|
I still want an ABC Warriors movie
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2017 20:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 08:44 |
|
|
Look you might be able to stretch 2 seasons out of it but once they get to Z, fights over.
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2017 20:49
|
|
|
a star war betamax posted:2010 remake I kind of want there to be a 2018 remake of the 1984 2001 sequel 2010.
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2017 21:29
|
|
|
Entropic posted:I kind of want there to be a 2018 remake of the 1984 2001 sequel 2010. Solve for X
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2017 21:32
|
|
|
I actually really like 2010: The Year We Make Contact. Once you get past the random dolphin house bits with the kid at the beginning it's a good movie. Roy Scheider, John Lithgow, Bob Balaban and Helen Mirren are all great, the effects all hold up pretty well for an '80s movie (the Jupiter stuff looks great), it has a story that actually makes sense, and it's actually the source of some of the iconic bits that people misremember as being in 2001. ("My God, it's full of stars" and the "ALL THESE WORLDS" message). The cold war stuff dates it horribly, but you just have to take it as an interesting product of its era.
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2017 21:43
|
|
|
PostNouveau posted:Also they recently found out the T-Rex didn't have feathers, so the coolest dinosaur is safe. Actually no: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxE68c9rYa0 Groovelord Neato posted:it's because it looks bad. nobody was real upset when it turned out trex didn't have kangaroo posture cuz it looks cooler the way it really was. You're a massive idiot, you don't know what a feathered dinosaur looks like. Nobody does. Jesus why do people get so upset about this idea.
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2017 21:48
|
|
|
PostNouveau posted:They used reptile DNA so no feathers. There I fixed it for you. Wait, they resurrected Jesse James with reptile DNA? I definitely need to watch it all the way through
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2017 21:51
|
|
|
You monster
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2017 22:02
|
|
|
khwarezm posted:You're a massive idiot, you don't know what a feathered dinosaur looks like. Nobody does. Jesus why do people get so upset about this idea. they looked like giant birds sans beaks most likely. birds are my least favorite class. gently caress cladistics for making them dinosaurs.
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2017 22:11
|
|
|
Groovelord Neato posted:they looked like giant birds sans beaks most likely. birds are my least favorite class. Man, birds are cool, when you notice that Dromaeosaurus like Velociraptor was more like a toothy, flightless eagle that was occupying the niche of a wolf or cat you realize that they aren't really any less 'tough'. In my mind it makes them seem like a more real animal than the emaciated naked turkey/lizard chimera monsters of yore. It would be cool to see something seriously try and recreate that for once.
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2017 22:19
|
|
|
this looks way cooler: birds just are lame in general. now our cool scaly monsters are the drag queens of the jurassic.
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2017 22:21
|
|
|
Groovelord Neato posted:this looks way cooler: I always hated that illustration, it looks like someone stitched an iguana's head to a kangaroo.
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2017 22:25
|
|
|
sorry to say friend you just have bad taste in dinos.
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2017 22:31
|
|
|
Is jurrasic world 2 out yet?
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2017 22:34
|
|
|
I have the objectively best taste in dinosaurs, look at my av.
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2017 22:35
|
|
|
Dinosaurs are cool, feathers or not
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2017 00:03
|
|
Entropic posted:I actually really like 2010: The Year We Make Contact. Yes, it was a perfectly serviceable audience-friendly popcorn movie that had Roy Schieder solving everything like a big heroic American so you didn't have to think. I saw it when I was young and dumb and liked it; I watched it back-to-back with 2001 after I turned 30 and it came off really poorly in comparison. And nobody but you remembered two things in 2001. 
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2017 00:11
|
|
|
they need to re:view 2001
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2017 00:41
|
|
|
Can't wait for some retard to say 2001 is bad
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2017 00:43
|
|
|
Quantum of Phallus posted:Can't wait for some retard to say 2001 is bad It's me. It's great technically but it's a poo poo film to try and follow and to me it's not enjoyable. I really liked the book though.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2017 00:51
|
|
|
Yeah the book is great. I saw the digital restoration last year and I loved every minute of it. It has this reputation of being a really dry and dour hard sci fi but a lot of it is really funny and the stargate sequence isn't even as long as I remembered. I think that Bored the poo poo out of me as a kid.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2017 00:55
|
|
|
I like both the movie and the book, but the movie leaves out way too many cool sci-fi ideas that I love.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2017 00:55
|
|
|
It's a great movie especially the 30 minute long kaleidoscope special effect and nonsensical "deep" ending
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2017 01:00
|
|
|
starkebn posted:they need to re:view 2001 No what they need to do is finish editing that Wheel of the Worst that's been sitting around since a week or more ago.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2017 01:00
|
|
|
I still don't understand all that happened in 2001 but it looked really cool
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2017 01:06
|
|
|
starkebn posted:It's me. It's great technically but it's a poo poo film to try and follow and to me it's not enjoyable. I really want to like it but I can't. I saw it for the first time in the theater in '68 and it's such a beautiful yet disappointing film. I've rewatched it several more times over the years because there are such gorgeous images, but I honestly can't say I like it.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2017 01:07
|
|
|
a bone to pick posted:I like both the movie and the book, but the movie leaves out way too many cool sci-fi ideas that I love. Yea, the book explores such cool sci fi themes that the moves never touches on. HIJK posted:I still don't understand all that happened in 2001 but it looked really cool You literally have to read the book to understand the ending of the movie.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2017 01:08
|
|
|
Eastbound Spider posted:Dinosaurs are cool, feathers or not True. I also like other prehistoric animals such as giant ground sloths, glyptodons, thylacosmilus, terror birds, andrewsarchus, gigantipithecus, titanoboa, megalania, dunkleosteus, and many others.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2017 01:10
|
|
|
so i'm watching cinema sins video on jaws because it's a movie i know like the back of my hand and literally the first three "sins" aren't even sins what the gently caress is wrong with this channel. they even count two sins for one "sin". why do all their videos have millions of views. edit: jesus christ it gets worse. Groovelord Neato fucked around with this message at 01:13 on Jul 10, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2017 01:10
|
|
|
Groovelord Neato posted:so i'm watching cinema sins video on jaws because it's a movie i know like the back of my hand and literally the first three "sins" aren't even sins what the gently caress is wrong with this channel. they even count two sins for one "sin". why do all their videos have millions of views. It's insanity. They're just jokes, but they're not funny. He also does a bunch of weirdly creepy poo poo like dinging hot actresses for "not giving me a lapdance in this scene." I have no idea why it's popular. Also, the "Sin Timer" is the dumbest bullshit ever, because YouTube has a loving timer bar already.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2017 01:14
|
|
|
WampaLord posted:You literally have to read the book to understand the ending of the movie. The book is very interesting if quite dry. I'm just baffled why the movie doesn't make things a little more explicit like the book does. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2017 01:17
|
|
|
khwarezm posted:I always hated that illustration, it looks like someone stitched an iguana's head to a kangaroo. sounds about right imo
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2017 01:19
|
|
|
Quantum of Phallus posted:Yeah the book is great. Every forgets this about Kubrick, he could be really funny a lot of the time. Not just the obvious Dr Strangelove. Barry Lyndon, Full Metal Jacket and A Clockwork Orange have some loving hilarious scenes. khwarezm fucked around with this message at 01:22 on Jul 10, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2017 01:19
|
|
|
Humbug Scoolbus posted:I really want to like it but I can't. I saw it for the first time in the theater in '68 and it's such a beautiful yet disappointing film. I've rewatched it several more times over the years because there are such gorgeous images, but I honestly can't say I like it. Good grief are you a hundred
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2017 01:22
|
|
|
i'm 4 minutes into this cinema sins video and the only actual "sin" is a continuity error in the scene where quint scratches the chalk board. but spielberg is the director who probably gives the least poo poo about continuity.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2017 01:22
|
|
|
philistines
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2017 01:22
|
|
|
The 2001 comic was great if you're into weird Jack Kirby stuff.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2017 01:24
|
|
|
a star war betamax posted:Good grief are you a hundred lol
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2017 01:25
|
|
|
Red letter medai 2017: You are going to have to read the book.
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2017 01:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 08:44 |
|
|
Groovelord Neato posted:so i'm watching cinema sins video on jaws because it's a movie i know like the back of my hand and literally the first three "sins" aren't even sins what the gently caress is wrong with this channel. they even count two sins for one "sin". why do all their videos have millions of views. Me and my one friend love hate-watching cinemasins because we like to yell at the voice in the TV about how wrong it is
|
|
#
?
Jul 10, 2017 01:31
|
|