|
logikv9 posted:buttigieg doesn't win outright, fake news buttigieg will get a respectable enough showing in the early primaries to run in 2024 if humanity still exists
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 18:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 15:03 |
|
|
the party in my state got a few interns and an executive organizer guy who are both in their twenties and apparently like omalley which is odd to me. also our state chair is the son of a literal communist who organized in the jim crow South this state is fukken weird
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 18:51
|
|
|
anime was right posted:theres no way booker/harris dont run and then become a single ticket if one of them wins Hillary and Bernie will suck enough oxygen out of the room that the clown car is going to flare out before Super Tuesday
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 18:51
|
|
|
Oh Snapple! posted:shoulda just let us get it out of our system naturally tbqh no such thing exists
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 18:52
|
|
|
Find me some Twitter takes about Hillary's new whinebook I require more takes
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 18:53
|
|
|
logikv9 posted:no such thing exists enough dumb poo poo comes out per week at this point that discussion would largely be what it is now with a small smattering of primary chat here and there. as is a lot of folks still have poo poo they want to say in regards to the primary but can't because of that dumb loving rule that seems to largely exist as an immediate reaction to hillfolk being confronted with the possibility of having to eat a lot of poo poo after they spent the better part of a year being huge fuckin' assholes.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 18:56
|
|
|
logikv9 posted:i see it mostly the other way but i also read dan rolle and ha ha goodman occasionally to see what mental illness does to the human mind well, i'm just going based on what i see from twitter (bernie sabotaged hillary, was too mean, etc). the equivalent to reading ha goodman would be if I formed my opinion after reading r/enough_sanders_spam Oh Snapple! posted:enough dumb poo poo comes out per week at this point that discussion would largely be what it is now with a small smattering of primary chat here and there.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 18:58
|
|
|
Oh Snapple! posted:enough dumb poo poo comes out per week at this point that discussion would largely be what it is now with a small smattering of primary chat here and there. the rule was put there starting during bernie's speech at the DNC but thanks for trying
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 18:59
|
|
|
anime was right posted:fyi i think if you have to grift as an ex-politician, book sales is the way to go because like 80% of the time people buy those things and toss them in the garbage and the politician still stands to make a cool few million plus every library & college & hs in the country will buy multiple copies.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:01
|
|
|
dnd banned primary chat as well because it's a dumb circular argument only argued by people with nothing better to do. there are no opinions to change it's people arguing past each other and then going back to their safe spaces to gloat about how they owned X if you want it so badly twitter is available
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:01
|
|
|
i probated so many people (including a former admin, whom i did not realize was a former admin) for every instance of any sort of salt, pro-hillary or pro-bernie during the DNC because it was finally over and the purge of the Angry People was underway. we called it the Unity Zone because we thought that *finally* all the assholes would leave, which they did
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:03
|
|
|
loquacius posted:Find me some Twitter takes about Hillary's new whinebook there's not much because everyone is in utter consternation about trump declaring the country a theocracy that bans trans people have a couple https://twitter.com/DRUDGE_REPORT/status/889986260449636352 https://twitter.com/ByYourLogic/status/890161372658585600
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:05
|
|
|
logikv9 posted:dnd banned primary chat as well because it's a dumb circular argument only argued by people with nothing better to do. there are no opinions to change it's people arguing past each other and then going back to their safe spaces to gloat about how they owned X i have never been probed for primary chat in d&d. maybe they banned primary chat for a while after the primary (which isn't a bad idea), but it's not still banned. just here
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:05
|
|
|
Main Paineframe posted:the FBI is investigating a PA Dem for paying a primary challenger $90k to drop out of the race in 2012 that's three years of my salary, how do i get that gig
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:06
|
|
|
Venom Snake posted:Even though I'm probably going to get owned for saying this: the 2020 primary is going to be an absolute clown car with everyone from centrists like booker to berniecrats like.....bernie running and this thread is going to be generating takes that could melt cobalt it usually goes this way in open races (ie, a dem pres not running for reelection). the upside might be that bad dems are so prevalent--and are convinced that they will win what clinton lost--that a bernie type could end up winning lots of primaries. but that's assuming that bad dems won't coalesce around a candidate like harris and pressure superdelegates and party honchos into supporting the handpicked bad dem like harris before the bad dem even announces.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:06
|
|
|
SKULL.GIF posted:there's not much because everyone is in utter consternation about trump declaring the country a theocracy that bans trans people lmao i just remembered that this is american dream week todays gonna own
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:07
|
|
|
logikv9 posted:i see it mostly the other way but i also read dan rolle and ha ha goodman occasionally to see what mental illness does to the human mind 
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:07
|
|
|
Condiv posted:i have never been probed for primary chat in d&d. maybe they banned primary chat for a while after the primary (which isn't a bad idea), but it's not still banned. just here i am extremely certain i've seen leper's colony probes from Fans that say "primary chat / salt"
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:08
|
|
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:here's my prediction for 2020 if Hillary runs again: If bernie gets more than 40% but doesn't win an outright majority MoM people would probably throw it to him
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:08
|
|
|
wait did that challenger actually take the 90k cause that seems low *~integrity~*
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:08
|
|
|
when wikileaks approached ha ha goodman and offered to pay, he probably said no no no i'll pay you
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:08
|
|
|
Venom Snake posted:oh my god your the goon who setup hills email server!!! According to Goodman's video thing she also stored them on "the CLOUD"!
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:09
|
|
|
Agean90 posted:the party in my state got a few interns and an executive organizer guy who are both in their twenties and apparently like omalley which is odd to me. Omalley would have won tbh
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:09
|
|
|
logikv9 posted:the rule was put there starting during bernie's speech at the DNC but thanks for trying it was also, iirc, specific to the DNC thread, but i also can't find any older rules thread after a cursory glance so  as is the only documentation of the rule is the current forum rules post, and that was posted after the GE.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:09
|
|
|
logikv9 posted:i am extremely certain i've seen leper's colony probes from Fans that say "primary chat / salt" that may well be, he may well have been probating primary chat at some point. but i've discussed the primary in D&D since the election and never received a probe for it. i think it's p ridiculous that it's still verboten to discuss it in c-spam cause who knows why
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:10
|
|
|
Oh Snapple! posted:it was also, iirc, specific to the DNC thread, but i also can't find any older rules thread after a cursory glance so given that i probated plenty for it throughout i assure you that it existed it was also codified in the old rules post but only as a "i'm getting really tired of all this poo poo so i'm going to up the probation length for each offense" addendum
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:11
|
|
|
UHD posted:wait did that challenger actually take the 90k oddly enough, politicians are bought p cheaply like i think $20k is enough to get most politicians to vote for whatever you want
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:11
|
|
|
Willa Rogers posted:it usually goes this way in open races (ie, a dem pres not running for reelection). i mean that happened with jeb! and look at how that turned out for every person that stays in line, there will be an opportunist that figures if they just take the lead, they'll get all the donor money instead.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:11
|
|
|
Venom Snake posted:Omalley would have won tbh true, but lets be honest the dissicated corpse of jfk could have won.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:11
|
|
|
Willa Rogers posted:it usually goes this way in open races (ie, a dem pres not running for reelection). The establishment is still quite fractured at this point (one example is schumer and pelosi cannot agree on messaging or platform) which leads me to believe they will just stab each other in the back while progressives sweep it. In fact I would hot take so far as to say Schumer would endorse bernie over harris. He didn't wait till hills corpse was cold to endorse keith
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:12
|
|
|
Oh Snapple! posted:as is a lot of folks still have poo poo they want to say in regards to the primary but can't because of that dumb loving rule that seems to largely exist as an immediate reaction to hillfolk being confronted with the possibility of having to eat a lot of poo poo after they spent the better part of a year being huge fuckin' assholes. Imagine having the worst thing about modern politics be that meanies didn't let loud enough screaming override 3 million votes.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:13
|
|
|
Condiv posted:that may well be, he may well have been probating primary chat at some point. but i've discussed the primary in D&D since the election and never received a probe for it. i think it's p ridiculous that it's still verboten to discuss it in c-spam cause who knows why i didn't read D&D so i can't tell you how it was but c-spam was a toxic wasteland solely from the primary and the rule, which grew out of the DNC speech rule, was just meant to keep the circular argument from forming the primary salt existed amongst plenty of salty people and they posted in GBS
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:13
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/keithellison/status/890273676637110272
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:13
|
|
|
Ketih great
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:14
|
|
|
the primary salt rule is very certainly getting old and outdated which is why i will remove it at some point today, tomorrow idk but definitely by 2018 just because it's a nice round number
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:14
|
|
|
logikv9 posted:given that i probated plenty for it throughout i assure you that it existed i'll take your word for it, tho i'll contend that the rule didn't accomplish poo poo. the biggest assholes remained here right up until the moment hillary lost
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:15
|
|
|
Oh Snapple! posted:i'll take your word for it, tho i'll contend that the rule didn't accomplish poo poo. the biggest assholes remained here right up until the moment hillary lost we removed half of the assholes, whom returned when the other half permatoxxed to death
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:16
|
|
|
we're running on half-rear end in a top hat capacity which will will ramp up to 2x rear end in a top hat capacity in 2020 so when that happens you're going to see some serious poo poo
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:16
|
|
|
logikv9 posted:i didn't read D&D so i can't tell you how it was but c-spam was a toxic wasteland solely from the primary and the rule, which grew out of the DNC speech rule, was just meant to keep the circular argument from forming I think it's more of that D&D may have a different tolerance on what salt is vs C-Spam, The casual nature of C-Spam means that salt is often taken far enough to derail a thread for pages resulting in people insulting each other. In the prime days of C-Spam we had more people, with more heated opinions There's also plenty of modern events we already do that with. That said, the primaries were a mess and nominating Hillary Clinton was a mistake for the DNC as Bernie Would've Won. This was true prior to 2016, and after November 9th. Not much else needs to be said about the primaries.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 15:03 |
|
|
there are some really, really, really nasty posters who stopped posting generally though, and they cause most of the problems. i hope they don't return, those dudes were the types to actually chase you from thread to thread demanding that you answer their loaded question and then PMing you if they got probed
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2017 19:19
|
|