|
How many incels does it take to take out a Chad in a fight?
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 10:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 11:33 |
|
|
Apparently someone on r/incels tattooed "incel subhuman" on his dick and nailed it to a piece of wood. The video of the dick-nailing has been removed but the photos of the tattoos are still out there.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 10:34
|
|
|
*realness fetish
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 10:34
|
|
|
Eh, he's no Bob Flanagan.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 10:45
|
|
|
The Maroon Hawk posted:Apparently someone on r/incels tattooed "incel subhuman" on his dick and nailed it to a piece of wood. The video of the dick-nailing has been removed but the photos of the tattoos are still out there. Well good as long as they inflict their toxic mental illness on themselves instead of makin rape dungeons I am ok with it
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 10:56
|
|
|
Ghostlight posted:Eh, he's no Bob Flanagan. Bob got laid regularly, so no he's not.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 11:08
|
|
|
Eimi posted:Jesus? Not really. Paul and Tertullian though? Without getting too deep into a religious discussion, I think that's an important distinction (that those words were said or written by other people and not by Jesus).
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 11:22
|
|
|
Zzulu posted:Well good It's pretty disturbing that someone would hurt himself in this way, but I'm gonna have to agree that if it's self-torture or the harming of other people, it's better for the world at large that he only harms himself. Still really awful, though... brrrr 
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 11:26
|
|
|
General Dog posted:Score another victory for the Automods over the Decpticels Extremely underrated post imo
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 14:34
|
|
|
what would these people be doing without the internet where would they be in life
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 14:56
|
|
|
Monkey Fracas posted:what would these people be doing without the internet That used to be what manufacturing jobs were for.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 14:56
|
|
|
The Maroon Hawk posted:Apparently someone on r/incels tattooed "incel subhuman" on his dick and nailed it to a piece of wood. The video of the dick-nailing has been removed but the photos of the tattoos are still out there. r/incels teaming up with death grips
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 14:57
|
|
|
Monkey Fracas posted:what would these people be doing without the internet They'd probably be like those dudes who collect miniature models and live with their parents Or you know they might be forced to actually face their demons and be better people for it
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 15:30
|
|
|
sincx posted:I'll just leave this here...
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 15:39
|
|
|
It is sad that these guys have an echo chamber on the internet where they can have their awful views and mentality reinforced on a daily basis, rather than being on their own in the real world meaning they'd have more of a chance to grow up away from it. What will they be like at 40-50?
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 15:41
|
|
|
Nicomo posted:What will they be like at 40-50? 
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 15:43
|
|
|
General Dog posted:Score another victory for the Automods over the Decpticels SciFiDownBeat posted:Extremely underrated post imo qft I was going to reply with an incel-themed parody of "You've Got the Touch" but then I decided that was ill-advised "when all Hell's breaking loose, you'll be begging for sex from your mom" is as far as I got
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 16:09
|
|
|
Zzulu posted:How many incels does it take to take out a Chad in a fight? none; Chad is a lover, not a fighter.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 16:45
|
|
|
sincx posted:I'll just leave this here... If I recall the original non-robot version of that diagram was made by religious feminists to show how awful premarital sex is. hyphz fucked around with this message at 21:33 on Aug 23, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 21:31
|
|
|
Monkey Fracas posted:what would these people be doing without the internet Probably married to a good-hearted but plain or slightly dumpy woman they met at work or something.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 21:35
|
|
|
sincx posted:I'll just leave this here... this chart does not figure in robo-husbandos; a real mistake or "boner" if you will
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 21:36
|
|
|
quote:Common normie mentality: "For a bunch of guys who can't get women, you incels sure pretend to know a lot about them."
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 21:36
|
|
|
Nicomo posted:What will they be like at 40-50? Dead if there is any justice in the universe. More than likely though they'll just end up being miserable fucks who hate their jobs like everyone else, except they'll still cry about  on the internet except by that age I'd assume they've moved on to being MGTOW rather than incels.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 21:40
|
|
|
So wait, knowing anything about women won't help them get laid, but they supposedly read "peer reviewed articles" (read: reddit posts) all about them?
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 22:45
|
|
|
chumbler posted:So wait, knowing anything about women won't help them get laid, but they supposedly read "peer reviewed articles" (read: reddit posts) all about them? Who could ever forget Nature's article "On the Social Structure of Chads in the Mabira Jungle"
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 22:47
|
|
|
remember when virgins were cheeky and fun like noel from frasier?
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 22:51
|
|
|
I wonder now what they think about matrilineal societies and studies showing that girls raised in them perform equally or better on various tests than boys, if I'm remembering correctly. But I also probably already know the answer.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 23:25
|
|
|
chumbler posted:So wait, knowing anything about women won't help them get laid, but they supposedly read "peer reviewed articles" (read: reddit posts) all about them?
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 23:25
|
|
|
Palpek posted:Somebody actually made an effort post in that thread explaining how non-randomized statistics sample is absolute garbage meaning that if you only ask for opinions about women from people who were never with one then the outcome will be extremely biased and have no scientific value. Of course it was met with silence because those guys know as much about science as a random comic book guy. I'm sure the mod has already deleted the comment. Gotta protect the man babies from those scary comments.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 23:42
|
|
|
I think you will find that because they know nothing at all about the subject they are the only ones who can be truly unbiased and objective. I am certain someone has made that argument.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 23:46
|
|
|
Monkey Fracas posted:what would these people be doing without the internet In the priesthood.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 00:33
|
|
|
sincx posted:I'll just leave this here... This is completely false, because incels insist that any woman, regardless of looks, can have Chad--or at least have sex.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 00:49
|
|
|
sincx posted:I'll just leave this here... They are claiming that sex with a sexbot is best, because post 2nd sexual revolution, even Chad is only loving the machine. But now, only the level 1 and 2 men are loving machines. Surely Chad would be all over anything that fucks best, so why isn't Chad all over the sexbots. Another thing this graph does not take into account is variety of sexbot brands. So theoretically Chad will have access to BMW and Mercedes sexbots but poor old incel will have to make do with a Skoda or a Lada.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 01:14
|
|
|
sincx posted:I'll just leave this here... This graphic has a lot of things wrong with it, but one of the funniest things is that they think 2 out of 10 men are already turning to robot sex dolls. The facial expressions on those things are terrifying. They have a long way to go before anyone beyond the most desperate fringes of society would have sex with them. This refers to the dolls as well as to the men who use them.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 01:17
|
|
|
green chicken feet posted:This graphic has a lot of things wrong with it, but one of the funniest things is that they think 2 out of 10 men are already turning to robot sex dolls. Its not 2 out of 10 mens, but the 1s and the 2s on the attractiveness scale. If you assume the 9s and 10s and 1s and 2s are all very rare then it would be a bell shaped curve and very few people are actually loving the sex dolls at the moment
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 01:48
|
|
|
Meme Emulator posted:Its not 2 out of 10 mens, but the 1s and the 2s on the attractiveness scale. If you assume the 9s and 10s and 1s and 2s are all very rare then it would be a bell shaped curve and very few people are actually loving the sex dolls at the moment Ah, I didn't catch that the SMV rating on the side of the chart was referring to that. So although it does seem more realistic that the people with the sex dolls currently are the ugliest, the future portion of the chart has now become even more bizarre because the hottest women are all hooking up with the ugliest guy, who is also the realness fetish guy instead of a doll sex guy. And I don't think Chad will give up the ladies.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 02:37
|
|
|
green chicken feet posted:And I don't think Chad will give up the ladies. Chad only deals in organic fair-trade booty.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 02:38
|
|
|
green chicken feet posted:Ah, I didn't catch that the SMV rating on the side of the chart was referring to that. The SMV scale is bizzare because its just like "Uh, when people say someones a 10, theyre not REALLY a 10, so you have to subtract 1.5 from peoples ratings" and thats all it is
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 02:46
|
|
|
green chicken feet posted:Ah, I didn't catch that the SMV rating on the side of the chart was referring to that. You're misreading it the same way I did initially. It's not that the hottest women are choosing the grossest men, it's that the grossest men are choosing to gently caress the hottest women (instead of the preferential robot) because they have a fetish for actual humans. The flip between part 2 and part 3 of the graph is who has the power to choose partners. Incels are fantasizing that one day the hottest of ladies will desperately beg for their dicks because they've been replaced by hunks of metal and plastic for the majority of men.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 02:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 11:33 |
|
|
Meme Emulator posted:The SMV scale is bizzare because its just like "Uh, when people say someones a 10, theyre not REALLY a 10, so you have to subtract 1.5 from peoples ratings" and thats all it is I never heard the subtract 1.5 rule before. If everyone gets an automatic minus 1.5, doesn't that effectively shift the scale to run from -1.5 through 8.5 instead of 1 through 10 
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 03:03
|
|