|
MizPiz posted:Safely Sodomized im mostly mad i apparently only started liking stuff on yt in like 2011 so the last days of actual lf.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 14:25 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 13:22 |
|
here's me
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 14:38 |
|
im sad i missed the glory days of the people's republic of lf
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 14:40 |
|
also george washingto was gay ya'll
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 14:41 |
|
safely sodomized posted:im mostly mad i apparently only started liking stuff on yt in like 2011 so the last days of actual lf. As someone who only knows of lf from legend, I'm grateful you saved what artifacts you did from this rich, beautiful culture.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 14:52 |
|
lmao holy poo poo
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 14:55 |
|
The only good video in that whole list is the one about Ice Pick Guy
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 17:01 |
|
Larry Parrish posted:The only good video in that whole list is the one about Ice Pick Guy
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 17:05 |
|
does anyone have the original rap from the lil b stalin and mao thing because it was done by an lf poster and it was unironic
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 17:06 |
|
larry parrish prefers the DIY aesthetic of an abandoned rural hellscape
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 17:07 |
|
Larry Parrish posted:The only good video in that whole list is the one about Ice Pick Guy thanks for the opinion larry
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 17:43 |
|
Sorry I didn't find stuff like, ah, guy reading a DPRK press release funny
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 18:09 |
|
Larry Parrish posted:Sorry I didn't find stuff like, ah, guy reading a DPRK press release funny The black guy doing a Zizek impression was spot on, and 5 years before it was popular
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 18:20 |
|
dish ish de crishish of de larry parrish!
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 18:23 |
|
Larry Parrish posted:Sorry I didn't find stuff like, ah, guy reading a DPRK press release funny then youll hate this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hq2rOEwnIU
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 18:55 |
|
safely sodomized posted:then youll hate this At last I truly see /pol/ is the vanguard of the MLM revolution in AmeriKKKa
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 19:15 |
|
Wow that's a deep pull
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 22:34 |
|
safely sodomized posted:then youll hate this has it been 7 years
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 22:40 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28AI_KAamMA
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 22:50 |
|
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 22:56 |
|
the M3Ws have a patreon now lol
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 23:00 |
|
Is Maoism Third Worldism real?
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 23:06 |
|
Jeb! Repetition posted:Is Maoism Third Worldism real? it depends on what you mean by "real"
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 23:08 |
|
Peel posted:the M3Ws have a patreon now lol quote:This creator hasn't posted anything yet! Jeb! Repetition posted:Is Maoism Third Worldism real? M3M is real in the sense that there are certainly people who believe in it, but they're all paradoxically First Worlders. Third Worlders are doing just fine with regular old Maoism tyvm. Anyway, Shubelmorgan hasn't posted a new video in 6 years. I wonder what he's up to?
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 23:09 |
|
https://twitter.com/Rhizzone_Txt/status/633401353327542272
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 23:14 |
|
Peel posted:the M3Ws have a patreon now lol seems legit
|
# ? Sep 7, 2017 01:42 |
|
please send money for
|
# ? Sep 7, 2017 02:23 |
|
Pener Kropoopkin posted:M3M is real in the sense that there are certainly people who believe in it, but they're all paradoxically First Worlders. Third Worlders are doing just fine with regular old Maoism tyvm. Can you summarize the difference? I legitimately don't understand the distinction. Admittedly Maoism always has been the poor man's Zapatismo in my mind.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2017 02:29 |
|
safely sodomized posted:then youll hate this this is my jam
|
# ? Sep 7, 2017 03:15 |
|
Dreddout posted:Can you summarize the difference? I legitimately don't understand the distinction. Admittedly Maoism always has been the poor man's Zapatismo in my mind. I think the third worldists are the ones who write stuff like "the united $nakes of amerikkka" and write afrika instead of africa, like they're talking about a ps3 game instead of a continent.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2017 06:33 |
|
Dreddout posted:Can you summarize the difference? I legitimately don't understand the distinction. Admittedly Maoism always has been the poor man's Zapatismo in my mind. Maoism is distinct from other forms of Marxism because it centralizes the peasantry as the primary revolutionary agents. This was essential for a place like China, where there was a tiny industrial proletariat and therefore not enough support to form a revolutionary vanguard in a traditional Leninist sense. The Bolsheviks did cement an alliance between the peasantry and proletariat which cemented their power, but the proletariat was always central to Leninist praxis because the proles were all literate and in the best position to organize. From its emphasis on the peasantry, Maoism advocates a practice of organizing rural people into a guerilla force to wage peoples' war. Once Maoist cadres control the countryside, then they can overwhelm or starve out the cities and force the ruling classes to surrender. M3W takes Maoism and puts some stank on it by centralizing the rural characteristics of the Third World in the development of a global peoples' war. By uniting the laboring classes of the Third World to wage global war on the First World, the internationalist nature of exploitation under global capitalism can be strangled and the First World will be forced to capitulate to a Joint Dictatorship of the Proletariat of Oppressed Nations. Mao did define the exploitation between the Fiirst and Third worlds in his analysis, but it wasn't central to his ideology. Maoism is primarily focused on achieving national liberation movements, because the liberation of the nation's oppressed laborers is always the immediately pressing goal. M3W being internationalist sounds dialectically correct, but it lacks any practical roadmap to actually realizing a JDPON. Actually existing Maoists have enough problems dealing with the reactionary authorities in their own countries, let alone trying to think about waging a genocidal global peoples' war against the highly sophisticated nuclear armed First World. IMO, global communism isn't really possible without a revolution in the First World, preferably in the United States itself. There's a big fat chance of that ever happening I know, especially because of the development of a massive labor aristocracy. However, the excessive rapacity of neoliberalism in seeking to guarantee the rate of profit, is also slowly eroding the labor aristocracy as a distinct element in First World countries. Political development within the First World is now trending towards either socialism or fascism as the rate of profit continues to inevitably decline. We're entering a historical phase in which it is a better time than ever to agitate the overthrow of capitalism within the very centers of imperialist power - the United States, UK, and the EU. If just the USA could be transformed into a communist power, then the global balance shifts in favor of the world's workers, and the necessity of a genocidal global war to overthrow the First World is rendered moot. Then again, the imbalance of power between the state and its people has only become even greater since Lenin's time, and the prospect of a vanguardist party being able to simply seize the centers of power and take the reigns of state aren't realistic. State power has become more decentralized - increasingly networked. The existence of a "capital" is a mere bureaucratic convenience, and not a practical necessity of power projection. To achieve revolution in the First World, we'll need a praxis that is neither Leninist or Maoist, but something new. Something that can advance a communist political program within our own historical context.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2017 07:03 |
|
Enter posadism...
|
# ? Sep 7, 2017 07:10 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XNLHS8o73Q
|
# ? Sep 7, 2017 07:26 |
|
theremin is the most comradely of instruments
|
# ? Sep 7, 2017 07:28 |
|
Pener Kropoopkin posted:The black guy doing a Zizek impression was spot on, and 5 years before it was popular Sniff Along with Slavoj! the bouncing ball will tell you when and how long to sniff
|
# ? Sep 7, 2017 07:30 |
|
I'm just an uneducated prole but posadism is unironically way more realistic in my book than M3W. A global nuclear war would eradicate first world imperialism far more surely than uh, stopping a portion of resource exports. The whole point of the USA more or less protecting or at least limiting the use of our own resources is so we have something to fall back on. That's why you don't see anyone in the federal government making real movements to exploit our own rare earth metal deposits even though it'd be cheaper than buying the Chinese and Russian ones.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2017 08:01 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m91zBt94Ll0
|
# ? Sep 7, 2017 08:01 |
|
wanna travel back in time and show that video to mao during the long march
|
# ? Sep 7, 2017 08:06 |
|
safely sodomized posted:wanna travel back in time and show that video to mao during the long march Not a lot of hints in that video that China is a mixed economy. It's all about the Central Plan.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2017 08:59 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 13:22 |
|
mister magpie posted:seems legit linked directly from the page they aren't what they used to be
|
# ? Sep 7, 2017 09:08 |