|
ImpAtom posted:He revealed he had serious alcohol problems and stepped back to just acting. Well don't I feel like a dumbass
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 18:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 21:26 |
|
|
I didn't hear about the alcohol part, that's really lovely and I feel bad now.
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 18:37
|
|
|
ouch https://twitter.com/tatianasiegel27/status/888449408848842752
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 18:39
|
|
|
quote:Of course, there's a downside to the passing-the-torch scenarios: It's hard to imagine fans or Reeves being excited about following someone who is not Bruce Wayne for a Batman trilogy. fuckin speak for yourself, dude
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 18:44
|
|
|
Is there anyone who read and did not enjoy Dick Grayson as Batman? Show yourself.
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 18:48
|
|
|
SonicRulez posted:Is there anyone who read and did not enjoy Dick Grayson as Batman? Thematically speaking I loved the idea of having Dick be the bright, smiling face opposed to Gotham's dour underworld with Master Planner Bruce being the Justice League's batman. I felt that was an idea that was abandoned way too quickly.
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 19:09
|
|
|
This Batman solo film went from Affleck writing/directing/starring to just starring. I think on Monday Reeves said they threw out Affleck's script
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 19:11
|
|
|
purple death ray posted:fuckin speak for yourself, dude I got really confused because I thought they were talking about George Reeves.
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 19:18
|
|
|
SonicRulez posted:Is there anyone who read and did not enjoy Dick Grayson as Batman? DickBats forever, but he really needs a scowling DamianRobin to be complete. I shudder to think what the DCCU version would be like though.
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 19:34
|
|
|
Best case scenario in my mind is Affleck's Batman gets injured in JL but creates a suit that lets him keep going. Solo film is about him having to pass the mantle on but stays around to guide everyone like in Beyond. You get to have a dour, angry Affleck and show the face you're paying millions for and have a lighter Batman that can show the audience a better way than literally branding criminals.
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 19:35
|
|
|
Can't wait to read the tell-all book about the DCCU that someone is gonna write in like 15 years
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 19:39
|
|
|
Just omega beam his rear end in JL2, and have Dick Grayson take over with some Ryan Reynolds/Chris Pratt type, and point at Laura in Logan to convince them to use Damian.
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 19:40
|
|
|
Jamesman posted:I got really confused because I thought they were talking about George Reeves.
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 19:40
|
|
|
Argue posted:It's going to be a very loose adaptation of Doom's role in Secret Wars, featuring the 2000s FF, Roger Corman FF, and Josh Trank FF, culminating in an as-of-yet uncast FF joining the MCU. Coming in 2018: Fantastic Fours and Where to Find Them
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 19:53
|
|
|
What's wrong with an older Batman?
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 19:53
|
|
|
Fangz posted:What's wrong with an older Batman? They can't play the part for 15 years.
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 19:55
|
|
|
Geoff Johns confirmed that The Rock is still playing Black Adam. But he definitely won't be part of the Shazam movie.
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 20:01
|
|
|
X-O posted:Geoff Johns confirmed that The Rock is still playing Black Adam. But he definitely won't be part of the Shazam movie. Looks like MoS 2 then.
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 20:04
|
|
|
Or WW2. Khandaq as a wild card in the Cold War could be interesting.
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 20:07
|
|
|
Remember when WB issued a press release announcing Reeves as the director of The Batman and it didn't mention Affleck at all? http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20170223006421/en/Matt-Reeves-Direct-Produce-%E2%80%9CThe-Batman%E2%80%9D
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 20:40
|
|
|
This loving rules https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlUdkRBOv64
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 22:20
|
|
|
I wish there was more of that kind of fun stuff in the movie itself. Not that the movie was particularly unfun, but still.
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 22:27
|
|
|
zoux posted:This loving rules 
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 22:27
|
|
|
BrianWilly posted:I wish there was more of that kind of fun stuff in the movie itself. Had the same thought.
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 22:31
|
|
|
That music video is going to be amazing.
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 22:31
|
|
|
BrianWilly posted:I wish there was more of that kind of fun stuff in the movie itself. MacheteZombie posted:Had the same thought. You people are what's wrong with America.
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 23:04
|
|
|
I wonder how much the novelty of the style of GotG1 affects GotG2 reviews. A big part of why Guardians 1 was so good is that it was so original and of course a sequel isn't going to be able to be as original. I think Guardians 1 was better, but I think some characters were better in 2 than 1.
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 23:12
|
|
|
BrianWilly posted:I wish there was more of that kind of fun stuff in the movie itself. Not that the movie was particularly unfun, but still. Yeah, the movie would have been so much better if it had classic music and David Hasselhoff making a cameo.
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 23:19
|
|
|
Todd McFarlane is directing a new Spawn movie that is being produced by Blum House Pictures (who are responsible for most of the low-budget horror successes of the last 5 years). http://www.ign.com/articles/2017/07/21/comic-con-2017-spawn-movie-officially-announced-todd-mcfarlane-to-direct
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 23:29
|
|
|
FlamingLiberal posted:Todd McFarlane is directing a new Spawn movie that is being produced by Blum House Pictures (who are responsible for most of the low-budget horror successes of the last 5 years). I just can't help but laugh at this.
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 23:31
|
|
|
FlamingLiberal posted:Todd McFarlane is directing a new Spawn movie that is being produced by Blum House Pictures (who are responsible for most of the low-budget horror successes of the last 5 years). Did he use his patented negotiating trick?
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 23:35
|
|
|
Wait, the article doesn't even seem to show the awkward-as-gently caress Facebook Live video McFarlane did (with Kevin Smith guest starring).
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 23:35
|
|
|
Fuckin Todd at it again
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 23:36
|
|
|
This is the one that's supposed to be Sam and Twitch investigating with Spawn himself a fairly minor role, right? As a horror fan, I like Blumhouse, but I can't really see them giving him enough money to make the cape as awesome as it should be for long. And if you can't have the cape than why have the movie at all.
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 23:40
|
|
|
Yeah if it's Blum House it's going to be a pretty low budget which seems like a mistake. But I'm guessing that they were the only ones willing to give McFarlane any input on the movie
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 23:44
|
|
|
To be fair, it may well end up looking better than Inhumans. aaayyyyyyyyyy low hanging fruit, my favorite kind of fruit!
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2017 23:53
|
|
|
zoux posted:I wonder how much the novelty of the style of GotG1 affects GotG2 reviews. A big part of why Guardians 1 was so good is that it was so original and of course a sequel isn't going to be able to be as original. I think Guardians 1 was better, but I think some characters were better in 2 than 1. In particular Drax was just sorta there in GotG1 while in 2 he had some of the best lines and scenes in the movie.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2017 00:08
|
|
|
zoux posted:This loving rules It fuckins sucks that Disney and Amazon can't get their acts together and not sell BRDs of NR for 50bux Canadian. loving christ the loss of a movie and music retail chain basically just hosed everyone here. Wasn't there a Spawn movie that was already happening? I feel McFarlane announces a new Spawn movie ever few years.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2017 00:26
|
|
|
BrianWilly posted:To be fair, it may well end up looking better than Inhumans. The new trailer that just came out looked more promising, since it was actually edited with some coherence. Medusa's hair kinda looks like 90's CGI though.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2017 00:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 21:26 |
|
|
FlamingLiberal posted:Yeah if it's Blum House it's going to be a pretty low budget which seems like a mistake. But I'm guessing that they were the only ones willing to give McFarlane any input on the movie Not that long ago I read a couple articles about how what was holding it up was really Todd himself refusing to let anyone besides himself direct and him wanting a big budget. I guess he was willing to budge on the second part. BrianWilly posted:To be fair, it may well end up looking better than Inhumans. I mean, from what I've seen the only part that looks really bad is Medusa's hair, but it looks really bad. Not that the rest is great though.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2017 00:26
|
|