|
Sir Lucius posted:Officers sure do complain a lot about how hard their lives are. What's the hardest part: the extra pay, the private room on ship? Seriously though, how is being a dept head worse than something like LPO? I've been on both sides of the coin and life was definitely better as an O, but that's largely because i had a good couple skippers and a decent wardroom. Some are cesspools of backstabbing and infighting. I remember on friend's ship one ensign would tattle on others for being late or other infractions via the CO's suggestion box. The hours are shittier sometimes, and you get yelled at a lot by other stressed people. Department heads, on the other hand, have much larger responsibility and can be fired almost willy nilly by the captain and their career ended for something that was outside of their control.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2017 14:41 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 04:08 |
|
Sir Lucius posted:Seriously though, how is being a dept head worse than something like LPO? As a former lpo, based on what I've seen in the ward room, I'd take lpo of a bunch of poo poo heads over dept head any day of the week from a mental health standpoint.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2017 14:45 |
|
I have no regrets about never wearing khaki.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2017 15:36 |
|
DinosaurWarfare posted:You know those specialized skills you have or the "fun" of doing your specific in-rate job? Are you talking about cleaning the heads/lubeoil/sands?
|
# ? Aug 15, 2017 16:29 |
|
Holy poo poo I just saw an instructor tell like 30 sailors it's ok to bring someone down with an arm bar then drive their knee into the back of the neck/ head in order to gain compliance. "Remember these are the bad guys we don't care if they get hurt ". These are moves for dealing with drunks and non-compliant individuals not active combatants.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2017 16:31 |
|
"Gain compliance"
|
# ? Aug 15, 2017 16:35 |
Wrong thread ignore me!
|
|
# ? Aug 15, 2017 16:44 |
|
LingcodKilla posted:Holy poo poo I just saw an instructor tell like 30 sailors it's ok to bring someone down with an arm bar then drive their knee into the back of the neck/ head in order to gain compliance. Are you taking an Auxilary Security Forces course?
|
# ? Aug 15, 2017 16:52 |
|
Nick Soapdish posted:Are you taking an Auxilary Security Forces course? Nah I was running the track and saw some sailors doing DT half-hearted and went and watched for a bit out of curiosity. I worked for years moonlighting as security for festivals and have dealt with a lot of belligerent drunks. They were encouraging people to do a move directly on the neck or head which is a huge no-no.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2017 18:34 |
|
DinosaurWarfare posted:You know those specialized skills you have or the "fun" of doing your specific in-rate job? I almost never revealed anything about my real personality at work. Never give another SWO anything personal that can be used against you.
|
# ? Aug 15, 2017 21:23 |
|
DinosaurWarfare posted:
All seems accurate but that's definitely mil.txt
|
# ? Aug 15, 2017 22:31 |
|
Goddamn you guys make O life sound awful. But I'm still pushing the LDO button in 2019 in hopes of picking up. As LDO I know I'll never be able to command, so what does the career track look like?
|
# ? Aug 16, 2017 23:43 |
|
Thronde posted:Goddamn you guys make O life sound awful. But I'm still pushing the LDO button in 2019 in hopes of picking up. What designator are you applying for?
|
# ? Aug 17, 2017 00:27 |
|
LDO is loving great go for it.
|
# ? Aug 17, 2017 01:54 |
|
Probably Info systems or Administrative. Security is an option too though as I'm doing the MSRON/CRS thing now.
|
# ? Aug 17, 2017 02:34 |
|
Why the heck is the navy having the same people stand OOW/OOD and EOW? In the commercial world, those are two completely different career tracks, with two (almost) completely different four year teaching curriculum and certification requirements. Also the engineering folks stop sailing after four years and make fat stacks ashore
|
# ? Aug 17, 2017 04:06 |
|
FrozenVent posted:Why the heck is the navy having the same people stand OOW/OOD and EOW? Because generally speaking they want the officers to be generalists not specialists. Its a redundancy thing.
|
# ? Aug 17, 2017 06:23 |
FrozenVent posted:Why the heck is the navy having the same people stand OOW/OOD and EOW? Because the engineering officers do no engineering and that is up to enlisted who are good at their jobs. Once you qualify you're doing deck poo poo and get to keep the vague idea of whats happening underneath/behind you.
|
|
# ? Aug 17, 2017 06:25 |
|
FrozenVent posted:Why the heck is the navy having the same people stand OOW/OOD and EOW? It's been answered already, but unless someone ends up as chief engineer as a part of their department head tours, after they have their EOOW complete they'll rarely ever stand watch down below again and are instead shuffled back into combat instead as the Tactical Action Officer. Even CHENGs will stand TAO instead of running the plant. SWOs are essentially navigation types in the commercial world, but they are mostly generalists and are expected to know at least the basics of how poo poo works. Naval officers are very rarely ever hands on with anything in the engine room and are mostly just middle managers.
|
# ? Aug 17, 2017 07:57 |
|
Stultus Maximus posted:I almost never revealed anything about my real personality at work. Never give another SWO anything personal that can be used against you. 12 officers in my wardroom, but if you cut us up into pieces and reassembled us, you'd be lucky to make five humans. That might be a military thing, but expectations and politics exacerbate it. And then five of those guys are DH, XO or CO, and one is me, leaving six people you're supposed to consort with. Half of which went to the same college and 80 percent never had a different job and have hobbies like 'running ' or 'thinking about when I played football'. And since they work twelve hour days then study for pins, constantly hide themselves and their opinions, and half of them are married and so spend their limited freetime trying to maintain a (usually) failing relationship, the most intellectual conversation you can get out of one another that you didn't exhaust in your first month of knowing each other is what the best part of the half of a movie you watched is. And the guys they work for are as emotionally/socially/intellectually stunted with bosses even more so such that most oakleaves can't even comprehend that something is wrong, or that you're uncomfortable lying for a living (after all, they've done it longer without giving up). DHs have that problem but only two other people they get to talk to, except when the XO orders them to be a liberty buddy. And so the enlisted generally interact with the half-human officer larvae early enough in their metamorphosis and with enough of each other that they're still able to differentiate between Friend and Food. At least when the chiefs stay in their treeforts and let the LPOs handle their poo poo. These numbers are larger on other platforms, but the process is similar. Exceptions exist, and I've been particularly blessed in my experiences thus far (probably partly self delusion). Nonetheless, you can see the scars in others and observe damage even in the good conditions. So that, combined with statistically more likely to have spent four years around real people prior to beginning he process, is one sort of big difference that explains the O-bitching.
|
# ? Aug 17, 2017 09:18 |
|
piL posted:The alienation is a huge soulsuck. Well I certainly hope you enjoyed your first tour more.
|
# ? Aug 17, 2017 13:03 |
|
yikes I feel like now is a good time for a copy/paste of the shim post with the Air Force IT officer fiancé asking questions in here or w/e it was
|
# ? Aug 17, 2017 18:32 |
|
Nostalgia4Dogges posted:yikes That sounds interesting.
|
# ? Aug 17, 2017 18:35 |
|
Probably his best imo
|
# ? Aug 17, 2017 18:52 |
|
DinosaurWarfare posted:You know those specialized skills you have or the "fun" of doing your specific in-rate job? But who do you think has to marry said landwhales? Certainly not the Nobles.
|
# ? Aug 17, 2017 19:51 |
|
A lightly redacted report on the Fitz collision is available here. https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3934451/Navy-Report-on-USS-Fitzgerald.pdf It looks legit and but is FOUO so if this isn't legit then let me know asap. That damage looks incredible.
|
# ? Aug 17, 2017 23:54 |
That Evacuating Berthing 2 section is something quote:One Sailor saw another knocked out of his rack by water. Others began waking up shipmates But the way they describe the damage control efforts is something else. loving hell, good work.
|
|
# ? Aug 18, 2017 00:30 |
|
Pryor on Fire posted:That Evacuating Berthing 2 section is something That's the way sailors are trained, because if succumb to panic when poo poo hits the fan, you will likely die. The ocean will kill the poo poo out of you if you let it.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2017 00:41 |
|
Yeah good job saving that ship.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2017 01:09 |
|
orange juche posted:That's the way sailors are trained, because if succumb to panic when poo poo hits the fan, you will likely die. The ocean will kill the poo poo out of you if you let it. Yeh. Drills suck dick. But when you have done them so many times at odd loving hours you remember all the bullshit you're supposed to do and just do it when something bad happens at the odd hours because thats when some bullshit always happens. Fire in the galley at 0230 is a pretty good example. poo poo got put out in about 8 seconds when it really happened.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2017 01:21 |
|
Elendil004 posted:A lightly redacted report on the Fitz collision is available here. https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3934451/Navy-Report-on-USS-Fitzgerald.pdf Jesus Christ what a nightmare. That FC1 needs a ship named after him.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2017 01:27 |
|
Looks like the report was released in conjunction with this news: Top two officers and other sailors aboard the USS Fitzgerald to be disciplined following deadly collision at sea quote:Military.com | 17 Aug 2017 | by Richard Sisk Sure would be nice if it served as a wake up call about the systemic, fleet-wide training issues that The Valley Stared was talking about, but we all know how likely that is.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2017 02:12 |
|
Wingnut Ninja posted:Looks like the report was released in conjunction with this news: Ship didn't sink. The system works fine.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2017 03:03 |
|
Godholio posted:Ship didn't sink. The system works fine. I mean quite literally true. Would better training have helped? Of course. Was the training they received adequate? 100%. They got it done and saved the ship.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2017 03:17 |
|
Mr. Nice! posted:I mean quite literally true. Would better training have helped? Of course. Was the training they received adequate? 100%. They got it done and saved the ship. I don't think they're talking about DC.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2017 03:23 |
|
Ceric posted:Jesus Christ what a nightmare. That FC1 needs a ship named after him. Godholio posted:The system works fine. Other than the whole run into by a 800 foot container ship thing...
|
# ? Aug 18, 2017 03:24 |
|
We'll see who's right.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2017 03:35 |
If I ever get the chance I want to buy TVS all the drinks. Reading that report was worth it.
|
|
# ? Aug 18, 2017 03:44 |
|
I just finished reading that report, and holy poo poo am I gonna have nightmares tonight. One of my recurring nightmares was being in my berthing asleep and we take a missile hit or something and I have to attempt to egress from the berthing while its flooding and report to my repair locker all the way back aft. If I ever meet a Fitz sailor face to face I will buy them whatever drinks they want, they've definitely earned it.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2017 04:07 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 04:08 |
|
We made everyone do that drill where you put flash gear on them backwards and they have to egress blind and man we thought it was a hilarious joke but poo poo was real for Ftz. I hope to read the report on what happened before the crash but this really shows how DC can save a ship.
|
# ? Aug 18, 2017 04:13 |