Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Rappaport
Oct 2, 2013

SulphagneSocialist posted:

Yle found a thing. Yle owns. A consult firm hired by the Ministry of Traffic confirms that the privatization is just a boondoggle to make money at the taxpayer's expense:


The only way to make any of this work would be for the government, which is allergic to infrastructural investment at a time when public debt is virtually free, to invest in railroads.

quote:

Kilpailulle avautuva Suomen henkilöjunaliikenne kiinnostaa Ruotsin suuria toimijoita. Muun muassa Tukholman paikallisjunaliikennettä ja metroa operoiva MTR Nordic kertoo olevansa kiinnostunut haastamaan VR:n Suomen tarjouskilpailuissa. Yhtiö kuuluu isoon hongkongilaiseen MTR-konserniin.

Maailma muuttuu, Anttiseni.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Vesi
Jan 12, 2005

pikachu looking at?
Finnish privatization really is the saddest thing, anywhere else in the world the politicians would at least get some massive bribes for it from the companies but here it's just pure gullibility

Da Gaspodin
May 2, 2006

boxSpin(time);
hÄhÄhÄ Tillasella on ruma hattu ja junes on avopotilas. näemmä noi myös antaa kyuulle ihan älyttömästi suunvuoroa, tietäisivätpä että se runkkaa animelle.

3D Megadoodoo
Nov 25, 2010

Da Gaspodin posted:

hÄhÄhÄ Tillasella on ruma hattu ja junes on avopotilas. näemmä noi myös antaa kyuulle ihan älyttömästi suunvuoroa, tietäisivätpä että se runkkaa animelle.

Viiltävä analyysi poliittisesta tilanteesta Suomen Lapissa.

No. 1 Callie Fan
Feb 17, 2011

This inkling is your FRIEND
She fights for LOVE

Jerry Cotton posted:

Viiltävä analyysi poliittisesta tilanteesta Suomen Lapissa.

I think he was referring to some event in Kamppi, I saw de Witt doing his martyr act to streamers and Kyuu Eturaitti hanging nearby there, along with a heavy police presence in riot gear. Seemed rather oddly scaled in comparison to the amount of people in the square, but I was just passing by.

3D Megadoodoo
Nov 25, 2010

Rexroom posted:

I think he was referring to some event in Kamppi, I saw de Witt doing his martyr act to streamers and Kyuu Eturaitti hanging nearby there, along with a heavy police presence in riot gear. Seemed rather oddly scaled in comparison to the amount of people in the square, but I was just passing by.

All right substitute "Karjala Oblastissa" for "Suomen Lapissa" then.

Rappaport
Oct 2, 2013

Berner is doubling down on dismantling VR. :allears:

Darkest Auer
Dec 30, 2006

They're silly

Ramrod XTreme
Just what are these new "services" that will be so vital for passengers in the new brightblue future?

Triple A
Jul 14, 2010

Your sword, sahib.
bussiyhtiöille enemmän asiakkaita

Geriatric Pirate
Apr 25, 2008

by Nyc_Tattoo

SulphagneSocialist posted:

Yle found a thing. Yle owns. A consult firm hired by the Ministry of Traffic confirms that the privatization is just a boondoggle to make money at the taxpayer's expense:


The only way to make any of this work would be for the government, which is allergic to infrastructural investment at a time when public debt is virtually free, to invest in railroads.

VR loses monopoly position, VR's value falls, goons enraged ("ARE NATIONAL ASSETS"), consumers most likely happy.

Also:

quote:

Lisää kysyntää junamatkoille tuskin saadaan, jos valtio ei investoi eli pane lisää rahaa ratoihin.
This goes against the experiences of just about every other developed European country that has opened up passenger rail transport to competition. Passenger numbers in just about every comparable European country that privatized railways (Sweden, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands) have risen much faster than in Finland.

No. 1 Callie Fan
Feb 17, 2011

This inkling is your FRIEND
She fights for LOVE

Geriatric Pirate posted:

VR loses monopoly position, VR's value falls, goons enraged ("ARE NATIONAL ASSETS"), consumers most likely happy.

Also:
This goes against the experiences of just about every other developed European country that has opened up passenger rail transport to competition. Passenger numbers in just about every comparable European country that privatized railways (Sweden, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands) have risen much faster than in Finland.

It's not as clear-cut as you put it. While the amount of passengers has increased and tickets have cheapened in Sweden, passengers are not happy about late trains and the confusing plethora of ticket sale websites of different companies. If your train even works in the first place. But hey, cheap tickets.

Herman Merman
Jul 6, 2008

Geriatric Pirate posted:

consumers most likely happy

I'll just post something opposite to reality, that'll help my argument.

ALLAN LASSUS
May 11, 2007

apul.prof./ass.prof.

Geriatric Pirate posted:

VR loses monopoly position, VR's value falls, goons enraged ("ARE NATIONAL ASSETS"), consumers most likely happy.

Please elaborate on what is the exact mechanism that will lower ticket prices, when the government's idiotic plan is to sell monopolies to companies on a per route basis? If a hypothetical Onnitrain gets the exclusive rights to serve let's say the Helsinki-Turku rail, why wouldn't they fleece the customers for as much as they can get away with? Unlike on the roads, there's not enough room on the rails for five different companies to serve the same route, so there won't be any serious competition.

3D Megadoodoo
Nov 25, 2010

ALLAN LASSUS posted:

Please elaborate on what is the exact mechanism that will lower ticket prices, when the government's idiotic plan is to sell monopolies to companies on a per route basis? If a hypothetical Onnitrain gets the exclusive rights to serve let's say the Helsinki-Turku rail, why wouldn't they fleece the customers for as much as they can get away with? Unlike on the roads, there's not enough room on the rails for five different companies to serve the same route, so there won't be any serious competition.

Five different companies can easily serve the same route with a little help from the invisible hand of the free market.

throw to first DAMN IT
Apr 10, 2007
This whole thread has been raging at the people who don't want Saracen invasion to their homes

Perhaps you too should be more accepting of their cultures
Privatizing VR is small potatoes frankly, we need to think big. How about privatizing verotus?

3D Megadoodoo
Nov 25, 2010

throw to first drat IT posted:

Privatizing VR is small potatoes frankly, we need to think big. How about privatizing verotus?

All the tax revenue is already going to private corporations and the amount of taxes to be paid is controlled by owners of private corporations. The business of actually collecting it provides no quarter for profit so it must remain a public endeavour.

Geriatric Pirate
Apr 25, 2008

by Nyc_Tattoo

Rexroom posted:

It's not as clear-cut as you put it. While the amount of passengers has increased and tickets have cheapened in Sweden, passengers are not happy about late trains and the confusing plethora of ticket sale websites of different companies. If your train even works in the first place. But hey, cheap tickets.

I mean you can look at different measures and find all sorts of problems in the system there but the ultimate test of whether consumers like it is whether they use it or whether they alternatives. The same goes with Ryanair and air travel, Onnibus and buses and so on.


ALLAN LASSUS posted:

Please elaborate on what is the exact mechanism that will lower ticket prices, when the government's idiotic plan is to sell monopolies to companies on a per route basis? If a hypothetical Onnitrain gets the exclusive rights to serve let's say the Helsinki-Turku rail, why wouldn't they fleece the customers for as much as they can get away with? Unlike on the roads, there's not enough room on the rails for five different companies to serve the same route, so there won't be any serious competition.

Oh gee, great point, no one has thought of that before. You stumped everyone with that great point.


If you'd bothered to even do the tiniest bit of Googling or thinking, or even just staying up to date with the news in Finland, you'd have seen that the competition aspect happens in the bidding process, not in the operating process.
Potential mechanisms for getting a better overall return:
1) Bidding for routes with fixed ticket prices (profits returned to consumers through the price of the franchise)
2) Bidding for routes, including ticket prices as a factor in the bid
3) Bidding for routes, including unprofitable routes (cross-subsidizing)

That being said, Onnitrain's ticket prices will also naturally be driven down by Onnibus and Onniplane.

3D Megadoodoo
Nov 25, 2010

Geriatric Pirate posted:

I mean you can look at different measures and find all sorts of problems in the system there but the ultimate test of whether consumers like it is whether they use it or whether they alternatives.

You mean the alternatives that physically don't and/or can't exist? Sure yes why not.

DarkCrawler
Apr 6, 2009

by vyelkin

Geriatric Pirate posted:

I mean you can look at different measures and find all sorts of problems in the system there but the ultimate test of whether consumers like it is whether they use it or whether they alternatives. The same goes with Ryanair and air travel, Onnibus and buses and so on.


LMAO people don't use the poorest shittiest option because they "like it", it's because they don't have money for a better option or there is NOT an another option. You're once again confusing how real people work with bizarre economic models.

throw to first DAMN IT
Apr 10, 2007
This whole thread has been raging at the people who don't want Saracen invasion to their homes

Perhaps you too should be more accepting of their cultures

Geriatric Pirate
Apr 25, 2008

by Nyc_Tattoo

DarkCrawler posted:

LMAO people don't use the poorest shittiest option because they "like it", it's because they don't have money for a better option or there is NOT an another option. You're once again confusing how real people work with bizarre economic models.

Ok, so then the government should privatize and allow the private sector to provide the poorest shittiest option instead of assuming that people will prefer paying more for "high quality" train transport.


That's just the logical conclusion to your argument there, of course in reality you're out of touch again living in some sort of fantasy world where people are so poor that they're forced to take the cheapest option, even though one of the examples I gave was Ryanair, i.e. something people use for holidays abroad or business trips. Even in rail travel it seems very DarkCrawlerish to argue that the reason train passenger travel has doubled since privatization in Sweden (compared to +35% in Finland for the same period) is because Swedes are poor and couldn't afford anything else beforehand.

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa

Jerry Cotton posted:

All the tax revenue is already going to private corporations and the amount of taxes to be paid is controlled by owners of private corporations. The business of actually collecting it provides no quarter for profit so it must remain a public endeavour.

Feudalism is the ultimate social order according to Kepu.

3D Megadoodoo
Nov 25, 2010

Nenonen posted:

Feudalism is the ultimate social order according to Kepu.

True; as anyone who has set foot in the countryside in the past 100 years well knows, Kepu is all about feuds.

HUMAN FISH
Jul 6, 2003

I Am A Mom With A
"BLACK BELT"
In AUTISM
I Have Strengths You Can't Imagine
Speaking of Kepu:

quote:

Vuonna 2016 suomalaisten miesten keski-ikä oli 41,1 ja naisten 43,8 vuotta, mutta demarien jäsenet ovat keskimäärin 20 vuotta tätä vanhempia.

:lol:

Andrast
Apr 21, 2010


HUMAN FISH posted:

Speaking of Kepu:


:lol:

Younger than I thought

Zat
Jan 16, 2008

Muistakaahan katsoa The Donaldin ja Salen pressitilaisuus klo 23.20

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABBRpdLsrNE

Gortarius
Jun 6, 2013

idiot

Zat posted:

Muistakaahan katsoa The Donaldin ja Salen pressitilaisuus klo 23.20

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABBRpdLsrNE

I'm gonna guess ol' trump is going to rant and rave how finland has such good relations with russian and the USA should follow our lead in that, because he is Putin's bitch/in so much debt to russian mobsters, the press will grill trump about loving up preparing for the hurricane and botching the aftermath, and basically Sale will just stand there like a statue and no one will ask him about anything or talk to him in any capacity.

throw to first DAMN IT
Apr 10, 2007
This whole thread has been raging at the people who don't want Saracen invasion to their homes

Perhaps you too should be more accepting of their cultures

Gortarius posted:

I'm gonna guess ol' trump is going to rant and rave how finland has such good relations with russian and the USA should follow our lead in that, because he is Putin's bitch/in so much debt to russian mobsters, the press will grill trump about loving up preparing for the hurricane and botching the aftermath, and basically Sale will just stand there like a statue and no one will ask him about anything or talk to him in any capacity.

I'm somewhat sad that this is probably the optimistic scenario.

Rotacixe
Oct 21, 2008

Gortarius posted:

I'm gonna guess ol' trump is going to rant and rave how finland has such good relations with russian and the USA should follow our lead in that, because he is Putin's bitch/in so much debt to russian mobsters, the press will grill trump about loving up preparing for the hurricane and botching the aftermath, and basically Sale will just stand there like a statue and no one will ask him about anything or talk to him in any capacity.

I'm sure the talks between a long winded lawyer and ADHD used car salesman went smoothly.

Kehveli
Apr 1, 2009

Push It Like You Push Your Girlfriend
"Finland would never sign NAFTA"

Trump clearly wants us to leave the eu, we should do it and maybe we'll get a discount on the F-35

Lightning Lord
Feb 21, 2013

$200 a day, plus expenses

What's it like to be Finnish?

throw to first DAMN IT
Apr 10, 2007
This whole thread has been raging at the people who don't want Saracen invasion to their homes

Perhaps you too should be more accepting of their cultures

Lightning Lord posted:

What's it like to be Finnish?

Gortarius
Jun 6, 2013

idiot
I was kinda hoping Sale would have done a coup and saved the world.

Also he looked like he certainly did NOT want to be there.

Kehveli
Apr 1, 2009

Push It Like You Push Your Girlfriend

Lightning Lord posted:

What's it like to be Finnish?



it's like an eldritch nightmare but instead of waking up you get drunk to make it stop

sean10mm
Jun 29, 2005

It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, MAD-2R World

Kehveli posted:

it's like an eldritch nightmare but instead of waking up you get drunk to make it stop

My limited experience drinking with Finns while part of UNPREDEP VIII (?) supports this. :finland::respek::911:

Beer drinking - Finns won this round
Macedonian wine drinking - Everyone vomiting for a week, inconclusive
Jack Daniels summer volleyball funtime rematch - :laffo:

Trogdos!
Jul 11, 2009

A DRAGON POKEMAN
well technically a water/flying type
https://twitter.com/niinisto/status/902282121888251905

lmbo

No. 1 Callie Fan
Feb 17, 2011

This inkling is your FRIEND
She fights for LOVE

BUT WHAT IS HE REALLY HIDING

DarkCrawler
Apr 6, 2009

by vyelkin

Geriatric Pirate posted:

Ok, so then the government should privatize and allow the private sector to provide the poorest shittiest option instead of assuming that people will prefer paying more for "high quality" train transport.


So the revenue will go to some CEO's tax account on Panama? Nah, if there is to be a lovely option at least, I'd like to see the revenue ending up in the government dole.

Also you do know how train tracks work, right? They are more or less at the capacity they can run at. The private sector won't increase the number of options, there will still be one, instead now the money will go to less people which I know gets your dick really hard - but normal people don't consider that a better outcome.

https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suomen_rataverkko

quote:

Rataverkko on vieläkin vähäisen liikenteen takia pääasiassa yksiraiteista, tärkeimpinä poikkeuksina pääkaupunkiseudun lähiliikenteen radat, pääradan osuus Helsinki–Riihimäki–Tampere, Riihimäki–Kouvola–Luumäki ja Lahden oikorata.

What, the new private company will magically make the trains run faster and cheaper? Who are these magical drivers that can manifest track space out of nowhere? Am I going to get a train to Helsinki from Tikkurila every 1 minute instead of the 2-5 minutes it is now at rush hour?

You see 1990 to 2017 and seem to think it's because of privatization, as if nothing else happened in near three loving decades. Do you not think the government built anything in that space? Do you believe that they made no infrastructure investments required for these companies to be able to increase the number of trains that are physically able to occupy the tracks?

Geriatric Pirate posted:

That's just the logical conclusion to your argument there, of course in reality you're out of touch again living in some sort of fantasy world where people are so poor that they're forced to take the cheapest option, even though one of the examples I gave was Ryanair, i.e. something people use for holidays abroad or business trips. Even in rail travel it seems very DarkCrawlerish to argue that the reason train passenger travel has doubled since privatization in Sweden (compared to +35% in Finland for the same period) is because Swedes are poor and couldn't afford anything else beforehand.

The reason train passenger travel has doubled since 1990 is A) population growth, especially in metropolitan regions B) public transport is used more by the new, less wealthy generation C) and by immigrants. It's not because the privatization has made trains so lovely to travel in, and any positives gained are offset by the negatives.

But hey, let's ask the Swedes! You know we don't actually have to rely on what you or me think they think:

quote:

Asiakkaiden mielestä yksityistäminen on epäonnistunut. Ruotsalaisten mielestä junat kulkevat myöhässä, lippujärjestelmä on hankala, hinnat liian kalliita ja ratojen kunnossapito huonoa.

Seitsemän kymmenestä ruotsalaisesta haluaisi valtiollistaa rautatiet uudestaan, osoitti pari vuotta sitten tehty mielipidemittaus.

drat it's not looking very good when we have to deal with the real world instead of economic hypotheticals, huh.

DarkCrawler fucked around with this message at 08:58 on Aug 29, 2017

doverhog
May 31, 2013

Defender of democracy and human rights 🇺🇦
Maybe a private train company would let conductors sell tickets on the train?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Geriatric Pirate
Apr 25, 2008

by Nyc_Tattoo

DarkCrawler posted:

So the revenue will go to some CEO's tax account on Panama? Nah, if there is to be a lovely option at least, I'd like to see the revenue ending up in the government dole.
The state run company is free to compete. I personally don't care where the money goes because I'm not as driven by envy as you are, as long as the customer gets the best outcome.

quote:

You see 1990 to 2017 and seem to think it's because of privatization, as if nothing else happened in near three loving decades. Do you not think the government built anything in that space? Do you believe that they made no infrastructure investments required for these companies to be able to increase the number of trains that are physically able to occupy the tracks?


The reason train passenger travel has doubled since 1990 is A) population growth, especially in metropolitan regions B) public transport is used more by the new, less wealthy generation C) and by immigrants. It's not because the privatization has made trains so lovely to travel in, and any positives gained are offset by the negatives.
So ignoring the complete lack of evidence (for instance, the correlation between growth in the popularity of train travel and population growth) and the fact that you're just trying to come up with alternative explanations, you're right that there isn't that much causal evidence on rail privatization... However, the lack of evidence goes both ways, and dumb posts like "there's only one track :smug:" which suggest you still don't understand what level the competition is coming from don't really make a strong case.

Your premise about trains being used by the less wealthy is incorrect, because buses are the cheapest option anyway. Yet even as a proportion of total journeys, train travel has increased in popularity in other countries but not in Finland. http://www.talouselama.fi/uutiset/e...vastaan-6671624

quote:

But hey, let's ask the Swedes! You know we don't actually have to rely on what you or me think they think:


drat it's not looking very good when we have to deal with the real world instead of economic hypotheticals, huh.
Great, we could also look at traveler polls showing that Ryanair is the most hated airline in the EU. Yet for some reason people continue to make the decision that a cheaper ticket is worth it.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply