|
mojo1701a posted:How much does the government currently owe to the first nations currently, compared to Khadr? I dunno, trillions? Lot of unceded land in valuable locations, plus resource rights, that were just squatted.
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 19:38
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 07:10 |
|
|
https://twitter.com/globalnews/status/883381217969618944 fuuuuuuuuuckk offfffffff Scheer
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 19:39
|
|
|
Conservatives really eager to go to the well adjacent to the Barbaric Cultural Practices Hotline well pretty soon after the last election.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 19:48
|
|
|
the party of Law and Order: Parliament should ignore the courts whenever politically advantageous.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 19:48
|
|
|
so how's scheer polling? i bet loving canadians love him
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 19:50
|
|
|
Helsing posted:Historically? A world war that leaves the home-front untouched yet compels the government to fully employ all available resources in a massive program of industrialization while spending billions on research and development across a wide range of fields from logistics to computers to rocketry, all while massively restraining the size and power of banks and financial markets. History didn't begin in 1939.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 20:09
|
|
|
We should have an Omar Khadr Day, like Louis Riel Day and Pride all mashed into one. No proud boys and no cops, it'd loving own.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 20:27
|
|
|
.
Legit Businessman fucked around with this message at 19:30 on Sep 9, 2022 |
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 20:34
|
|
|
There was that article in the housing thread yesterday about Gregor's girlfriend's mom getting charged in China and it said the court had like a 99.x% conviction rate and I just can't imagine what it's like to live in that type of environment.
Somebody fucked around with this message at 00:27 on Sep 10, 2022 |
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 21:34
|
|
|
 Conservative's are cowards.  That message basically means you've been blocked from replying.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 21:55
|
|
|
I'm the unironic use of muzzie.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 22:07
|
|
|
I'm going to change people's minds with direct communication and dialogue More dialogue you guys More understanding
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 22:14
|
|
|
bunnyofdoom posted:I also have a lot of people wanting us to overule the supreme court ruling.... Who's us? Didn't you quit the LPC over electoral reform?
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 23:05
|
|
|
So based on Trump's Poland speech, how long until he gets the idea to make Canada into 30s Poland?
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 23:06
|
|
|
Reality Winner posted:Who's us? Didn't you quit the LPC over electoral reform? I wish. I have been trying to get a job out of there since then. Unfortunately I apparently can't get one and as such I must work there to pay the bills as I cannot afford to be unemployed. (Que another av change I can feel it)
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 23:16
|
|
|
Have you considered joining the NDP?
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 23:18
|
|
|
The most important parable about political ensnarement, of our times
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2017 23:22
|
|
|
Jordan7hm posted:All good. You know half the time I'm just riling you up, right? I think there is room for disagreement between what is legal and what is moral, but in general I like Canada quite a bit the way it is. Even if it means sometimes "justice" isn't served for the greater good. Gregor is guilty of treason against the crown I thought. We are talking about game of thrones, right? No one would name an actual real child such a stupid thing I assume.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2017 02:44
|
|
|
Jeez, apparently not overruling the supreme court means the Liberals have betrayed the country. I have a very hard time talking to any of my consevative acquaintances because of how viciously vindictive they've become. Like unironic hate speech as a default.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2017 04:35
|
|
|
Maybe you should grow a pair and unfriend them on Facebook
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2017 04:37
|
|
|
I'm not talking about Facebook, I'm talking about people I see on a daily basis. Besides, if I had you on Facebook CI I'd keep you on. You're at least entertainingly scathing, not depressing.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2017 04:43
|
|
|
i'm all for violence if you can't reason with someone
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2017 04:49
|
|
|
Violence may be the best answer but it's not the only one
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2017 06:29
|
|
|
the trump tutelage posted:History didn't begin in 1939. Ok, then it's ample supplies of coal, control of major sea lanes, proximity to a fertile continent whose natives are decimated by disease and another nearby continent full of people you can enslave.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2017 10:47
|
|
|
How about we collectively stand in the corner and think about what we and our ancestors have done?
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2017 13:07
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/LaureenHarper/status/883468226474016768 fuckin lol
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2017 16:37
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gspElv1yvc
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2017 16:39
|
|
|
Agreed, vote for Bernie Sanders so his kids can go to college for free
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2017 16:40
|
|
|
quote:The U.S. President heaped praise on Mr. Trudeau during an event marking the establishment of a $200-million fund managed by the World Bank to help female entrepreneurs. Mr. Trudeau announced on Saturday that Canada is contributing $20-million to the program. Well there we go, Trump and I might disagree on something finally.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2017 17:10
|
|
|
I wish I understood federal law well enough to directly answer the idiots who keep asking why Khadr isn't being charged for high treason out of spite. Like I can hazard a couple dozen guesses, but I don't have a definitive provision I can point to in the criminal code. E: I'm well aware that they don't care about facts, but I do. Lurdiak fucked around with this message at 17:20 on Jul 8, 2017 |
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2017 17:18
|
|
|
high treason for what? He did nothing to a canadian.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2017 17:25
|
|
|
👏OMAR👏KHADR👏DIDNT👏COMMIT👏ANY👏CRIMES👏
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2017 17:31
|
|
|
DariusLikewise posted:👏OMAR👏KHADR👏DIDNT👏COMMIT👏ANY👏CRIMES👏 Well, he probably did but it's beside the point. There were videos of him making IEDs and those are good at killing people. He probably killed people and that's fine, the Charter is that important. It's (supposed to be) what separates us from the barbaric values that Khadr was fighting for.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2017 17:38
|
|
|
Postess with the Mostest posted:Well, he probably did but it's beside the point. There were videos of him making IEDs and those are good at killing people. He probably killed people and that's fine, the Charter is that important. It's (supposed to be) what separates us from the barbaric values that Khadr was fighting for. Cars are good at killing people, do we arrest everyone Windsor and Woodstock?
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2017 17:42
|
|
|
Here are some questions you can ask these people to have them work it out on their own. I asked these of myself when I was on the fence about Kadhr a long time ago: If a soldier is killed in combat, does that soldier's family have a right to take the enemy combatant to trial? Would you be willing to support such a measure of the enemy combatant's family was afforded the same right? If you are a child who has been raised in an environment framed only by your parents worldview, should you be held accountable like an adult for your actions if you've had no other frame of reference for the entirety of your reality? Is being a child soldier any different from being an adult soldier? Why? If you are Canadian by birth, do you have more or fewer rights than other Canadians at birth? Is this dependent on anything? Should it be dependent on anything? Think back on the last ten years of your life since you were X years old. If you spent all of that time confined only to your bedroom, and told that the only way you could leave would be to confess to a crime that has extremely questionable evidence of you committing it, would you confess? Oh and also you are being tortured constantly.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2017 17:42
|
|
|
The argument goes that there's no provision in the criminal code that makes allowances for child soldiers. Even though Al-Qaeda is obviously not the armed forces of a foreign nation, their declarations could make their actions be seen as "levying war". It's loving weak-rear end rhetoric by people who want to twist the definition of the criminal code just so they can jail a brown guy that they keep photoshopping to look evil.  But I don't know enough about law to point out where they're specifically wrong, and it's frustrating. I have to resort to "if there was a charge you can bet that rear end in a top hat Harper would've taken it to court".
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2017 17:49
|
|
|
.
Legit Businessman fucked around with this message at 19:30 on Sep 9, 2022 |
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2017 17:52
|
|
|
DariusLikewise posted:👏 👏 👏 👏 👏 👏 👏 Please don't do this. It should be kept purely as a sign that the poster is wrong, and you're probably not wrong here.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2017 18:02
|
|
tagesschau posted:Please don't do this. It should be kept purely as a sign that the poster is wrong, and you're probably not wrong here. Outside of SA, most emoji use is not sarcastic.
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2017 18:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 07:10 |
|
|
DariusLikewise posted:Cars are good at killing people, do we arrest everyone Windsor and Woodstock? If they have IEDs in them, yes? I'm just saying, it's a red herring. If it was 100% true that khadr had killed a guy, would it change the way you feel? I don't feel like it matters.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2017 18:04
|
|