|
Al! posted:the clinton machine bill and hillary!??!?!?! donald trump, the rear end in a top hat?!?!?! 
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 23:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 02:13 |
|
|
Gene Hackman Fan posted:you're not telling me anything i haven't heard already. trust me, i'm on the email lists.  subjecting yrself to the scrawlings of bad dems (rhymes with mad men)
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 23:25
|
|
|
Willa Rogers posted:* complicit in lies about criminal charges against defendants
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 23:26
|
|
|
You know if the dems keep sucking at elections at least it will be easier to primary them all, they won't see it coming since they can no longer remove their heads out of their asses
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 23:32
|
|
|
Gene Hackman Fan posted:trust me, i'm on the email lists lol yer nutty *uses cheese grater on own genitals* "trust me, im on the special menu"
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 23:33
|
|
|
Office Pig posted:democrats are basically republicans from yesteryear and that's been the plan for the past 50 years The Democrats keep looking for the Rockefeller Republicans at Panera Breads across the country but it turns out Panera Bread was inside them the whole time.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 23:34
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/anniekarni/status/892876732059004929
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 23:42
|
|
|
Lastgirl posted:lol yer nutty they said it was how i could learn about the conference calls. but the emails with the details arrive the day after the calls actually happen edit: i mean, absent any other knowledge, how the gently caress was i going to get any training? edit edit: turns out it wasn't going to be there, either.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 23:42
|
|
|
So Zuck wants to lose?
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 23:46
|
|
|
like i said, my position as chair is like harry potter if harry was supposed to prevent cthulu from waking up but couldn't be arsed and just hosed off for eight years so the responsibility fell upon the shoulders of a mostly-insane dude in the background whose only pleasure in life that he can afford is getting drunk off bathtub gin, whose only knowledge of wizardy comes from foreign-language youtube tutorials, and is trying like mad to justify to himself why he shouldn't just let the great old one wreck havoc on the land.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 23:47
|
|
|
i went into a panera bread the other day and immediately felt out of place and went right back outside and across the street to a wendy's a lot of people don't know this but panera bread doesn't even have a dollar menu
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 23:48
|
|
|
Gene Hackman Fan posted:as much as an rear end in a top hat hillary was to maddy over a loving dollar, how do you think she's going treat her own flesh and blood? idk who maddy is
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 23:51
|
|
|
comedyblissoption posted:it's almost like the democrats have adopted the strategy of opposing anyone disagreeing with them by accusing them of racism, sexism, or being a russian plant i guess voting dem wont solve racexism
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 23:55
|
|
|
Gene Hackman Fan posted:be that as it may, that set has proven to be a better investment than your consultancy for the democratic party, if your posts itt are anything to go by. Anyone who actually has several thousand dollars to spend on some frivolous isn't really in a position to be randomly accusing others of being rich. I don't really know where all this "CC is rich" stuff is coming from. Most younger political staffers do not make much money, and being rich is hardly a prerequisite for having relatively mainstream/establishment political views (especially if you frequently interact with other people who hold such views). Heck, that's part of the reason why there's such a big class divide; people usually can't afford to work in politics unless they have families to support them. edit: I mean CC is really not that bad. I disagree pretty strongly with him, but he's not a dumb condescending rear end in a top hat like some of the D&D posters (like JC for example). As far as being some sort of devil's advocate for this thread, he works pretty well. Ytlaya has issued a correction as of 23:58 on Aug 2, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 23:56
|
|
|
punk rebel ecks posted:So Zuck wants to lose? Which will build better advice To build a better facebook To consumer users In Reality Facebook is the one who consumes you
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 23:57
|
|
|
papa horny michael posted:The only thing i disagree with her about then is over the israel/palestine thing, but I'm pretty okay with people being pro-palestine. They're the underdogs so they need the defenders. Why in the world would you be pro-Israel, though? As far as political stances go, it's pretty much indefensible. It's no different than someone saying they're against affirmative action or gay marriage or something* in the sense of being an issue with a really clear and obvious right and wrong. *It's actually quite a bit worse than this
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 00:06
|
|
|
Holy poo poo I knew Zuck was rich but I didn't know that he was 72 billion dollar rich. That's between 7 and ∞ times more money than Trump. Between that and Facebook I wonder how much power he would have to give up in order to become president.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 00:06
|
|
|
Gene Hackman Fan posted:like i said, my position as chair is like harry potter if harry was supposed to prevent cthulu from waking up but couldn't be arsed and just hosed off for eight years so the responsibility fell upon the shoulders of a mostly-insane dude in the background whose only pleasure in life that he can afford is getting drunk off bathtub gin, whose only knowledge of wizardy comes from foreign-language youtube tutorials, and is trying like mad to justify to himself why he shouldn't just let the great old one wreck havoc on the land. Also lol if you aren't already consumed by the madness. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PFcOeM_Usk&t=23s
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 00:06
|
|
|
JC convinced me that if the dumbass pipedreams of bad dems to gently caress off to Canada whenever a republican is elected happened, they'd have given the tories majorities so crushing there'd be calls for international observers.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 00:09
|
|
|
Feldegast42 posted:You know if the dems keep sucking at elections at least it will be easier to primary them all, they won't see it coming since they can no longer remove their heads out of their asses do party insiders have outsized voting power in some state or local primaries like they do in the presidential primaries or CA state chair elections?
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 00:11
|
|
|
Feldegast42 posted:Holy poo poo I knew Zuck was rich but I didn't know that he was 72 billion dollar rich. That's between 7 and ∞ times more money than Trump. Between that and Facebook I wonder how much power he would have to give up in order to become president. uh, none? the rules only apply to the rich if someone makes them
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 00:11
|
|
|
Feldegast42 posted:You know if the dems keep sucking at elections at least it will be easier to primary them all, they won't see it coming since they can no longer remove their heads out of their asses Incumbancy is a hell of a force. comedyblissoption posted:money still heavily buys elections
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 00:22
|
|
|
Feldegast42 posted:Holy poo poo I knew Zuck was rich but I didn't know that he was 72 billion dollar rich. That's between 7 and ∞ times more money than Trump. Between that and Facebook I wonder how much power he would have to give up in order to become president. Trump only has a net worth of 3.4 billion dollars. He famously sued Forbes for publishing this researched number.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 00:23
|
|
|
etalian posted:Trump only has a net worth of 3.4 billion dollars. only it's loving disgusting a serial failure like trump can be 3.2billion dollars rich
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 00:27
|
|
|
criticism of the democrats' lovely better deal: http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/41444-better-deal-than-what https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhrJ_RtKIGs
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 00:28
|
|
|
zegermans posted:"The fascist president is letting his completely unelected stupid privileged family gently caress up the country. We should turn our gaze on Clinton's daughter for reasons." The point that liberals don't aim criticism like this at people perceived as "their own" still stands. There are a bunch of Democratic politicians from privileged backgrounds, but you only see this arguments aimed at conservatives who they perceive as being dumb.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 00:32
|
|
|
Call Me Charlie posted:what if i told you that chuck uses the term 'american workers first' a bunch while also announcing the desire to form a committee on foreign investment in the us, rework our trade deals with china and give tax credits to companies willing to 'reshore' outsourced jobs? TAX CREDITS  Ytlaya posted:edit: I mean CC is really not that bad. I disagree pretty strongly with him, but he's not a dumb condescending rear end in a top hat like some of the D&D posters (like JC for example). As far as being some sort of devil's advocate for this thread, he works pretty well. i usually like CC but he's been dipping a bit too hard into trolling and being willfully obtuse lately
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 00:33
|
|
|
oh thank god. theres no way he wins now
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 00:35
|
|
|
Terror Sweat posted:oh thank god. theres no way he wins now Zuck for president
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 00:39
|
|
|
Imagine a Zuck-Harris ticket
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 00:40
|
|
|
have voters figured out that a 'tax credit' is equivalent to handing someone a big bag of money yet
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 00:42
|
|
|
comedyblissoption posted:have voters figured out that a 'tax credit' is equivalent to handing someone a big bag of money yet phrases like tax credit are use intentionally because they are vague/bland so they don't set off alarms
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 00:58
|
|
|
Venom Snake posted:phrases like tax credit are use intentionally because they are vague/bland so they don't set off alarms yeah but a lot of people who would benefit can't see through the vague blandness either i think talking about big bags of money might go over better in the end
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 01:00
|
|
|
comedyblissoption posted:have voters figured out that a 'tax credit' is equivalent to handing someone a big bag of money yet I'm a big fan of nonrefundable tax credits, which are big bags of money that only the rich are eligible to receive what means testing
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 01:01
|
|
|
Gene Hackman Fan posted:they said it was how i could learn about the conference calls. unsubscribe from their mailing list imo  they dont need you jest like you dont need them
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 01:02
|
|
|
the problem is dems like using tax credits for the idiots that would benefit them and not to obfuscate the free money to people that their voters dont want having it even tho its literally just free money
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 01:02
|
|
|
tax credits in general are bad no matter who they go to and giving away free incentives is part of the reason our budget is so hosed
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 01:06
|
|
|
UHD posted:idk who maddy is http://knowyourmeme.com/photos/1078502-i-m-not-kidding-maddi 
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 01:07
|
|
|
wtf lol
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 01:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 02:13 |
|
|
hillary friggin sucks
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 01:09
|
|