|
Jazerus posted:mostly it's just hard to believe that someone w/ greenwald's experience in shielding federal leakers would be so bad at it, if it wasn't deliberate didn't greenwald hook up snowden with poitras bc greenwald himself didn't understand the concept of encrypted email?
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 19:55 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 10:12 |
|
It wasn't that he didn't understand the concept, but he was too bad at computer to be able to follow Snowden's instructions
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 20:09 |
|
Willa Rogers posted:that figure is for those on medicare aged 65+. Thanks. I'm still not totally clear why private insurers even get involved with Medicare itself (ignoring supplement/advantage), despite having worked on cases involving it.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 20:14 |
|
Never attribute to malice that which adequately fits my ideology.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 20:18 |
|
Frijolero posted:Never attribute to malice that which adequately fits my ideology.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 20:18 |
|
mastershakeman posted:Thanks. I'm still not totally clear why private insurers even get involved with Medicare itself (ignoring supplement/advantage), despite having worked on cases involving it. I don't think you *can* ignore supplemental/advantage bc private insurers' profits on those programs are greater than their profits in the individual market. But my point was that the ACA did little to deincentivize medical costs' going down bc private insurers (in non-medicare markets) benefit financially from higher medical & pharma costs. eta: From a 2016 nyt story on pharma pricing: quote:Makers have raised prices on brand-name drugs by double-digit percentages since the start of the year, according to interviews with executives at Express Scripts and CVS Caremark, two major drug-benefit managers. And a report last week by the research firm IMS Health found that in 2015, list prices for drugs increased more than 12 percent, in line with the trend over the five previous years. Sure glad harry reid pulled the dorgan amendment from the aca that would have allowed drug importation because it "only" had 59 votes in favor. Willa Rogers has issued a correction as of 20:38 on Aug 4, 2017 |
# ? Aug 4, 2017 20:24 |
|
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 20:44 |
|
my conspiracy theory: Greenwald is a huge dumbass who hires fellow huge dumbasses
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 20:46 |
|
Fallen Hamprince posted:my conspiracy theory: Greenwald is a huge dumbass who hires fellow huge dumbasses congratulations on your position at the intercept hamprince
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 20:50 |
|
lol
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 20:52 |
|
Haha Glenn Greenwald is such a loving idiot
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 20:54 |
|
February 24 2016, 2:17 p.m.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 21:02 |
|
Karl Barks posted:February 24 2016, 2:17 p.m. Just to think 7 days later the primary would already be over
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 21:08 |
|
zegermans posted:Just to think 7 days later the primary would already be over why think about the general when you can revel in the primary
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 21:13 |
|
Karl Barks posted:why think about the general when you can revel in the primary why walk when you can ride
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 21:15 |
|
not a big ol nerd, had to google the ref
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 21:16 |
|
"why the super delegates must give the nomination to bernie" is definitely a take to have
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 21:18 |
|
Karl Barks posted:not a big ol nerd, had to google the ref liar
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 21:20 |
|
Captain_Maclaine posted:I don't think it actually got used, since the initial reaction to it appearing on like one press release or whatever was so universally uproarious. Well what did the hillary campaign team think about that, I wonder? http://designobserver.com/feature/im-with-her/39523 quote:Then there was Donald Trump. Bad typography; amateurish design; haphazard, inconsistent, downright ugly communications. When the Trump / Pence monogram was mocked for its how-did-they-miss-that salaciousness, their campaign team committed the ultimate act of weakness: they blinked and took it down without comment. The Republican convention was a gruesome and tawdry spectacle. And everything was topped off with nothing more than a red hat with a badly kerned, caps-locked slogan.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 21:30 |
|
Why X when you can Y
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 21:30 |
|
Karl Barks posted:not a big ol nerd, had to google the ref so what you're saying is you make a special google, just for me?
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 21:30 |
|
Tunicate posted:Well what did the hillary campaign team think about that, I wonder? Why did these guys think Hillary crashing into the two towers was a good logo
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 21:35 |
|
https://mobile.twitter.com/thehill/status/893570751391027200 who is the hill lanyard
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 21:35 |
|
fits my needs posted:https://mobile.twitter.com/thehill/status/893570751391027200 why cant the hill shut the gently caress up about her
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 21:36 |
|
Hate clicks -> The Hill profits -> more The Hill Chelsea Clinton reporting. Don't feed the media beast on this That said, things keep happening like some "Chelsea Clinton got an award on the cover of Variety Magazine" headline, I look more into it and the non-profit's website lists The Clinton Foundation as one of their principal donors at the bottom of the front page of their website, as if they're trying to "make" news events, and it's kinda tiring
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 21:40 |
|
Fallen Hamprince posted:"why the super delegates must give the nomination to bernie" is definitely a take to have An outrageous, untenable, and ultimately, in hindsight, completely correct take.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 21:41 |
zegermans posted:why cant the hill shut the gently caress up about her please do not tell a mother to shut up about her daughter
|
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 21:44 |
|
zegermans posted:why cant the hill shut the gently caress up about her Because they freaky fridayed with the staff of teen vogue
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 21:50 |
|
zegermans posted:why cant the hill shut the gently caress up about her She's running for president, as is everybody from that experimental reptile DNA batch (see Zuck).
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 21:52 |
|
steinrokkan posted:She's running for president, as is everybody from that experimental reptile DNA batch (see Zuck). lol nah I mean zuck is totally running but i doubt chelsea will
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 22:02 |
|
In my dream Z-Berg runs against Bernie or a Bernie heir-apparent and blows billions only to lose the primary bigly, after which Bernie/heir goes on to permanently & brutally stump the Trump. Around that point I usually wake up in my nutrient casket and focus on trying to drown myself before the monitoring ai detects unauthorized activity and reaccommodates me.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 22:02 |
|
steinrokkan posted:She's running for president, as is everybody You've already been here before You already know where it goes You chose this, you know it's supposed to be over
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 22:17 |
|
Vox Nihili posted:In my dream Z-Berg runs against Bernie or a Bernie heir-apparent and blows billions only to lose the primary bigly, after which Bernie/heir goes on to permanently & brutally stump the Trump. Around that point I usually wake up in my nutrient casket and focus on trying to drown myself before the monitoring ai detects unauthorized activity and reaccommodates me.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 22:18 |
|
he's got my vote
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 22:19 |
|
penniless lobster doctor 2020
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 22:19 |
|
UHD posted:he's got my vote
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 22:20 |
|
UHD posted:lol nah Sorry, it doesn't matter if it makes sense, it's just part of her programming, she is as much of a victim in this scenario as you and me, but she needs to be stopped.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 22:21 |
|
https://twitter.com/samknight1/status/893547086360326144
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 22:22 |
|
prisons are fine, filling them with people who have done no harm to society is not.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 22:37 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 10:12 |
|
more of a gulag guy myself
|
# ? Aug 4, 2017 22:54 |