|
Also, for every 200k I get, I will not make a porn with those 2 gen lees in it.
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 19:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 20:00 |
|
|
Karate Bastard posted:Oh sorry maybe that was disrespectful. I'll go right ahead and flip that line of thought right around shall I. For every 100k I get, I will not make a porn with gen lee in it. Terribly sorry. Generally speaking you want to make a porn of General Joseph Hooker He's your goto guy for civil war shenanigans
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 19:38
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/TMannWSJ/status/899702782206386177
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 19:48
|
|
|
Well the Nazis didn't listen to Indiana Jones about the ark either...
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 19:49
|
|
|
Well gently caress, Guess we're going to war with the sun now.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 19:53
|
|
|
loving lmao https://twitter.com/ryanlawrence21/status/899704422527381507
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 19:55
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6X9KcrXHwg
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 19:56
|
|
|
Kurieg posted:Well gently caress, Guess we're going to war with the sun now. Decrepit, wealthy man tries to destroy sun? Simpsons did it
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 19:57
|
|
|
I can't stop laughing
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 20:26
|
|
|
Jesus Christ I desperately want a MAGAchud to weigh in on this 
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 20:29
|
|
|
XTimmy posted:oh and no crash mats, Norris is landing on cardboard boxes there! Yes, that's completely normal and standard practice on movies. Inflatable mats are only used when the impact point is definitely known. You can't use multiple since the person could slide between them. Cardboard boxes are used when the landing area is very large, and stacking them offset means the actor can't just slide between them.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 20:29
|
|
|
https://i.imgur.com/MOrJs3h.mp4
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 20:43
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 21:03
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 21:04
|
|
|
Don't do donuts in your car in the middle of a busy street. http://imgur.com/gallery/Od6Sa0z (aw, apparently it's fake. Still funny though.)
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 21:05
|
|
|
I know, colostomy bag ahoy!
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 21:07
|
|
|
This is so delightfully stupid.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 21:08
|
|
|
God drat. I like to play a fun game called "can you imagine if Obama had done this?"
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 21:10
|
|
|
I don't know if this really counts, but practically every post from a YouTuber about how their videos are no longer displaying ads due to suitability because of their content. I suppose part of it is their response to it. Some have existing Patreons (due in large part that ad revenue is spitting out pennies, so why are you kvetching), others are claiming they'll be jumping ship (to where?), and some just want you to get outraged.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 21:29
|
|
|
I watched this a half-dozen times because it really looks like he gets force-pushed by the hand that's in view for a few frames.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 21:30
|
|
|
MisterBibs posted:I don't know if this really counts, but practically every post from a YouTuber about how their videos are no longer displaying ads due to suitability because of their content. Post an example then. Also you're very wrong because a lot of people make their money on YouTube and their content is pretty vanilla but the backlash is so immense it's damaging a lot of people who've never posted anything remotely controversial. For example when YouTube age gated a ton of LGBT videos automatically they lost plenty of money for no reason other than YouTube's gently caress up.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 21:36
|
|
|
EmmyOk posted:Post an example then. Fair enough, here's a dude I follow with 15k subs, saying he's going to jump ship: https://twitter.com/BootsToReboots/status/899544118283644929 Dude's content (especially his skits) can be actually mildly disturbing and violent, so no poo poo his stuff could be argued as not suitable for some advertisers. As for people trying to make their money on YouTube, events like this remind me why that notion will always be a vein of schadenfreude for me. You'd think by now you'd get the notion that you're at the whim of a platform you don't have control over, unless you're crazy popular, but nooooooooo.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 21:47
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Dschnoeb/status/899708216820551680
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 21:47
|
|
|
MisterBibs posted:As for people trying to make their money on YouTube, events like this remind me why that notion will always be a vein of schadenfreude for me. You'd think by now you'd get the notion that you're at the whim of a platform you don't have control over, unless you're crazy popular, but nooooooooo. Even crazy popular people that have any content at all that the advertisers deem inappropriate get shunted into the "no income for you" category. Tons of people I watch that just do video game LPs are shutting down because they don't bother editing out curse words and other things from games and that puts them on Youtube's new unadvertisable list. YT's advertising has gotten so draconic that unless you're like the platonic ideal of a 50's sitcom you're probably going to get tossed into their no-monetizing category.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 21:54
|
|
|
Avenging_Mikon posted:I watched this a half-dozen times because it really looks like he gets force-pushed by the hand that's in view for a few frames. Nah the hand doesn't touch him. He flinches though so it has the same effect.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 21:55
|
|
|
Azhais posted:Tons of people I watch that just do video game LPs are shutting down because they don't bother editing out curse words and other things from games and that puts them on Youtube's new unadvertisable list. Yeah? That's what I'm talking about. If I was doing LPs and putting them on YouTube, I'd either put in the effort to ding out my swears, go into it knowing I'm going to forgo monetization, or both. Assuming in 2017 you're going to run a YouTube channel at something of a net gain (short of Patreon) is the kind of low-key pride-before-the-fall stuff that makes good schadenfreude.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 22:02
|
|
|
EmmyOk posted:Post an example then. Also you're very wrong because a lot of people make their money on YouTube and their content is pretty vanilla but the backlash is so immense it's damaging a lot of people who've never posted anything remotely controversial. For example when YouTube age gated a ton of LGBT videos automatically they lost plenty of money for no reason other than YouTube's gently caress up. Google just no-platformed a statistics professor at Columbia who's routinely cited and linked to by WaPo, NYT, etc. He worked for the Obama administration. He was the director of research and analytics for TARP, and ran the PBGC. NYT literally just based an article on his work, and linked to his blog page, but it's now a dead link because Google banned him from everything. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/19/business/the-stock-market-has-been-magical-it-cant-last.html Everything. Even his gmail account. Google's response is their typical black box: "You broke a rule. We're not telling you which rule you broke. But it's in the TOS somewhere." It's not just YouTube. Something is broken at Google.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 22:02
|
|
|
MisterBibs posted:As for people trying to make their money on YouTube, events like this remind me why that notion will always be a vein of schadenfreude for me. You'd think by now you'd get the notion that you're at the whim of a platform you don't have control over, unless you're crazy popular, but nooooooooo. You're literally always at the whim of a platform you don't have control over, regardless of your income stream. That's how capitalism works. The "Puritan work ethic" - "hard work and persistence will always lead to success" - is a lie sold to you by corporations that profit from your hard work and persistence.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 22:03
|
|
|
Phanatic posted:
ftfy
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 22:10
|
|
|
I've heard recently that unless you have pregnant spiderman on your videos it's really hard to make money on YouTube nowadays Those videos are really weird though
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 22:11
|
|
|
MisterBibs posted:Yeah? That's what I'm talking about. If I was doing LPs and putting them on YouTube, I'd either put in the effort to ding out my swears, go into it knowing I'm going to forgo monetization, or both. Assuming in 2017 you're going to run a YouTube channel at something of a net gain (short of Patreon) is the kind of low-key pride-before-the-fall stuff that makes good schadenfreude. Would you also edit out any content in the whole video game that applies? Even knowing the video game itself can be one of the things advertised on Youtube, you can't get monetization for showing a video game where, say, people swear. The weird umbrella rules are silly, man.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 22:12
|
|
|
orange sky posted:I've heard recently that unless you have pregnant spiderman on your videos it's really hard to make money on YouTube nowadays They just brought in rules that kill those videos lol about putting iconic characters in weird roles bit bein okay anymore
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 22:13
|
|
|
Found a good list on the backlash from the UnitetheRight rally on a neonazi blog:
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 22:21
|
|
|
yeah yeah, yet most of them remain unpunched. how do you explain that mr white power sir? e: 
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 22:23
|
|
|
Midnight Voyager posted:The you also edit out any content in the whole video game that applies? I probably wouldn't go that far, but that falls under the "go[ing] into it knowing I'm going to forgo monetization" thing I said in the post you quoted to make your reply. The freude would entirely be on me for presumably wishing to squeeze blood from the stone of YouTube. If it wasn't the unworthiness for ads, it'd be the ad blockers making the numbers poo poo, and if it wasn't that it'd be trying to make money off YouTube videos in general without something like Patreon. MisterBibs has a new favorite as of 22:34 on Aug 21, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 22:27
|
|
|
Midnight Voyager posted:Would you also edit out any content in the whole video game that applies? Even knowing the video game itself can be one of the things advertised on Youtube, you can't get monetization for showing a video game where, say, people swear.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 22:33
|
|
|
Phanatic posted:Google just no-platformed a statistics professor at Columbia who's routinely cited and linked to by WaPo, NYT, etc. He worked for the Obama administration. He was the director of research and analytics for TARP, and ran the PBGC. NYT literally just based an article on his work, and linked to his blog page, but it's now a dead link because Google banned him from everything. it's kinda-racebaity Elizabethan Error has a new favorite as of 22:41 on Aug 21, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 22:38
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/robinwasserman/status/899685171137478656
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 22:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 20:00 |
|
|
Magnus Manfist posted:... the guy who punches him in the back of the head twice? Watch the video again. He punched him in the chest the first time then hit him in the temple. JFC goons are loving blind.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2017 23:01
|
|
