Darkman Fanpage posted:

does my dark heart good to see the pepes turn on yet another right wing "intellectual"

Andrew Anglin, Daily Stormer Organizer and Fantastic Shithead posted:

Look good.

It is very important to look good.

We must have Chad Nationalism. That is what will make guys want to join us, that is what will make girls want to be our groupies. That will make us look like bad boys and heroes. That is what we are going for here.

Admiral Ray posted:

Chad Nationalism

these people haven't had a real thought in their lives.

Montasque posted:

Proud CHAD NATIONALISTS

StashAugustine posted:

lol who doesn't use incognito mode

Montasque posted:

Proud CHAD NATIONALISTS

pillsburysoldier posted:

The I Hate Everything guy did it too

Zikan posted:

can't wait for pictures of dumpy neonazis in badly fitting suits standing around for hours in 88 degree weather

Uncle Wemus posted:

How come the most creative thing most of them do with money is hookers

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

Identity politics reached its apotheosis within the last year through the Clinton campaign, and now the premature push to make Kamala Harris the 2020 nominee. It's a fundamentally liberal political formulation that is ironically shaped as a reaction to white supremacy and heteronormativity, that subsumes the individual within a group identity that confers a social privilege within its own in-group politics. It claims to value diversity, but flattens it within the narrow confines of pre-defined stereotypes. Which in the end, causes the symbolic to overtake the real.

The most important thing about Hillary Clinton was that she was a woman, and all of the symbolic values that carried. All misgivings about her past record of stated policies and ideology were dismissed as mere misogynies.

And Kamala Harris is all of those contradictory and self-defeating tendencies carried out to its logical conclusion. Supposedly Harris carries "progressive" bonafides just in the fact that she's a female poc, even though in reality she's a member of the professional bourgeois that directly profited from the carceral state which disproportionately persecutes minorities. As California AG she did more to persecute black and Hispanic people than any individual Republican voter could ever hope to do in an entire lifetime, and this is apparently supposed to be the progressive champion of Democratic politics. It's a transparent sham that absolves white liberals of the guilt of their privilege by performing the proper sacraments, and rewards middle class & bourgeois minorities for perpetuating the exploitative system.

Yet white, male, or hetero privilege is never even meaningfully challenged, because there is still a massive reactionary political formulation outside of the confines of identity politics which conveniently makes it impossible to challenge any of those oppressive cycles. Idpol folks are so obsessed with policing language and performing the correct deference, because their own internal politics are more important than reality. Democrats don't really care if they actually win, or are a party of power, because it's more important that they perform the role of a principled opposition. In reality, being able to overcome the opposition means having a willingness to engage in a discoursive dialectical process, that can realize an ideological synthesis which creates a greater liberationist politics. Otherwise you have to overthrow the system by force and make the opposition bend to the will of your agenda. Yet liberals reject the use of force out of hand, and they don't want to be discoursive because they know their ideology doesn't hold up under scrutiny. In any real sense they're politically impotent, but the result of that impotence is that white liberals get to have their cake and eat it too. They can keep benefiting from all of their race, sex, and class privileges while having the added benefit of being praised for claiming to oppose them.

Normal people can spot these contradictions, even if they lack the ability to articulate them. They can feel it. It's a political dead end.

Crowsbeak posted:

I think this was posted in the CTH thread but.

Crowsbeak posted:

I think this was posted in the CTH thread but.

Yinlock posted:

brave pedophile stands against the villainous sjws who don't want him to rape kids

Yinlock posted:

brave pedophile stands against the villainous sjws who don't want him to rape kids

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

Identity politics reached its apotheosis within the last year through the Clinton campaign, and now the premature push to make Kamala Harris the 2020 nominee. It's a fundamentally liberal political formulation that is ironically shaped as a reaction to white supremacy and heteronormativity, that subsumes the individual within a group identity that confers a social privilege within its own in-group politics. It claims to value diversity, but flattens it within the narrow confines of pre-defined stereotypes. Which in the end, causes the symbolic to overtake the real.

The most important thing about Hillary Clinton was that she was a woman, and all of the symbolic values that carried. All misgivings about her past record of stated policies and ideology were dismissed as mere misogynies.

And Kamala Harris is all of those contradictory and self-defeating tendencies carried out to its logical conclusion. Supposedly Harris carries "progressive" bonafides just in the fact that she's a female poc, even though in reality she's a member of the professional bourgeois that directly profited from the carceral state which disproportionately persecutes minorities. As California AG she did more to persecute black and Hispanic people than any individual Republican voter could ever hope to do in an entire lifetime, and this is apparently supposed to be the progressive champion of Democratic politics. It's a transparent sham that absolves white liberals of the guilt of their privilege by performing the proper sacraments, and rewards middle class & bourgeois minorities for perpetuating the exploitative system.

Yet white, male, or hetero privilege is never even meaningfully challenged, because there is still a massive reactionary political formulation outside of the confines of identity politics which conveniently makes it impossible to challenge any of those oppressive cycles. Idpol folks are so obsessed with policing language and performing the correct deference, because their own internal politics are more important than reality. Democrats don't really care if they actually win, or are a party of power, because it's more important that they perform the role of a principled opposition. In reality, being able to overcome the opposition means having a willingness to engage in a discoursive dialectical process, that can realize an ideological synthesis which creates a greater liberationist politics. Otherwise you have to overthrow the system by force and make the opposition bend to the will of your agenda. Yet liberals reject the use of force out of hand, and they don't want to be discoursive because they know their ideology doesn't hold up under scrutiny. In any real sense they're politically impotent, but the result of that impotence is that white liberals get to have their cake and eat it too. They can keep benefiting from all of their race, sex, and class privileges while having the added benefit of being praised for claiming to oppose them.

Normal people can spot these contradictions, even if they lack the ability to articulate them. They can feel it. It's a political dead end.

Montasque posted:

Proud CHAD NATIONALISTS

Relevant Tangent posted:

People who're incapable of shame i.e. the deeply depressed.

Montasque posted:

pillsburysoldier posted:

welp, he kinda decided to go there in his Emoji Movie rant

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjObqNxcyig&t=1173s

Enjoy the loathing in his voice when he drops "skeletons!"

Qu Appelle posted:

Y'know what the Alt-Right was missing?

Children's books.

Glad that Denton ISD assistant principal Eric Hauser filled that gaping void in modern US literature.

http://www.dallasobserver.com/news/denton-isd-assistant-principal-pens-childrens-book-starring-trump-mascot-pepe-the-frog-9754953

Qu Appelle posted:

Y'know what the Alt-Right was missing?

Children's books.

Glad that Denton ISD assistant principal Eric Hauser filled that gaping void in modern US literature.

http://www.dallasobserver.com/news/denton-isd-assistant-principal-pens-childrens-book-starring-trump-mascot-pepe-the-frog-9754953

Crowsbeak posted:

I think this was posted in the CTH thread but.

Jeb! Repetition posted:

Small brain: politicians, operatives and pundits are honorable people and our country is too great for them to be pedophiles
Normal brain: John Podesta is a pedophile
Connected brain: Mike Cernovich is a pedophile
Galaxy brain: They're both pedophiles

Equeen posted:

it was really cool when he mocked the movie for having a heavy-handed agenda, then turned around and devoted several minutes taking feminism down a peg

not defending emoji movie (lol), but surely he could have called out its poorly executed "girl power!!!" message without bring up everyone's favorite buzzword.

Notorious R.I.M. posted:

lil googler is already flirting with the neonazis now

https://twitter.com/1776RealNews/status/895741391107534853

Ague Proof posted:

He retweeted the US Representative who wants the US to work with ISIS and wanted to hold a vote to give Alaska to Russia.