|
poptart_fairy posted:I'd just like the thread to be a little more transparent about what's considered acceptable, especially when accusations about trolling are thrown around. Saying it's subjective is vague enough to let the "you're a Nazi" bullshit continue though, so
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2017 22:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 20:51 |
|
|
poptart_fairy posted:What is this questionable content though? Looking at his stuff he's just posting things which aren't targeting the thread's usual lot, and that gets posters running in to squeal about how he's supporting Nazis and the alt-right. Just seems a bit of a dick move to accuse the former trolling, but let the latter go untouched. It would take just going over the examples in detail that would make a huge derail that is no fun for anyone. My rule of thumb is "If this is something I'd find on /r/thedonald or some other alt-right site as proof that all liberals are evil" I'll steer away from it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2017 22:23
|
|
|
Staying away and ignoring content, cool. Jumping in and calling someone a Nazi because of what they posted, then having the image's poster called a troll, seems kind of backwards. If someone is genuinely being a dick they can be dealt with. The dog piling just gets old. vvv - Are you seriously following me into another thread to continue that, veni. Jesus. poptart_fairy has a new favorite as of 22:31 on Aug 12, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2017 22:26
|
|
|
Have you considered that if you are having/ perpetuating a petty argument in every thread you post in, maybe it's you?
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2017 22:30
|
|
|
Ularg posted:It would take just going over the examples in detail that would make a huge derail that is no fun for anyone. My rule of thumb is "If this is something I'd find on /r/thedonald or some other alt-right site as proof that all liberals are evil" I'll steer away from it. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2017 22:31
|
|
|
poptart_fairy posted:Staying away and ignoring content, cool. Jumping in and calling someone a Nazi because of what they posted, then having the image's poster called a troll, seems kind of backwards.
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2017 22:32
|
|
|
Stuntman posted:Seriously, please shut the gently caress up. You got very angry and started making accusations towards me because I took issue with a QCS poster, in a thread about the moderation of GBS. I'd rather you try and not take the moral high ground here.
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2017 22:33
|
|
|
We're right at the top of page so let's see if we can go the remainder of it and the next page posting silly people on facebook without involving politics or politically charged content.  I belive in us! (I don't but I googled mgmt tips on the internet and it said to say this and then sell u avon so fingers crossed)Here is some el classico 
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2017 22:33
|
|
|
I read this thread anyways poptart fairy you arrogant dumb poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2017 22:33
|
|
poptart_fairy posted:I'd just like the thread to be a little more transparent about what's considered acceptable, especially when accusations about trolling are thrown around. Saying it's subjective is vague enough to let the "you're a Nazi" bullshit continue though, so Would you say it's about ethics in forum modding? EDIT: For actual content;  Imgur is still awful and full of creeps. Nuebot has a new favorite as of 22:43 on Aug 12, 2017 |
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2017 22:38
|
|
|
Okay our current record of moving on and posting good gravy content is one, we can only go up from here! Or laterally, but not down!
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2017 22:38
|
|
|
The internet witch hunt for the driver of that car is going well.  veni veni veni posted:I read this thread anyways poptart fairy you arrogant dumb poo poo. You broke your silence for me though. That's got to count for something between us. Nuebot posted:Would you say it's about ethics in forum modding? I'm just saying if the thread's only allowed to mock certain political spectrums then fine, just don't call it trolling and ignore the accusations of Nazism. Or just bring back the "no post without content" rule and watch these masturbatory dick fights drop. poptart_fairy has a new favorite as of 22:49 on Aug 12, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2017 22:43
|
|
|
Stop dragging on slap fights. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2017 22:49
|
|
|
EmmyOk posted:Okay our current record of moving on and posting good gravy content is one, we can only go up from here! Or laterally, but not down! Zero is less than one. So now we've hit rock bottom!
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2017 22:52
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2017 23:16
|
|
|
Citation needed.
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2017 23:26
|
|
|
This derail is over and I'm just hitting sixers on anyone who continues it.  
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2017 23:34
|
|
|
 I can't really post it because the context is all real life things said, but in related news, I'm starting to get sorta irritated with my super conservative cousin and her divorce. You know the type. Divorce wrong unless it's mine!
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2017 23:47
|
|
|
Boycotting your propane, lady
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2017 23:47
|
|
|
 I think there's supposed to be a comma for "rioting, #antifa's 'counter protesting'."  Dislikes: Nazis. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 12, 2017 23:57
|
|
|
Emmy just gas the thread for a few days, for the love of God. We're in need of a good colon cleanse every once in a while.
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 00:00
|
|
|
Ularg posted:
No, I think he just improperly used an apostrophe to pluralize. EDIT: Or maybe he meant "rioting antifas' counter protesting."
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 00:17
|
|
|
Ultimate Shrek Fan posted:this is the fuckin worst word. it sounds so clunky and maybe the dude explains tedious poo poo nobody gives a gently caress about to everyone. Did you just mansplain mansplaining?
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 00:36
|
|
|
Jurgan posted:Did you just mansplain mansplaining? Mansception
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 00:38
|
|
|
why dont u ever talk about MansPain!!? classci neolithic repsonse classic iosm from when HMV was being shutdown 
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 00:42
|
|
|
EmmyOk posted:why dont u ever talk about MansPain!!? classci neolithic repsonse NIPPER!
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 00:45
|
|
|
thread title delivers
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 01:08
|
|
|
poptart_fairy posted:I'm just saying if the thread's only allowed to mock certain political spectrums then fine, just don't call it trolling and ignore the accusations of Nazism. In the known history of mankind there have been two major revolutions against freemasonry. The first I covered a bit above, but let me go over the second for you because the methods, motivations, and such are very similar and you will be familiar with the details of the second. So, the topic is the American revolutionary war. It is often said in conspiracy media and such that this was a fraud perpetrated on the masses by mystery babylon. Freemasons will boast about their role in the revolution and offer that as evidence that they are not such bad people, or that they give people the chance to be free who then squandered and therefore need / deserved to be ruled. However, nothing could be further from the truth. The revolutionary war was an event where Christians infiltrated the freemasonic cabal in order to turn it against itself and make the revolution possible. If you read a book like How the Nation Was Won by Lowry you'll find a mountain of evidence about how a very few families labored intensely to create the conditions that would allow the war to be successfully prosecuted. They retreated to the distant frontier to set up iron foundries that would fuel the war effort decades later. They were set upon over and over again by the crown, the secret societies, and literally did their work in hiding - out in the Appalachian hills, locations and purposes concealed, etc. When the conditions were ripe for revolution, a psy-op was conducted against freemasonry that you now know as the "Illuminati." The idea was simple: because freemasons operate under cloak and dagger, deception, and disinformation campaigns, you can insert one of your own into the order. So the psy-op was created as such: the freemasonic society is going to create a "fake" freedom for the masses in order to quell their growing rebellious nature, that the American revolution can be allowed to succeed because it is part of a larger plot towards tyranny. Furthermore, because freemasons are sworn to protect the lives of other freemasons, by inducting much of the revolutionary officer corp into the society you give them protection against assassination (temporarily, until the psy-op is unraveled) and allow the revolution to have a chance to succeed. You can tell that is actually what happened because leaders of the revolution were killed later on. George Washington was murdered by his doctor. His kin, Meriwether Lewis (Martha Washington's family, which was the primary source of wealth that funded the revolution) was also assassinated and clearly by what we now know as Skull & Bones (they took part of his skull as a trophy). These sorts of mopping up operations by the masonic cabal in the aftermath of the revolution show you that they realized they had been had by subversion within the ranks and were set out to kill those who had played tricks on them. You can start to elucidate much about the characters involved in the revolution from that starting point. For example, Thomas Jefferson publicly shilled for the "nothing amiss here" version of Meriwether Lewis's death and proclaimed it a suicide. This, despite the unassailable forensic evidence to the contrary which was known to him: a large chunk of your skull cannot walk away from the scene of its own volition. As time passes, the masonic cabal starts to shill publicly that the revolution was their idea all along. They promote the "illuminati" as a real society that is taking over the world (to this day) when in fact it was never more than a psy-op meant to make the revolution possible. So not only can you identify traitors like Thomas Jefferson through this information, you know that controlled opposition media that goes on and on about the "illuminati" are just freemasonic fronts. In short, faced with a real revolution, the cabal is forced into a big coverup operation lest others get wind of the idea of challenging them. Many more would put to death at the hands of the cabal like the whistleblower Captain William Morgan and those who supported the anti-Masonic party in the wake of an assassination spree by the cabal against Americans in the early 19th century, endorsed by a president (Jefferson). After the life of Jesus, very similar things happened. The freemasons create an alternative story, go on a murdering spree against the original revolutionaries, and seek to co-opt everything to their own purposes. Rumors abound in conspiracy circles about the original Jesus being a Rothschild plant way back in the day, because this is what they always do: destroy the idea that you can fight, that you can do right, and suck the hope out of mankind. There is abundant hard, objective scientific evidence against their narrative even for the irreligious though like the fact that an Earthquake really did happen when Jesus was put upon the cross. This sort of thing they hate the most, because the most carefully concealed secret in freemasonry (by the top of the food chain from their foot soldiers) is that God is real and they will fail.
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 01:12
|
|
|
Jurgan posted:Did you just mansplain mansplaining? who said i was a man???
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 02:00
|
|
|
i'll admit, i mansplain a lot, but i don't have a social circle, so it's just me repeating poo poo i know to an otherwise empty house.
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 02:07
|
|
|
Well, actually, you undoubtedly share your home with vermin, so it's more likely you're regaling cockroaches and rats with facts.
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 02:08
|
|
|
Blade_of_tyshalle posted:Well, actually, you undoubtedly share your home with vermin, so it's more likely you're regaling cockroaches and rats with facts. yes, mansplaining (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 02:18
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/slowbeef/status/896533144714833920
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 02:29
|
|
|
At the very least he didn't name anybody so the thing with the Boston bombers isn't repeated. And who seeks information from /pol/, of all places? The forefront of internet trolling isn't usually concerned with veracity. v Oh god, he actually did retweet Mike Cernovich saying the false name. Not only is the information from /pol/, he trusted Mike Cernovich, one of the most partisan person out there. Why is this man so bad at screening his sources toanoradian has a new favorite as of 03:19 on Aug 13, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 02:51
|
|
|
toanoradian posted:At the very least he didn't name anybody so the thing with the Boston bombers isn't repeated. And who seeks information from /pol/, of all places? The forefront of internet trolling isn't usually concerned with veracity. https://twitter.com/Bearpigman/status/896535721649065984
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 03:06
|
|
|
 HYEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAARGHH
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 03:14
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 03:17
|
|
|
Hey need some help trying to understand this. This is in favor of Trump I'm sure of that, but I don't get it, what is anyone supposed to be seeing here?
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 03:17
|
|
|
Trump is wearing some sort of uniform but Barack "The Islamic Shock" Obama is a blackman
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 03:18
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 20:51 |
|
|
Electric Phantasm posted:Hey need some help trying to understand this. That Trump is a clean-cut, uniformed white man and Obama was a scary black man.
|
|
#
?
Aug 13, 2017 03:18
|
|
