|
Condiv posted:"lol look at their pathetic numbers, they can't help anyone like that! check out what radical centrism can do!" people *are* showing up to their pickets, though twitter followers isn't a good indication of engagement or attendance, a tiny slice of the population actually uses twitter its primary purposes is for your favorite authors to post pictures of their pets and journalists to post breaking news stories
|
#
?
Jul 14, 2017 23:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 22:45 |
|
|
SKULL.GIF posted:twitter followers isn't a good indication of engagement or attendance, a tiny slice of the population actually uses twitter ThndrShk2k has issued a correction as of 23:55 on Jul 14, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jul 14, 2017 23:53
|
|
|
Al! posted:you'd have to be crazy with power. some sort of powercrazy person I should be IK.
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 00:06
|
|
|
UHD posted:well you can't just have a guillotine out in public view Are Guillotines actually illegal? I don't imagine they are classified as weapons. I mean obviously until the People's Democratic Socialist Courts are instituted they would be illegal to use, but surely any good protest should have a few portable guillotines, maybe with some watermelon's for demonstration purposes.
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 00:08
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 00:15
|
|
|
No good. The effect is lost unless they are fully functional. On the other hand, maybe the implication of guillotining dicks may sway a few bad dems.
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 00:17
|
|
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:No good. The effect is lost unless they are fully functional. You sway them by social blessing everything with sacramental wine. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oBTkDvPSPgY&t=50s Especially boids. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 00:22
|
|
|
A reminder that killing people is still wrong.
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 00:22
|
|
|
Seriously though find the politicians who drink and get schmoozy and give them liquor. A good politician who drinks beer will befriend local homebrew clubs because they get to be beer hipsters and elite by trying the new stuff before it gets popular, and getting a local brand endorsement if their views match as well.
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 00:24
|
|
|
docbeard posted:A reminder that killing people is still wrong. scoop if true
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 00:24
|
|
|
docbeard posted:A reminder that killing people is still wrong. the existence of nazis would seem to disprove your theory oh wait, you did say "people" nevermind
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 00:25
|
|
|
Serf posted:the existence of nazis would seem to disprove your theory good point, i retract my sarcastic rebuttal killing actual people is very wrong indeed and i strongly disapprove of it
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 00:26
|
|
|
Someone's gotta be the diehard pacifist around here.
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 00:27
|
|
|
docbeard posted:Someone's gotta be the diehard pacifist around here.
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 00:30
|
|
|
docbeard posted:Someone's gotta be the diehard pacifist around here. i'm actually a pacifist when nazis are not involved gently caress nazis though
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 00:34
|
|
|
Yinlock posted:i'm actually a pacifist when nazis are not involved Yeah, fair enough. Once the conversion process hits the Heil Whoever stage, death is probably a mercy.
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 00:36
|
|
|
once the revolution is over, there will be no more guns in the valley
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 00:37
|
|
|
ThndrShk2k posted:Seriously though find the politicians who drink and get schmoozy and give them liquor. A good politician who drinks beer would only drink union-made beer, which probably rules out the local hipster brew.
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 00:39
|
|
|
The Little Kielbasa posted:A good politician who drinks beer would only drink union-made beer, which probably rules out the local hipster brew. Granted I guess a more general term would be beer nerds if they're into making it rather than drinking it.
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 00:41
|
|
|
Yinlock posted:i'm actually a pacifist when nazis are not involved yeah, you're a liberal
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 00:42
|
|
|
zeal posted:yeah, you're a liberal no see i want nazis to not exist, the liberal thing would be wanting anything other than that
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 00:51
|
|
|
docbeard posted:Someone's gotta be the diehard pacifist around here. that's joe "disband the military" mentum's job
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 00:53
|
|
|
I've been thinking about hey the idpol vs. economic justice debate between leftists and liberals seems so circular and unproductive. I don't think it's an actual policy disagreement, or a messaging problem. I don't even think it's a disingenuous attack on Bernie Bros by Clintonistas. I think this debate reveals a fundamental difference in the way the two sides think about the issue This might be completely wrong, or already discussed, but whatever. I think of it as Solidarity vs. Privilege. The leftists don't understand the accusation that they're sacrificing racial justice for economic justice, because to the leftist those two issues are fundamentally intertwined. Leftists think of it as an issue of solidarity. Back in the day a common strike-breaking technique was to hire black scabs. That was bad for the unions because it undermined the effectiveness of strikes. But the only reason that there were black people available to do scab work was because the unions wouldn't let black people join. So the black people couldn't get good union jobs, didn't see the benefits of unions, and had no reason not to do scab work. The solution is simple; get blacks into the same unions as whites. Black workers received the benefits of union membership, and the white workers couldn't be undermined by black scabs. Being less racist was part and parcel of a more effective labor movement. Solidarity among workers of all races led to material benefits for them all. The liberals see things as an issue of privilege. White people gain the benefit of privilege when black people have less than whites. It's a zero sum game. For blacks to gain, whites must lose. So racial justice and economic aren't just not intertwined, they're actually at odds with each other. That's the problem right there, leftists and liberals are coming at the issue from contradictory assumptions.
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 00:55
|
|
|
Guy Goodbody posted:I've been thinking about hey the idpol vs. economic justice debate between leftists and liberals seems so circular and unproductive. I don't think it's an actual policy disagreement, or a messaging problem. I don't even think it's a disingenuous attack on Bernie Bros by Clintonistas. I think this debate reveals a fundamental difference in the way the two sides think about the issue except the liberal assumption is stupid as poo poo
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 00:57
|
|
|
ate poo poo on live tv posted:Are Guillotines actually illegal? I don't imagine they are classified as weapons. I mean obviously until the People's Democratic Socialist Courts are instituted they would be illegal to use, but surely any good protest should have a few portable guillotines, maybe with some watermelon's for demonstration purposes. idk I just didn't think we should break out the guillotines until we have the rich in stocks otherwise they might catch on
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 01:04
|
|
|
rich liberals want to separate economic and social justice in a country founded on white people profiting off the forced labor of black slaves so they don't feel bad about being on the wrong side of history
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 01:06
|
|
|
like every time there's been an economic program undertaken by the government until recently its always been moderates trying to win over white racists by means testing minorities out of its benefits
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 01:11
|
|
|
Buddy if you don't have a $200 designer guillotine at your next operation wallstreet protest sponsored by TD BANK I duno but here's what I think 1/96
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 01:11
|
|
|
a $200 guillotine would be p shoddy
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 01:20
|
|
|
Squizzle posted:a $200 guillotine would be p shoddy you could probably get away with $200 just for the lumber. I dunno how much a guillotine blade cots, but I bet it's a surprising amount. of course, that's not taking into account the cost of your labor, which is problematic
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 01:23
|
|
|
if you want something that doesnt need sharpening after every single use and is heavy enough to push thru every time your lookin at, guesstimating, high thousands to low tens of thousands for the blade maybe $8k minimum????? im not remotely sure, just kinda pulling numbers from the ether
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 01:41
|
|
|
Squizzle posted:if you want something that doesnt need sharpening after every single use and is heavy enough to push thru every time your lookin at, guesstimating, high thousands to low tens of thousands for the blade lamo just get a car door, hammer it out and sharpen
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 01:43
|
|
|
Squizzle posted:if you want something that doesnt need sharpening after every single use and is heavy enough to push thru every time your lookin at, guesstimating, high thousands to low tens of thousands for the blade A guillotine blade is just sharpened iron or steel attached to a weighted block. You don't need the blade itself to be that heavy or sharp.
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 01:43
|
|
|
*learned capitalism helplessness*
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 01:43
|
|
|
oh we can't afford the revolution powerrangers is the opiate of the masses !
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 01:44
|
|
|
how did the french afford them then
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 01:44
|
|
|
have yall considered nature's guillotine: a large rock falling from an elevated position
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 01:45
|
|
|
Oh Snapple! posted:have yall considered nature's guillotine: a large rock falling from an elevated position https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJEqeu-K7m0
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 01:47
|
|
|
if the revolution comes, which it will not because yall cucks are lazy as gently caress and if the rich somehow don't get away, which they will because ~airtravel~ and if yall actually get organized, which you will not because lol leftist fractionalization  you ain't gonna use gillotines
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 01:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 22:45 |
|
|
UHD posted:how did the french afford them then i assume the tradesmen making the blades comped them for the revolution
|
|
#
?
Jul 15, 2017 01:47
|
|