Vietnam, McGovern's defeat, Reagan/Second Cold War/Baby Boomer economy, Clinton/Tech Bubble/GenX economy, but is there a well-developed thesis about the interweaving of these (and/or probably other) things to drive leftist out leftist participation? Or do I just need to read Chomsky?

I feel that another reason is that as the first world developed and absolute poverty became less common, "First World Guilt" became more common and less people saw a strong reason to support left wing ideals

Horseshoe theory
Mar 7, 2005

PostNouveau posted:

Oh gee guys, I don't know if the GOP trying to throw tens of millions of people off their health insurance is worth breaking decorum. :ohdear:

Politics is one big tone argument.

ThndrShk2k
Nov 3, 2009

by Nyc_Tattoo
Bread Liar

Ace of Baes posted:




The sexy blogger has logged on.
:prepop:

Al!
Apr 2, 2010

:coolspot::coolspot::coolspot::coolspot::coolspot:

PostNouveau posted:

Oh gee guys, I don't know if the GOP trying to throw tens of millions of people off their health insurance is worth breaking decorum. :ohdear:

its ok im sure the republicans would do the sahahahahah jk the president would openly mock the guy that got shot and the republicans would accuse the democrats of capitalizing on a tragedy

The Ol Spicy Keychain
Jan 17, 2013

I MEPHISTO MY OWN ASSHOLE
https://twitter.com/madinatoure/status/876166592782118912

a good dem

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


comedyblissoption
Mar 15, 2006

what this man desperately needs is a new categorization for his employment in this new gig economy

*gilbert gottfried voice* THE DEMOCRATS!

comedyblissoption
Mar 15, 2006

what this man desperately needs is higher mandate penalties on his taxes for not having health insurance

*gilbert gottfried voice* THE DEMOCRATS!

KomradeX
Oct 29, 2011

I think another important thing to remeber about the decline of labor inn America is the ALF-CIO tossing out all of it's old communist and socialist members, you know the grassroots guys that cut they're teeth (literally) during the depression. George Meney killed labor's power

etalian
Mar 20, 2006

KomradeX posted:

I think another important thing to remeber about the decline of labor inn America is the ALF-CIO tossing out all of it's old communist and socialist members, you know the grassroots guys that cut they're teeth (literally) during the depression. George Meney killed labor's power

it's almost like cutting a deal with bad dems hosed them in the long run.

GalacticAcid
Apr 8, 2013

NEW YORK VALUES

He is good, I was there.

But he is running on the Green Party line with DSA's endorsement, so he's a good not-dem.

Concerned Citizen
Jul 22, 2007
Ramrod XTreme
https://twitter.com/JMilesColeman/status/876216216083476480

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold

why do they elect manchin over a republican anyway

KomradeX
Oct 29, 2011

etalian posted:

it's almost like cutting a deal with bad dems hosed them in the long run.

Even in the early years a bunch of the organizers thought that alligining with any of party in the long run would gently caress them. Those people obviously lost

Venuz Patrol
Mar 27, 2011

Raskolnikov38 posted:

why do they elect manchin over a republican anyway

standing up to the democratic leadership gives him a lot more publicity than a republican doing the same thing would get

Concerned Citizen
Jul 22, 2007
Ramrod XTreme

Raskolnikov38 posted:

why do they elect manchin over a republican anyway

it's not the democratic party in wva, it's the manchin party

PostNouveau
Sep 3, 2011

VY till I die
Grimey Drawer

Raskolnikov38 posted:

why do they elect manchin over a republican anyway

He is a centrist.

Now I'mma say something here, brace yourselves:

It's better to have a centrist Democrat in that seat than a Republican.

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold

PostNouveau posted:

He is a centrist.

Now I'mma say something here, brace yourselves:

It's better to have a centrist Democrat in that seat than a Republican.

i'm more curious about the wants of the WV electorate as they seem contradictory and counter intuitive

punk rebel ecks
Dec 11, 2010

A shitty post? This calls for a dance of deduction.

KomradeX posted:

Even in the early years a bunch of the organizers thought that alligining with any of party in the long run would gently caress them. Those people obviously lost

Didn't unions side with Reagan?

GalacticAcid
Apr 8, 2013

NEW YORK VALUES

punk rebel ecks posted:

Didn't unions side with Reagan?

No

Concerned Citizen
Jul 22, 2007
Ramrod XTreme
some unions did back reagan

for example, the air traffic controllers endorsed him in 1980. then he busted their union

KomradeX
Oct 29, 2011

punk rebel ecks posted:

Didn't unions side with Reagan?

Only the Air Traffic Controllers Union. And that was over 50 years after the debate of unions hitching themselves to the Democrats was a good idea or not

Concerned Citizen
Jul 22, 2007
Ramrod XTreme
the teamsters also endorsed reagan twice

Normie Chomsky
Apr 10, 2008


Concerned Citizen posted:

some unions did back reagan

for example, the air traffic controllers endorsed him in 1980. then he busted their union

cucked up if true

(which it is)

KomradeX
Oct 29, 2011

Concerned Citizen posted:

the teamsters also endorsed reagan twice

That was under Jimmy Hoffa Jr wasn't it?

got any sevens
Feb 9, 2013

by Cyrano4747

PostNouveau posted:

He is a centrist.

Now I'mma say something here, brace yourselves:

It's better to have a centrist Democrat in that seat than a Republican.

*citation needed

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Venom Snake
Feb 19, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo

Raskolnikov38 posted:

i'm more curious about the wants of the WV electorate as they seem contradictory and counter intuitive

Identity politics makes or break you in states like WV and Manchin is the WV democratic party. Remember this dude is besties with loving Jeff Sessions

  • Locked thread