|
Perturabator Konrad Kavinsky: NightLords. That's all I got. Der Waffle Mous fucked around with this message at 08:54 on Aug 1, 2017 |
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 08:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 09:49 |
|
|
Should be Fulgrim with a Hawaiian shirt
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 04:53
|
|
|
I am going to be painting Angron this month, so I will be (theoretically) half way out from under my TOXX burden. My real question is how I should paint the dead Marines on his base. Loyalist World Eaters is how it should be, but I think part of me is always sexually aroused by seeing dead Iron Warriors.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 18:02
|
|
|
Lord_Hambrose posted:I am going to be painting Angron this month, so I will be (theoretically) half way out from under my TOXX burden. Imperial Fists because I want to see you paint yellow and be miserable.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 18:54
|
|
|
Lord_Hambrose posted:I am going to be painting Angron this month, so I will be (theoretically) half way out from under my TOXX burden. Ultras for that Betrayer feeling.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 18:57
|
|
|
PantsOptional posted:Ultras for that Betrayer feeling. Dead Space Wolves would also be quite fitting.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 19:07
|
|
|
Stanyer89 posted:Imperial Fists because I want to see you paint yellow and be miserable.  I always dreamed of doing Imperial Fists as my loyalist army.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 21:07
|
|
|
When the gently caress did (pre-demon, pre-Siege of Terra) Angron fight the Imperial Fists?
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 21:22
|
|
|
Maybe an IF force during the shadow crusade?
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 21:55
|
|
|
Safety Factor posted:When the gently caress did (pre-demon, pre-Siege of Terra) Angron fight the Imperial Fists? In a galaxy far far away...
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 23:17
|
|
|
Safety Factor posted:When the gently caress did (pre-demon, pre-Siege of Terra) Angron fight the Imperial Fists? My eidolon is standing on an IF dread because gently caress them.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2017 23:54
|
|
|
  satisfied! With bonus malcadors! 
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 01:21
|
|
|
Fuckkkkk. That's beautiful Gazk. The freehand is ace
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 01:26
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 01:28
|
|
|
Thanks! It was intentionally sloppy but totally works.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 01:29
|
|
|
Ghazk posted:
Where do you want me to send your VHS of Space Jam?
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 01:40
|
|
|
Safety Factor posted:When the gently caress did (pre-demon, pre-Siege of Terra) Angron fight the Imperial Fists? I am incandescent with rage over this irony. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 01:43
|
|
|
Lord_Hambrose posted:I am incandescent with rage over this irony.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 01:46
|
|
|
Man that's pretty
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 01:54
|
|
|
Ghazk posted:
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 01:55
|
|
|
panascope posted:Where do you want me to send your VHS of Space Jam? Yesssss! Hand it off to Tallkid, he knows where to find me.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 02:42
|
|
|
Ghazk that symbol of chaos is the cherry on a very nice cake.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 08:08
|
|
|
gently caress this means I'm going to have to reaaaallly try on my LoW
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 14:54
|
|
|
I have painted three more marines. Please tell me how to do better!             Other questions: How does basing work? I'd like to put them on some cracked desert. Does the weathering just look like bird poo poo? If yes, does it matter? They're Death Guard.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 16:56
|
|
|
It looks a little bird lovely; but thats ok. Try giving it a light silver metallic drybrush. This simulates paint wearing on the uppermost edges of the armor
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 17:04
|
|
|
Hixson posted:gently caress this means I'm going to have to reaaaallly try on my LoW The lust for Space Jam is palpable ITT
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 17:52
|
|
|
Use a sponge to weather, and go light on it and build it up. Skavenblight dinge and rhinox hide.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2017 17:55
|
|
|
Thanks for the suggestions, everyone. The Arcus Sicaran is up on FW's site. The display model has a pretty paint scheme.  The rules for 30k and 40k (pdfs) are also up. It seems pretty wicked in 30k (especially with all the options) and just kinda mediocre in 40k. Overall seems much better than the Punisher to me.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 13:45
|
|
|
Jeez 8 S8 AP2 shots that reroll cover and Jink if it doesn't move?
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 14:36
|
|
|
Specialized anti automata warheads are interesting too.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 14:50
|
|
|
Just looking at the difference between those rules makes me so glad for 8th edition.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 15:10
|
|
|
MasterSlowPoke posted:Just looking at the difference between those rules makes me so glad for 8th edition.  Seriously considering putting Heresy on the back burner until it inevitably makes the jump to 8th ed, playing the 7th ruleset now feels so clunky and frustrating.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 15:12
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 15:18
|
|
|
MasterSlowPoke posted:Just looking at the difference between those rules makes me so glad for 8th edition. SteelMentor posted:
gently caress no, the 8th Edition rules are so boring, no character at all other than "it shoots I guess". What happened to the multiple warhead types, the armour penetration mechanic? The 8th rules are watered down trash.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 16:14
|
|
|
The difference between the two rule sets is almost comically stark with this thing. The 7th ed version has a ton of character, lots of different clunky rules to remember and a ton of weapon profiles. It's really customizable and having multiples means layered bookkeeping with remembering which model has which options. The 8th ed version is totally flavorless, and looks like all the other 8th ed vehicle profiles where it's got the big main gun and some one-off special rule to set it apart from other vehicles.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 17:57
|
|
|
The Terminal Tracking and Cluster Warhead rules are shared with the Xiphon and Scorpius in the same army list. It'd be much better if they named them something unique. Multiple names for the same rule is good and cool. it's also got a dumb name. Should be called something like the Primaris Thundar Stryker. TTerrible fucked around with this message at 18:26 on Aug 4, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 18:24
|
|
|
What flavor? It's zany for zany's sake. It' s a rotary missile launcher, which means that it fires a ton of smaller rockets instead of one larger missile. Sure, that's cool. But why are there ammo selections? There's only one hopper per launcher, and there isn't any means of mechanically selecting which rockets it can fire, so where's the ammo coming from? It should only be loaded wwith one ammo type. And if they're smaller rockets, why are they so powerful? Why don't marine missile launchers get these turbo-vehicle-fucker missiles? If they're slightly too big for a marine, why not dreads and hunter killer missles? Why is it D3 rolls on the chart and not just 2D6, pick highest? Where's the elite tracking coming from for the anti-air missiles? Why do they all have different ranges? Is it really fun to spend 50 points on extra ammo to gently caress-harder low-save blobs or mechanicus dudes? Why even give the option to list tailor against Admech? If the Imperium has had weapons that can just turn off entire robot forces since before Unification, why is it only in this extremely underproduced tank? It's a rotary missile launcher. It should just shoot a bunch of small missiles. I'd say the 8th edition special rule it has is more flavorful anyway, you can fire it normally or go full auto. I don't see why the HH version has remaining stationary be more important to it, it's a Sicaran class tank and is meant to be move and fire. It's not the Enterprise-D where it's choosing to give more power to the phasers or engines.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 18:27
|
|
|
MasterSlowPoke posted:What flavor? It's zany for zany's sake. It' s a rotary missile launcher, which means that it fires a ton of smaller rockets instead of one larger missile. Sure, that's cool. But why are there ammo selections? There's only one hopper per launcher, and there isn't any means of mechanically selecting which rockets it can fire, so where's the ammo coming from? It should only be loaded wwith one ammo type. And if they're smaller rockets, why are they so powerful? Why don't marine missile launchers get these turbo-vehicle-fucker missiles? If they're slightly too big for a marine, why not dreads and hunter killer missles? Why is it D3 rolls on the chart and not just 2D6, pick highest? Where's the elite tracking coming from for the anti-air missiles? Why do they all have different ranges? Is it really fun to spend 50 points on extra ammo to gently caress-harder low-save blobs or mechanicus dudes? Why even give the option to list tailor against Admech? If the Imperium has had weapons that can just turn off entire robot forces since before Unification, why is it only in this extremely underproduced tank? Having options is very bad. You shouldn't have to make a choice about ammo types, its just a gun. It goes bang.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 18:29
|
|
|
I'm stoked for 7.5 and definitely prefer the granularity compared to 8th. It's cool if you like one over the other. They are two different games. That Sicaran is a motherfucker. All the warhead options are good which blows my mind since usually one of the choices is garbage. The AP4 option is the weakest, but it will erase solar aux and auxiliary hordes. Neutron Flux warheads are a serious gently caress you option to Cibernetica armies. Honestly they are probably too powerful IMO, since it totally fucks those armies. Like, that thing will delete hundreds of points of robots each turn even if they are in cover. I bet the plasma Sicaran is going to be crazy.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 18:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 09:49 |
|
|
e:
BULBASAUR fucked around with this message at 18:40 on Aug 4, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2017 18:36
|
|