|
It didn't happen if we didn't see it.
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 16:59 |
|
|
skeleton warrior posted:1968: Democrats offer up leftist to "vast-majority of Americans desperate for let-wing policies", loses Millennials really failed the leftist voting block in the 80s.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:03
|
|
|
Willo567 posted:If I could side track for a bit, how do people in the thread deal with the poo poo show of a government we have now I work on my hobbies, go for walks, focus on eating right, and work at local charities and protest organizations.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:03
|
|
|
Covok posted:Oh please, Nate ain't a trusted source on poo poo anymore since Nov 9th.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:03
|
|
|
Willo567 posted:If I could side track for a bit, how do people in the thread deal with the poo poo show of a government we have now Unhealthy amounts of alcohol.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:04
|
|
|
Covok posted:Oh please, Nate ain't a trusted source on poo poo anymore since Nov 9th.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:04
|
|
|
If you want to argue that the guy who introduced the Civil Rights plank into the 1948 Democratic National Convention that caused the Dixiecrats to walk out, the guy who shepherded the 1964 Civil Rights Act through Congress, and the guy who was seen as the leader of the liberals in Congress throughout the late '50's and early '60's wasn't liberal, go ahead.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:04
|
|
|
Covok posted:Oh please, Nate ain't a trusted source on poo poo anymore since Nov 9th. What the hell are you on? Nate was about the only poll aggregator saying that Trump still had a decent chance to win. Do you not remember Princeton's polls guru eating a bug because he lost that particular bet?
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:04
|
|
|
Covok posted:Oh please, Nate ain't a trusted source on poo poo anymore since Nov 9th. The most Covok post possible. Nate Silver is trustworthy because of the presidential election. He was the only one to suggest it wasn't in the bag for Hillary.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:05
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Bencjacobs/stat...6pagenumber%3D7
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:05
|
|
|
Shook Nate tried to warn everyone but all we did was Post the Map.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:05
|
|
|
lol the DNC should have put money into SC instead jesus christ
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:05
|
|
|
Willo567 posted:If I could side track for a bit, how do people in the thread deal with the poo poo show of a government we have now i started going to therapy in november. it's been good. i hardly talk to her about politics anymore. honestly, the gbs lol trump thread helps me a lot.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:06
|
|
|
ThePeavstenator posted:The most Covok post possible. Nate Silver is trustworthy because of the presidential election. He was the only one to suggest it wasn't in the bag for Hillary. He also called that there was a very real possibility that Hillary win the popular vote but lose the EV.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:06
|
|
|
pumpinglemma posted:Why has this thread already descended into eating itself over Ossoff's inevitable and predictable loss when as of a few minutes ago Nate Silver is saying "I’m totally up in the air on this one right now and have no idea who will win"? Because thats the tone he takes as the commentary gets closer to the actual vote.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:06
|
|
|
WAHH A DEMOCRAT LOST IN THE SOUTH WAHH just kill yourself everyone in this thread I hate you loving all (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:07
|
|
|
HannibalBarca posted:Ossoff had so much loving money he literally spent all of it on everything. No part of the Ossoff campaign was hurting for cash. the problem is that a big, visible D campaign in a district like this actually activates so many marginal/resentful R voters as to make it counterproductive at worst or only slightly useful at best. Dems should distribute pamphlets in independent bookstores and campaign through hushed whispers and frightened side-eye glances. If nobody knows they're bothering then they're sure to win.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:08
|
|
|
Willo567 posted:If I could side track for a bit, how do people in the thread deal with the poo poo show of a government we have now I'm a government contractor and I work for a financial regulatory agency. I'm anxiously awaiting my contract to get axed and to be unemployed and shooting up heroin this time next year.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:09
|
|
|
ISeeCuckedPeople posted:WAHH A DEMOCRAT LOST IN THE SOUTH WAHH Rude.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:09
|
|
|
FizFashizzle posted:lol the DNC should have put money into SC instead jesus christ Going by the numbers, SC was close BECAUSE Dems didn't put money into it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:09
|
|
|
Just got my AHCA mailer, my organs get shipped to four coal miners in West Virginia on Friday. How about you guys?
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:09
|
|
|
BRISTOL PALINS BABY posted:i started going to therapy in november. it's been good. i hardly talk to her about politics anymore. honestly, the gbs lol trump thread helps me a lot. I had my first appointment the day after the election. It was extremely difficult. Not sure I'm doing all that much better to be honest though 
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:10
|
|
|
Mustached Demon posted:Rude. I give zero fucks. What are you going to loving do about it you pisscrybaby
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:10
|
|
|
Dafte posted:Shook Nate tried to warn everyone but all we did was Post the Map. So what's the enlightened D&D revisionist history about the 2016 election thread? Was the nonstop POST YOUR MAP spams in response to anything not agreeing to a dominant Hillary election really a ironic acknowledgement that Trump was actually going to win and D&D knew all along what was going to happen? I can't wait to see what the 2020 election thread version of POST YOUR MAP is going to be.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:10
|
|
|
Aves Maria! posted:No, you're being relatively rational. God help us all.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:10
|
|
|
haha ossof is going to lose by like 20 points.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:11
|
|
|
Please put Covok on ignore everyone. I have not seen anything from the posts of his you guys have quoted in the past page or two to make me want to unignore him, and I ask you, implore you, to question why you have not already ignored him as well.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:11
|
|
|
Fulchrum posted:Going by the numbers, SC was close BECAUSE Dems didn't put money into it. this is the story being touted or pondered currently, yea DNC needs to figure out how to recreate itself as the outsider in a lot of areas. ga06 probably not one of them, but large swaths of the country want an alternative.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:11
|
|
|
axeil posted:I had my first appointment the day after the election. It was extremely difficult. It's a slow process but take it from me, you'll get there. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:11
|
|
|
Whoo boy, and people wonder why we're calling while Nate "70% Hill victory" Silver is still shook and confused going "it's 50/50."
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:12
|
|
|
ISeeCuckedPeople posted:I give zero fucks. What are you going to loving do about it you pisscrybaby Say you're rude? Rude.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:12
|
|
|
ISeeCuckedPeople posted:WAHH A DEMOCRAT LOST IN THE SOUTH WAHH whose throwaway are you, who just had to scream those magic words 
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:12
|
|
|
Covok posted:Whoo boy, and people wonder why we're calling while Nate "70% Hill victory" Silver is still shook and confused going "it's 50/50." how are you this stupid
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:13
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Nate_Cohn/statu...6pagenumber%3D8
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:13
|
|
|
Covok posted:Whoo boy, and people wonder why we're calling while Nate "70% Hill victory" Silver is still shook and confused going "it's 50/50." You are the guy that flips cards at the blackjack table and roasts people for not hitting on 19 when it turns out there was a 2 on top.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:13
|
|
|
BetterToRuleInHell posted:So what's the enlightened D&D revisionist history about the 2016 election thread? Was the nonstop POST YOUR MAP spams in response to anything not agreeing to a dominant Hillary election really a ironic acknowledgement that Trump was actually going to win and D&D knew all along what was going to happen? No? It was months of ongoing argument about why Hillary lost. Like normal people do when they get stunned by something completely unexpected. Meanwhile the shitheads who predicted the worst without a shred of evidence felt emboldened that there incessant doomsaying paid off that one time
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:14
|
|
|
post your fake bank account statement again
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:14
|
|
|
You people aren't worth saving.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:14
|
|
|
I'm excited for four years of this thread saying "well actually it's great that the margin of republican victory was what it is because that means is 2% less than last time. We'll get 'em next time!" Or more boar chat. That was unironically fun 
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 16:59 |
|
|
BetterToRuleInHell posted:So what's the enlightened D&D revisionist history about the 2016 election thread? Was the nonstop POST YOUR MAP spams in response to anything not agreeing to a dominant Hillary election really a ironic acknowledgement that Trump was actually going to win and D&D knew all along what was going to happen? Just proves all the "stop your arzying" lines were just people who don't want to hear the truth. Nothing has changed in that regard.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2017 02:15
|
|