|
Are you a This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| homeowner |
|
39 | 22.41% |
| renter |
|
69 | 39.66% |
| stupid peace of poo poo |
|
66 | 37.93% |
| Total: | 174 votes | ||
|
SurreptitiousMuffin posted:I like how suddenly Australia is talking about us like we're North Korea or something
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2017 01:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 12:46 |
|
|
Ghostlight posted:It's not really that sudden when you consider they've been actively cutting our citizens off from benefits negotiated on the basis of reciprocation and putting them in concentration camps for the last couple of years. You could say they're giving you... The Doubt of the Benefits 
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2017 03:22
|
|
|
SurreptitiousMuffin posted:the hostile foreign power of New Zealand Are we still in a state of war with Israel?
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2017 04:16
|
|
|
Mate of mine quipped that NZ had a conspiracy to destroy Australia Australian Govt beat us to it looooong before that.
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2017 06:11
|
|
|
Somehow New Zealand is to blame for Australia's isolationist and xenophobic legislation banning dual citizens from office.
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2017 06:44
|
|
|
I just lol@australia and a little bit at Chris hip
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2017 07:17
|
|
|
Kennedy Graham can still go gently caress himself. (He just made a pompous, self - aggrandizing farewell speech).
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2017 09:18
|
|
|
Heh, go out blazing taking his party with him [Not Colin Craig]
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2017 09:20
|
|
|
Right-wing turning on Right-wing. It's like Stalin vs Hitler all over again!
|
|
#
?
Aug 16, 2017 10:57
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/ColmarBruntonNZ/status/898062247871758337 drat son
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 07:06
|
|
|
 How are the polls translating into seats?
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 07:12
|
|
|
Without considering electorates that's 49 seats for Labour, 58 for National and 13 for New Zealand First.
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 07:17
|
|
|
Landline only poll. Greens will be underrepresented
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 07:29
|
|
|
loving Christ we're headed for a repeat of 2005 aren't we? Something tells me seeing the greens below 5% might scare some people back to them from Labour though.
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 07:37
|
|
|
Pollsters account for landlines, polls were pretty accurate last election, etc My biggest question is: with TOP steady on gently caress all, will media stop trying to boost them?
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 07:39
|
|
|
exmarx posted:Pollsters account for landlines, polls were pretty accurate last election, etc No because the media loves rich tools like Gareth Morgan
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 07:41
|
|
|
Greens hosed up
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 07:47
|
|
|
If anything they will double down on Morgan.
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 07:53
|
|
|
The mass emails to the green members has increased
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 10:05
|
|
|
 this sucks
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 10:12
|
|
|
Why
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 10:24
|
|
|
That such a thing is needed in the first place. A lot of my superiors buy from that place regularly, but they also have kids and may have come from a rough background themselves.
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 10:46
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/drivethrupod/status/898098338888785920
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 11:13
|
|
|
I love using child poverty to sell my product vv maybe I'm just cynical but it seems like pretty transparent marketing to me, maybe their heart is in the right place  particularly "oh we'll know which MPs are doing something about child poverty by which ones buy our product" 
The Schwa fucked around with this message at 11:41 on Aug 17, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 11:18
|
|
|
Having some of the proceeds going to a good cause is a good thing - Ideally it'd be as tax rather than as a business model, but lol getting any kind of empathy from the govt. Or would you rather they didn't bother?
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 11:27
|
|
|
It's a cynical marketing gimmick that amounts to the slacktivist version of corporate social responsibility.
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 12:01
|
|
|
It explicitly says that private charity is a better answer to hungry children than actually changing the system that makes them hungry
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 12:08
|
|
|
They could not look more bored
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 12:12
|
|
|
bike tory posted:It's a cynical marketing gimmick that amounts to the slacktivist version of corporate social responsibility. Because I keep missing opportunities to use my cynicism to make money from the dross. Seriously, this is humiliating that other people are better at it than me. exmarx posted:It explicitly says that private charity is a better answer to hungry children than actually changing the system that makes them hungry e: Actually, this line's a little too far. D&D brings out the worst in me.
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 12:13
|
|
|
I will literally die from schadenfreude if moronic greens voters deserting the party to Labour or TOP due to personality politics results another Nat government because 5-10% of the 'left-wing' vote goes to parties that fail to meet the threshold. Where are all the people who kept talking about how policy is more important than personality last election?
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 12:17
|
|
|
El Pollo Blanco posted:I will literally die from schadenfreude if moronic greens voters deserting the party to Labour or TOP due to personality politics results another Nat government because 5-10% of the 'left-wing' vote goes to parties that fail to meet the threshold. TOP have been "2% (unchanged)" for the last month, despite all the upheaval.
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 12:59
|
|
|
This seems much more likely, and would be a loving disaster: https://twitter.com/norightturnnz/status/898065533714681856
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 13:22
|
|
|
exmarx posted:This seems much more likely, and would be a loving disaster: This electorate (in general) doesn't deserve elections.
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 13:33
|
|
|
exmarx posted:This seems much more likely, and would be a loving disaster: did something happen? vv oh gotcha The Schwa fucked around with this message at 15:01 on Aug 17, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 14:43
|
|
|
The Schwa posted:did something happen? Greens: 4%
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 14:58
|
|
|
Metiria leaving is good the party, guys! She's toxic now! 
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 22:13
|
|
|
Eatmylunch lunches are real good though, and they feed a lot of kids. I am not 100% sure I see a problem - but why not be a charity?
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 23:20
|
|
|
You can simultaneously be pleased with an organisation like them while being disappointed that they have to exist in the first place, it's okay.
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 23:25
|
|
|
It is sort of cashing in on a real lovely social situation Capitalism at its finest
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 23:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 12:46 |
|
|
I mean, I'd rather capitalism be doing that thing than the thing where they just keep all the money and keep loving over the poor. It is hardly ideal that it had to be done this way but I'm not gonna be mad about poor kids getting to eat.
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2017 23:48
|
|