|
Munkeymon posted:the gray forum monitor thread informed me that dells don't implement display port correctly so if you turn them off they appear disconnected I actually kind of like it that way
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2017 05:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 20:53 |
|
|
Bulgakov posted:hell yeah model names lol yospos bicth
|
|
#
?
Jun 18, 2017 05:26
|
|
|
Generic Monk posted:if you use windows 10 it will immediately forget where your windows are placed and vomit them all over the screen when you next turn the monitor on. have fun!
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2017 23:57
|
|
|
Generic Monk posted:if you use windows 10 it will immediately forget where your windows are placed and vomit them all over the screen when you next turn the monitor on. have fun! windows is indeed garbage
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 03:57
|
|
|
thank god i never have to unplug the screen on my imac that one time i connected an old 720p tv as a second screen was bullshit tho lol
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2017 04:27
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2017 08:32
|
|
|
noticed there is a new codec thread. didn't read, just wanted to post "AOMedia Video 1"
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2017 08:38
|
|
|
my favorite codec iss DivX ;-) because it is friendly
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2017 10:16
|
|
|
Share Bear posted:update: i found the setting, the TV's defaults were wrong, it was labelled "just scan" you have a decade-old samsung. it will forget the just scan setting at random and you will have to go through the incredibly slow menu or toggle to get back to just scan. which it will then forget at some point again.
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2017 11:46
|
|
|
ShadowHawk posted:Plugging/unplugging display port and HDMI interfaces also has the wonderful side effect of changing your speaker outputs. this at least feels like it could be a behaviour that someone, somewhere, could want though. HAIL eSATA-n posted:windows is indeed garbage only seems to happen in windows 10 which seems to befit the mission statement of not even being consistently poo poo Generic Monk fucked around with this message at 12:05 on Jul 6, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2017 12:00
|
|
|
latest news i've heard about "next generation" codecs was that there was some bullet point about apple again licensing h.265. i think they dropped it at some point. everyone else seems to be on board with AV1
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2017 12:15
|
|
|
Wheany posted:latest news i've heard about "next generation" codecs was that there was some bullet point about apple again licensing h.265. i think they dropped it at some point. apple's all in with HEVC to the point that photos will be natively HEIC.
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2017 14:57
|
|
|
stuff using h.265 (HEVC)
stuff using AV1: 
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2017 17:58
|
|
|
LOOK FOR THE GOLD V https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwO4LP0wLbY *bitchin guitar solo* *rockos modern life graphics*
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2017 18:00
|
|
|
is there a commonly-accepted reason why The Scene has not standardized on HEVC yet? I’m guessing it’s just because dumpster hardware doesn’t have hardware decoding support yet
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2017 18:05
|
|
|
pagancow posted:LOOK FOR THE GOLD V frocks on the box!!
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2017 18:07
|
|
|
Jimmy Carter posted:is there a commonly-accepted reason why The Scene has not standardized on HEVC yet? I’m guessing it’s just because dumpster hardware doesn’t have hardware decoding support yet because "the scene" is notoriously slow in changing their ways? some of them were still splitting movies up into chunks that would fit on CD-Rs in the early 2010s
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2017 18:13
|
|
|
its 90% scene being set in their poo poo ways and 10% nobody understanding how to set it up properly yet. everything and their dog does hevc hardware coding these days
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2017 18:15
|
|
|
Jimmy Carter posted:is there a commonly-accepted reason why The Scene has not standardized on HEVC yet? I’m guessing it’s just because dumpster hardware doesn’t have hardware decoding support yet it does seem to be happening slowly, though it mostly seems to be an excuse to slash the filesize by 3/4s with the resultant video looking like it was shot on a 2005 feature phone
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2017 18:53
|
|
|
Jimmy Carter posted:is there a commonly-accepted reason why The Scene has not standardized on HEVC yet? I’m guessing it’s just because dumpster hardware doesn’t have hardware decoding support yet For a while x265 was same or worse quality than x264 at much higher encode times.
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2017 19:15
|
|
|
pagancow posted:stuff using h.265 (HEVC) duh nobody is using the standard that has not been completed. but the biggest streaming services, all cpu and gpu manufacturers and over 70% of browser marketshare are members of the alliance
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2017 19:37
|
|
|
mp4 is good
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2017 19:37
|
|
|
Last Chance posted:because "the scene" is notoriously slow in changing their ways? some of them were still splitting movies up into chunks that would fit on CD-Rs in the early 2010s SD things get put into MP4 containers, everything else into MKV because
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2017 19:52
|
|
|
lol the scene couldnt encode their way out of a paper bag
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2017 21:41
|
|
|
an over the top parody of who you really are. nice cover... if you're low-t chickenshit
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2017 21:59
|
|
|
Wheany posted:duh nobody is using the standard that has not been completed. but the biggest streaming services, all cpu and gpu manufacturers and over 70% of browser marketshare are members of the alliance lots of hardware makers etc were in the "alliance" for "totally not h.264, we promise" aka VP8, and guess how that turned out?
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 00:11
|
|
|
pagancow posted:For a while x265 was same or worse quality than x264 at much higher encode times. x265 is a garbage fire project compared to x264 and it's embarrassing that they got to use the same name
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 00:25
|
|
|
I just realized I could disable webm in edge. youtube is so much better now.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 00:57
|
|
|
x265 is p dece now Most content doesn't get encoded with grain anymore because ~digital delivery~
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 01:00
|
|
|
one of the big things was when some parts of the scene hesitated to move on from xvid because a bunch of them wanted their files to be playable burned to cd rom on dvd players from like 2000 that could just barely play xvid encoded files. which was in turn a repeat of a lot of people had wanted to stay on SVCD encodings so they could use even cheaper dvd players and in some cases actual svcd players in like the early 2000s still.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 02:34
|
|
|
i never understood why the scene went with lowest-common-denominator "solutions" like that when the few people desperate for CD-ROM playability could just get exactly that with a single click re-encode of a higher-quality file
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 03:53
|
|
|
how dare you only pure, once-encoded-from-the-source-disc bits may reach my phillips divx certified prgoressive scan dvd player
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 03:57
|
|
|
univbee posted:i never understood why the scene went with lowest-common-denominator "solutions" like that when the few people desperate for CD-ROM playability could just get exactly that with a single click re-encode of a higher-quality file lol @ re-encoding poo poo on ur crappy pentium ii you were still using in 2003 probably, since you wanted to be able to play SVCD format video
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 03:59
|
|
|
the scene doesnt even allow vp9 lol https://scenerules.org/t.html?id=wdx264v1.0-ecb63c67.nfo quote:1.4) Transcoding untouched files must only occur if files do not meet the │ lol original source footage like interlaced or black borders is a technical issue that must be re-encoded YOU NEED SECOND GENERATION BECAUSE I DONT LIKE BLACK BARARRARRRSSSR
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 04:11
|
|
|
Doc Block posted:lots of hardware makers etc were in the "alliance" for "totally not h.264, we promise" aka VP8, and guess how that turned out? there wasn't any incentive to abandon h.264 since hardware support was ubiquitous and the licensing wasn't that bad (most companies either paid nothing or the cap of $6.5 million, which is still nothing if you are a company like samsung or intel) h.265 licensing is a nightmare and everyone wants to get away from it as soon as possible. it's so bad that companies offered up their patents royalty-free as long as they would eventually have a codec they could actually use
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 04:37
|
|
|
The_Franz posted:there wasn't any incentive to abandon h.264 since hardware support was ubiquitous and the licensing wasn't that bad (most companies either paid nothing or the cap of $6.5 million, which is still nothing if you are a company like samsung or intel) yep. h.264 is definitely good enough and h.265 has existed for 4? years now and yet nobody supports it because ot the licensing issues.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 04:44
|
|
|
i bet as soon as the av1 bitstream gets finalized, google will add support to chrome and will start pushing av1 videos on youtube to browsers that support it. i don't know if http streaming apis have evolved to the point where they can differentiate between "supports this format" and "can decode the format but not smoothly at this resolution", because that was definitely a problem with my then-current computer and 1080p60 vp9 on youtube
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 04:49
|
|
|
oh yeah and i read about color spaces and this fukken chart: see those numbers along the edge of the "horse shoe"? those are the wavelengths of monochromatic light at that point. it's physically impossible to go outside that colored area. like i thought that maybe we just don't have good enough leds or whatever to make a monitor that uses some kind of "hyper RGB" primaries to show the whole color gamut. because our imperfect meatbag eyes have cone cells that respond to light wavelenghts like this:  to go "outside the horse shoe", there would have to be a color that stimulates the red cone and "negatively stimulates" the green one, for example. in the xyz color space the math works and you can use physically impossible colors (that horse shoe graph shows an x-y plane)
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 12:24
|
|
|
Wheany posted:oh yeah and i read about color spaces and this fukken chart: good poo poo
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 14:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 20:53 |
|
|
Wheany posted:i bet as soon as the av1 bitstream gets finalized, google will add support to chrome and will start pushing av1 videos on youtube to browsers that support it. as long as pagancow is on the board of directors, h265 will be chosen because its da bess and lol if u dont use da bes https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVUyyHYkBHk
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 14:05
|
|