|
I will admit that I wish there was a 16x10 144hz monitor I could have instead of this otherwise excellent asus.
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2017 01:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 03:49 |
|
|
yeah of course you do cause 16:9 is awful to use especially on a device you're looking at for hours every day.
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2017 01:11
|
|
|
shaggar leaning full on into "it goes to 11"
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2017 01:18
|
|
|
if you had three free DVI connections and $8400 to spare you could have had the original retina display in 2001 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_T220/T221_LCD_monitors
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2017 14:45
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:yeah of course you do cause 16:9 is awful to use especially on a device you're looking at for hours every day. your brain adapts and then it's not so bad. try it
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2017 14:51
|
|
|
i sure do miss that extra inch on top of my monitor yep
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2017 15:26
|
|
|
I made my monitor 4 inches taller
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2017 15:29
|
|
|
Silver Alicorn posted:I made my monitor 4 inches taller congrats on rotating your tablet to portrait?
|
|
#
?
Jul 11, 2017 15:30
|
|
|
BONGHITZ posted:why is a ratio bad? i overheard someone (not an IT person) talking about "square" monitors today at work has anyone made any actual square monitors? as in 1:1?
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 02:09
|
|
|
There Will Be Penalty posted:i overheard someone (not an IT person) talking about "square" monitors today at work good news! https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/eizo-unveils-bizarre-square-shaped-monitor/ edit apparently its an air traffic controller thing this one is 2048x2048 Samuel L. ACKSYN fucked around with this message at 03:57 on Jul 12, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 03:48
|
|
|
"little-known Japan-based company named Eizo" go gently caress yourself digital trends
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 05:51
|
|
|
KOTEX GOD OF BLOOD posted:"little-known Japan-based company named Eizo" go gently caress yourself digital trends
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 06:24
|
|
|
Since we aren’t familiar with the rest of Eizo’s monitor lineup, we’re going to refer to this unorthodox thing as simply the FlexScan.
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 06:29
|
|
|
16:9 monitors are garbage trash for trash people who live in garbage and only watch garbage trash youtube videos when they arent in the garbage
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 06:30
|
|
|
Vintersorg posted:i sure do miss that extra inch on top of my monitor Shaggar and the Angry Inch
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 06:39
|
|
|
what ratio is my mac book pro eh most of the time it's fine but occasionally i have to use the totally acceptable full screen mode and then everything is totally fine if the monitor was taller the entire lappy would be less cool so i am very content
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 06:53
|
|
|
I want a 3:2 monitor does anybody make those other than the surface oem
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 07:06
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 07:21
|
|
|
surebet posted:can someone run me through the pro/cons of a superwide display? i'm looking at the u3417w in a mildly color sensitive context and it looks needs suiting pros you think youre going to be cool and unique so put red lights on that fucker cons, its bad for games and work and you get to fight with your monitor to do anything
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 16:52
|
|
|
Breakfast All Day posted:16:9 monitors are garbage trash for trash people who live in garbage and only watch garbage trash youtube videos when they arent in the garbage wrong they are for people mastering content, there are expensive 16x9 displays that I dont put any UI, only debayered pixels that cost more than your car
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 16:55
|
|
|
cinci zoo sniper posted:is that a 27"? kinda not sold on sub-35" 4ks at computer viewing distances its fine. you need to be like 3 foot away for high dpi to be worth it in the 20"-whatever sizes
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 18:20
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:at computer viewing distances its fine. you need to be like 3 foot away for high dpi to be worth it in the 20"-whatever sizes well it depends on whats your computer distance. i usually sit so i cant reach the monitor with my arm, and at 100% scaling im comfortable with ~100 ppi. could go a bit higher, but wouldn't want to overdo it. hence, without universal hi-dpi support (which is not my use case), i'd prefer at least 32" screen if its 4k
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 18:26
|
|
|
some 32"-37" inch 4k would probably be nice though, given a new computer. would most likely be enough with a single monitor too
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 18:31
|
|
|
cinci zoo sniper posted:is that a 27"? kinda not sold on sub-35" 4ks the goal on a small 4k is to get a high dpi with insanely crisp text
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 20:01
|
|
|
cinci zoo sniper posted:some 32"-37" inch 4k would probably be nice though, given a new computer. would most likely be enough with a single monitor too at 37" i'm gonna want a lot more than 4k pixels 200 dpi or bust
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 20:01
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:the goal on a small 4k is to get a high dpi with insanely crisp text Notorious b.s.d. posted:at 37" i'm gonna want a lot more than 4k pixels the goal of a small 4k with windows is to find something that doesn't support hi-dpi
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 20:03
|
|
|
cinci zoo sniper posted:the goal of a small 4k with windows is to find something that doesn't support hi-dpi then your goal is stupid and you should stop doing 4k at 100 dpi results in a 43" monitor http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?c=us&cs=04&l=en&sku=210-AHSQ this is a perfectly fine idea but it ain't small
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 20:07
|
|
|
I can see stair stepping @ 1080p on my 55". 4K is basically retina res though
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 20:17
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:then your goal is stupid and you should stop Notorious b.s.d. posted:doing 4k at 100 dpi results in a 43" monitor
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 20:26
|
|
|
this is in one of the rooms here it's amazing  
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 20:37
|
|
|
Vintersorg posted:this is in one of the rooms here do they use that $10k monitor for anything cooler than uninstalling MS Office in a crappy conference room?
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 20:43
|
|
|
cool except 4 the ugly wall
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 20:43
|
|
|
Vintersorg posted:this is in one of the rooms here same but we got some cheap piece of crap 75 inch for <$2000, but it's 10000x better than the terrible projector we had before and it does the job
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 21:13
|
|
|
Vintersorg posted:this is in one of the rooms here hahahahaha there is no loving way you can tell the difference between 4k and 1080 at standard viewing distances on that
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 21:15
|
|
|
sharp makes 90 and 100 inch displays, too bigger than that and you have to go to specialist suppliers
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 21:20
|
|
|
owners at lastjob decided they wanted to do a big sales "scoreboard" display on the wall of their sales floor. so they got five ~60" 1080p TVs (with ultra-thin bezels), turned them sideways, and ganged them all into a single 5400x1920 display. their idiot contractor tried to do it on a mac mini at first and then eventually gave up and built out a custom PC in some 4u rackmount case and stuck one of those AMD eyefinity video cards in it. goddamn thing was fuckin' janky as poo poo and any time there was a power outage it was guaranteed at least one of the TVs would fuckin' lose the connection and we'd have to have to talk someone through reaching around the rackmount to wiggle/reseat the HDMI plugs, because we didn't have any IT staff on location there. the TVs alone cost a little over $10K apiece if I remember right, because of the minimal bezel requirement.
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 21:45
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:sharp makes 90 and 100 inch displays, too is there a specific factory that does small runs of huge-rear end LCDs, or do they basically do one-off builds?
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 21:46
|
|
|
Farmer Crack-rear end posted:is there a specific factory that does small runs of huge-rear end LCDs, or do they basically do one-off builds? i have nfc all i know is that displays get super expensive once they're outside the range that sharp sells
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 21:56
|
|
|
Roosevelt posted:do they use that $10k monitor for anything cooler than uninstalling MS Office in a crappy conference room? they have a lot of big conferences in there with doctors and researchers
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 22:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 03:49 |
|
|
ShinsoBEAM! posted:same but we got some cheap piece of crap 75 inch for <$2000, but it's 10000x better than the terrible projector we had before and it does the job same place also had a bunch of rectangular pixel 768p plasmas we couldn't replace because they'd been there for "only" 8 years and were really expensive when new
|
|
#
?
Jul 12, 2017 22:49
|
|