|
Venom Snake posted:https://twitter.com/ThisWeekABC/status/878971240937005058
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 22:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 00:39 |
|
|
Subjunctivitis posted:Uhh, Bernie is actually the guy who crashed a lame party saying, "This party sucks with your chip crumbs, watered-down lemonade, and monopoly. I have tequila, stuff to BBQ, and a fresh new mixtape to throw on the stereo - Let's get turnt!" And then the miserable attendees were all, "No. Go away. That sounds dumb."
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 22:32
|
|
|
Chuck's the guy who recognizes Bernie is the guy who brings the cool kids they said would show up and ruins his friendship with the host because he wants to make the party the tits pajamas because he's worried about the homecoming game's pregame show.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 22:33
|
|
|
Cuck Schumer has it wrong you're supposed to blame RUSSIA
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 22:35
|
|
|
Vox Nihili posted:i want to make an ironstache thread but it's probably a bit too early for that yet The Zuck thread is a good thing though IMO.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 22:35
|
|
|
Uncle Wemus posted:this guy again Jesus he stole joy Reid's stupid analogy and somehow made it even more stupid
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 22:36
|
|
|
Yinlock posted:take my suck energy ironstache ironstache gets the dinner...bacon? whats a quintessential american food? if i had disposable income i'd donate to stache
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 22:38
|
|
|
Democrats: "Don't Stop Believing" Leftists: "We Built This City"
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 22:39
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8IoFvAbaMU
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 22:39
|
|
|
This dude owns.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 22:40
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1b8AhIsSYQ
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 22:41
|
|
|
Seriously, "We Built This City" should have been the Bernie Campaign song.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 22:43
|
|
|
lmao his go to booze is some ultra-premium vodka that's $40 a bottle
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 22:43
|
|
|
comedyblissoption posted:chuck has a lot of words about needing a progressive policy and bubblegum and sunshine but did not give a single concrete policy here This seems general bad dem trick, they talk about how much they believe progressive policies but don't pass any actual legislation.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 22:43
|
|
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:lmao his go to booze is some ultra-premium vodka that's $40 a bottle seriously. everyone knows that The Berndog prefers homemade maple mead.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 22:46
|
|
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:lmao his go to booze is some ultra-premium vodka that's $40 a bottle trendy dipshit brand thats entirely indistinguishable from a $20 handle lmao wait til the boys in the home bar & drinking thread hear about this
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 22:47
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/IronStache/status/879086983145979905
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 22:47
|
|
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:lmao his go to booze is some ultra-premium vodka that's $40 a bottle Vox Nihili posted:trendy dipshit brand thats entirely indistinguishable from a $20 handle lmao who are we talking about here
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 22:49
|
|
|
etalian posted:This seems general bad dem trick, they talk about how much they believe progressive policies but don't pass any actual legislation.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 22:49
|
|
|
Shear Modulus posted:who are we talking about here that sir James dipshit whose spending $40 per bottle when he could get a handle of the infinitely superior Tito's for  less
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 22:50
|
|
|
Shear Modulus posted:who are we talking about here the ciroc guy with the anti-bernie tweets
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 22:50
|
|
|
Vox Nihili posted:the ciroc guy with the anti-bernie tweets to be fair, further review indicates that Ciroc costs $24 at my local store, so it's not actually that bad still, relatively pricey french vodka is a pretty funny choice when youre trying to look like the down to earth person
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 22:53
|
|
|
Vox Nihili posted:trendy dipshit brand thats entirely indistinguishable from a $20 handle lmao Buying Ciroc instead of Tito's Vodka, very shameful.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 22:53
|
|
|
love to tour Iowa with my hired photographer https://twitter.com/zzzzaaaacccchhh/status/878636045251866624
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 22:55
|
|
|
Vox Nihili posted:to be fair, further review indicates that Ciroc costs $24 at my local store, so it's not actually that bad are you sure that's not the 375ml bottle/bevmo
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 22:55
|
|
|
Subjunctivitis posted:Democrats: "Don't Stop Believing"
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 22:56
|
|
|
comedyblissoption posted:right now they are even worse than that. it's like they refuse to articulate any loving policy position. see: ossoff, tom perez, etc. It was hilarious seeing Ossoff's repulbican lite campaign getting cucked.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 22:56
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LatorN4P9aA
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 22:58
|
|
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:are you sure that's not the 375ml bottle/bevmo 750 ml @ total wine TW owns, tbf
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 22:58
|
|
|
Joementum posted:love to tour Iowa with my hired photographer At least the alien has empathy. Or at least bothers to emulate it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 23:06
|
|
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:that sir James dipshit whose spending $40 per bottle when he could get a handle of the infinitely superior Tito's for i don't normally like vodka but tito's is pretty good
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 23:09
|
|
|
Democrats: "Landslide" Leftists: "Edge of Seventeen" Subjunctivitis has issued a correction as of 23:19 on Jun 25, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 23:14
|
|
|
the reason centrists dislike setting out policy positions is because they don't want to preclude themselves from getting that sweet lobbyist cash the entire goal is getting into politics to turbocharge your lifetime earnings potential and personal influence over society
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 23:15
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/879000737765871618 🤔
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 23:19
|
|
|
Subjunctivitis posted:So what the gently caress is PP about? Do they just want to keep their special place as the only major national source for semi-public-funded healthcare? If they get behind single-payer or NHS, and it loses, that they will definitely lose funding from either party? Maybe PP is filled with bad actors, because one would think that siding with the nurses unions would be a very good thing for them instead of capitulating so quickly. there are a few things in play here: the CO single-payer initiative was held the same time as the presidential election, and CO elected dems + "progressive" groups circled the wagon against the initiative; PP throws itself in with bad dems all the time, hence its endorsement of clinton in the primaries; bad dems love themselves some agenda-setting when it serves their needs; and like someone pointed out, with a full-out single-payer system PP would lose its relevance, especially when it comes to the vast majority of its services (hint: not abortions). granted, the CO initiative never polled well and lost by a landslide, but to what extent that was due to elected pols of both parties (and "progressive" groups) and the local media opposing it, the insurance industry waging a multi-million-dollar ad campaign against it, or the particulars of this legislation is hard to determine. but it makes me insane when I see lanyards dismiss federal single-payer or legislation like CA's by saying "if people wanted single-payer then the CO initiative wouldn't have failed" or "Vermont tried it and it failed" (no, the dem governor killed it after running for reelection on it, but it was never "tried"). Willa Rogers has issued a correction as of 23:29 on Jun 25, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 23:25
|
|
|
ThndrShk2k posted:I'd elect that alien president over the standard candidates we get. Oblivion Character look-a-like for president!
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 23:29
|
|
|
Joementum posted:love to tour Iowa with my hired photographer 
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 23:30
|
|
|
Woah I've already found footage of Zuckerberg debate prep https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOVJsTc_HMU
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 23:31
|
|
|
Willa Rogers posted:there are a few things in play here: the CO single-payer initiative was held the same time as the presidential election, and CO elected dems + "progressive" groups circled the wagon against the initiative; PP throws itself in with bad dems all the time, hence its endorsement of clinton in the primaries; bad dems love themselves some agenda-setting when it serves their needs; and like someone pointed out, with a full-out single-payer system PP would lose its relevance, especially when it comes to the vast majority of its services (hint: not abortions). It's almost like like there is big money opposition behind making sure things like higher wages or single payer fail?
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 23:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 00:39 |
|
|
anime was right posted:extremely hot take: if medicare for all happens and womens health care is covered, then PP loses a shitload of money uh i just realized, maybe this is why PP, despite having a 100% record for both bernie and hillary, endorsed hillary so brazenly  i really hope thats not true, bc everyone deserves free access to birth control and contraceptives no matter what the people that make salaries in PP would be endangered by single payer.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2017 23:33
|
|
