|
Sagebrush posted:a company tricked them into buying a lovely product by lying about its quality. that's extremely effective advertising, granted, but it only works repeatedly on the terminally stupid (gamers). lol let me introduce you to dyp and all the samsung fans therein
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2017 18:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2024 22:04 |
|
|
LastInLine posted:lol let me introduce you to dyp and all the samsung fans therein i imagine the overlap of gamers and samsung fans is pretty much a circle
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2017 18:48
|
|
|
BONGHITZ posted:gently caress a ad ultimate custom avatar combo
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2017 18:54
|
|
|
pagancow posted:lol websites have little value. got it. online advertising is, by and large, worthless the only meaningful exception is google search
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2017 21:02
|
|
|
BONGHITZ posted:gently caress a ad agreed, comrade
|
|
#
?
Aug 20, 2017 21:33
|
|
|
"in dealing with advertisers you must remember that they are professional liars"
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 01:13
|
|
|
blocking ads is a moral imperative imo
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 01:40
|
|
|
defending ads is just contrarianism
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 01:49
|
|
|
do hipsters view ads ironically?
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 01:54
|
|
|
LastInLine posted:do hipsters view ads ironically? do pretzels make you thirsty?
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 03:23
|
|
|
if blocking ads is bad/illegal i should be able to sue sites that push malvertising onto my precious compy til then ill block the ads!
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 03:26
|
|
|
I blocked an ad today
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 04:36
|
|
|
blocking ads is not illegal website owners can block viewers as well, it goes both ways if they want. But that's a stupid arms race with everybody losing. Instead the content becomes the ad, then u reach peak advertising and you go full consumerism and something something something, you thirst for ads, something something something, $4,000 camera
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 04:38
|
|
|
the gimmick has begun to break down
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 04:39
|
|
|
i have never been more tempted to quote stymie in my life
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 04:45
|
|
|
Asymmetric POSTer posted:i have never been more tempted to quote stymie in my life I found a workaround, hold on
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 04:51
|
|
|
the gimmick has begun to break down
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 04:51
|
|
|
at least include a citation
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 04:56
|
|
|
and create a wormhole? I don't think so
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 05:29
|
|
|
i love sites that break when u block ads: https://twitter.com/GarbageDotNet/status/896213457929871360 e: this is more lovely design i guess but still fuckin ads *shakes fist* Pile Of Garbage fucked around with this message at 15:51 on Aug 21, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 15:48
|
|
|
Why bother catering to customers who bring you no income?
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 15:51
|
|
|
pagancow posted:Why bother catering to customers who bring you no income? data collection is being the big one e: i guess that falls under income but not ad income
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 16:03
|
|
|
100 sticky paying customers are worth more than 1,000 freeloaders who will just go somewhere else when your js is tied to page load
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 17:18
|
|
|
but it was in their support portal. and only their support portal. and im not a paying customer, i was just trying to lodge a missing item enquiry as the recipient of an item that had gone missing in the post.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 17:37
|
|
|
pagancow posted:Why bother catering to customers who bring you no income? because organic "sharing" drives visitor counts
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 18:26
|
|
|
the problem with this entire argument is that the ad-funded content is trash and we'd have a much easier time navigating the internet without it
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 18:49
|
|
|
pagancow posted:100 sticky paying customers are worth more than 1,000 freeloaders who will just go somewhere else when your js is tied to page load let's be realistic it's more like 100 sticky paying customers for every million freeloaders, of which 100,000 will go somewhere else when you force them to view your insipid garbage
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 19:22
|
|
|
i wouldn't mind paying for good content, except i know they'd still shove ads down my throat. also the content would still suck because why make an attempt at actual journalism when you can just copy/paste a press release and call it an article
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 19:35
|
|
|
lol post more ads https://weather.com/science/space/video/best-place-to-watch-eclipse Weather channel promo for total solar eclipse
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 19:36
|
|
|
Suspicious posted:i wouldn't mind paying for good content, except i know they'd still shove ads down my throat. also the content would still suck because why make an attempt at actual journalism when you can just copy/paste a press release and call it an article hmm maybe if people just watched the ads harder they could hire more journalists instead of keeping up their AP/Reuters subscription!
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 19:38
|
|
|
solar eclipse news stories are just a conspiracy by Big Solar Eclipse to sell more solar eclipse
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 19:41
|
|
|
pagancow posted:lol post more ads there are some really great ones out there https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_taxBRRZ6s
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 20:17
|
|
|
https://vimeo.com/215045337
syscall girl fucked around with this message at 20:22 on Aug 21, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 20:19
|
|
|
double lol
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 21:04
|
|
|
Agile Vector posted:double lol triple lol you use amberpos
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:18
|
|
|
syscall girl posted:triple lol you use amberpos
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:29
|
|
|
wtf is this did someone hack the forums???
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:46
|
|
|
syscall girl posted:there are some really great ones out there yes fast food advertising industry
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:58
|
|
|
My Linux Rig posted:wtf is this i can't get a vimeo to imbed in bbcode
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2017 00:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2024 22:04 |
|
|
pagancow posted:lol post more ads the only good part of The Weather Channel was their actual forecasting/data science division which they sold off to IBM so they could stuff it into Watson because they're desperate for that division to save them now that mainframes aren't a cash cow
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2017 03:31
|
|
