Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
webmeister
Jan 31, 2007

The answer is, mate, because I want to do you slowly. There has to be a bit of sport in this for all of us. In the psychological battle stakes, we are stripped down and ready to go. I want to see those ashen-faced performances; I want more of them. I want to be encouraged. I want to see you squirm.

Ashcans posted:

The only way to stop a bad guy with a ring is a good guy with a ring.

This message proudly brought to you by the Numenorean Ring Association

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Runcible Cat
May 28, 2007

Ignoring this post

NikkolasKing posted:

I'm bothered less by Sexy Shelob and more by her change in personality. I liked that in the books she couldn't care less about rings or wars or Sauron. Everyone in Middle-earth is (rightly) scared shitless of the Dark Lord she has as a neighbor but he is of absolutely no concern to her. With Durin's Bane and Smaug dead, she's pretty much the last Great Evil of the First Age in Arda.

But apparently, her characterization here is that she is sort of a spurned lover and is salty at Sauron for neglecting her or something.

Maybe they read Bored of the Rings by mistake.

Schlob, was she now called. For eons she nurtured her pique, obsessively stuffing herself with bon-bons, movie magazines, and an occasional spelunker. At first, Sorhed dutifully sent her monthly alimony payments of a dozen or so narc volunteers, but these gifts soon stopped when word got around what a dinner invitation with Sorhed's ex actually entailed.

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

It is interesting that there is no alluring femme fatale Ayesha type character i can think of in all Tolkien's work. If you're a girl, you're hot or you're a spider.

Mayyybe Queen Beruthiel?

Ashcans
Jan 2, 2006

Let's do the space-time warp again!

webmeister posted:

This message proudly brought to you by the Numenorean Ring Association

Gandalf tells you that you can't make any rings of power, but how does that make sense when Sauron has a ring? And his nine generals have their own rings. Now that rings of power are outlawed, only outlaws have rings of power. It's time that we put that power back onto the hands of the good people of Middle Earth. Would you fear a Dark Rider if you had your own ring of power at hand to defend your home? This November, vote for the Mayor that will let YOU keep the Shire safe, rather than entrusting the future of our children to foreign rangers.

Mordekai
Sep 6, 2006

Salt in the wound eases the soul.
Just searched "Song of Durin" on youtube. Theres a lot of cheesy crap, but this one hits right home.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pISzxdEgDCU

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



Hieronymous Alloy posted:

It is interesting that there is no alluring femme fatale Ayesha type character i can think of in all Tolkien's work. If you're a girl, you're hot or you're a spider.
It's kind of interesting that while female characters are rather marginalized in Tolkien, he seems almost completely free of the sort of malicious or distrusting stuff we often see in more recent materials. Queen Beruthiel, who is referred to in a story about cats, is the only evil woman with fewer than three legs.

As for "being a mirror to Galadriel" I bet this means something like the phial is gonna come up, huh.

skasion
Feb 13, 2012

Why don't you perform zazen, facing a wall?

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

It is interesting that there is no alluring femme fatale Ayesha type character i can think of in all Tolkien's work. If you're a girl, you're hot or you're a spider.

Oh, you can also be an old biddy like Lobelia or Ioreth.

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound

Nessus posted:

It's kind of interesting that while female characters are rather marginalized in Tolkien, he seems almost completely free of the sort of malicious or distrusting stuff we often see in more recent materials. Queen Beruthiel, who is referred to in a story about cats, is the only evil woman with fewer than three legs.

As for "being a mirror to Galadriel" I bet this means something like the phial is gonna come up, huh.

skasion posted:

Oh, you can also be an old biddy like Lobelia or Ioreth.

Good point -- maiden, mother, or crone, but never a witch or evil queen; Always Mary, never Eve (and most definitely never Lillith). (I don't think Beruthiel really counts -- she only even got drafted to fill in the hole created by Aragorn's reference to her cats).

You could blame it on his catholicism but I think it comes down to just being someone who reflexively didn't find evil attractive or fascinating.

Runcible Cat
May 28, 2007

Ignoring this post

skasion posted:

Oh, you can also be an old biddy like Lobelia or Ioreth.

Lobelia is awesome. I only wish we had the scene where she told Saruman her opinion of him.

sassassin
Apr 3, 2010

by Azathoth
In every way except physical I am not a spider.

SHISHKABOB
Nov 30, 2012

Fun Shoe
Same, but a whale shark.

skasion
Feb 13, 2012

Why don't you perform zazen, facing a wall?

sassassin posted:

In every way except physical I am not a spider.

[bubbles]

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



Hieronymous Alloy posted:

Good point -- maiden, mother, or crone, but never a witch or evil queen; Always Mary, never Eve (and most definitely never Lillith). (I don't think Beruthiel really counts -- she only even got drafted to fill in the hole created by Aragorn's reference to her cats).

You could blame it on his catholicism but I think it comes down to just being someone who reflexively didn't find evil attractive or fascinating.
You know, that kind of seems to be the thing when you get down to it, isn't it? He clearly understood evil but he didn't find it alluring. Or even necessarily inevitable (if, of course, very likely).

chernobyl kinsman
Mar 18, 2007

a friend of the friendly atom

Soiled Meat

Nessus posted:

You know, that kind of seems to be the thing when you get down to it, isn't it? He clearly understood evil but he didn't find it alluring. Or even necessarily inevitable (if, of course, very likely).

? Of course evil is inevitable, it's built into the fabric of the world because of the Fall/Marring of Arda

NikkolasKing
Apr 3, 2010



There's a lot of rigid moralizing in Tolkien's work that I find uncomfortable. It's also why I find Saruman to be his best-written villain as Saruman's fall - why he became what he did - is extremely detailed if you read all the supplementary material. It's extremely realistic and easy to elate to.

My favorite little story is the one where Saruman goes to beg Gandalf's pardon when he realizes how deep he's in but Gandalf had already fled. An infuriated Saruman then just kept digging his own grave out of spite. I don't think this is "canon" but it is perfectly in line with Saruman's character.

Multiple times he realized he was wrong but a mixture of fear, resentment and pride always mastered him. It was very human, in a way Sauron never was and Melkor only kinda was.

skasion
Feb 13, 2012

Why don't you perform zazen, facing a wall?
Sauron definitely isn't supposed to be a relatable villain in the same sense as Saruman. Saruman ultimately is a really petty and pathetic figure, his efforts to become a great tyrant collapse overnight and before you know it he is just a wandering thug who can be sent packing by a harsh word from an even-tempered midget. He is literally humanized, made from a wise angelic wizard who feels obliged to destroy the world to save it into a dirty old man who shits on nice things just because he still can.

With Sauron nothing like this ever occurs and he is never reduced to the level of taking a direct part in the character-level action. We know him only by his works: tyranny over his slaves, devastation over his lands, and a enormous presence that literally overshadows the world. When he finally physically appears after the Ring is destroyed it's not as a person who does personlike things, it's as a giant dark figure in the sky, crowned with lightning, who is abruptly blown away by the wind. This isn't a human, but a god; a Power rather than a person. LOTR Sauron is ironically kind of more convincing as a deity than Morgoth, who after his escapades up to the rape of the Silmarils comes off as a sluggardly ogre who sits in a dungeon all millennium scheming ways of doing wicked things without risking himself, while Sil Sauron acts like a spooky sorcerer and gets his rear end whipped by a talking dog.

Data Graham
Dec 28, 2009

📈📊🍪😋



Fukken loving these takes on Tolkienian characterization guys ^^ .

It's easy to get put off by the flowery and pseudo-archaic language (who would describe someone in a modern piece of fiction as being "mastered by resentment and pride" anyway); but if you reframe the characters using our modern humanized standards these characters are more realistic and varied than a lot of casual readers give them credit for.

Just going through the intricate details of the differences in characterization between the various hobbits and Gandalf in the first few chapters (including in the preliminary drafts when they were Bingo and Odo and Marmaduke etc), like the podcast covers, exposes you to more variation in their personalities and more "wait, that seemed really out of character for so-and-so" than I had previously realized. I usually concede to people "Yeah, Tolkien wasn't great at characters", but I probably shouldn't

laaaaaandscapes though

Radio!
Mar 15, 2008

Look at that post.

skasion posted:

Sauron definitely isn't supposed to be a relatable villain in the same sense as Saruman. Saruman ultimately is a really petty and pathetic figure, his efforts to become a great tyrant collapse overnight and before you know it he is just a wandering thug who can be sent packing by a harsh word from an even-tempered midget. He is literally humanized, made from a wise angelic wizard who feels obliged to destroy the world to save it into a dirty old man who shits on nice things just because he still can.

With Sauron nothing like this ever occurs and he is never reduced to the level of taking a direct part in the character-level action. We know him only by his works: tyranny over his slaves, devastation over his lands, and a enormous presence that literally overshadows the world. When he finally physically appears after the Ring is destroyed it's not as a person who does personlike things, it's as a giant dark figure in the sky, crowned with lightning, who is abruptly blown away by the wind. This isn't a human, but a god; a Power rather than a person. LOTR Sauron is ironically kind of more convincing as a deity than Morgoth, who after his escapades up to the rape of the Silmarils comes off as a sluggardly ogre who sits in a dungeon all millennium scheming ways of doing wicked things without risking himself, while Sil Sauron acts like a spooky sorcerer and gets his rear end whipped by a talking dog.

I agree with this, but I also feel like the potential for Sauron to be that kind of villain is there moreso than it is for Morgoth. If Sauron's stint in Numenor before the fall had been written in the same style as LotR instead of in the detached/distant format of the Sil, we would have seen Sauron as a contemptible schemer much in the same vein as Wormtongue (only more successful in the end, obviously).

I think Sauron in the Sil at least is a different kind of deity than Morgoth- more of a trickster god (Annatar, him turning into a wolf to defeat Huan) than Morgoth is.

Winifred Madgers
Feb 12, 2002

Radio! posted:

I agree with this, but I also feel like the potential for Sauron to be that kind of villain is there moreso than it is for Morgoth. If Sauron's stint in Numenor before the fall had been written in the same style as LotR instead of in the detached/distant format of the Sil, we would have seen Sauron as a contemptible schemer much in the same vein as Wormtongue (only more successful in the end, obviously).

I think Sauron in the Sil at least is a different kind of deity than Morgoth- more of a trickster god (Annatar, him turning into a wolf to defeat Huan) than Morgoth is.

Tom Hiddleston to play Sauron in the adaptation of Akallabêth.

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



chernobyl kinsman posted:

? Of course evil is inevitable, it's built into the fabric of the world because of the Fall/Marring of Arda
In the sense that power does not inevitably corrupt, you can make good decisions, choice is meaningful, etc. Like, arguably the entire Council of Elrond is literally a bunch of wise people behaving in a way that is actually kind of wise, viz: "We understand what the Ring means, and now we have to figure out what the gently caress to do with it, without taking the obvious course that we all know is gonna be doomed."

skasion posted:

Sauron definitely isn't supposed to be a relatable villain in the same sense as Saruman. Saruman ultimately is a really petty and pathetic figure, his efforts to become a great tyrant collapse overnight and before you know it he is just a wandering thug who can be sent packing by a harsh word from an even-tempered midget. He is literally humanized, made from a wise angelic wizard who feels obliged to destroy the world to save it into a dirty old man who shits on nice things just because he still can.

With Sauron nothing like this ever occurs and he is never reduced to the level of taking a direct part in the character-level action. We know him only by his works: tyranny over his slaves, devastation over his lands, and a enormous presence that literally overshadows the world. When he finally physically appears after the Ring is destroyed it's not as a person who does personlike things, it's as a giant dark figure in the sky, crowned with lightning, who is abruptly blown away by the wind. This isn't a human, but a god; a Power rather than a person. LOTR Sauron is ironically kind of more convincing as a deity than Morgoth, who after his escapades up to the rape of the Silmarils comes off as a sluggardly ogre who sits in a dungeon all millennium scheming ways of doing wicked things without risking himself, while Sil Sauron acts like a spooky sorcerer and gets his rear end whipped by a talking dog.
I think part of the point with all that is that evil and wickedness is not, like, satisfying or gratifying. Melkor sat on his rear end with his stolen magic jewels and generally did not satisfy himself at all in all his bullshit treachery, while Tulkas wrestled the poo poo out of him and had a high old time.

I also don't think from Tolkien's perspective that what you describe Saruman going through is "humanizing" in the literal sense. He's becoming less and less anything, not somehow more "human." Though dying in the street was probably pretty Man-like of him :v:

NikkolasKing
Apr 3, 2010



Tolkien definitely wanted to make Evil as unappealing as possible. Not just in everything is ugly and fiery but also in showing just how miserable these people are. I consider Melkor the star of The Silmarillion and there is not a more miserable being in Arda than him. And of course it's all his fault, another big theme of the series' depiction of Evil. (unless you want to get into the Problem of Evil but let's not)

I think the moist poignant thing Tolkien ever said about him was that, even if Melkor had succeeded, he'd never have been happy. He'd end up destroying his own creations and empire alongside the rest of the universe but he'd still be unhappy because things exist and he can't do anything to change that fact.

I pity Melkor in the same way Frodo pitied Saruman.

Runcible Cat
May 28, 2007

Ignoring this post

Radio! posted:

I agree with this, but I also feel like the potential for Sauron to be that kind of villain is there moreso than it is for Morgoth. If Sauron's stint in Numenor before the fall had been written in the same style as LotR instead of in the detached/distant format of the Sil, we would have seen Sauron as a contemptible schemer much in the same vein as Wormtongue (only more successful in the end, obviously).

I think Sauron in the Sil at least is a different kind of deity than Morgoth- more of a trickster god (Annatar, him turning into a wolf to defeat Huan) than Morgoth is.

Yeah, the bit where he's sitting in the temple laughing his head off about Ar-Pharazon and his fleet heading West and then SPLAT has a lot of the trickster-tricked flavour.

sassassin
Apr 3, 2010

by Azathoth
Enough parallels are drawn in deed between Sauron and Saruman and Gandalf that the same "humanized" qualities can be inferred for him. The only time we sort-of see him (Gollum's recollection told through Gandalf... so no biases there) his missing finger is emphasised. He's a wounded figure, and driven by fear of that wound (see: Aragorn with the Palantir).

Several characters also operate as "his voice" (The Mouth, the wraith that visits the dwarves), claiming to speak in his words. There's more there than just an overshadowing, godly presence/great fiery eye.



Nessus posted:

In the sense that power does not inevitably corrupt, you can make good decisions, choice is meaningful, etc. Like, arguably the entire Council of Elrond is literally a bunch of wise people behaving in a way that is actually kind of wise, viz: "We understand what the Ring means, and now we have to figure out what the gently caress to do with it, without taking the obvious course that we all know is gonna be doomed."

The Council of Elrond is more literally a bunch of toffs sitting around endlessly telling stories and getting nowhere until a plucky old hobbit (also a toff) decides to 'ave a go.

Also Legolas crying about how useless his people are.

Runcible Cat
May 28, 2007

Ignoring this post

This made me laugh: http://r-navy.tumblr.com/post/118074165045/mirkwood-daily-d

Data Graham
Dec 28, 2009

📈📊🍪😋



Okay so there are two things about the LotR that have bugged me ever since I first read it as a kid. Small things, the kind of things that don't have any bearing on the story or anything, but they just make me go all :psyduck: whenever I think about them, and I can't understand why nobody else finds them weird or talks about them.

1) "Farmer Maggot". WTF is up with that name? Is there some bucolic innocuous 19th century meaning of "maggot" that I'm not aware of? Or is Tolkien deliberately naming a guy after fly larvae in your rotting meat?

2) The horn-call of Buckland. FEAR FIRE FOES AWAKE. How is that a "horn-call"? Why are there words in it? Is it like a giant megaphone attached to an alpenhorn or something? Is it supposed to be, like, musical notes that evoke words through their sound? Or like the fire department whistle that blows in a sequence that you're supposed to look up on a sheet on your refrigerator, "Two long honks then a short, that means FOES"

Having listened to like 60 hours of Tolkien Professor podcasts by now which cover the relevant scenes in great detail, in which he's talked at length about every single little aspect of these two things and taken countless questions from his listeners about them and yet not actually addressed these two simple yet seemingly crucial questions at any time, I'm left to wonder whether I'm just hopelessly dense and am missing something horribly obvious. He talks about how Farmer Maggot was conceived in a variety of different ways, like this ominous threatening Mr. McGregor figure who threatens to murder Frodo and pals for stepping on his mushrooms and for killing one of his dogs when he was a kid, and Tolkien waffled back and forth as to whether he should be an adversary or an asset to them; and he talks about how the horn-call is so evocatively described that "you can just hear those words, can't you? Fear! Fire! Foes! Toot-toooot!" —but apparently this is plenty for everyone to just go "Mmyep, that's our JRRT :allears:"

Hieronymous Alloy
Jan 30, 2009


Why! Why!! Why must you refuse to accept that Dr. Hieronymous Alloy's Genetically Enhanced Cream Corn Is Superior to the Leading Brand on the Market!?!




Morbid Hound
People in rural communities get weird names


Data Graham posted:


2) The horn-call of Buckland. FEAR FIRE FOES AWAKE. How is that a "horn-call"? Why are there words in it? Is it like a giant megaphone attached to an alpenhorn or something? Is it supposed to be, like, musical notes that evoke words through their sound? Or like the fire department whistle that blows in a sequence that you're supposed to look up on a sheet on your refrigerator, "Two long honks then a short, that means FOES"

I've always assumed that it was a combination of

1) First you blow the horn, then you shout "fear fire foes," then you blow the horn, etc.

2) If it's like the standard Alert call then they probably teach all the kids what the specific horn pattern means so they associate the words with the notes. Like, everyone knows what a siren means.

3) Hobbit are basically rabbits and rabbits have like stomp alert pattern calls

4) Gondor horn magic

skasion
Feb 13, 2012

Why don't you perform zazen, facing a wall?

Data Graham posted:

Okay so there are two things about the LotR that have bugged me ever since I first read it as a kid. Small things, the kind of things that don't have any bearing on the story or anything, but they just make me go all :psyduck: whenever I think about them, and I can't understand why nobody else finds them weird or talks about them.

1) "Farmer Maggot". WTF is up with that name? Is there some bucolic innocuous 19th century meaning of "maggot" that I'm not aware of? Or is Tolkien deliberately naming a guy after fly larvae in your rotting meat?

2) The horn-call of Buckland. FEAR FIRE FOES AWAKE. How is that a "horn-call"? Why are there words in it? Is it like a giant megaphone attached to an alpenhorn or something? Is it supposed to be, like, musical notes that evoke words through their sound? Or like the fire department whistle that blows in a sequence that you're supposed to look up on a sheet on your refrigerator, "Two long honks then a short, that means FOES"

Having listened to like 60 hours of Tolkien Professor podcasts by now which cover the relevant scenes in great detail, in which he's talked at length about every single little aspect of these two things and taken countless questions from his listeners about them and yet not actually addressed these two simple yet seemingly crucial questions at any time, I'm left to wonder whether I'm just hopelessly dense and am missing something horribly obvious. He talks about how Farmer Maggot was conceived in a variety of different ways, like this ominous threatening Mr. McGregor figure who threatens to murder Frodo and pals for stepping on his mushrooms and for killing one of his dogs when he was a kid, and Tolkien waffled back and forth as to whether he should be an adversary or an asset to them; and he talks about how the horn-call is so evocatively described that "you can just hear those words, can't you? Fear! Fire! Foes! Toot-toooot!" —but apparently this is plenty for everyone to just go "Mmyep, that's our JRRT :allears:"

1) Hobbits have goofy names that Tolkien chuckled sensibly over. But it's an unpleasant sounding name that you associate with his story of how he kicked Frodo's rear end so it's priming you to think he is bad, but he is actually good and like the most competent guy in the Shire apparently.

2)

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

2) If it's like the standard Alert call then they probably teach all the kids what the specific horn pattern means so they associate the words with the notes. Like, everyone knows what a siren means.

This basically, Tolkien is representing the sound of their horns (you can't do this more literally in text without resorting to onomatopoeia) by the symbol of a guy shouting "Fear fire foes" because that is the meaning of the signal they are blowing.

e:

While we're asking questions, here's a geography thing that I've never understood: is there a passage through the mountains into Mordor IN Minas Morgul, or do they just use the Cirith Ungol path whenever anyone needs to go through?

skasion fucked around with this message at 18:42 on Aug 27, 2017

Ashcans
Jan 2, 2006

Let's do the space-time warp again!

Yes, I believe there is a path directly through Minas Morgul to access Mordor; the hobbits don't take it because it means passing directly through the fortresses and in the busiest areas, where they are very unlikely to get through (maybe Frodo on his own if he was using the ring). Especially because at the time they arrive, the forces are mobilizing so there is lots of traffic/people running around.

Gollum leads them on the path through Cirith Ungol because it is a very narrow and difficult way that all the armies will avoid, and they can hope to squeeze through unnoticed (well, also because he intends to get them eaten, but he also wants to avoid having them found/captured by anyone else as well). The pass is known, but not heavily watched because its too small for a sizeable force to use and is also guarded by Shelob.

Bongo Bill
Jan 17, 2012

Fear Fire Foes Fum

sat on my keys!
Oct 2, 2014

Ashcans posted:

Yes, I believe there is a path directly through Minas Morgul to access Mordor; the hobbits don't take it because it means passing directly through the fortresses and in the busiest areas, where they are very unlikely to get through (maybe Frodo on his own if he was using the ring). Especially because at the time they arrive, the forces are mobilizing so there is lots of traffic/people running around.

Gollum leads them on the path through Cirith Ungol because it is a very narrow and difficult way that all the armies will avoid, and they can hope to squeeze through unnoticed (well, also because he intends to get them eaten, but he also wants to avoid having them found/captured by anyone else as well). The pass is known, but not heavily watched because its too small for a sizeable force to use and is also guarded by Shelob.

I don't have the book in front of me for the quote but as Sam approaches Cirith Ungol (and I think as they leave) they can see the main road from Morder below them in the cleft of the pass.

SHISHKABOB
Nov 30, 2012

Fun Shoe
Fear fire foes awake is like how the hammers in the deep "said" DOOM a whole lot.

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



SHISHKABOB posted:

Fear fire foes awake is like how the hammers in the deep "said" DOOM a whole lot.
Yeah, this and the horn call code was probably a thing. Even if foes and fear were rare, the hobbits occasionally had fires, so without modern technology a good way to get warning of a big ol' forest fire spreading would be horns from hilltops.

skasion
Feb 13, 2012

Why don't you perform zazen, facing a wall?
Actually here's another Brandybuck question: why did they leave the Shire for Buckland? The Brandybucks were the original Shire-thains, back when they were the Oldbucks, but despite this they seemingly migrated out of the Shire and abdicated that office to the Tooks. Always struck me as just a weird thing.

webmeister
Jan 31, 2007

The answer is, mate, because I want to do you slowly. There has to be a bit of sport in this for all of us. In the psychological battle stakes, we are stripped down and ready to go. I want to see those ashen-faced performances; I want more of them. I want to be encouraged. I want to see you squirm.
Lebensraum for the hobbit master race

girl dick energy
Sep 30, 2009

You think you have the wherewithal to figure out my puzzle vagina?

skasion posted:

Actually here's another Brandybuck question: why did they leave the Shire for Buckland? The Brandybucks were the original Shire-thains, back when they were the Oldbucks, but despite this they seemingly migrated out of the Shire and abdicated that office to the Tooks. Always struck me as just a weird thing.
It was all a centuries-long plot to make sure that Merry and Pippin existed and had the dynamic that they did.

girl dick energy
Sep 30, 2009

You think you have the wherewithal to figure out my puzzle vagina?
Not at all hot take: There's probably a slow-burn Thorin/Bilbo romance fanfiction somewhere out there that's better than the actual Hobbit movies.

Runcible Cat
May 28, 2007

Ignoring this post

Nessus posted:

Yeah, this and the horn call code was probably a thing. Even if foes and fear were rare, the hobbits occasionally had fires, so without modern technology a good way to get warning of a big ol' forest fire spreading would be horns from hilltops.

Yeah, it just means UNSPECIFIED BAD poo poo HAPPENING WAKE UP AND HELP.

Runcible Cat
May 28, 2007

Ignoring this post

PMush Perfect posted:

Not at all hot take: There's probably a slow-burn Thorin/Bilbo/Azog three-way romance fanfiction somewhere out there that's better than the actual Hobbit movies.

FFY.

girl dick energy
Sep 30, 2009

You think you have the wherewithal to figure out my puzzle vagina?
If only.

Bongo Bill
Jan 17, 2012

PMush Perfect posted:

Not at all hot take: There's probably a slow-burn Thorin/Bilbo romance fanfiction somewhere out there that's better than the actual Hobbit movies.

Wouldn't be too difficult for a sufficiently dedicated fan, I think.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

girl dick energy
Sep 30, 2009

You think you have the wherewithal to figure out my puzzle vagina?
Seriously, if Bilbo isn't gay, I'll eat my Proudfeet.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply